February 2008 \ Features \ Product Spotlight \ The BluesBreaker Revisited

The BluesBreaker Revisited

John Wiley
Premier Guitar February 2008

(4 of 5)

Speakers
The amp’s speakers consisted of two 12” Celestion G12s, rated at 20 watts, 15 ohms, and with an Alnico magnet. These speakers were essentially the same as those used in Vox AC30s, and are extremely fragile when pushed beyond their limit. Because Clapton ran the amplifier at full volume, the Alnicos may have been damaged. He may have replaced them with the higher wattage, ceramic magnet Celestion Greenbacks.


The BluesBreaker Revisited
The Model 1962 reissue schematic


The Objective: Convert a Reissue to Clapton-Spec
I started my investigation into obtaining this sound over 20 years ago. In addition to the “Beano” studio CD, there were other John Mayall albums that included “live” cuts from Eric Clapton’s time with the Bluesbreakers. Although these recordings were done with crude equipment, they captured the raw and unrestrained sound of Clapton’s guitar and amplifier. To my ears, these recordings were most realistic, as they lacked any studio treatment. I quickly knew what sound I was after.

In 1994, Mike Doyle’s book, The History of Marshall, was released and included an eye-opening chapter on the Bluesbreaker. That chapter confirmed the reissue’s lack of authentic sound, and it became obvious that in the amp’s conversion to Clapton specs the only salvageable pieces would be the electrical chassis, the control panel and some of the cabinet hardware – the cabinet and speakers would have to be replaced.

With that, I decided to do the conversion in a logical progression and planned to document the progress. I preferred a progressive approach, as it would give me a chance to analyze each change made separately. In addition, since this conversion would be fairly expensive, it would be easier on the budget to purchase items over a period of time. The changes required could be grouped into three categories:
  1. Cabinet: Since the reissue cabinet was too small, it could not be used. I’d have to find a new cabinet that is the correct size. The reissue’s casters, amplifier strap handle and the plastic Marshall logo badge could still be used.
  2. Electronics: Swap out the reissue output transformer for a vintage correct one, re-tube with KT66 vacuum tubes and change out the filter capacitors.
  3. Speakers: Change to an Alnico magnet type.
I should note that it is possible to make deeper changes, such as replacement of the circuit board, resistors, potentiometers and components, plastic tube sockets, and rewiring of the chassis to original specifications. These additions will make the electronics of the amplifier more authentic, but will not noticeably improve the sound. These additions also significantly increase the cost and add more time to the project.

The steps I have outlined above will reproduce the amplifier tone as heard on the live cuts of Clapton with the Bluesbreakers, as well as the “Beano” record. In fact, after making these changes, your Bluesbreaker will no longer be a mere reissue – it will sound like the real thing!


The BluesBreaker Revisited
The new cabinet is over 2” bigger than the reissue cabinet, resulting in a fuller sound


Step 1: A Bigger Cabinet
There are now several competent amplifier cabinet makers building exact replicas of the Model 1962 Series I and II cabinets. Be sure these makers use the required multi-ply Baltic birch plywood, correct black tolex covering, vintage gold veining and the surrounding white piping. It is also wise to have them confirm the correct cabinet dimensions, as the Series I and II are two completely different cabinets. To save some money, you could use the Marshall logo, casters and other hardware from your existing reissue. Two excellent cabinet makers available on the internet are Vibroworld.com and Swansoncabinets.com.

For the first phase, I ordered a new cabinet from a cabinet maker on the internet – to ensure accuracy, I supplied them with a CAD drawing of the Series II dimensions and features. I was very pleased with the results I received a few weeks later. I removed the chassis and speakers from my Marshall reissue and reinstalled them in the new cabinet. Even though the new cabinet included pre-drilled holes and Tnuts for the speakers, it still took some time to make this switch. While switching cabinets, be careful to ensure the speaker and amplifier connections are right.

« Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5    Next »

Related Articles

The Wild and Wacky World of Collectible Effects
The Pickup Game


Comments

(11 comments) display by
UsernameComment
frank
on 12/03/2012
manque le poid est necesaire savoir aussi
Duke
on 06/24/2011
I have a mojo large size combo. Huge sound difference when compared to the reissue marshall.
John Moleksi
on 07/01/2010
Where is the best place to buy a kit from in order to try to build a better bluesbreaker? I can build the cabinet myself.

zaphod_phil
on 11/09/2009
Great article, but it's wrong where it says "the speakers supplied in the original combo were G12M “Greenbacks,” rated at 20 watts each. This speaker utilized an Alnico magnet..." G12M 'Greenback' speakers, even the original 20W ones, have always had a ceramic magnet. The Celestion G12 Alnico Silver and Blue speakers are the alnico models. I was surprised to see such a fundamental error.
John
on 10/15/2009
I have a Metro Amp JTM45 build. I sourced out for some vintage parts so this is a custom build from a Metro Amp kit. I am replacing a pair of June 1962 Mullard EL34's with some new Gold Lion KT66's tomorrow. I have a Swanson custom build Marshall Style 1 combo with a pair of original Dec '64 Celestion Pulsonic speakers with the original cones and paper. I am hopeful this will be tone nirvana...not that the '62 Mullards are not. I am also running a vintage Mullard AX7 in V1.
Lord Valve
on 11/19/2008
Since it's rumored I may know a little bit about tubes, I'll pass this on... ;-)

The Reflektor-production "Tung-Sol" KT-66 isn't a KT-66. Rather, it's a set of the Reflektor-production "Svetlana" 6L6GC guts mounted in a metal-based KT-88 bottle. It doesn't sound like a KT-66, nor spec like one. (I'm not saying it sucks or anything, but it isn't a KT-66, and if you like the tone it produces, you can get it cheaper as a Reflektor/Svetlana 6L6GC.) The JJ KT-66 is an unknown quantity at this point; like the Tung-Sol, it's mounted in a KT-88 bottle. I haven't had time to do any testing on the dozen sample pieces I have. Stay tuned. The Groove Tubes KT-66s used to be made in Russia by HP. No more are available. I don't know what GT is using for KT-66s these days, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are Shuguangs. The "Valve Arts" KT-66s mentioned in the article are from Shuguang. They do indeed sound excellent, although (like most Chinese power tubes) they don't last as long as I would like. Probably the best currently available KT-66 is the Reflektor-production "Gold Lion," a clone of the original GEC KT-66. The new (I don't like to use the term "re-issue") Gold Lions are probably as close to the originals as you are going to find; you'll need to take out a second mortgage if you want real ones. Although it doesn't matter in this particular application, the Gold Lions are serious eye candy - they look like someone cared.
I like that. They sound great, too.

Lord Valve
NIC
on 09/24/2008
Thanks, this is great information and i have a reissue bluesbreaker which i would love to convert to the original specs however i live in New Zealand and the voltage here is 220-240v. My question is "where do i find a suitable output transformer rated at 240v"? can you help me? Nic in NZ
Rick
on 08/12/2008
I have examined the Mercury Magnetics RS output transformer in detail and find it in no way similair in design or measured characteristics to the real RS Deluxe output transformer.. It does not use the same winding geometry nor the same type of core material.. It does not even sound remotely the same. Nice push for Mercury through...Brain at Marstran makes a much closer replacement. Also, Merren Audio makes a repro with the original style Tag-Board..
You need to research a bit more before leaping to such conclusions.
Brian Myers
on 02/13/2008
Hi,
Great stuff, except! in the table
"The following is a listing of the basic differences between the original Model 1962 and the Model 1962 “Bluesbreaker,” as reissued in 1990:"

It lists the "original" [as compared to the reissue] depth as 10.5 " but thats the series II It should have read 12" deep.
Thanks for a great read!
Brian

JoeZ
on 01/27/2008
I thought I'd share a couple of other tidbits I've picked in my pursuit of an authentic sounding "Bluesbreaker" combo amp.

Original Radiospares output transformers were hardwired for 16 ohms output. It's my understanding that Marshall used only 16 ohm Celestion speakers and in 2 x 12 1962 Bluesbreakers combos, wired them in parallel for 8 ohms. This "mismatch" is vital for Beano tone. I'm not an electronics expert, but I've been told by knowledgable amp gurus that this arrangement works for this amp's transformers and tubes.

Makers of accurate reproductions of JTM 45's and 1962 combos include Germino Amplication (I highly recommend working with Greg Germino who provided me with a special order Style II cabinet upon my request, although he prefers the Style I), Retro-King (Style II) and Blockhead (Style I) with kits available from Metropolous, Mojo and others. As far as I know, only Metropolous and Blockhead offer a tremelo circuit on their BB's.

The matter of speakers is the subject of significant discussions on guitar-related internet forums. The consensus seems to be that the speakers in Clapton's 1962 were AlNiCo's, mostly based on the sonic evidence, which also seems likely since ceramics were only first being introduced in late '65 and widely used in '66. Based on dates in Doyle's book only the recently reissued Celestion G12C-25 ceramic speakers could have been available for use in Marshall combos before April '66 recording of the "Beano" album. Power handling ratings on AlNiCo's seemed to have increased during the sixties and it also seems that Celestion used speaker cones from Pulsonic 102 003 and Kurt-Mueller H1777. Their were probably numerous variations. There's some reluctance to use relatively expensive Celestion Blues rated at 15 watts each in a Bluesbreaker combo since the rated power is reported somewhere between 30 and 45 watts. Further it seems that the speakers used in Clapton's speakers may have had different cones and othe



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

F24A7970-392F-4DC6-B06C-5EA315F00899