February 2008 \ Features \ Product Spotlight \ The BluesBreaker Revisited

The BluesBreaker Revisited

John Wiley
Premier Guitar February 2008

(5 of 5)

For testing, I used a Gibson Les Paul Heritage 80 model. After re-checking the chassis and cabinet connections, I turned on the amplifier, and let it warm up. I started at low volumes and progressively turned up the volume to 10, all while keeping the other settings such as presence, bass, middle and treble at 10. Upon hearing the first chords, I was immediately struck by a new “openness.” The amplifier seemed to breathe and had a new, airy sound to it – it did not sound as tight as the smaller reissue cabinet. With 30 percent more space in the cabinet than the reissue, the trebles seemed revived and the amp now had an “airy” bottom-end. Comparative testing with another stock Bluesbreaker reissue verified the tonal improvements.

An interesting side note; in 1997, Marshall produced a limited edition white Bluesbreaker called the “Limited Edition 1997.” It was basically was the same amplifier as the 1989 reissue, with one important difference: the limited edition’s cabinet incorporated the deeper 10.5” thickness, as can be found in the original Model 1962 Series II.


Step 2: The Electronics
Before digging into the guts of the Bluesbreaker, a word of caution: this phase deals with potentially dangerous electrical voltages and it is highly recommended that only a trained and competent amplifier repair person or skilled electrician perform these tasks.

This phase involves swapping out the reissue transformer, changing the 6L6 vacuum tubes to KT66s, and replacing the filter capacitors.


The Transformer and Tubes
There are now some good vintage transformer manufacturers around, so one has a choice in the matter. Since the original Model 1962 used a Radiospares (RS Deluxe) transformer, the objective here is to get one like it. When I did my conversion, I purchased a Mercury Magnetics model O45RSL- 8-M (mercurymagnetics.com).

When it comes to power tubes, the only one to use here is the revered KT66. There are however, a few brand options available. One could either purchase a matched set (two are needed) of original GECs, or purchase a pair from companies offering reissue KT66s. The European and American tubes manufactured in the 1950s and 60s (new old stock) are superior in tone, quality and reliability. Tubes now manufactured in Russia and China such as Groove Tube, the new Tung-Sol, and JJ/Tesla offer comparable tone and are reasonably priced. Since these tubes are made overseas, it is difficult to isolate a superior brand, and although tonal quality is improving with better consistency, tone remains an individual choice. For my conversion I used a matched set of Chinese Valve Art tubes, and was not disappointed.

Since we are changing out the power tubes, it is highly recommended to replace the 12AX7 (ECC83) preamp tubes as well. Again, there are several good options here which include SED Winged “C,” Electro-Harmonix and Ei/Ei-Elites. Replacing the GZ34 (5AR4) rectifier tube is also a must for optimum performance. The same tube suppliers listed above carry the GZ34, in varieties like Sino, Sovtek, or the very expensive Phillips metal base.


Filter Capacitors
Replacing the big can-style filter capacitors will definitely give your reissue more clarity. Filter capacitors are rated in the ZZxZZ format. The reissue Bluesbreaker has two 50x50ìF capacitors which must be replaced. The blue 50x50ìF filter capacitor, located closest to the GZ34 rectifier tube should be replaced with a 32x32ìF/600V capacitor. The other 50x50ìF gets replaced with a 16x16ìF/450V capacitor. JJ and F&T are two good options for filter capacitors.

Caution: These changes should only be done by a good amplifier repairperson. Also remember to have your KT66 vacuum tubes rebiased. I had renowned Bluesbreaker guru Ted Breaux finalize and tune my Bluesbreaker electronics.

Before using the amp at full volume, a suitable warm-up for the newly installed electronics should be done by simply powering up the amp and leaving it on Standby for a good hour or so. While it’s warming up, pay close attention to any unusual odors or burning, as a bad solder joint or incorrect wiring could cause a short circuit.

Once the amp has warmed up, with no guitar plugged in set the Presence, Bass, Middle and Treble controls to 10. Then start increasing the volume of Input 1 slowly, listening for any peculiar pops or sizzling noises in the process. If you don’t hear or notice anything unusual, you should be set to go.

For the “sound” test I used the same Gibson Les Paul Heritage 80; for the tonal comparison, I used the Primal Solos CD, starting with the solo in “It Hurts to Be In Love.” Before cranking the amp to 10, I employed the same gradual progression of low volume checks, listening for any unusual noises and so on. When I got to 10, I was astounded!

I was able to produce the same overtones and harmonics as the recording.

Likewise, the treble response was spectacular. I had read that Clapton used a Rangemaster treble booster with his amp, but I was getting the “sound” without one. The F9 chord in “Have You Ever Loved a Woman” shimmered and went into harmonic overload, exactly like the recording. The only notable difference was in the bass registers, as it seemed harsh at times and slightly lacking in tightness – additionally, some of the treble response seemed a little harsh. But I was definitely hearing 95 percent of that Clapton-spec sound, as no EL34 or 6L6 had ever sounded like this. It was now time for a speaker change.


The BluesBreaker Revisited
The cabinet after installing the Weber Blue Dogs

Step 3: The Speakers
I narrowed my choice of Alnico speakers down to the Celestion G12 Alnico Blues and the Weber P12B Blue Dogs. The Celestions were rated at 15 watts while the Webers were rated at 30 watts – I decided to try the higher-wattage Weber P12B. After swapping out the reissue Greenbacks for the new Blue Dogs, I played the amp at lower volumes for several hours. At these levels (5-6), I was pleasantly introduced to the British chime of the 1960s. Early Beatles rhythm and lead guitar sounds were easily obtainable, particularly within the mid and bass ranges.

I then tried the full throttle test. At full volume, I was in for quite a shock – the mid and bass ranges nearly cut me off at the knees. The treble side was knife-edge harsh and the amp was monstrously louder. I was obviously disappointed, as none of this remotely sounded like a Bluesbreaker. I had read that Alnico speakers may require an extended “break-in” period, and I hoped that was the case here.

I removed the Blue Dogs from the Bluesbreaker cabinet and reinstalled them into a 2x12 cabinet I was using for weekend gigs. After a few weekends of extended playing, I noticed the sound changing, as I was having to re-adjust my amp head settings. After a few more weekends, I definitely noticed something happening. It was now time to re-install the Blue Dogs back into the Bluesbreaker cabinet.

Upon trying it again, something magical happened to the overall sound of the amplifier. Right there in my basement, and out of my rebuilt Bluesbreaker, came the sound. I was flabbergasted, as it sounded incredible. I must have played the amp all night. I was nailing all of Clapton’s Bluesbreaker riffs, and they sounded identical to recordings. The A minor solo break in “All Your Love” sounded amazing, and like the recording, it was drenched in sustain and overtones. “Stormy Monday” from Looking Back was spot on.

Finally, my Bluesbreaker renovation was complete. The amp sounded just like it should, some 40 years ago. Doing this yourself makes all the difference, as you become a part of the equation – with a little work and dedication, you can experience Marshall just as Clapton discovered it.

« Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5   

Related Articles

The Wild and Wacky World of Collectible Effects
The Pickup Game


Comments

(11 comments) display by
UsernameComment
frank
on 12/03/2012
manque le poid est necesaire savoir aussi
Duke
on 06/24/2011
I have a mojo large size combo. Huge sound difference when compared to the reissue marshall.
John Moleksi
on 07/01/2010
Where is the best place to buy a kit from in order to try to build a better bluesbreaker? I can build the cabinet myself.

zaphod_phil
on 11/09/2009
Great article, but it's wrong where it says "the speakers supplied in the original combo were G12M “Greenbacks,” rated at 20 watts each. This speaker utilized an Alnico magnet..." G12M 'Greenback' speakers, even the original 20W ones, have always had a ceramic magnet. The Celestion G12 Alnico Silver and Blue speakers are the alnico models. I was surprised to see such a fundamental error.
John
on 10/15/2009
I have a Metro Amp JTM45 build. I sourced out for some vintage parts so this is a custom build from a Metro Amp kit. I am replacing a pair of June 1962 Mullard EL34's with some new Gold Lion KT66's tomorrow. I have a Swanson custom build Marshall Style 1 combo with a pair of original Dec '64 Celestion Pulsonic speakers with the original cones and paper. I am hopeful this will be tone nirvana...not that the '62 Mullards are not. I am also running a vintage Mullard AX7 in V1.
Lord Valve
on 11/19/2008
Since it's rumored I may know a little bit about tubes, I'll pass this on... ;-)

The Reflektor-production "Tung-Sol" KT-66 isn't a KT-66. Rather, it's a set of the Reflektor-production "Svetlana" 6L6GC guts mounted in a metal-based KT-88 bottle. It doesn't sound like a KT-66, nor spec like one. (I'm not saying it sucks or anything, but it isn't a KT-66, and if you like the tone it produces, you can get it cheaper as a Reflektor/Svetlana 6L6GC.) The JJ KT-66 is an unknown quantity at this point; like the Tung-Sol, it's mounted in a KT-88 bottle. I haven't had time to do any testing on the dozen sample pieces I have. Stay tuned. The Groove Tubes KT-66s used to be made in Russia by HP. No more are available. I don't know what GT is using for KT-66s these days, but I wouldn't be surprised if they are Shuguangs. The "Valve Arts" KT-66s mentioned in the article are from Shuguang. They do indeed sound excellent, although (like most Chinese power tubes) they don't last as long as I would like. Probably the best currently available KT-66 is the Reflektor-production "Gold Lion," a clone of the original GEC KT-66. The new (I don't like to use the term "re-issue") Gold Lions are probably as close to the originals as you are going to find; you'll need to take out a second mortgage if you want real ones. Although it doesn't matter in this particular application, the Gold Lions are serious eye candy - they look like someone cared.
I like that. They sound great, too.

Lord Valve
NIC
on 09/24/2008
Thanks, this is great information and i have a reissue bluesbreaker which i would love to convert to the original specs however i live in New Zealand and the voltage here is 220-240v. My question is "where do i find a suitable output transformer rated at 240v"? can you help me? Nic in NZ
Rick
on 08/12/2008
I have examined the Mercury Magnetics RS output transformer in detail and find it in no way similair in design or measured characteristics to the real RS Deluxe output transformer.. It does not use the same winding geometry nor the same type of core material.. It does not even sound remotely the same. Nice push for Mercury through...Brain at Marstran makes a much closer replacement. Also, Merren Audio makes a repro with the original style Tag-Board..
You need to research a bit more before leaping to such conclusions.
Brian Myers
on 02/13/2008
Hi,
Great stuff, except! in the table
"The following is a listing of the basic differences between the original Model 1962 and the Model 1962 “Bluesbreaker,” as reissued in 1990:"

It lists the "original" [as compared to the reissue] depth as 10.5 " but thats the series II It should have read 12" deep.
Thanks for a great read!
Brian

JoeZ
on 01/27/2008
I thought I'd share a couple of other tidbits I've picked in my pursuit of an authentic sounding "Bluesbreaker" combo amp.

Original Radiospares output transformers were hardwired for 16 ohms output. It's my understanding that Marshall used only 16 ohm Celestion speakers and in 2 x 12 1962 Bluesbreakers combos, wired them in parallel for 8 ohms. This "mismatch" is vital for Beano tone. I'm not an electronics expert, but I've been told by knowledgable amp gurus that this arrangement works for this amp's transformers and tubes.

Makers of accurate reproductions of JTM 45's and 1962 combos include Germino Amplication (I highly recommend working with Greg Germino who provided me with a special order Style II cabinet upon my request, although he prefers the Style I), Retro-King (Style II) and Blockhead (Style I) with kits available from Metropolous, Mojo and others. As far as I know, only Metropolous and Blockhead offer a tremelo circuit on their BB's.

The matter of speakers is the subject of significant discussions on guitar-related internet forums. The consensus seems to be that the speakers in Clapton's 1962 were AlNiCo's, mostly based on the sonic evidence, which also seems likely since ceramics were only first being introduced in late '65 and widely used in '66. Based on dates in Doyle's book only the recently reissued Celestion G12C-25 ceramic speakers could have been available for use in Marshall combos before April '66 recording of the "Beano" album. Power handling ratings on AlNiCo's seemed to have increased during the sixties and it also seems that Celestion used speaker cones from Pulsonic 102 003 and Kurt-Mueller H1777. Their were probably numerous variations. There's some reluctance to use relatively expensive Celestion Blues rated at 15 watts each in a Bluesbreaker combo since the rated power is reported somewhere between 30 and 45 watts. Further it seems that the speakers used in Clapton's speakers may have had different cones and othe



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

F24A7970-392F-4DC6-B06C-5EA315F00899