May 2009 \ Features \ 45 Degrees of Tone: The JTM45 Roundup

45 Degrees of Tone: The JTM45 Roundup

Steve Ouimette

Nearly 50 years since its creation, the Marshall JTM45 remains both a relevant and near-perfect example of what a great rock ‘n’ roll tube amp should be.


Premier Guitar May 2009

(2 of 8)


Original 1965 JTM45

To get our ears accustomed to the JTM45 sound, we began by firing up our ’65 head with a Les Paul. Normally, this head has EL34s in it, but we borrowed the Genelex KT66s from the Mojave and biased the amp to accommodate them. It made sense to us to use KT66s, because they were what the amp was designed for. With everything looking good, we flipped it from standby and beheld the beauty of this vintage masterpiece. It’s no wonder players and collectors are paying big bucks for these amps; everything we played through it sounded incredible.

What was amazing was how much of a rock ‘n’ roll amp this really is. Considering how long it’s been since it was conceived, the amp’s sound remains surprisingly current. The distortion is organic, full-bodied and earthy, and it allowed the personality of the guitar and player to shine through. While it was very easy to play, this is an amp that still requires a level of discipline and control to fully harness its capabilities. It makes sense that players who want to be heard would play on this style of amp, because like it or not, whatever you play through the amp is… well, amplified. It just comes out better.

We played through it for a good long time, switching guitars and speaker cabinets to hear it in as many different configurations as possible. Whether it was a Strat, a Les Paul, a 2x12 or a 4x12, the sound was always remarkable— perhaps the very definition of great tone. Subjective? Yes. Brilliant? Absolutely. Rolling back the volume on the guitars exposed a beautiful clean tone that was harmonically rich and defined, never muddy or dull. Even with the guitar’s volume knob all the way up, the dynamic response of the amp, and the way it musically fed back, was awe-inspiring.

Once we had established a base tone for comparison’s sake, it was time to play and listen to the other amps. Before I break down each individual amp and builder, I must observe that each and every one of the amps had ridiculously good tone, and they all sounded like JTM45s, but each had its own unique voice. Aside from the reissue Marshall, all of the amps are hand-wired. The reissue Marshall was of PCB-construction, and used the standard parts and components that Marshall was building their amps with during that era. I spoke with Mitch Colby from Korg USA (Marshall’s US distributor), who told me that the reissues have not undergone any significant changes since their reintroduction 20 years ago. While they are using the components that Marshall builds with today, they should yield very similar tones to the earlier reissue amps.




« Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8    Next »

Related Articles

Summer Survival Giveaways Day #13: Fishman
NoahJames Guitars Introduces new JENZ Bass Tuners


Comments

(35 comments) display by
UsernameComment
BobC
on 03/23/2013
@W.A.Looker Because they were named JTM45 due to the fact that they had a max output of 45watts. As measuring the power of guitar amps became more about a standardized RMS measurement and less about marketing fluff the "real" wattages started being used. People around when the JTM45 was created still know it as a "45 watt" amp even if under the more accurate measurement it is not.
W.A. Looker
on 10/25/2012
Why does everyone and I mean EVERYONE insist on saying that these are 45 watt amplifiers??? The clones might very well be, but on Marshalls own site it says that the reissues are 30 watts. It might not mean much to some, but if you are going to put it in writing, be accurate.
Joe R
on 08/13/2012
I have a 97 Re-issue (pcb) which performed extremely well for the past 10 years. Currently the board is being replaced with a Ceriatone turretboard unit and 5881's with KT66's. (all due to a funky colored burn on the pcb and strange microphonic type squeal (not affected by tube change in preamp). Can't wait to ressurect this beast!
paul
on 01/02/2012
I live in the UK and bought a JTM45 re-issue new, less than half the price of any of the clones here. And of course I supported British jobs cos the amp is MADE IN BRITAIN. Unfortunately, CELESTION SPEAKERS ARE CHINESE and as such are NOT British. My JTM RI sounds great. I think no amount of amp tone can make up for the tone you get from your fingers, so i am not even gonna read these reviews, I am going to PLAY.
de
on 03/16/2011
i have a jtm 45 reissue from the mid 90's. the original printed board is replaced with a doug hoffman marshall plexi-style point-to-point board and the amp builder had to increase the caps sizes a bit. it's now using 2 el34's, but i want to go back to using paired 6l6's/5881's. in my opinion the jtm 45's have a more mellow, less edgy tone than the jtm 50 w plexis, even when keeping the tube rectifier in there.
Andrew
on 08/23/2010
I have a JTM 45 reissue from the early 90's. This is the last model with the original Drake transformer.. Whoever says the Metro amps and all boutique custom built shit overtaking mine: thick bullshit. 6l6 sound darker indeed than EL34 but this particular baby really smokes... Tried Metro, Germino, Ceriatone, etc.. they are all good, but cannot really tell the difference sound-wise blindfolded.. SG, good cable, JTM 45 cranked, maybe throwing a fulldrive 2 in front of it, man you would love it!
Peter
on 07/24/2009
Just in reply to the man who said we are sheep... you're right :-) When you look at players in the sixties they were doing all sorts of wierd mods, slicing speakers because the distorted sound was groovy baby.... but they also used dual showmans, hiwatts, FUZZ boxes :-) My favourite amps at the moment are a Marshall DSL100 and Fender (red knob) Dual Showman head and they do everything, plus more, that I want... for another bloke it would be a Fender Twin or a Boogie... Don't get me wrong, these were great amps in their day... and when pushed they crank today... but again it's funny making big money from old technology...
Peter
on 07/24/2009
The reason why companies change their product is competition... idiots wanted more and more gadgets built-in to the amp... channel switching, overdrive, reverb, FX, lighter amps, etc... or be left behind in the rush...

You can't beat ONE great tone... and then play around with that... add one great guitar... and a guitarist with "the touch" and bingo... If I became a Satriani on guitar and used a TSL601 combo... and young pups looked up to me... they'd re-issue the TSL in 20 years time :-)

Cheers!
Frank M
on 06/24/2009
One thing I think needs to be pointed out about the Marshall Reissue in this roundup is that looking aththe PCB you can easily see that the circuit was totally modded from the original JTM45 circuit with those larger caps and how they're wired up as well as the fact that the orignal came with 5881s not EL34s so that was a mod as well. Still a great article and about the only one out there that compares them. Now if we could have a good Plexi 100 watt round up would be really great!
trippin
on 05/29/2009
Skeptical of "reissues"? Why did people stop making them? Easy. Making short term cost improvements and the typical kinds of model "upgrades" dictated by a competitive marketplace. The same reason Les Pauls were made with pancake bodies and poly finishes. So I'd say rather the opposite: the sheep were the ones lured to what was peddled as the latest and greatest iron at that point in time. Even the Beatles went all transistor, didn't they? Sputniks and all that mod stuff! That was like the cool thing: "Solid State." Since then we reflected on our musical history and discovered that, hey, whoa, we really liked those old records for a reason. Not everyone, mind you, but some. It's a conscious decision and a conscious goal that has nothing to do with wool bearing mammals, and it's not everybody's bag. So if it's not your bag, that's cool. But no one is "amending" the past. To the contrary, we're recreating it as true to original as possible. We do this because we HAVE learned the lessons of the past. You've got it all backwards, man.



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

481C0424-481F-454D-8735-E53DF0E330C5