November 2009 \ Tech Tips \ Tech Tales \ Front to Back with Brad Paisley's Rig

Front to Back with Brad Paisley's Rig

Chad Weaver

Chad Weaver explains the full rig Brad Paisley uses on the road


Premier Guitar November 2009

Click here to read this month's interview with Brad.
Now that we've been introduced, I thought I would give you a quick rundown of Brad's rig. This way, I can talk about some things that I've had to tackle over the last few years, how to correct them and hopefully prevent them from happening again.

The original guitar rig was built by Brad and his first tech, Zac Childs. It's gone through many configurations over the years, but the basis has stayed the same. Brad and I have taken it apart twice and I've done it at least three times on my own, but the latest version was assembled by David Friedman of Racksystems in Los Angeles. I had been having a lot of noise issues and David was able to correct them all and give us back a guitar rig anyone could be proud of.

The 'brain' of the rig is Digital Music's GCX and Ground Control system. I have two GCXs, giving me a total of 16 loops for both effects and amp outputs. Each loop has an ‘in’, ‘out’, ‘send’ and a ‘return’. David internally wired the 'ins and outs' of the GCXs in series so there's no need to jump from one loop to the next on the backside of the units. You only need to 'send' and 'return' to each of your effects pedals, which makes the view in the back of the rig a little cleaner with fewer cables in there.

We use a Shure UR4D wireless to start the chain, but unfortunately it doesn't have an internal combiner for its two channels, so I send them both into a 4-channel Shure mixer. This also allows me to make sure my wireless signal is equal to that of plugging a guitar with an instrument cable straight in. The mixer output hits the front end of GCX 1 and from here the effects begin.

There have been articles written about what Brad uses, but pedals and amps change in and out of this rig quite often—I'm confident that by the time this article goes up online, it will have changed again. The effects as of now are a Boss CS-2 compressor, Hermida Zen Drive, Keeley-modded Ibanez 808 Tube Screamer, Line 6 M13, Way Huge Aqua Puss, Boss DD-2, Empress Super Delay, Wampler Analog Echo and a Real McCoy Picture Wah. To further the possibilities, I can use any of the Empress’s eight delays in its single loop. I can also trigger any of the Line 6 M13's expansive modeling effects by assigning a midi channel in the Ground Control. All of the M13’s effects can be had while only using one loop in the GCX.

The last five loops are amp outputs, one with a Hermida Mosferatu in line so it only hits that amp. The amps (as of last Saturday night) were a handwired Vox AC30, Dr. Z Z-Wreck, Bruno Underground 30 and a Dr. Z Remedy. The fifth output is used only as a spare.

By using the Ground Control I can program any effect with any amp on any channel, and it keeps the signal path to a minimum. All of the loops in the GCX are true bypass so it helps keep noise down and also gives a truer guitar-amp tonality without a ‘processed’ overtone. 95% of the time when Brad is playing, you’re hearing a single pedal and a single amp. That’s all. And with the ability to switch amps like we do, I can either use an amp with a Tube Screamer in front of it or just dial up the Remedy. All of the tones that were created in the studio can be mimicked and effectively used live.

I’ll manage all of the effects and amp switching in a show from the stage area we call "guitar world," but Brad has a Ground Control at his feet on stage if he decides he wants to hear something different. On TV and at awards shows, you won’t see me but I’ll be laying on the floor behind the drum riser, hiding behind a piece of the set or truly being the ‘man behind the curtain’ doing the same thing.

Now that you have an understanding of the way the rig is set up, I'll be back next month to walk you through a frustrating grounding issue we encountered, and the fix I found.

     

Related Articles

On the Road with Clapton
Tech Tales: Soothing Single-Coils
Tech Tales: Packing Your Guitar for Air Travel
Humidity Hassles
Brad Paisley's Flooded Gear: The Aftermath


Comments

(11 comments) display by
UsernameComment
Phil
on 11/12/2009
Thanks for the great article Chad!! See you in Cincinnati in 2010!
fishman on Z
on 11/05/2009
thanks for the real deal Chad.
bluzman
on 11/05/2009
DR. Z REMEDY!! COOL! Thanks for the great information and insights Chad.
Gary
on 11/05/2009
Great article Chad. It's being talked about over at Z-Talk and it's so cool to get your perspective. Thanks!
Don
on 11/05/2009
Great article Chad! Very enlightning!
Kevin Lamb
on 10/31/2009
So strange that Brad would help develop the "Z" RX/ES, refine his tones with the co-design of the Z StangRay - - but then choose to use a stock Remedy. I'm gonna have to go back to the "Z" Talk Forum and ask the guru's about this! I will not be surprised to see him use the "Monza" soon.
Geoff Arnold
on 10/31/2009
After 40 years of bashing through just about every conceivable setup, I am back to fewer effects and so less "garbage" between the guitar and amp. With the advent of true bypass in pedals now, it gets cleaner/quieter. But sometimes that old vintage pedal can't be duplicated by the newer clones and updates. So we live with the noise they introduce. If it's getting to be too much, a decent noise gate will help, but they have to be set up carefully so as not to clip off the notes too soon.

For those gigs where I have to have every possible combination available (studio and pop music gigs), I have a pretty large pedal board setup. The arrangement of the pedals is often believed to be important - some MUST be set before others, such as a compressor before pretty much everything to smooth out the signal.

Multiple signal paths help reduce noise, and confusion, but sometimes necessitates duplication of pedals (multiple delays and chorus for example). That can be avoided if you put them before the loops, but it isn't always desirable.

In some ways the proliferation of pedal companies is a good thing, but in others it is a hellish task. You can't really go by what you read because taste is subjective. So you eliminate the cheap stuff (though sometimes they're what you want - yeah, scary) and then sit down in the store and test them all out. It's time consuming, but if you really want the best pedal for YOU, it's time well spent and you won't regret the tedium of the task.

Going wireless presents its own challenges. I have a good wireless (Sennheiser), but I don't use it unless I need to. Back in the early days wireless rigs used to really compress the signal, which I hated, so I only used them in hard rock gigs where that compression/distortion actually worked. Now the signals are as clean as without, mostly, particularly if you use a higher end unit.
trent
on 10/31/2009
awesome column.
Tim
on 10/31/2009
Excellent career advice Mr. yank I mean Crank. I guess since you been there done it, and got it down to the Kiss approach you can let that tech go huh? What did you pay him for that complicated building job? The money you saved on buying that kick butt Boss wireless system. jeez, I thought I needed a life
D.W.
on 10/31/2009
R.C.I had been going the way You describe (though not entirely) but found that "Multi-Processors" (amp models, cabs & effect models can all start to sound very much like each other , while still using some (Line 6Podxt, Vox Tonelab and Roger Linn Adrennalin III,) I have gone back and forth now using stomboxs (Electro-Harmonix , Seymour Duncan, and Boss and even a Danelectro at times ) *Best of both worlds but as they say "To Each Guitarist their own Path (or Signal-Chain) Peace D.W



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

70706980-3AC3-4B22-BB67-E2922028171F