October 2009 \ Tech Tips \ Stomp School \ Stompbox Classics: Tone Bender

Stompbox Classics: Tone Bender

The history of the iconic fuzzbox, the Tone Bender


Premier Guitar October 2009

Greetings, effects aficionados, welcome to another installment of “Stomp School.” This month we’re going to take some time to talk about Tone Benders. Nearly 45 years after its introduction, this iconic fuzzbox is one of the most coveted and revered of all vintage guitar pedals. Most recently, the Tone Bender has experienced a resurgence in popularity, thanks in part to the availability of some highly regarded boutique clone benders, a seemingly bona fide reissue, and perhaps most significantly, the sudden reappearance of the reclusive designer of the Tone Bender, Mr. Gary Stewart Hurst.

Suffice to say, the Tone Bender is a hot commodity at the moment, so a good discussion is well warranted. But let’s first clarify what we mean when we refer to a Tone Bender. Over the years, the name “Tone Bender” has appeared on more than a dozen different pedals, some of which hardly resemble the others in appearance or design. From its earliest beginnings, the Tone Bender underwent continuous circuit revisions, was sold under numerous brands, and received more cosmetic alterations than… well you get the idea.

Legend has it that the Tone Bender was born in 1965 when British guitarist Vic Flick (best known for playing the famous “James Bond Theme” riff) walked into Macari’s Music Exchange on Demark Street in London with a Maestro FZ-1 Fuzz Tone that was not to his liking. He made the request to the shop’s proprietors, Larry and Joe Macari, that something be done to give the pedal more sustain. The Macari brothers gave the assignment to the young electronics wiz who worked for them, Gary Hurst.


Mid-nineties Sola Sound reissue of the Professional MKII, hand-built by the late Dick Denney. Late-sixties Italian-made Vox Tone Bender. Sola Sound Tone Bender MKIV. Photos by Tom Hughes

The very first Tone Bender (later christened Tone Bender MKI), was based on Hurst’s modified Maestro fuzz. In the course of a year, the Tone Bender was subject to a succession of revisions that yielded two different versions of the MKI, a “transitional” MK1.5, and finally the classic Tone Bender Professional MKII. An excellent history of the early development of the Tone Bender is recounted by David Main, builder of the D*A*M (Differential Audio Manifestations) line of pedals, on the D*A*M website.

The various iterations of the Tone Bender have had many circuit configurations, but it’s best known as a three-transistor germanium design, typified by the Professional MKII. This is the pedal associated with Jimmy Page during the early days of Led Zeppelin, and was a key component of Eric Clapton’s “Woman Tone” on the Disraeli Gears album by Cream. The MKII featured three germanium Mullard OC75 transistors (although some rare examples are reputed to have used Mullard OC81D transistors).

While the earliest American fuzzboxes seemed to have been created as sound effect novelties, there was no mistaking that the Tone Bender was there to make fuzz, and it meant business. It had a complex, saturated fuzz tone that was loud and in your face, making its American counterparts sound anemic, thin and buzzy. With minor alterations, the MKII was also sold as the Marshall Supa Fuzz, Park Fuzz Sound, and Rotosound Fuzz Box. This briefly summarizes the “classic era” of the Tone Bender. There’s quite a bit more to the story, but that will have to wait for another time.

This has all been a very nice bit of history, but it doesn’t answer the pertinent question: why Tone Bender, why now? Simply stated, it’s my opinion that it all started with the DIY community, which over the course of the last decade has fueled a growing interest in the Tone Bender design and kept the love alive. By its very nature, the germanium three-transistor circuit is a finicky design. It seems to sound best with components that are obsolete and difficult to procure. It begs to be tweaked and optimized and fussed over, and does not lend itself well to mass production. The major manufacturers won’t even touch it, and very few makers have attempted extended regular production runs, the Fulltone Soul Bender being one of the notable exceptions.

Many of today’s small boutique pedal builders actually cut their teeth in the DIY scene and have apparently taken their Tone Bender appreciation with them. A Tone Bender clone will thrive on the individual attention given by a skilled and dedicated builder, and will reward a builder greatly. Players are catching on, and the demand has been growing, evidenced most recently by a series of Limited Edition reissues from JMI, with the participation of none other than Gary Hurst. It’s been a long time coming, but the day of the Tone Bender has finally arrived.

Well, that’s enough fuzz for one day. Check back with us next month. Until then, keep on stompin’!


Tom Hughes
(a.k.a. Analog Tom) is the owner and proprietor of For Musicians Only (formusiciansonly.com) and author of Analog Man’s Guide To Vintage Effects. Questions or comments about this article can be sent to: stompschool@formusiciansonly.com.

Analog Man
(analogman.com) is one of the largest boutique effects manufacturers and retailers in the business, established by “Analog” Mike Piera in 1993. Mike can be reached at AnalogMike@aol.com.

     

Related Articles

Stomp School Graduation Day!
Stomp School: What's Inside Your Pedals?
Roger Mayer Talks Fuzz
Doing Your Homework, Part 2
Stompbox Classics: Tone Bender, Part 2


Comments

(4 comments) display by
UsernameComment
william evers
on 05/13/2010
i do actually agree with allen in texas...i too have read similiar stories, such that a mkI circuit inside a mkII enclosure...a mkII circuit inside a mkI enclosure...then you have the elusive mk??? fuzz which i believe was the "yardbox" used as the frontline effect with the yardbirds...it wouldn't surprise me at all if the yardbirds and jimmy page used all three fuzz designs, perhaps interchangeably...in addition to altered fuzz circuits...

i think the emphasis on which fuzz pedal was used to create the led zeppelin tone is an invalid pursuit...it is more likely a question of did he actually use a mkII fuzz? everyone seems to be placing sole emphasis on the fuzz box as the source of the led zeppelin tone...i as well was one of these who thought the same...

i have long ago discounted any particular fuzz box as being singularly responsible for the led zeppelin tone...all i said was that page did in fact use a mkII fuzz, as opposed to not using one, and i base my thoughts on this from my countless hours of experimentation with the mkII circuit...it is only one piece to the puzzle...

also, we have tricky roger mayer...it is actually very easy to modify a mkII fuzz circuit and recreate the dynamics such as for instance found on "you shook me" although a good adsr module will accomplish the same thing...and i am of the belief that one fuzz tone design cannot do everything to create the broad spectrum of dynamics page was able to conjure up...

i do remember coming across an article some years ago about roger mayer...i can no longer recount exactly how it was worded, but it went something like this...if roger mayer developed a circuit design that was only used to play four notes in a unique way, then the circuit served its purpose...yay or nay, let's not forget that roger was on the scene, and contributed much to the led zeppelin tone through studio adjustments...

the studio recordings are so highly produced that it doesn't really make a
Pythonman
on 02/07/2010
I believe whatever it is Jon Gundry of ThroBak electronics is doing with his (S)Tonebender MKII circuit, it get's the Jimmy Page sounds very nicely indeed. Love that pedal. I liked the SoulBender as well, at least the first one I had. The SoulBender had the smoothness of the Colorsound 3knob Tonebender with some added extra fizz to the fuzz like a '66 MKI.5 Tonebender circuit. Wish I would have kept it but a pro musician buddy had to have it and it was my honor to let him have it (cheaply!) The next Soulbender I had wasn't nearly as good dammit! But the Stonebender gets the high mid crunch boost that the better MKII 'Benders had and it's very organic and sweet to play so it STAYS!
Allen in Texas
on 12/23/2009
I have to disagree with William...I am one of those that believes that THE pedal that Page used from The Yardbirds in 1966 through the summer of 1969 is a different circuit placed in the housing of an early Sola Sound Professional MKII Tonebender. I have studied this tone for over 20 years (like many others,I hasten to add). I have a mid 90's reissue MKII with a complete rebuild of it's circuitry by D*A*M-I believe his build is accurate to the original MKII,but it is different from Page's. I have never heard an accurate clone of THE Page Tonebender.
william evers
on 12/22/2009
amazing little pedal that mk II.........
very clever elektronix design...it is very easy to accept that jimmy page used it, seemingly throughout most of the led zeppelin first album...all things considered, while there is quite a bit of mystique surrounding which pedal was actually used by jimmy page, i would have to say that indeed, the mk II was that mystery pedal...

it is a fuzz tone that is set apart from other fuzz pedals, it has its own unique dynamics...



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

510D6CFB-15DC-4F72-8C6A-DE10F94DDE52