March 2010 \ Features \ Interview: Ken Scott, Part 1: Recording with The Beatles & Inside the Studio

Interview: Ken Scott, Part 1: Recording with The Beatles & Inside the Studio

Elianne Halbersberg

In the first of our two-part interview, producer Ken Scott tells stories from inside the studio with the Beatles, and shares his approach to mic'ing guitars and drums.


Premier Guitar March 2010

(1 of 2)

Photo: Mike Banks

For many people, life is measured and recollected by a series of milestones: what they were wearing at a particular event, whom they were with, calendar dates marked in red each year. For the rest of us, life’s milestones are commemorated by music: what we were listening to, which song was on the charts, the riff that wouldn’t leave our brain.

If you’re one of us, your milestones include the work of Ken Scott, who has been engineering and producing records since he was 18 and has played a part in creating music history, including A Hard Day’s Night, the White Album, Magical Mystery Tour, Ziggy Stardust and the Spiders From Mars, Honky Chateau—the list goes on.

Scott stays busy both in the studio and holding workshops and presentations. Right now, he is also promoting a Ken Scott Collection—EpiK DrumS, a software package released by Sonic Reality that features five drummers that Scott worked with over the course of his career: Bill Cobham, Bob Siebenberg, Terry Bozzio, Woody Woodmansey and Rod Morgenstein. What does this mean to you? “A guitarist can use this to put together backing tracks on demos of his songs, and he can also learn to mix real live drums, which is valuable whether he’s recording at home or taking a band into the studio,” says Scott.

Premier Guitar spoke with Ken Scott at winter NAMM, where Sonic Reality was debuting EpiK DrumS, and again a few weeks later. He offered insight into his production techniques, getting guitar sounds, and of course some fond recollections about his years with the Beatles.

Do you have plans for other EpiK series?

I certainly want to do more of these. Over the next couple of years I want to produce The Ken Scott Collection. Part 2 should be ready in time for the next NAMM [winter 2011]. I always had a sensibility about drums and it made sense to start there. It’s what you lay down first: drums, bass, and you overdub the other things. Everything will be based on the records I did, and as much as possible I will be using the original artists.

What is your technique for mic’ing drums—is there a Ken Scott sound?

With drums, the mics I use are a Neumann U67 on toms, an ElectroVoice RE-20 or AKG D20 on bass drum, a Coles 4038 ribbon for overhead, and a Neumann KM56 or Sony C38 on the snare. It’s been primarily the same thing through the years. Anyone interested can go to epikdrums.com and from there they can find videos of the making of the collection and see exactly how everything was set up.

It’s funny, I remember an engineer who, when mixing, would zero out everything every night just so that no one could copy how he got his sound. To me, that’s such bullshit, because you can copy to the nth degree and it still will not come out like it’s him or me doing it. There’s a sensibility that’s indefinable. It has nothing to do with EQ and reverb. You take a recipe from a cookbook written by the greatest chef, and your food won’t come out tasting as good as his. People getting these drums is a start. They’ll get closer to emulating what I did, and hopefully make something new and fresh.

What are your key pieces of gear when mic’ing and recording guitars?

It basically comes down to the same way I mic’ed drums back in the day: a Neumann U67, now a U87, and normally some kind of compression, maybe an LA-3A [Audio Leveler] or something like that. With acoustic guitar it has changed a bit. With the Beatles I used an AKG d19c. It was a general-purpose mic and I liked it for a lot of things. I also used U67s and AKG C12s.

What are you listening for when positioning the mics and recording guitars, and also when producing or engineering tracks overall?

I wish I could answer that and bottle it—I’d be a multi-millionaire right now! It always comes down to getting the sound in the studio first and the sound that works for the track, or for a section of the track. There are no specifics. These days, everything is overpowered by volume and it feels great until I go into the control room and listen to it at a reasonable volume and it sounds so small. I prefer to record guitars in the control room with a long cable so that the guitarist can hear the sound the same way I do, and we can modify it until we find something we’re both happy with.

There’s no right or wrong way to get a sound. It’s what other people consider it to be, and luckily, they’ve considered what I’ve done more often right than wrong.

How do these techniques change from electric to acoustic guitar?

There’s less room to mess around with acoustic guitar in the studio. With the electric guitar you can use a different guitar, different strings, different amps. You can change the sound to a point with mics and EQ. But an acoustic guitar is an acoustic guitar and there’s not much you can do with it. You’re purely going for the sound of that guitar.

How do these techniques change when recording more than one guitar?

I haven’t recorded more than one guitar at a time in God knows how many years. When I did, we were still monitoring in mono, so we would work on trying to get each guitar so that it stood out and was not enmeshed into an indistinguishable sound. We were trying to get two individual sounds coming out of one speaker at the same time.

What was it like to lead Beatles sessions? Were they open to input and direction?

By the time I started working with them as an engineer, they ruled the roost. Even George Martin did not have much say at that point. They were in complete control, but they were absolutely open to input.

Sometimes that input was purely accidental. I erased a whole bunch of snares accidentally on “Glass Onion.” When we laid down the basic tracks, it was obvious that a single snare would not be enough, so we overdubbed and bounced them. We were working with eight-track and came to what we thought was the last overdub. Paul and Chris Thomas were playing the recorders, but unfortunately all the tracks were full and so we could only put them after the last snare, so I did a punch. It took several takes and I finished up punching early and erasing the overdubbed snares. My immediate reaction was, “I’ll never work with them again!” But John said, “It actually works. We’re coming out of the biggest part of the song, and where you expect it to get bigger, it gets smaller. It works perfectly.” They were amazing about going with mistakes and humanness all around this way. Now, of course, that could never happen because everything is computer controlled and it sucks the life out of everything.

   1 | 2    Next »

Related Articles

GALLERY: Gear Ads of the 1980s, Volume II
Markbass Announces 2012 Product Line
Journeys Through Music and Making Music
The Working Guitarist: The Home Studio
Interview: Ken Scott, Part 2: Musicians’ Questions About Recording with the Beatles


Comments

(20 comments) display by
UsernameComment
vee sonnets
on 03/13/2010
Electricat pointed out reading the Complete Beatles Recording Sessions book. I have yet to read it myself but will recommend as well the Beatles Gear Book as perhaps another insight as to how the gear the Beatles recorded and toured with altered their sound as a group and individually.
John Della Selva
on 03/04/2010
Great to actually hear from people that were there. It always strikes me as funny when people are offended by hearing the truth as opposed to some larger than life type of biblical epic about their heroes. I loved the Beatles as much as anyone, but I've actually grown to appreciate the people around them as much,such as Sir George Martin,Billy Preston,etc.
Holly P.
on 03/03/2010
"Vaughn" speaks as if he himself has "logged" hours with the Beatles. Come on, lighten up. This was a few paragraphs touching on a few moments. As for the comment,"I wonder if Mr. Scott was even listening,...." Vaughn, you are truly a D-Bag my friend.
Brooks Bell
on 03/03/2010
I understand his point as being that they weren't maestros. They weren't Glenn Gould. They were pop musicians writing pop songs. They said it themselves: There's nothing you can play that can't be played.
Feh
on 03/02/2010
Ms. Halbersberg is a gifted writer and was clearly in her element with this interview. There are no dull moments here. I look forward to reading part 2.
electriccat
on 03/01/2010
If you want to read the definitive book on recording the Beatles, check out Mark Lewisohn's book:The Complete Beatles Recording Sessions: The Official Story of the Abbey Road Years 1962-1970
Don
on 02/28/2010
I could read stuff about this all day long.The thing's they did in the studio are so fascinating to me,I can't help it I was 10 yr's old when please please me came out and I've never looked back,one of the true love's of my life.
James Walsh
on 02/27/2010
I enjoy it when someone thinks that technique should be unconditionally immediate and confuses it with style. I'll take a Great Songwriter over the technical masters of Guitar any day. 'Strawberry Fields' may be the greatest song of the Sixties- ever! And 'Tomorrow Never Knows' is pure Genius. As for Ringo, he plays SONGS on his drums- not drums. Still I love this interview.
-Vaughn-
on 02/27/2010
The answer to the last question, "Were the Beatles underrated as musicians" was quite bizarre. It's interesting that when Mr. Scott did decide to effort a (slight) praise, he didn't mention the sheer excellence of Sir Paul's vocal performances, or his ground-breaking bass lines, he didn’t mention Georges phenomenal right hand and very distinguished hybrid picking style, he didn’t even mention the writing of Lennon & McCartney, which literally changed the course of history and the way the world looked at things. No. Instead, he mentions Ringo’s drum fills. I mean, I love Ringo and every thing … but after reading that, I wonder if Mr. Scott was actually listening to any of the Beatles material. I like Geoff Emrick and Sr. George’s take a lot better – and they both logged a LOT (!) more studio time with the fab four than Scott did.
Gail W
on 02/27/2010
Oh wow! This is such a fun interview, not only because Ken worked with The Beatles, but because the writer asks such naturally intuitve yet unexpected questions. Can't wait for part 2!



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

A7EFAF19-E9C8-4972-B75F-8719E8B53D99