August 2011 \ Features \ Builder Profile \ Builder Profile: Ken Parker Archtops

Builder Profile: Ken Parker Archtops

Gayla Drake Paul

Though he shook up the industry in 1993 with the Fly—the most unique solidbody design the electric world had seen in years—for more than 30 years now his primary passion has been advancing the art and science of archtop luthiery.


Premier Guitar August 2011

(4 of 5)

“With [that design], I got all these other great features: incredible access to the second octave because there is no heel, de-mountability for repair or travel, lots of room for a neck-end-mounted electromagnetic pickup, and the ability to fit another neck to the guitar for a different scale, a different number of strings, or whatever.”

It took Parker nearly a year to perfect his neck system. “I start with a neck core out of my favorite stuff—beautiful-sounding, perfectly quartersawn Douglas fir or spruce. This one-piece core is only visible on the side of the headstock, but it goes all the way to the end of the neck. The back of the neck has a hardwood veneer that matches the sides. Between the veneer and the neck core there’s quite a bit of carbon fiber set in an aerospace resin that needs two hours at 275 degrees Fahrenheit to cure. Room-temperature resins just aren’t rigid enough to do that job. It’s kind of challenging—you have to make a metal mold, you have to get the resin pretty hot, and it’s kind of tough to control all those things and have them all come out looking gorgeous at the end. I can’t tell you how happy I am with the result. It works just beautifully.”

Hold Your Head(stock) High
Parker makes every single component of his archtops except the tuners and the strings. For the tuners’ home—the headstock—Parker machines a strop of aluminum that resembles the Parker Fly’s headstock, has it anodized, and then, unlike most archtops, positions the tuning pegs in a row. But he doesn’t use this arrangement for aesthetic or branding reasons. He says there are two things that can change the dynamic tension of a string: the angle over the bridge and the nut, and the after length—the distance between the bridge and the termination at the tailpiece, and between the nut and the tuning peg.


The Fig flaunts its incredibly figured Big Leaf maple. Note
the hexwrench port for adjusting neck height and action.

“That’s why, in one man’s opinion, a three-and-three headstock is just plain-old physically wrong.” Parker reasons that it doesn’t make sense for the tension of the high-E and the B strings to be the same as the low-E and A strings. “I think it makes the strings feel wrong. You have to get everything right in order to create an extraordinary experience for the player, and I really try to get this balancing-the-string-tension thing right. It’s not my idea—this is a European idea from hundreds of years ago—but the only way to do it is to put all the strings in one line, so the top string is more supple than it would be otherwise, and there’s a nice, even progression in tension.”

He says that arrangement facilitates greater customization, too. “For example, if you primarily play rhythm guitar, and you don’t care so much about bending strings, I’m going to make you a left-handed headstock for your guitar so you can put huge strings on the bottom and they won’t feel too tight—and they’ll drive the pickup crazy.”

Parker says his headstock angle makes the instrument feel more playable, too. “Gibson’s is 14 degrees. Mine’s four and a quarter. It’s as low as you can get it and not [have the strings] come out of the nut slots and start behaving badly. And I know, because I’ve explored it!”

« Previous    1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5    Next »

Related Articles

Builder Profile: Visual Sound
Builder Profile: Mesa/Boogie


Comments

(9 comments) display by
UsernameComment
Casey
on 08/18/2011
Josh, Spanky, I haven't played one of the new archtops (but Bob has!), and I have to tell you from owning a Fly... once you play one, you find yourself being seduced by the aesthetics, not turned off by them. They're just so perfect. My point is, don't knock on the aesthetic of the guitar until you play one.
Spanky
on 08/17/2011
I really like the new guitars. Super nice material, construction and forward design. I've never liked the headstock though and is still is a bit of turn off to me. But would love to play one of those.
Steve Strattton
on 08/12/2011
I have to commend Gayla Drake Paul on this story -- learned a few things I had never thought of before. Plus, just getting to hear from Mr. Parker is a delight. Played a couple of his guitars in the past, and though not a fan of his neck thickness, still knew I was playing something special.
Jazzbox
on 08/12/2011
I LOVE the headstock. Be different. Not everything has to look like a Gibson.
David
on 08/11/2011
I got to meet Ken back in '95 at the ASIA symposium after his lecture. We spent about an hour talking about guitars and building dan he was very gracious with his time and was a very nice guy. I think his arch top designs are bold and daring and I like them a lot. Sorry Josh.
Josh Newton
on 08/11/2011
I don't like his designs. They look to much like a futuristic mess. The peghead is ugly. If anyone likes this then I'm sorry.
Casey
on 08/09/2011
Bob, it looks to me like the good folks at PG have edited the captions. Robert, I completely and whole heartedly agree! I'm actually scared to try one of Ken's new designs. The attack of G.A.S. that would bring on would be unbearable! It's everything I can do not to buy every killer Fly on eBay.
Bob Martin
on 07/22/2011
I see you have "veneers" listed in your captions when referring to the back, sides and neck. This is incorrect. The back and sides are solid wood. The neck is crafted from a core of solid wood, typically spruce or douglass fir, then treated to a carbon fiber composite layer to reinforce the neck and form the mounting "square" that you see going into the body. THEN there is a wooden veneer used as the final layer on the neck. Hope you can correct the captions so that the proper information is disseminated. This information is from Ken directly and he has asked me to contact you regarding correcting it. I emailed you two days ago, but haven't seen a correction yet. Hope you get to it soon. Bob Martin (Ken's web master)
Robert Marlin
on 07/19/2011
Ken is nothing less than a master luthier and a great inspiration.



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

71C1E13A-D1CA-4B2B-BAE5-CB55C4722ABD