August 2012 \ Reviews \ Effects \ Mad Professor Golden Cello Pedal Review

Mad Professor Golden Cello Pedal Review

Tyler Green
Premier Guitar August 2012

As far as stompbox names go, “Golden Cello” is a lot to live up to—evoking thoughts of singing, harmonically rich tones, muted heavenly light, and a prized relic from antiquity perhaps. There’s just no way your mind’s eye won’t weave some very grand ideas about how it’s going to sound.

In concept, the Golden Cello is aptly named. It’s designed to deliver big, singing overdrive with high-quality, tape-echotype delay from a compact pedal—which certainly sounds like a recipe for golden tone. And if doesn’t quite summon the strains of some celestial chamber quartet, it’s a powerful pedalboard tool of deliciously varied capabilities.

Heart of Gold
For all the tone-massaging capabilities it delivers, the Golden Cello makes do with just four main controls—delay, drive, volume, and tone. There’s more going on than meets the eye, however. Pop open the hood and there are four tiny holes on the PCB. They’re labeled gain, delay 1, repeat, and delay 2, and they yield access to trim pots for additional delay tweaks.

In the Golden Cello’s manual, the user is advised to exercise extreme caution when opening the pedal to make adjustments, because it’s easy to disturb the electronics and damage the pedal—a truth I discovered first hand: After opening the pedal, adjusting the trim pots, and gingerly replacing the cover, the pedal came to life and promptly died when I moved my chair to assume a better playing position.

It was hard to determine the exact reason for the intermittent signal, but I did discover that the delay section’s circuit board can make unwanted contact between the solder connections and the back plate of the pedal—contacts that ground the circuit and interrupt the signal. That means aligning the back plate before screwing it back together has to be done very carefully.

With this in mind, it’s hard not to wonder how the pedal might fare in a jostling, unventilated tour van traveling through climates that could have drastic extremes in temperature and humidity— because you’re definitely not going to want to find out in the middle of a gig that, since the last show, those delaycircuit connections have been jostled into contact with the rear plate. For a builder of pro-grade gear like Mad Professor, it’s surprising the pedal isn’t a little more bulletproof. (Mad Professor’s John Pegler tells us this design flaw has since been fixed.)

That said, the circuit design is admirably ambitious. It isn’t easy to cram such a fine-sounding overdrive with two separate delay circuits into a single chassis. And it’s pretty clear that the circuit is designed with careful consideration for component selection, including the venerable Princeton Technologies PT2399 chip. Though it’s digital, it does a great job of emulating tape- and bucket-brigade-delay tones in a very small and efficient circuit.

The Midas Touch
To test the Golden Cello, I used a ’60s Gibson Firebird with P-90s and a Fender Lone Star Stratocaster, both routed via the Golden Cello into a ’60s Fender Twin Reverb and played at volumes ranging from quiet to near meltdown.

Using the Firebird’s neck pickup, I dialed in thick, heavy distortion with a touch of delay, which enabled me to paint with some very bold brushstrokes. The pedal has a liquid, sustaining distortion that seems capable of lingering for days—just as the name implies. But it can also get quite biting for leads when you crank the distortion and tone all the way up. There’s also enough gain to drive a Twin’s speakers to a husky bark. At more aggressive settings, the distortion can border on fuzz, but it retains plenty of harmonic definition. The tone and distortion knobs are very interactive, and the former generates a lot of harmonic content in the high end, which can become very exaggerated when you crank the gain.

Ratings

Pros:
Awesome lead tones in one pedal. Cool ’70s-style atmospheric possibilities.

Cons:
Possible reliability issues. Limited flexibility due to internal delay controls.

Tones:

Playability/Ease of Use:

Build:

Value:

Street:
$199

Mad Professor
mpamp.com

With a neck pickup, rolled-off tone, and delay disengaged, you can get a fine approximation of Robert Fripp’s sound on King Crimson’s “Starless.” The nicely compressed distortion, which blunts the sound of pick attack in a really cool way, can be so smooth in these settings that it nearly sounds like backwards tape. At these settings, the silky but aggressive tones of Carlos Santana and John McLaughlin’s Love Devotion Surrender album also come to mind—and the pedal is as ideal for fast, defined, single-note flurries as that association would suggest.

The delay knob brings in a solid-sounding, tape-like echo that found me indulging in ripping, ethereal solos much more than I ordinarily would—it’s real easy to find the “Comfortably Numb” zone. Though the factory-preset delay tone was perfect, tweaking the internal trim pots expanded its range in cool ways. I got nice doubled sounds with the delay trims and repeat pulled down, though my favorite was bringing out heavy delay and murky lo-fi repeats by cranking both delays pots all the way.

The Verdict
With singing sustain and emotive, atmospheric delay, the Golden Cello is a lead guitarists dream machine. Many players like several distortion pedals and delay textures on tap, but this pedal is a one-stop shop for guitarists looking for saturated and delayed lead tones that can flow and blur into the infinite. The overdriven tones have a foot in the ’70s, to be sure. If you want to recreate the shag-era sounds of a big amp driven to saturation, the Golden Cello gets you mostly there for a lot less dough (and in a lot less space) than a raging Marshall. The tape-delay tones are beautiful, too, although if you like to tweak settings often or need more focus, they may feel limiting.

That said, for the money, the Golden Cello’s tone is entirely impressive: If you’re set on inexpensively and easily conjuring luxurious, Pink Floyd-style ’70s lead tones, it’s a serious contender.


     

Related Articles

Roland Cube Lite and Cube Jam App Review
Ibanez Echo Shifter Pedal Review
VOX Delaylab Pedal Review
Mojo Hand Colossus Pedal Review
TC Electronic TonePrint Flashback Delay and Looper, Shaker Vibrato, Vortex Flanger, and Corona Chorus Pedal Reviews


Comments

(7 comments) display by
UsernameComment
PDC
on 12/30/2012
Just got this pedal used and have played it for two days. I like the pedal a lot but I can see why others may not. It is not a versatile pedal so if you do not care for the sound and vibe there is not too much tweaking that you can do to change it. Sound wise I would describe it as a fat sounding fuzz type sound. Not at all razor like or nasally, but kind of like a smooth warm fuzz in the vane of American Woman by the Guess Who. As far as the Eric Johnson tone, it has definitely got a close approximation of that. If you can play in his style it can sound very close. For chuggy type metal rhythm playing it sounds flabby. Another good description is the newer ZZ Top sound where it is really big, fat and full but fuzzy. Its not a cut through the mix type sound you would use in a band with lots of instrumentation. But if you are in a trio type situation it sounds huge. There are internal controls to adjust the gain amount and delay time and number of repeats. The delay sound is a vintage analogue tape type echo. You can only really change the volume of the repeats once you set the internal settings for the delay time you want. Not ideal, but good sounding. This pedal sounds just like most of the youtube demo's so if you like the demo's you should like the pedal.
Eric M
on 10/26/2012
After a bit (approx. 2 hours) of tweeking the internal controls: gain (percentage of overdrive into delay circuit), 2 separate delay times (it's true that they MUST be in balance), and repeat (regeneration), I arrived at a great setting that yields two great effects. One is a clean delay (requires less guitar gain, particularly if one uses humbuckers) and one combines various levels of delay with an ideal overdrive setting. I believe that most humbucker players will find that a delicate balance, whereas single-coil players will have a bit more freedom in that regard. A lot will depend on the type of amp one plays through. I think that some people might be happy with the factory default settings, but others will have to spend a few hours tweeking the internal controls, and then should be able to arrive at an ideal setting. It takes that long because one cannot do these adjustments with the back off of the unit while the unit is in use. The latter will damage the unit. The bottom line is, if the Golden Cello made even me happy (and I do not like most overdrive units), then Mad Professor has really done their homework to create a compact, flexible little pedal that can in some cases help musicians to eliminate the need for two pedals (delay and overdrive). Even blues, jazz and country players will like this pedal. Bravo!
Eric
on 10/25/2012
I bought a Golden Cello, after hearing a number of fine Finnish (or are they Danish) guitarists doing demos of the pedal online. As would be expected of a pedal with no real controls for the overdrive, other than Drive and Tone, I found this aspect of the pedal to be really more distortion than overdrive, although there definitely is overdrive in the circuit. The internal delay settings are unusual, with two separate delay time pots, a repeat and a gain for the delay. Getting these pot adjusted to personally acceptable settings takes some work, but this a crucial part of using this pedal. All in all, the delay works well on this pedal, albeit difficult to adjust at first. However the overdrive leaves a bit to be desired. Fender players with single coil pickups will have better results with this overdrive than will Gibson players and humbucker users. I will not be using or keeping this pedal permanently. I have better overdrive and delay pedals, but was hoping for a simple, compact unit. Some will like this pedal, but I did not.
Dukeof Earl
on 10/09/2012
Dont understand why you rambled on for 3 paragraphs, (That could have been spent on review) about the "Design Flaw", the manufacturer said they fixed. Then put the design Flaw as a Con on the write up. ?
abdolrahman
on 08/17/2012

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff

Read more: http://www.premierguitar.com/Magazine/Is sue/2012/Aug/Mad_Professor_Golden_Cello_ Pedal_Review.aspx#ixzz23ruS5sl3
Bruce
on 08/11/2012
Tried a golden cello at my local S. Austin GC,. I wasn't too impressed with the sound. Thats too bad because I was really hyped after reading the reviews. I don't know if the ill sound was due to playing budget guitars with cheezed out dirty strings ( 3 guitars in their pedal section) or the pedal running thru a fender blues junior ( a respectable amp). I'm open to trying it again, especially if the price drops some.
HoraceLime
on 07/12/2012
Mad Professor pedals all are worth the money if you have it!



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

9BC57D2D-88D5-4F43-BC3E-A129758DE2B5