December 2012 \ Tech Tips \ State of Stomp \ The Truest Bypass

The Truest Bypass

Terry Burton
Premier Guitar December 2012


The Vertex Dual Buffer sports separate input and output buffer circuits, each designed for its specific task. Photo courtesy of Vertex Effects

What could be better than having “true” bypass in your pedal? This sounds like an indisputably good idea, but in fact, it’s not that simple. The subject has been written about before, but there is such confusion regarding true bypass that it’s helpful to revisit it from time to time. When it comes to preserving optimum tone, how you bypass and wire your pedals can be as important as how you power your pedal. (For more on this topic, see “Powering Your Board” in the December 2011 issue.) Let’s take a look at how both true bypass and buffered bypass work.

The idea of true bypass is that when your pedal or effect is off, there are no electronic components whatsoever touching— and thereby having an influence on—your guitar signal. This sounds great in theory, but there are some practical problems with the approach. In almost all cases, guitar pickups are passive, high-impedance devices with a relatively wimpy ability to drive a signal. Think of it as a trickling stream of water rather than a pressurized pipe. It’s very easy to divert a trickling stream with a few small rocks, but not so easy to place those rocks in a high pressure pipe without them simply being blown out.

Because the signal coming out of a guitar is weak and easily influenced, even the wire in your cables and true-bypass circuits can degrade your tone. The degradation you may hear will manifest itself as a loss of high frequencies—or “tone suck,” as many refer to it. This is caused when a simple low-pass (treble cut) filter is created with a passive RC circuit. The “R”, or resistor, is the combined resistance of all the cabling in your rig. The “C”, or capacitor, is the inherent capacitance present in shielded cables. Each true-bypass circuit adds unbuffered cable length—and therefore more resistance and capacitance to the signal path—so they create an unintentional low-pass filter.

Another problem is that the 3PDT footswitches commonly used in true-bypass circuits are not optimized to switch low-voltage signals like guitar pickups. The side effect of this can be noise or pops when switching in and out of bypass. The physical distance between the input and output jacks and the switch can also exacerbate this switching noise, in addition to adding internal cable length. A better way to accomplish true bypass is to use a relay that’s optimized for switching small signals. Such relays can be quieter and placed in an optimum location in the pedal that minimizes cable length when the pedal is bypassed.

The other way that pedal manufacturers implement bypass circuits is, of course, with solid-state electronics. This is often done with FET switching circuits and is called buffered bypass or analog bypass. A simple truth that escapes many is that any pedal with active electronics in it automatically and by its very nature will include a buffer.

Now, the quality of that buffer can vary greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer, but when buffered bypass is done well, it can be a very good method of bypassing a pedal. It provides a robust and relatively silent form of switching. Buffered bypass has simply gotten a bad name over the years because of poorly designed buffered bypass circuits that color your tone.

Because of this, and for fear of any extraneous electronics hanging on to their guitar signals when bypassed, many players insist on only using pedals with true bypass. Players who use batteries in their pedals also have to worry that once the battery dies, not even the dry-bypass signal will pass through the pedal because it requires power to do so. One drawback of buffered-bypass circuits is that pedals not using low-noise components and designs can add a significant amount of white noise to the signal chain even when the pedal is bypassed. This can usually be minimized with a correctly designed bypass circuit.

So, what’s a pedal junkie to do? There is, in fact, a best-of-both-worlds solution: Place a good quality buffer at the beginning of your pedalboard signal chain. This can be in the form of a compact dedicated buffer, a clean boost set to unity gain, or even a pedal with a high-quality integrated buffer that you don’t mind leaving on all the time.

In my personal rig, I leave an optical compressor set to a very light compression level on all the time, and it serves as my up-front buffer. What the buffer does is transform the trickling stream that is your guitar signal into a pressurized fire hose of a low-impedance signal. This significantly minimizes any degradation that can be caused by having many true-bypass pedals or lots of cable in your rig.

Having a buffer up front becomes extremely important when using a true-bypass “looper,” a device that bypasses effects externally with multiple true-bypass effects loops. In practice, those devices add a ton of extra cable to your rig. Again, a buffer up front will minimize any harm they can potentially do and let you take full advantage of true bypass. In short, put a buffer first in the chain, trust your ears, and rid yourself of bypass anxiety. Happy shredding!


Terry Burton is an engineer at—and the founder of—Strymon.

     

Related Articles

The ABCs of Compression
Control Your Pedals with the Wave of a Hand
Build Your Own Series Resistance Box
Effects Loops 101
Maxwell’s Silver Hammer of the Gods


Comments

(10 comments) display by
UsernameComment
Mike Mu-Tron
on 12/12/2012
In practical use, the "raw" signal from the guitar with a passive pickup system has an intrinsic variation of both output resistance, capacitance and inductance --all of which depend on the setting of any control on the guitar that is presently connected to the tip of the output jack, with respect to the GROUND of the output jack. All cables have varying resistance, capacitance (and even inductance) depending on how long the cable is, what it's made of, and whether its "looped together" if there's a lot more cable than there is distance to the (Next thing the cable plugs into). Which could vary all over the place, from a few kilohms and a hundred or more picofarads of input capacitance and even the junction of a transistor or the grid of a vacuum tube(which if direct coupled may even produce a DC offset that could affect the performance of the INDUCTOR coils back in the pickup. Then, each piece of equipment in the signal processing chain adds at least a little capacitance or resistance or inductance. And by the time you go through maybe 6 processors, even if ALL are true bypass, you inevitably load and modify the guitar signal compared to what would come out of the guitar jack hooked up to nothing. So..... True bypass on ALL effects would allow the signal to come all the way through all the processes changed according to the cables and small R,C and L of the effect chain. Sounds to me like a GOOD Active bypass at the beginning of the signal chain would eliminate these artifacts. But since some of the pedals DEPEND on the artifacts between the guitar and their input stages, the argument FOR or AGAINST active bypass becomes very very subjective. Maybe a nice active bypass with a true bypass switch would be useful. And it would be something else for people to talk about at the edge of human perception of sonic impressions.
David
on 12/09/2012
"Another problem is that the 3PDT footswitches commonly used in true-bypass circuits are not optimized to switch low-voltage signals like guitar pickups. The side effect of this can be noise or pops when switching in and out of bypass." This is not true! Pops and clicks are either caused by lack of pull down resistors than are needed to bleed off the charge from coupling caps. This is only when people are retrofitting older pedal designs to true bypass, and don't add the resistors. You only need a DPDT switch for true bypass. The 3PDT's extra pole is only for the status LED, something that older pedals obviously didn't have. Another reason or pops and clicks is either a dirty switch, or an impedance mismatch when switching the pedal in. This is where a buffered switch, or even an unbuffered electronic switch helps. There are no mechanical connections to cause a pop. You can make a solid state switch that does not buffer the signal. But most are made with JFETs, which have high impedance inputs, so the buffering is a bonus. But really, you might notice that none of this was an issue until all these boutique pedal makers came on the scene making copies of older fuzz designs. It's the old designs that are the problem. These could have been improved without changing the tone, but often not that much imagination is put into the whole thing, and they are just copies of old pedals, sometimes with tweaks.
David
on 12/09/2012
Continued... @Ty, regarding cable capacitance, the old PRS guitars had something called a "sweet switch". It simulated 100 feet of cable. This was because Carlos Santana started using a wireless system, and didn't like the brighter tone. So they used something called a "passive delay line" to simulate a long cable run. The newer Santana models have a resistor to load the pickups and dull the high end. You can also do this with small value tone caps. Just install a .01µF or .005µF cap on your tone control and turn it down. Instant pickup loading. That would work great in front of a fuzz too. The funny thing is that todays players want this dark tone from humbuckers, and they leave the covers on to look vintage. The players back in the day took the covers off to get a brighter tone, and often used a Range Master, or other treble booster to get a brighter tone from Les Pauls. That way you can actually hear what notes they are playing! I'm an old timer, so I like my humbuckers loud and bright! I;m also a pickup maker, and that's how I make them. To me something like a Duncan JB sounds like mud when played clean, but they do sound good dirty.
David
on 12/09/2012
@Joe, not all fuzz pedals load the pickups. And none of them were *designed* to do that. It's a matter of sloppy design really. No thought was out into it at all. Same is true of wahs. It's only early fizz designs that are like this. They really were not designed to work with high impedance guitar pickups, they were just generic circuit designs. It would be a simple matter to add a buffer at the front of something like a fuzz face, and then present the fuzz face with the signal it's looking for. Also if you want to run a wah before the fuzz, you need a buffer after the wah, because the fuzz's impedance is so low that it will stop the wah and the fuzz, from working properly. This is a disadvantage, and why modern pedals are buffered. They don't care what order you put them in. The whole reason why we now have the term "true bypass" is because effects makers used to skimp on things like DPDT foot switches, and because their circuits were designed with the input impedance too low. @Guest, well when you have ALL your pedals by passed, then a lopper doesn't add much. But when the pedals are in the chain, you have the cables going between each pedal. If you turn a few of them off then you have that extra cable. That's why pedal makers like Boss started putting the buffers in. This true bypass thing is a fad based on a misconception. In most cases it does nothing to help your tone. But this is how many musicians are, they worry about things they have no reason to worry about, and think they need stuff they don't need. True bypass was a fix for older pedal designs that left the input of the circuit always connected to the input jack. If these circuits had lower input impedances, they would load the guitar down and make the tone dull, even when bypassed. True bypass fixes that, but then you often have a drop in level. Buffering fixes that. @Ty, regarding cable capacitance, the old PRS guitars had something called a "sweet switch". It simulated 100 f
Fabio
on 12/06/2012
some devices as Carl Martin Octaswitch has in-built buffer that can works in some ways
Felipe
on 12/06/2012
Great article! Thanks for sharing!
Guest
on 12/06/2012
How does a true-bypass looper "add a ton of extra cable to [my] rig" ? When the loops are bypassed, the signal goes straight from the input of the looper to the output.
btdvox
on 12/06/2012
Moving away from this topic, I'm really looking forward to the Mobius:)
Ty
on 12/05/2012
Great article! I'm very glad that you finally pointed out that "good" tone is all in the ear of the player. Albert Collins (so the myth goes) insisted on using a 120 foot cable between his guitar and his amp because he said it sounded good to him. I doubt anyone would have pressured him into adding a buffer. I do agree with Joe. The placement of the buffer in the chain is fairly dependent on the pedals used. For instance, I put a buffer before my volume pedal to help with the impedance issues of using the tuner out option. Sooner or later I'll have an isolated buffer/splitter wired inside there. I know companies like JHS and Mercy Seat Effects do these mods, but for now it does it's job quite well.
Joe
on 12/05/2012
I agree that a buffer should be early on in the chain, but I use a Germanium fuzz (Fulltone '69 clone), and I find that running my guitar straight into that with no pre-buffer sounds better than with a pre-buffer. Fuzz pedals are designed to load the guitar pickups--it's part of the sound. I use buffered pedals after the fuzz, however. My Ethos Overdrive uses buffered bypass, and that's the last pedal before going into my amp. I like to drive that cable with a buffered pedal.



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10

A90451C0-4262-419B-8CC4-D7C5BC0B0C9D