The first composite Steinberger
prototype used off-the-shelf,
open-gear tuners in a staggered
array on the end of the body.
We could also see the influence
of Stuart Spector in many
areas: The brass nut was a dead
giveaway, because Ned later
decided to use a zero fret. The
bass also appeared to have an
adjustable truss rod, which is
standard on most wood-necked
instruments, though Ned determined
it was unnecessary and
removed it from his final design.
Perhaps the most unusual
feature was an appendage at
the base of the body that held
four conventional bass tuners.
Obviously, Ned had not
yet designed his own tuning
system, so he merely incorporated
off-the-shelf tuning
machines. The pickups were
also unusual—they looked
homemade, and therefore were
probably from the period before
Ned began his association with
Rob Tuner at EMG pickups.
Needless to say, Jeff and
I were thrilled. We felt we’d
uncovered the long-missing
“platypus”—the one-of-a-kind
original Ned Steinberger prototype
bass! But the real proof
came when we sent our photos
to the man himself. Jeff shot
some basic photos, I composed
a letter, and we sent them off to
Ned at his office, which is now
in Nobleboro, Maine. The following
day, I phoned Ned. This
is the conversation that ensued:
Me: Ned, did you receive
the photos and e-mail that
I sent you yesterday?
Ned: Yes I did, Don. This
is quite amazing! I sold this
bass to Steve Freidman in
about 1979, and I haven’t
seen it since. It has aged
and changed a little bit
over time, but it appears
to be pretty much intact.
Hopefully, the same could
be said about me.
In this late-’70s photo,
Ned Steinberger holds
his first carbon-fiber
prototype—the same one
recently discovered after
more than 35 years.
Me: Where did you build
this bass?
Ned: This bass was designed
and fabricated at the
Brooklyn Woodworkers
Co-op, where Stuart Spector
was also a member. As a
furniture designer, I was
naturally intrigued with the
electric guitars and basses
that Stuart was building.
Along with his associate,
Billy Thomas, Stuart taught
me everything I knew about
electric basses at that time.
Me: How did you come up
with this unusual design?
Ned: I remember watching
the first Star Wars
movie—which was the latest
thing at the time—and
seeing the futuristic bar
scene, with all of the exotic
characters from around
the galaxy, boozing and
listening to the band. The
band was playing what
looked like Fender-type
guitars and basses, which
had been designed in the
1940s and 1950s—well
before the advent of the
space age. This struck me
as all wrong, and it got me
to thinking that it would
be exciting to design more
modern-looking instruments
for the future.
Me: Where does this bass
fit into the evolution of
your designs?
Ned: This bass was the
very first instrument that I
molded from carbon fiber.
I finished it around 1977. I
made only this one bass [this
way], and the plaster cast for
it is long gone, so this one
is—and will remain—a oneof-
a-kind instrument. The
neck and body were molded
as a single, primary structure
of rigid, continuous fiber
that runs from the headpiece
to the tuners. The mold was
made with high sides so that
the fiber could be saturated
with resin as it lay in the
mold. Wooden molding
blocks were clamped down
into the mold to squeeze out
the excess resin and to form
the top surfaces of the part.
The thin, molded-fiberglass
cover plate screws onto
this structure and carries
the electronics in a small
pod beneath the cover. It
has a phenolic fretboard
and conventional frets.
The headpiece and fully
adjustable locking bridge
were fabricated in aluminum
by Bob Kretchmar, a
great machinist located in
Brooklyn. The original finish
was in black lacquer.
The first carbon-fiber Steinberger
prototype featured a scapulashaped
appendage that swivels
down to function as a leg rest, or
up for use with a strap.
Me: How does this bass
compare to your final production
version?
Ned: This instrument
has most of the features
that would eventually
become identified with the
Steinberger bass, including
the contoured pivot plate
molded of fiberglass that
rotates so the bass can be
played at any angle. Key
differences are that it has
conventional tuners and
virtually no body. It also
has an adjustable truss
rod, unlike the production
models that followed.
Me: What brand of pickups
are these?
Ned: The pickups were
custom-wound locally. This
was before I had discovered
EMG pickups. I really don’t
remember much about
the control circuit, but I’m
pretty sure it was very basic.
The volume control location
and both knobs were
changed at some point, I
think for the better.
Me: Thank you, Ned. I’m
amazed at how much you
can still remember about a
bass that you built almost
35 years ago!
In this shot, you can see the first
prototype’s two strap buttons and
chromed hardware.
Ned: I’ve just sent you
some photos of the instrument
when it was new,
including one of me holding
it. This bass has always
been one of my favorites,
and I’m so happy it has
finally resurfaced. Nice
work, Don.
I’ve played dozens and dozens
of Steinberger basses over the last
30 years, so I have a pretty good
perspective when it comes to
being able to evaluate the prototype.
There are similarities with
production Steinbergers, as well
as differences, neither of which is
surprising. Because it’s composed
of the same carbon-graphite
material as production models,
the feel of the neck is about the
same as what you’d get from
store-bought Steinbergers. The
accuracy and sustain are also
similar, again due to the consistent
construction techniques.
The main difference I noticed
is the sound of the pickups.
Virtually every Steinberger bass
I’ve played had factory-installed
active EMGs, but as Ned had
said in our phone conversation,
the pickups in the platypus
were hand wound, one-off
units. In contrast to the famous
plugged-in L2 sound, this bass
doesn’t quite have the deep richness
of tone and high-fidelity
output. It doesn’t sound bad,
but it’s certainly not as good,
either. However, I still believe
it’s of such high quality that it
could perform quite well in the
studio or onstage exactly as it
stands today. That Ned’s very
first carbon-graphite bass is that
good is truly a testament to his
incredible vision.
Locating and securing this
long-lost prototype bass was an
exciting adventure. I felt like
I had rescued a missing treasure—
like I had happened upon
Les Paul’s Epiphone “Log” or
Leo Fender’s first Esquire. I’m
thrilled to be able to share the
excitement and satisfaction of
this event with other musicians
who respect and appreciate Ned
Steinberger’s genius.
In closing, I’d like to
thank Jeff Babicz for his helpful
perspective and excellent
recollection of design details
from so long ago, Robert
Tompkins for his fantastic photographic
skills, Hap Kuffner
for his knowledge and moral
support, and, of course, Ned
Steinberger at NS Design for
inspiring me with his wonderful
instruments.