Magazine \ Daily News \ Field Report \ SXSW: Metallica and the Loudness Wars

SXSW: Metallica and the Loudness Wars

by Joe Coffey

Mastering Engineer Bob Ludwig Diagnoses the Problem


  RSS  EMAIL   SHARE   LINK   PRINT  COMMENTS


Mastering Engineer Bob Ludwig of Gateway Mastering and DVD
Austin, TX (March 18, 2009) – Even though we enjoy tone chasing via gear hunting, modding and endless knob tweaking, we also know that a big part of the tones made famous on historic albums had a lot to do with those albums’ mastering engineers. That’s not to say that our quest is all for naught—it’s just important to keep in mind that there’s more to it than the guitarist’s gear. There’s also the producer’s ear, the studio’s gear and of course, the mastering engineer’s final touch. Mastering engineers take a producer’s final product—an otherwise finished album—and tweak it just a little or a lot more so that it is in optimum condition to be reproduced.

Outside of audiophiles and liner note junkies, your average music fan has paid little attention to mastering engineers and the important final process they’re involved with. Recently, however, people have noticed that recorded music is reproduced at much louder levels than ever before. Perhaps you’ve had your iPod on shuffle mode and noticed that newer songs are so loud that they can kill the overall vibe of what you’d prefer to be a steady, seamless presentation of your music stash. Legendary mastering engineer Bob Ludwig explained the trend at a South by Southwest presentation, breaking down the history of the problem, playing A/B’d comparisons for the audience and offering a glimmer of hope for music fans. Ludwig has mastered thousands of recordings in all genres. He’s worked with everyone from Led Zeppelin to Frank Sinatra. He’s the guy the Rolling Stones and Rush go to when they want their entire back catalogues remastered.

Ludwig breaks down the “Loudness Wars” at SXSW

Blame the A&R Guy
As Ludwig explains it, the loudness wars can be traced to A&R guys doing what they do best—whatever it takes to get their acts noticed. They started influencing their labels to pressure mastering engineers to make their acts’ cuts a little louder based on the idea that those songs would have more immediate appeal and attention-grabbing mojo when lost in a sea of other music. They envisioned radio station program directors sifting through piles of new music and industry-prepared compilations of music on the current charts and suddenly being wowed by their act’s song and its ability to stand out. Of course, this louder volume was also intended to have to same effect on listeners when unknowing disc jockeys would fire off the songs without adjusting the potentiometers on the board. Eventually, mastering engineers were making albums louder just to be able to keep up. Just like the musicians in your average band at a bar gig, someone’s attempt to bump their volume up to stand out results in someone else bumping their volume up just to be heard and before you know it, everything is way too loud.

Among the many downsides of the creeping volume level on recordings is the fact that dynamic range has been lost. In order to master an album at a higher level, the difference between the peaks and the lows in a song’s waveform are basically eliminated. What should be a rich variety of levels that help a song develop character and have someplace to go ends up being double forte all the way through. This can be achieved via specific manipulation of various frequency ranges or simple compression.

A/Bing the Evidence
Ludwig’s presentation included the following two minute video clip by Matt Mayfield which demonstrates how this loud-for-loud’s sake process can turn a dynamic recording into a wimpy loud recording.



“We have a long to back off,” Ludwig told a room full of music industry types that included musicians, engineers and label execs. Ludwig played clips he was working on for a new Beck album that demonstrated where good dynamic levels should be at and where they’d have to be to follow the loudness trend. He also played clips of Gun N’ Roses’ Chinese Democracy, the long-anticipated album that is considered to be one of the most over-tweaked albums in history. When it was time for mastering, Axl Rose went to a number of mastering engineers and asked them to master the album. Rose picked Ludwig’s version in the end, to the surprise of everyone. Ludwig’s version is old-school—it isn’t overly artificially loud, over-compressed and squishy. It has dynamics and gives the album a chance to show its depth of emotion. However, it isn’t as dynamic as it could be. Ludwig’s mix backs off from the loudness trend but it is still louder than the records he used to make.


From left to right: original sound file and various versions with increased compression. Notice how the version on the far right, a mix that is typical for today’s loudness standards, is basically reduced to square waves.

The poster child of the loudness wars is Metallica’s Death Magnetic, the Rick Rubin-produced album that prompted 20,000 fans to petition for a remix. The fans actually got to A/B the album due to the release of remixed tracks produced for the Guitar Hero video game. They noticed that the Guitar Hero tracks weren’t over-compressed and let the band know they deserved better when buying CDs and downloading the album from the Internet.

To put the situation into perspective, Ludwig described the loudness wars from what he sees on his VU meters. “An average CD’s peaks are probably at +6dB to +6.5dB with the occasional 7dB peak," Ludwig said. "That Guns N’ Roses record [Chinese Democracy] averages +4dB. Death Magnetic is like +12dB or +13dB. The meter only goes up to +14dB.”

Good News
While acknowledging that the “forces that are out there are very strong forces,” Ludwig was pleased to report that the loudness wars may have peaked.

“Since this Death Magnetic record, I’ve actually for the first time in years had a couple of people ask me to redo something at a lower level with more dynamics,” Ludwig said. “…and that hasn’t happened to me in a long time. “ Ludwig mentioned Axl Rose’s take on the situation when they were working on Chinese Democracy: “I don’t have any issue with the radio stations paying attention to my record,” he paraphrased. “There’s no program director to impress. My record’s gonna get played.”

It’s important to note that Ludwig was very careful not to criticize other mastering engineers or their work. The discussion was focused on the loudness trend, to which he admitted being an unwilling participant. “It’s easy to go past the point of ‘still musical,’” he said as the session came to a close. “It’s easy to make a loud record.”

     



Comments

(12 comments) display by
UsernameComment
Richard
on 03/27/2009
Orin, no criticism is meant of Bob's presentation - there really isn't any better way to present what he appears to be presenting than to show those plots. (Sadly, I didn't attend the presentation, and I even live in Austin! I apparantly was the only person in the world who did not go to SXSW.) From what is being described here, Ludwig put on an absolutely spectacular presentation, hopefully the most influential one yet, and this article seems to handle the topic very well. All I'm saying is.... I've seen people drawn to waveforms for the last several years as an easy evaluative tool - as they are being discussed here in the comments - but it's just too misleading at times. Some waveform plots really do require an experienced eye (often times more experienced than me ;) ) to correctly evaluate. Unfortunately, there aren't any particularly better solutions at the moment. Here's an example of what I'm talking about. If you take a hypercompressed master and cut it to vinyl (which BTW happens a lot more common than you might think), the distortions in the manufacturing and playback process - phase errors, rumble, tracing error etc - will artificially boost the peak level of the hypercompressed track compared to its CD counterpart. The peak-to-RMS value increases, and it LOOKS more dynamic on a waveform plot, but it's entirely illusory, and only a zoomed in sample-by-sample plot can show that the telltale signs of clipping are still present. But a lot of people don't do that, and come to a potentially fallacious conclusion that said vinyl really does come from a superior master. That's really unfortunate, and it's only one issue out of many.
Orin
on 03/26/2009
Richard, this is Bob Ludwig you're talking about, which is why I'm surprised you're criticizing him even though you probably weren't at his presentation. Me thinks he probably had that info but the writer didn't put it in the story. Good point about the pixels, though. I've noticed that before. Visual flat peaks aren't always burned.
Mutt
on 03/26/2009
I find it amusing that some producers and engineers insist on 24 bit audio, yet they compress the dynamics down so far that they are using only a small fraction of the available dynamic range. Forget radio frendly mixes. Besides, radio stations compress the crap out of their music due to broadcast transmission limitations anyway. Let's hear some air and some dynamics for a change.
Richard
on 03/26/2009
Observing waveform plots is useful, but at times the plots can be astonishingly misleading. Plots typically only show peak content for the time represented by each pixel, which can grossly underestimate the dynamics of the music. Clipping can occur quite independently of the "envelope" of the waveform plot - it doesn't necessarily mean clipping is occurring, or even that the track is compressed; clipping can even occur even when the plot looks nice and dynamic. I don't mean to criticize Bob's presentation - his use of plots is illustrative - but his plots do not tell you the audible amount of distortion present in each master, nor do they tell you the specific loss of dynamic range. What I'm saying is, when you analyze waveforms, you've gotta be intelligent about it. They are statistics and they can often be interpreted in multiple ways.
KD Helmert
on 03/25/2009
If a drop of perfume smells good, then pouring a gallon of it on yourself will smell better.........WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I really hope something changes or else the young listeners will never know the dynamics of good music and good music will never sound good ever again and sonic coloring will just be black(When you mix all colors together they turn black or just a gross dark color).
Doug
on 03/25/2009
Thanks so much for featuring this important issue. A few years ago while first exploring the world of Audio Production I was importing my full CD collection to iPod and noticing some of the old ones seeming anemic. I imported a variety of tunes including an older Joni Mitchell CD and newer Carlos Santana. I then took screen prints of the waveforms, like you show in your article and it was amazing to see that the older tunes had discernable peaks and quiet spots...full of dynamics, like looking at a mountain range in the distance, while the newer tunes looked as though someone took a sharpie and filled in a horizontal bar (or a side view of a freshly mown yard, leaving only a trace of space unfilled. In my own recordings striving for something in between has yielded the best of those worlds.
Music publisher
on 03/25/2009
We actually did re-did the mastering on an album this past summer. First version was done like they always do at the mastering plant - everything loud and compressed. We got them to re-do it the more oldschool way. The record now sounds more like we envisioned it to sound when we did the final mix.
Mitch Keen
on 03/25/2009
I'm a music technology professor teaching basic mixing techniques- and I too hate the current over-limiting/compression used on many modern recordings- it kills the music- and for me makes it very tiring and virtually un-listenable- If you want to hear good examples of great dynamics- listen to (for example) Supertramp albums- incredible depth, imaging & dynamics- in fact many 1970's albums were for me- the epitome of good engineering & mixing skills - 'nuff said...
Boro
on 03/25/2009
Yeah, Bob Ludwig is right not to criticise the mastering engineers as they quite often have to work on mixes which are already too dense because of compression and limiting overdosage - mixing engineers trying to do some sort of mastering, for which they don't have neither the knowledge nor the instrumentation (dedicated equipment, hi-end monitoring systems, properly treated rooms to work in, etc.)
Here comes a pleasant surprise: some guys with a poetic sense of humor have done a great job covering some Metallica tunes with added different lyrics, explaining what and how ruined the band's last record effort! Here's the link to watch and listen:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v= QPu0DKyGgZI

Enjoy and spread the word!
Son Hizzle
on 03/23/2009
Audiophile guitar player here, I digitize albums and CDs as a hobby and I can attest to this. Do it some time and study the waveforms. It's shocking . Todays mastering techniques should be a crime. The dynamics on old Zep albums are incredible. Dynamics are ballzy, NOT sheer volume.



Your Comment:  

All comments are subject to editing or deletion by the Premier Guitar staff.

Your Name:  


Please enter the text you see in the image:  
10