Our columnist shares a love story about his longtime passion for the 1965 heavyweight that’s his No. 1.
Let me tell you the story of my first vintage Fender amp, which I call “No. 1"—the 1965 Super Reverb that I consider the greatest guitar amp I've ever heard and played.
When I was a teenager, in the late '80s, I had a 25-watt Fender Sidekick and a bigger, 2x12, 40-watt Marshall Valvestate. They worked well for the Gary Moore and Jeff Healey blues-rock licks I was into then. When I moved to Trondheim, Norway, in 1998 to study at the university, I went back in time and listened to classic blues from Muddy Waters, Buddy Guy, Albert King, B.B. King, and Freddie King. I learned they all played Fender amps, at various times, and when I saw Stevie Ray Vaughan's legendary Live at the El Mocambo concert film, where he played a Vibroverb and a Super Reverb, I knew I had to get a black-panel Super Reverb. So I got in touch with a local guitar shop called Tre45, and they helped me find a Super Reverb in the U.S.
A few months later, I paid €1,400 for a beat-up Super Reverb dated January 1965 that came via boat. The amp looked real rough and had large cuts in the aged brownish grille cloth. It had replacement Mojotone speakers with weighty ceramic magnets and large speaker coils. The shop installed a heavy-duty step-down transformer in the back to cope with 230V, making the amp extremely heavy. Despite the weight and rough looks, I loved it. It played twice as loud as my brother's 1968 transition-era Super Reverb with original square-magnet CTS alnico speakers. Back then, volume and punch meant everything, and I hadn't yet developed an appreciation for the CTS alnicos, which later became one of my favorite speakers. Neither did I have much experience with how speakers affect tone. My No. 1 sounded louder, more mellow, and creamy compared to a typical black-panel Super. Because of my amp, my brother sold his precious, vintage-correct '68.
Twelve years later, in 2010, I started trading Fender amps on a larger scale, finding them on U.S. eBay and importing them to Norway, where I swapped power transformers and did basic service like tubes and cap jobs. I eventually developed a taste for vintage-correct tone and pursued amps in original or mint condition. I was eager to learn, and systematically A/B-tested all black- and silver-panel Fender amps, with all possible speakers and circuits. I also experimented with newer replacement speakers from Weber, Jensen, Eminence, Celestion, and WGS, and tried all kinds of circuit mods.
"Because of my amp, my brother sold his precious, vintage-correct '68."
I decided to replace my Super's Mojotones with a set of vintage-correct speakers for an authentic pre-CBS sound. I found a 1965 Super in really poor technical condition and swapped the grille cloth and the factory-original CTS ceramic speakers into my No. 1. Now my amp was restored to original condition, with speakers with matching manufacturer date codes, and, more important, it sounded better! The new-old speakers added more clarity and crispness, which I particularly enjoy with a Strat's out-of-phase, quacky tone in the in-between pickup positions.
Other amps have caught my affection, too. Not surprisingly, I find the narrow-panel Fender Bassman a great amp, but unfortunately it lacks reverb, which is a big deal to me. Same goes with the Marshall JTM45 and JMP50 amps from the '60s. They have great crunch but lack some transparency and clarity when used with closed-back 4x12 cabinets. I've also had the pleasure of owning and playing some popular boutique amps, like the Two-Rock Custom Reverb, Victorias, Headstrongs, Bad Cats, and others. Compared to vintage amps, they are more robust and have high quality materials and components that survive longer on the road. I also like how the solid, thick cabinets in some modern amps produce a tight low end. All the boutique amps I've tried sounded good, different, and had more tone options than my Super Reverb, but when I played those amps for a long time or at gigs, I found myself confused with all the tonal options and I end up dialing in a sound as close as possible to a Super Reverb. I can't help it. That is how a guitar is supposed to sound, in my ears. And nothing sounds more vintage Fender than a black-panel Super Reverb, in my humble opinion.
If you haven't played one, try the huge tone and dynamic response within the big and airy 4x10 speaker cabinet of a Super. It offers a pure, natural, and transparent tone and connects with your guitar in a physical way when you crank the amp a few meters behind you on a larger stage. If you need a little more crunch and early break-up, add an Xotic RC Booster and see my April 2020 column, "How to Get Big Tones on Small Stages."
[Updated 9/3/21]
See what an alternate method of hooking up pedals can do for you.
How’s the new year treating everyone? Let’s jump right in! The other night I was doing yet more experimentation with the order of effects through a standard double-channel Fender amplifier—a silverface Pro Reverb combo that was completely rebuilt by my friend Adam Palow of Tungsten Amplification. You know the type of Fender amplifiers that feature two inputs each on both the normal and reverb channels? If you’re going to use the concept I’m describing this month, keep in mind that it appears to work best with this exact type of input layout.
Most everyone seems to “daisy chain” their effects pedals in a row and then hook the whole chain into the amplifier input of their choice (here the second reverb channel is usually used). However, there is another trick that you can use to massive advantage that might not come to mind at first. That is to make use of at least three of the four inputs in a parallel arrangement. I’m quite certain that many of you will find this a little bit off the beaten path, but hey, it sure is a lot of fun to hear what happens when you try this out for yourself. I found some really different sounds coming from this setup when compared with the time-tested daisy-chain method.
I started by hooking my guitar’s output cable into the input of a PedalworX Five O’Clock Charlie distortion pedal and then taking the output of the Charlie pedal and inserting that cord into the first input of the Pro Reverb’s normal channel. Once I found a spot where the distortion sounded really good, I then took another guitar cable from the second input of the amp’s normal channel into the input of yet another type of clean booster pedal, just so I could have more texture on tap. You could hook these two pedals up in the reverse order if you desired—it’s all a matter of taste, right? Here’s where it started to get really fun. From the output of the second booster pedal you could (like I did) go into an octave-up type of pedal, and you can adjust the level of the octave pedal from the volume control of the second channel, the reverb channel, when the octave pedal is hooked into the first input of that channel. Cool, huh?
The wild thing here is that with a bit of experimentation you will most definitely get sounds that you will not hear with the regular pedal linking method. This is also the reason why you need to have dual (yet separate) channels with parallel inputs and dedicated Volume and Tone controls for this method to work. Modern amplifiers that have four channels with only one input for the instrument need not apply. As usual, you can toss anything into the mix here, whatever your imagination might dictate. You will also find that the resulting sounds might seem to exude a noticeably wider three-dimensional quality to boot. This isn’t a bad thing at all. The wider the merrier, in my humble opinion. As you may guess, this is just another sonic sculpting tool to have at your disposal to give your sound yet more personality and distinctness. This has been at the very heart of this column every month.
I would like to share with you the list of things that I used for this bit of craziness. When I do this type of experimenting, I always tend to use a single brand of pedals at first to keep things more straightforward. This way I can focus on the sound textures as a whole before I branch out into mixing the many types of pedals that are lying around the practice room. Additionally, it’s much easier for me to remember the stellar sounds that I might encounter by sheer accident too.
This time I used various PedalworX products, such as the Squeeze Factor compressor along with a new pedal called the Nashville Breaker booster. Also in attendance was the PedalworX Skye booster as well the Cool Machine, and I shouldn’t forget several fuzzes made by the company, like the germaniumbased McFuzz model and it’s hotter relative, the silicon-based Hot McFuzz. Other pedals used later in these tests included models like a KLON Centaur booster and numerous BJFE models: Björn Juhl’s infamous Pink Purple Fuzz, Dyna Red Distortion, Candy Apple Fuzz, Folk Fuzz and numerous others.
The method I’ve described here also worked well with various types of instruments sporting both single-coil and humbucking pickups. I had an absolute blast doing this, and discovered many new tones and textures among the participating elements. So, now it’s time for you to knock yourself punchdrunk until we meet again next month.
Dean is the chief designer of "Snake Oil Brand Strings" (sobstrings.net) and has had a profound influence on the trends in the strings of today.