get wired

Does restoring a vintage instrument really make it better?

I once interviewed Mark Karan, guitarist extraordinaire for Ratdog and Jemimah Puddleduck, and L.A. session guru and total gearhound. Mark had a refreshing take on gear. He told me, "Because I want to actually use these instruments, I buy pieces that have what collectors might call ‘issues,’ like non- original hardware or having been refinished. To me, it’s the old wood that matters, and as long as the wood is there, I can find a way around the issues. When I bought my ’51 Nocaster, I strummed it unplugged and knew I couldn’t walk out of the store without that guitar. And that’s one a collector wouldn’t be caught dead with, simply because somebody had slapped another type of paint on it."


David Loo’s 1969 Les Paul Custom. Photo by Wallace Marx

You can see the wisdom. Get past the looks and listen to the tone. Avoid letting a few mods and perhaps ill-advised "upgrades" sway you, and ask yourself, "Do I like this guitar? And what does it matter what the snobs say?" Mark got what would turn out to be his number-one touring guitar. If you remember Stevie Ray Vaughan’s yellow Strat, you might not know that axe had a swimming-pool route in it from having four humbuckers installed. I once had a Ventures model Mosrite I loved, despite the fact that it had a Floyd Rose and a god-awful leopard paint job.

Sometimes, great guitars get hacked up and still sound great. But in these days of vintage-correct-or-die sensibilities, we get roped into a knee-jerk, lock-step march toward restoring—or even over-restoring—all in the name of authenticity. And, friends, authenticity does not always equal bitchin’ tone.

It happened to me recently. I work with a great guy named David Loo. He’s a world-class programmer, a total genius type. One of those guys who can look at a page full of code, the kind of stuff that would make most people go blind, and spot the error among thousands of strings of digits. David is also a blues lover. I’m always accessing his iTunes library over the company network to hear all the Albert King songs I don’t have. David can play a lot of these tunes and play them quite well. He is also a serious gearhound—enough so that he makes a line of effects pedals that are unique and off the charts, tonewise. The man knows what he’s talking about.

We have a guitar room downstairs at work. Last week, David asked me if I wanted to see his Les Paul. Love to, I said. We went down to the room and he pulled out a beat-up case that was obviously for a Les Paul. My pulse went from semi-interested to gotta-see-it-now in a nanosecond. The guitar he pulled out was indeed a Lester, a 1969, David told me, and I could see it was a Custom.

Or, the vintage-snob in me said, it once was a Custom. The axe had survived a classic ’70s mod job: finish stripped on top, back, and sides. Unpotted humbuckers with well-warped plastic surrounds. Non-stock Grovers. And the biggest ’70s giveaway, a mini-toggle switch laid between the volume knobs.

Working through my disappointment, I began telling David what he could do to restore it. Re-fin. New hardware. Fret job. And plug that dang mini-toggle.

But then I strapped it on and started playing. And the more I did, the more I started to feel like I was holding a really good guitar. Nice weight, maybe nine pounds. Without the finish the body felt wonderful and the neck smooth.

The action on the ebony board was el perfecto and the neck straight with a perfect amount of relief. Unplugged that LP sang with sweet Spinal Tap-like sustain. I couldn’t put it down.

I asked him how much he wanted for it—an instant attack of G.A.S! Not for sale, David said with a knowing smile. He has owned this guitar for 20 years after buying it out of the paper (remember that?) and in all this time, it has never had so much as a simple set up. I loved it, and since he wouldn’t sell it to me, I told him to never get rid of it—which was obviously his intention anyway.

So here’s the big point: When you see a guitar that’s had some surgery, give it a chance before you turn up your nose. Ask yourself if you like this guitar. Ask yourself if it plays and sounds like what you want. Determine your opinion before you listen to the chat-room rabble that will always try to talk you into dumping serious cash for questionable gain. If the answer is yes, I like it, move to the next step. Why should I change it? Why should I immediately restore it? Will I like it more? Will it be better? Maybe it will be better to the money people, the guys who appraise and trade and buy and sell. But how it plays for you is what matters. David loves his modded and beat-up Custom and I can see why.

Remember that scene in Spinal Tap (wow, two references in one column) where David and Nigel are discussing the death of one of their drummers? "Authorities said...best leave it...unsolved," one remarks. Maybe that holds true for some guitars as well. Perhaps sometimes we should resist the urge to re-vintage an axe and just leave it alone.

Wallace Marx Jr.
Wallace Marx Jr. is the author of Gibson Amplifiers, 1933– 2008: 75 Years of the Gold Tone. He is a lifelong musician and has worked in all corners of the music industry. He is currently working on a history of the Valco Company. He is a children’s tour guide at the Museum of Making Music, a struggling surfer, and he once hung out with Joe Strummer.

Do thicker strings make you a better player? Let's find out!

Stevie Ray Vaughan's influence on gear and gearheads has been gigantic. Back in the '80s, it seemed as if he almost single-handedly resurrected the Stratocaster, helping boost vintage Strats into a mythic realm. And who else did more to bring the worship of vintage Fender amps to a whole new level?

Read MoreShow less

Why small gear builders are struggling, and how some are coping

The guitar business is in a weird spot. It’s the best of times for some, the worst for others. Never before has so much quality gear been available to players. Never before have there been so many of us looking for gear. You’d think everybody would be happy. Yet the folks who build and sell the gear are struggling to stay in business. And the players, well, they’re still hunting for that perfect piece of gear.

Since the mid 1980s, we have seen a resurrection of the entire industry. We’ve come from a point when it looked like both Fender and Gibson were about to go under (1985 and 1986, respectively) to now having more manufacturers of guitar gear than ever. In straight numbers, production hasn’t been this high since 1964—and that was a spike sparked by the Beatles, not a sustained period like we’ve seen over the past few years. This renaissance was built on three trends: 1) The popularity of reissues of the iconic electric guitars of the first golden era, 2) buyers’ desire for high-end gear, and 3) the ability of manufacturers to produce gear of excellent quality at lower prices. It’s a rare case of an industry actually listening to the market. It was a good business model and, for a time, it worked.

The Economic Blues
The state of the economy, of course, has not helped. According to Music Trades, the oldest and probably most-read journal of the musical instrument industry, sales of musical instruments dropped by 19% in 2009. That’s the single biggest dip ever recorded—and Music Trades ought to know, because they’ve been in publication for well over 100 years. Shaky economics have put a pinch on the pocketbooks of gear buyers at every level.

Perhaps we’ve come to a point where the industry has gotten so good at what it does that it’s almost too much of a good thing. The quality of the gear available today is really astounding. There are more high-end builders of guitars and amps than ever before, and the products they produce are mini works of art—pieces of craftsmanship well beyond any production-line pieces of previous periods. They take the best of what we know about building and make it available to every player. For a price. Many of the small shops reside in what has come to be called the “boutique” category—a term that has become synonymous with “expensive” and that has, I believe, unfairly categorized a lot of good builders who truly do make a superior product.

Savaged by Overhead

Take, for instance, my friends over at Savage Audio. I have known Jeff Krumm and his team for years. They have a solid reputation for quality repair and tremendous customer service, and the amplifiers they build are some of the best offerings ever available. Savage amplifiers reside squarely in the “overbuilt” category: heavy cabinets, massive transformers, better-than-military-grade wiring, and circuits that have some serious thought and expertise behind them. Savage got into the amp business back in the mid ’90s, building amps for rock stars like Beck, Pearl Jam, and R.E.M. to take out on the road—where quality is paramount. If you’re building an amp for a guy who is about to go out on a 200-show world tour, you build the amp to stand up to any abuse. You overbuild it, because that’s the type of quality a pro player requires. It’s not overbuilt to be expensive.

Savage has sold these amps to the general public for some time, and they have always commanded some of the highest prices in the amp game. But the Great Recession of the last few years has really put a squeeze on high-end amp sales. This leaves Savage and their dealers in a tight spot. In fact, recently Savage found themselves forced to sell their amps direct from the shop as the only way to continue to build to their quality standards and still be able to offer amps to the public.

The Quality Conundrum
The odd juxtaposition here is that the big guys have gotten much better at offering great quality gear at the lower end of the price spectrum. Back in ’64, when you bought a budget guitar that’s exactly what you got—something that was just barely playable, might last for a year, and probably produced a sound that was dubious at best. Now the budget-level offerings are much different. I was at Larry Taylor’s house a couple months ago (Larry played with Canned Heat at Monterey, Woodstock, and Altamont, and has played with a zillion other artists since—Larry knows gear) and he was freaking over a new guitar he had just bought. I figured it was another classic piece, something that would go right along with his collection of fine vintage gear. But when I got to Larry’s gear room, the new jewel he so proudly handed me was a Jay Turser JT139T hollowbody with two P-90s. I thought he was kidding until he showed me the build quality. Nice frets, good fit and finish, fine hardware. He plugged it into his reissue tweed Fender Deluxe, and I’m telling you it sounded righteous. I had the same experience recently when I bought a Squier Classic Vibe ’50s Telecaster. It’s truly one of the best axes I’ve ever played. And at $300, I don’t feel guilty about it.

So, good for the big guys. They finally got to the point where they’re building boutique-style gear in China. They’ve worked out the kinks, and even the pickiest internet forum-jockeys are impressed. But where does this leave the small guys? Jeff Krumm and his team continue to build Savage amps one at a time, using the best materials they can get their hands on and playing and listening to each amp for hours until they are completely sure it’s A-1 quality. I think we all admire that kind of dedication to craft. At the same time, it’s hard to deny the satisfaction you get out of thrashing around on a well-built budget piece of gear that you didn’t have to take out a second mortgage to buy.

I admire the guys at Savage for their work ethic. I also know how much work it took the folks at Jay Turser and Fender to get their factories abroad to build their guitars exactly to spec. I’d hate to think that these two extremes are a mutually exclusive deal— that, to like one, you have to hate the other. Because I sure don’t—I get quite a kick out of playing my $300 Classic Vibe Tele through my $3000 Savage Glas 30.

Read MoreShow less