Last month, we covered some of the basics of 5.1 surround sound audio production. This time around, we’ll look a little deeper into how consumers actually hear our work back
Last month, we covered some of the basics of 5.1 surround sound audio production. This time around, we’ll look a little deeper into how consumers actually hear our work back at home. As you already know, it’s not how it sounds to us in the studio that’s important; it’s how it translates out in the real world.
Listen Up
It’s a simple fact that a huge portion of the music we create for people is listened to on speakers as big as my fingernail. The infamous iPod earbuds are a reality that’s here to stay. However, if your mix sounds good on those, it should sound great on almost anything. But, on a bigger scale, how do consumers actually hear surround sound at home, and what format can they do it on? While there is no single answer, there are a few common options that we have for multichannel content delivery.
As recent as a few years ago, many in the industry thought DVD-A and SACD (Super Audio Compact Disc) would bring 5.1 music to the forefront of consumers’ minds. A variety of reasons, including competition and confusion, made that a passing wish. With the amazing success of DVD-V (video) and iTunes/iPods, it became clear to the big companies that ‘simple’ sells. But it was also clear that consumers loved surround sound, both for movies and live concert broadcasts. The cable companies started delivering more and more surround-ready content, and Blu-Ray won out the latest ‘optical’ delivery war.
HTTBs
In order to make it easy to hear surround, the consumer electronic giants such as Sony, Onkyo, Panasonic and Samsung developed HTIB, or Home Theater in a Box. Available from around $350 and up (to several thousand), they combined a DVD player, multichannel receiver/amplifier, speakers, a sub and even cables into a single, ‘wife-friendly’ package. This “all-in-one” offering delivered consumers a cinematic experience in their living rooms, and more importantly, created a need for multichannel content. One of the downsides, however, is that the cheapo units have cheapo speakers, and once again, we’re battling to make our mixes translate. What we do have going for us though, is that monster called a subwoofer
If you’re in the business of delivering surround mixes that will be played back by consumers at home, you need to understand how the sound is handled. |
Unlike traditional stereo playback systems, home theater setups rely on something called bass management to handle the heavy lifting of the low end. Think about how small the speakers are on a typical home theater setup. Unless you’ve spent $600 or more, you’re getting five very small satellite speakers to go along with that subwoofer. Those speakers (left, center, right, left surround, right surround) are too small to reproduce low-end frequencies.
With a Dolby Digital or DTS mix streaming from your cable box or DVD/Blu-Ray player, the receiver will filter out any bass information and direct it into the subwoofer. This crossover selection is located in the receiver, and typically varies from 60 up to 150 Hz, with 100/120 Hz being a common setting. Often, it’s completely set up for you and nothing needs to be done at all. Simply put, bass management allows home theater systems with small satellite speakers to reproduce bass properly. Some of them even allow you do direct bass to any speakers that can handle it, such as the larger front left and right speakers on my particular system.
Who Cares?
Well, we should. If you’re in the business of delivering surround mixes that will be played back by consumers at home, you need to understand how the sound is handled. But if you’re mixing in the studio, how can you simulate the sound of a home theater receiver bass managing your mix?
There are generally two different methods to bass manage your mixes at home: hardware or software. Software products, such as the Waves 360 Surround Tools package, include not only multichannel compressors, reverbs, panners and limiters, but a useful M360 Surround Manager. The manager loads directly into your session and lets you easily adjust the levels to your subwoofer and satellite speakers. This essentially makes your mix room sound more like a home theater system.
Hardware bass management systems are a bit more difficult to set up. Units such as Blue Sky’s Bass Management Controller MKII combine bass management and calibration along with volume control into a single unit. Note that hardware systems must sit between the output of your console (or DAW) and the speakers, so there’s extra cabling involved. However, using either type of system can help assure proper reproduction to the end user.
I hope this brief explanation of home theater listening has at least helped you think about the topic. After all, the more we know about how our mixes will be heard by those who listen to (and purchase) them, the more product they will (hopefully) want from us. And that will help fund our guitar buying habits.
Rich Tozzoli
is a producer, engineer and mixer who has worked with artists ranging from Al DiMeola to David Bowie. A lifelong guitarist, he’s also the author of Pro Tools Surround Sound Mixing and composes for such networks as Discovery Channel, Nickelodeon and National Geographic.
Day 9 of Stompboxtober is live! Win today's featured pedal from EBS Sweden. Enter now and return tomorrow for more!
EBS BassIQ Blue Label Triple Envelope Filter Pedal
The EBS BassIQ produces sounds ranging from classic auto-wah effects to spaced-out "Funkadelic" and synth-bass sounds. It is for everyone looking for a fun, fat-sounding, and responsive envelope filter that reacts to how you play in a musical way.
A more affordable path to satisfying your 1176 lust.
An affordable alternative to Cali76 and 1176 comps that sounds brilliant. Effective, satisfying controls.
Big!
$269
Warm Audio Pedal76
warmaudio.com
Though compressors are often used to add excitement to flat tones, pedal compressors for guitar are often … boring. Not so theWarm Audio Pedal76. The FET-driven, CineMag transformer-equipped Pedal76 is fun to look at, fun to operate, and fun to experiment with. Well, maybe it’s not fun fitting it on a pedalboard—at a little less than 6.5” wide and about 3.25” tall, it’s big. But its potential to enliven your guitar sounds is also pretty huge.
Warm Audio already builds a very authentic and inexpensive clone of the Urei 1176, theWA76. But the font used for the model’s name, its control layout, and its dimensions all suggest a clone of Origin Effects’ much-admired first-generation Cali76, which makes this a sort of clone of an homage. Much of the 1176’s essence is retained in that evolution, however. The Pedal76 also approximates the 1176’s operational feel. The generous control spacing and the satisfying resistance in the knobs means fast, precise adjustments, which, in turn, invite fine-tuning and experimentation.
Well-worn 1176 formulas deliver very satisfying results from the Pedal76. The 10–2–4 recipe (the numbers correspond to compression ratio and “clock” positions on the ratio, attack, and release controls, respectively) illuminates lifeless tones—adding body without flab, and an effervescent, sparkly color that preserves dynamics and overtones. Less subtle compression tricks sound fantastic, too. Drive from aggressive input levels is growling and thick but retains brightness and nuance. Heavy-duty compression ratios combined with fast attack and slow release times lend otherworldly sustain to jangly parts. Impractically large? Maybe. But I’d happily consider bumping the rest of my gain devices for the Pedal76.
Check out our demo of the Reverend Vernon Reid Totem Series Shaman Model! John Bohlinger walks you through the guitar's standout features, tones, and signature style.
Reverend Vernon Reid Totem Series Electric Guitar - Shaman
Vernon Reid Totem Series, ShamanWith three voices, tap tempo, and six presets, EQD’s newest echo is an affordable, approachable master of utility.
A highly desirable combination of features and quality at a very fair price. Nice distinctions among delay voices. Controls are clear, easy to use, and can be effectively manipulated on the fly.
Analog voices may lack complexity to some ears.
$149
EarthQuaker Silos
earthquakerdevices.com
There is something satisfying, even comforting, about encountering a product of any kind that is greater than the sum of its parts—things that embody a convergence of good design decisions, solid engineering, and empathy for users that considers their budgets and real-world needs. You feel some of that spirit inEarthQuaker’s new Silos digital delay. It’s easy to use, its tone variations are practical and can provoke very different creative reactions, and at $149 it’s very inexpensive, particularly when you consider its utility.
Silos features six presets, tap tempo, one full second of delay time, and three voices—two of which are styled after bucket-brigade and tape-delay sounds. In the $150 price category, it’s not unusual for a digital delay to leave some number of those functions out. And spending the same money on a true-analog alternative usually means warm, enveloping sounds but limited functionality and delay time. Silos, improbably perhaps, offers a very elegant solution to this can’t-have-it-all dilemma in a U.S.-made effect.
A More Complete Cobbling Together
Silos’ utility is bolstered by a very unintimidating control set, which is streamlined and approachable. Three of those controls are dedicated to the same mix, time, and repeats controls you see on any delay. But saving a preset to one of the six spots on the rotary preset dial is as easy as holding the green/red illuminated button just below the mix and preset knobs. And you certainly won’t get lost in the weeds if you move to the 3-position toggle, which switches between a clear “digital” voice, darker “analog” voice, and a “tape” voice which is darker still.
“The three voices offer discernibly different response to gain devices.”
One might suspect that a tone control for the repeats offers similar functionality as the voice toggle switch. But while it’s true that the most obvious audible differences between digital, BBD, and tape delays are apparent in the relative fidelity and darkness of their echoes, the Silos’ three voices behave differently in ways that are more complex than lighter or duskier tonality. For instance, the digital voice will never exhibit runaway oscillation, even at maximum mix and repeat settings. Instead, repeats fade out after about six seconds (at the fastest time settings) or create sleepy layers of slow-decaying repeats that enhance detail in complex, sprawling, loop-like melodic phrases. The analog voice and tape voice, on the other hand, will happily feed back to psychotic extremes. Both also offer satisfying sensitivity to real-time, on-the-fly adjustments. For example, I was tickled with how I could generate Apocalypse Now helicopter-chop effects and fade them in and out of prominence as if they were approaching or receding in proximity—an effect made easier still if you assign an expression pedal to the mix control. This kind of interactivity is what makes analog machines like the Echoplex, Space Echo, and Memory Man transcend mere delay status, and the sensitivity and just-right resistance make the process of manipulating repeats endlessly engaging.
Doesn't Flinch at Filth
EarthQuaker makes a point of highlighting the Silos’ affinity for dirty and distorted sounds. I did not notice that it behaved light-years better than other delays in this regard. But the three voices most definitely offer discernibly different responses to gain devices. The super-clear first repeat in the digital mode lends clarity and melodic focus, even to hectic, unpredictable, fractured fuzzes. The analog voice, which EQD says is inspired by the tone makeup of a 1980s-vintage, Japan-made KMD bucket brigade echo, handles fuzz forgivingly inasmuch as its repeats fade warmly and evenly, but the strong midrange also keeps many overtones present as the echoes fade. The tape voice, which uses aMaestro Echoplex as its sonic inspiration, is distinctly dirtier and creates more nebulous undercurrents in the repeats. If you want to retain clarity in more melodic settings, it will create a warm glow around repeats at conservative levels. Push it, and it will summon thick, sometimes droning haze that makes a great backdrop for slower, simpler, and hooky psychedelic riffs.
In clean applications, this decay and tone profile lend the tape setting a spooky, foggy aura that suggests the cold vastness of outer space. The analog voice often displays an authentic BBD clickiness in clean repeats that’s sweet for underscoring rhythmic patterns, while the digital voice’s pronounced regularity adds a clockwork quality that supports more up-tempo, driving, electronic rhythms.
The Verdict
Silos’ combination of features seems like a very obvious and appealing one. But bringing it all together at just less than 150 bucks represents a smart, adept threading of the cost/feature needle.