Everything you need to know before diving into speaker swapping—one of the easiest, most impactful gear changes you could possibly make.
Have you ever grabbed a mallet and bashed away at a gong? If so, regardless of whether it was a tiny tabletop version or a huge one like those favored by hair-band drummers, you no doubt witnessed a continuum of changing frequencies and tones created by its varying vibration patterns. The harder you hit it, the more air it moves, the louder it gets. Those patterns of air movement you hear (and sometimes feel) are directly related to the physical properties of the hammered alloy disc. Naturally, gongs of various shapes and sizes vibrate differently—bigger ones sound deeper, smaller versions sound more shrill. And, of course, a gong player’s playing techniques affect all sorts of audible nuances, too.
These basic principles of sound also apply to a cymbal, a drum, a violin, and basically any musical instrument. But they also apply to a breaking glass, footsteps on gravel, a slamming door, a crying baby, a motorcycle engine, or any of the billions of items generating the sounds we’re exposed to daily. Physics is physics. No matter how sonically different objects may be, they all share a common factor—they create waves in the air that our ears detect as sound. And every little variance in an object’s makeup can alter its resultant sound.
Basic Anatomy and History
Like any good musical instrument, loudspeakers are designed to broadcast their signals with specific intent. They generate sounds the same way a gong—or anything else—does: by moving air. Unlike a gong, however, a speaker consists of a number of components working together. Every change in design, along with the inherent behavior of the component materials, will alter the characteristics of the sound waves it produces. The waves themselves are ultimately generated by the speaker cone— the funnel-shaped piece of heavy-duty paper you see when looking at an unenclosed speaker. But several other components combine forces to get the cone moving.
The innermost part of the cone is attached to a voice coil—the part that vibrates the cone. Appropriately named, the voice coil typically consists of a coil of copper wire. If you buy into the idea that when you play an electric guitar, you are also playing the amplifier—and, ultimately, the speaker—then the voice coil is the first speaker component you’re playing. The positive and negative wire-connection leads on the back of the speaker are directly connected to the voice-coil windings.
Despite its importance in the signal chain, the voice coil isn’t easy to actually lay eyes on. From a front view, it’s located behind a little domed protective dust cap at the center of the speaker, and from the sides the coil is surrounded by a donut-shaped magnet. The coil is fragile, but it’s well protected.
Filed with the U.S. patent office on April 20, 1925, Chester Williams Rice and Edward Washburn Kellogg’s music-optimized loudspeaker design was eventually released in 1926 by RCA as the Radiola Loudspeaker #104.
We can trace the origins of the voice coil to Hans Christian Ørsted, a Danish physicist and chemist who, in 1820, noticed that compass needles act differently around electricity. He soon figured out that when electricity flows through a wire, magnetic fields are created. Ørsted was a curious guy—in 1825 he was also the first person to produce aluminum. However, he never got the chance to hear a speaker.
Ninety years after Ørsted’s discovery, two Americans—Peter L. Jensen (also of Danish descent) and Edwin S. Pridham—created a public-address-system speaker that used a moving coil. Subsequently, one milestone in early loudspeaker history was when President Woodrow Wilson used a PA to address a crowd in 1919. In 1921, Chester Williams Rice and Edward Washburn Kellogg, respectively with General Electric and AT&T, worked to refine the idea with a focus on higher fidelity for music reproduction. They applied for a patent titled “loud speaker,” culminating in RCA’s release of the Radiola Loudspeaker #104 in 1926.
Why does RCA’s iconic early logo depict a dog up close to a mechanically amplified early phonograph? Perhaps because they were famously volume challenged prior to the invention of the loudspeaker.
History buffs are no doubt looking at the timeline here and rightfully thinking that we’ve overlooked some pretty important stuff. After all, Alexander Graham Bell invented the telephone in 1875, and Thomas Edison’s phonograph followed two years after that—and obviously both required some sort of amplification device predating Jensen and Pridham’s and Rice and Kellogg’s loudspeakers.
Bell’s early telephones managed to make intelligible sounds, but the earliest versions had little or no fidelity. And Rice and Kellogg’s design was a dramatic improvement over the horns Edison, Motorola, and the Victor Talking Machine Company (makers of the Victrola) used to mechanically amplify recordings on early phonographs. There’s a reason the original RCA “His Master’s Voice” logo shows the dog sitting right next to the horn on the hand-cranked player—volume was severely lacking. The loudspeaker changed everything.
Now closing in on its 100-year anniversary, Rice and Kellogg’s loudspeaker design is essentially unchanged from the speakers we use today. There have been countless updates in construction and materials used since the 1920s, all of which improved not just fidelity, but also power handling. But the basic configuration remains.
The basic anatomy of a conventional loudspeaker.
Guitar (and Bass) Speakers vs. Playback Speakers
Typically, speakers designed for listening to recorded music have one primary goal: to produce an even response across a wide frequency spectrum, at varying volume levels. In other words, quality audio speakers aim to have as flat of an EQ response as possible in order to accurately reproduce the sound the artists and engineers intended you to hear, without coloring it in any way. An audio speaker also, of course, should be devoid of distortion. Audiophiles want unadulterated sound.
On the other hand, although identical in basic construction, speakers for guitar amps are designed from a very different point of view. Guitar speakers are purposely intended to add character. As Anthony Lucas, design engineer at Eminence puts it, “Guitar speakers are tone creators, whereas other speakers are sound reproducers.” Each component—the cone, the surround (which attaches the cone to the frame), the spider (which holds the voice coil in place), the voice coil, and the magnet—affects the speaker’s tonal character in some unique way. All of these parts are, therefore, in a speaker designer’s toy box. That said, speaker design is admittedly something of a black art, because every part also has its own set of idiosyncrasies, advantages, and potential challenges. For manufacturers, the result of design and component variations always comes down to a final audition.
As a player, if your ultimate goal is to replicate the sound of one of your favorite guitarists, something you heard in a live performance or a recording, you may be faced with a challenge. “Changing speakers can change your tone more drastically than anything else next to a pedal or the guitar you use,” says Orin Portnoy, vice president of marketing and sales at Jensen Loudspeakers. He adds, “The main question [I get] is how do I get speakers to sound like so-and-so?” But speakers are just one link in a chain of factors that starts with your fingers and ends with your guitar notes ringing out to the crowd. The nice thing about speakers, however, is that they can be swapped out much more readily than, say, pickups. And they’re certainly more affordable than most new instruments or complete amps you’re likely to consider as tone game-changers. You can simply run your amp through a different cabinet or, with just a little work, remove your existing speaker and replace it with something different. You simply need to make sure the new speaker’s impedance and power rating jive with what’s coming out of your amp. We’ll talk about both of these more shortly.
This may seem obvious, but perhaps the best way to find a speaker that suits your style is simply to consider its frequency-reproduction traits. “A lot of people think ‘genre’ [when considering new speakers]—but I don’t like grouping speakers by genre,” says Eminence’s Anthony Lucas. “I don’t like pigeonholing speakers that way, because even a blues player and a metal player may want the same qualities in their tone. They may both want more low end or more warmth or whatever the description may be. I like to shoot for the tonal characteristics a guitarist wants.”
Lucas also has some poignant thoughts on the previously mentioned idea of matching the speaker’s power rating to the amp’s power output—something he says is a common point of misunderstanding. A speaker’s wattage rating does not need to match the amp’s power output. The speaker rating should,of course, be equal to or greater than the amp’s output in order to prevent overheating and burning the speaker out. But a speaker with a way higher wattage rating than the amp’s output section can work perfectly fine, too. “Guitarists often think they shouldn’t use a higher-watt speaker with a 5-watt amp, for instance,” says Lucas, “but I may recommend a 150-watt speaker for a 5-watt amp if the speaker has the right tone. ‘But my little amp won’t push that speaker!’ Sure it will!”
Speakers don’t need a lot of power to make them loud, so don’t make the mistake of ruling out a design with a higher power rating than your amp. On the flip side, you may very well be happy with a close power match, too. The choice should be determined by the sound characteristics you’re looking for.
Things to Consider When Shopping and Swapping
Before jumping into the big, exciting world of speaker swapping, it’s important to make sure you understand the relevant nomenclature and terminology. Let’s dive into the basics (as well as two or three more obscure specs that some high-end speaker manufacturers allow you to customize).
Size: Most guitar amps use 10" or 12" speakers, although you’ll also find the occasional 15". A 10" can be punchier and tighter sounding, while a 12" usually delivers more bass, and a 15" has even more oomph—though with some possible sacrifices in clarity or treble response. Low-wattage guitar amps tend to be stocked with 8" speakers, which can sound surprisingly great. Bigger isn’t automatically better. Bass amps, meanwhile, typically use 10" speakers, or maybe a 15" for a sub. But 12" speakers are also becoming increasingly popular for bassists, too. All this said, considering all the variables that go into speaker design, these descriptions of size-related characteristics are simply generalizations. Speakers will vary greatly. This may be good news, because realistically your choice of speaker size may be based on the size that will fit into your amp or cabinet. Even so, you’ll still have wide variations in sound to choose from.
Magnet alloys: A speaker’s magnet material may be alnico, ceramic, or neodymium. Alnico (aluminum, nickel, and cobalt) was the magnet used in early (pre-1960s) speakers, which is no doubt why Portnoy says, “It’s generally associated with vintage tones, having a high frequency bump.” Alnico is also a slower-moving magnet. What exactly does that mean? Well, thermally, different magnet materials behave differently. Alnico has a relatively low thermal limit, and if you push it hard the heat causes temporary demagnetization—although its magnetic-flux properties return upon cooling. The demagnetization that happens with alnico-magnet speakers is enough to cause a compressor-like effect where your loudest notes become fatter and a little less loud.
Ceramic magnets, on the other hand, are faster. First used in the 1960s to keep speaker prices down in the face of increasing cobalt prices, ceramic magnets have a stronger magnetic field, resulting in a smaller, lighter magnet that takes the heat better than alnico. With a ceramic magnet, louder notes get louder rather than compress, which many players find to be a more dynamic and expressive response.
Neodymium is the newest of the three materials. It's slow, reacting much like alnico, considerably lighter in weight, and great at handling lots of power. Therefore, it’s a third option to consider.
Here you can see the concentrically corrugated spider attached to the apex of the speaker cone.
Impedance: As a general rule, in order to operate properly and avoid risk of damage to itself and/or your amp, a speaker should have an impedance rating that matches your amp’s output-impedance rating (the number printed next to the speaker jack, usually 4, 8, or 16 ohms, sometimes 2 ohms for bass amps)—although there are some somewhat complicated exceptions beyond the scope of this introductory article. That said, keep in mind that wiring two or more speakers together changes the impedance load on the amp itself: For example, two 8-ohm speakers wired in parallel will create a 4-ohm load, and two 8-ohm speakers wired in series become a 16-ohm load.
Power rating: A speaker’s power-handling ability is measured in watts, and it’s a specification that’s often misunderstood or misinterpreted. The rating indicates the wattage a speaker can endure when tested—not with a guitar signal, but with a standard pink-noise signal called EIA 426A—before experiencing mechanical failure though overheating or breakage of one or more of its components. When amplifying a guitar signal, a speaker pushed to the upper limits of its power rating will not necessarily sound good—but it won’t mechanically fail unless that limit is exceeded. In addition, if one speaker’s wattage rating is higher than another’s, that doesn’t necessarily indicate it will be louder. A speaker’s volume capacity is indicated by its efficiency rating: a measure of the speaker’s loudness with a given input signal. However, this is yet another rabbit hole beyond the scope of our basic discussion. For our intents here, the loudness of any given amp and speaker configuration is determined by a number of factors, including the type, efficiency, and wattage of your amp’s power section—which is, after all, what’s driving the speaker.
One myth commonly heard by Lucas at Eminence concerns the relationship between wattage rating and “breakup”—i.e., overdrive or distortion. “Everyone thinks that if you have a high-power speaker, it won’t break up, or that a low-rated speaker will break up too much. That may be true in many cases, but power ratings and breakup are not directly related.” Many factors determine when and how a speaker’s sound will break up. And driving a speaker until it distorts will sound better for some speakers than others. For this reason, most manufacturers proffer layman’s-terms descriptions of a speaker’s general sound to supplement the electrical specifications.
While speakers of different makes and builds have varying efficiency ratings, on the whole, traditional speaker designs of the sort discussed here are dismally inefficient: The ratio of “power out” over “power in” is less than 5 percent. Speakers produce heat more than they produce sound.
Cone design: Perhaps the most influential factor in speaker breakup is the thickness and density of the cone material. Since the beginning of speaker history, paper has been the primary material used for cones. A cone made from a lighter, thinner paper will break up more readily than a cone made from heavier, denser paper. The choice of material has other implications as well. For example, a more flexible paper will be better at conveying low frequencies, while a stiffer paper is typically more suitable for treble frequencies.
When speaker shopping, you may notice that some speakers feature cones that are smooth, while others are ribbed. Ribbed cones started appearing in the late 1940s and early 1950s as a way to gain the advantages of stiffer cone paper without adding mass, which would have an effect on tone. It was a simple solution to accommodate loud playing while avoiding distortion. Because of this, all else being equal, a smooth cone will distort more readily than a ribbed one.
The spider: Looking at a speaker assembly, you may be inclined to think the spider (the concentrically corrugated part that holds the voice coil in place and allows it to move freely) isn’t designed to influence the tone. But spiders can be made stiffer or looser in order to affect upper-midrange response from around 800 to 1,000 Hz.
The surround: Yes, even the part of the speaker that connects the outer rim of the cone to the “hoop” of the speaker’s metal frame affects tones, mostly in the higher range. Generally, stiffer surrounds are more conducive to emitting treble frequencies. Common surround materials include corrugated cloth or paper. Also, while the surround’s design is intended to allow free movement of the cone, the surround itself may have a resonant frequency, increasing or decreasing specific frequencies and affecting tone. In some cases, an unwanted “edge yowl” can occur when the energy from the surround’s resonation transfers back to the cone.
Embarking on the Adventure
Shopping for the perfect speaker isn’t easy—it’s certainly more complicated than buying, say, a new instrument or amp. However, as with guitars and pickup swapping, many times the right replacement speaker can make that final bit of difference between liking an amp and finding it absolutely indispensible. In some cases, the right speaker swap can even make you fall in love with an amp you didn’t like at all and were considering hocking.
The ideal approach to speaker shopping has many facets: researching your favorite players’ go-to speakers, reading reviews and forum posts from players who seem to have gear and musical tastes similar to your own, consulting with trusted and experienced players who get what you’re going for, listening to sound samples, watching demo videos, and, of course, confirming that the technical specifications of speakers in the narrowed field comport with your amp. In the end, though, your ears are always going to be the final judge. You’ll never know for sure if you like a speaker unless you audition it in person, using your own guitar, amp, and pedals, and spending a reasonable amount of time playing at the sorts of volumes you normally play at.
Given the breadth of offerings on the market, chances are you won’t get to audition most of the speakers that could be a good match for you. But keep in mind that doing your homework and then making a leap-of-faith purchase has just as much potential to transform your sound as a new pedal—and a new speaker is often easier to incorporate into your signal chain than figuring out where to insert a new stompbox on a crowded board. The other good news is that, just as with pedals, there are so many great guitar and bass speakers to choose from that there is no single “right choice”—there are likely several speakers that would be a wonderful match for your needs.
On the other hand, going gong shopping would be much easier.
With the E Street Band, he’s served as musical consigliere to Bruce Springsteen for most of his musical life. And although he stands next to the Boss onstage, guitar in hand, he’s remained mostly quiet about his work as a player—until now.
I’m stuck in Stevie Van Zandt’s elevator, and the New York City Fire Department has been summoned. It’s early March, and I am trapped on the top floor of a six-story office building in Greenwich Village. On the other side of this intransigent door is Van Zandt’s recording studio, his guitars, amps, and other instruments, his Wicked Cool Records offices, and his man cave. The latter is filled with so much day-glo baby boomer memorabilia that it’s like being dropped into a Milton Glaser-themed fantasy land—a bright, candy-colored chandelier swings into the room from the skylight.
There’s a life-size cameo of a go-go dancer in banana yellow; she’s frozen in mid hip shimmy. One wall displays rock posters and B-movie key art, anchored by a 3D rendering of Cream’s Disraeli Gearsalbum cover that swishes and undulates as you walk past it. Van Zandt’s shelves are stuffed with countless DVDs, from Louis Prima to the J. Geils Band performing on the German TV concert seriesRockpalast. There are three copies ofIggy and the Stooges: Live in Detroit. Videos of the great ’60s-music TV showcases, from Hullabaloo to Dean Martin’s The Hollywood Palace, sit here. Hundreds of books about rock ’n’ roll, from Greil Marcus’s entire output to Nicholas Schaffner’s seminal tome, The Beatles Forever, form a library in the next room.
But I haven’t seen this yet because the elevator is dead, and I am in it. Our trap is tiny, about 5' by 5'. A dolly filled with television production equipment is beside me. There’s a production assistant whom I’ve never met until this morning and another person who’s brand new to me, too, Geoff Sanoff. It turns out that he’s Van Zandt’s engineer—the guy who runs this studio. And as I’ll discover shortly, he’s also one of the several sentinels who watch over Stevie Van Zandt’s guitars.
There’s nothing to do now but wait for the NYFD, so Sanoff and I get acquainted. We discover we’re both from D.C. and know some of the same people in Washington’s music scene. We talk about gear. We talk about this television project. I’m here today assisting an old pal, director Erik Nelson, best known for producing Werner Herzog’s most popular documentaries, like Grizzly Man and Cave of Forgotten Dreams. Van Zandt has agreed to participate in a television pilot about the British Invasion. After about half an hour, the elevator doors suddenly slide open, and we’re rescued, standing face-to-face with three New York City firefighters.
As our camera team sets up the gear, Sanoff beckons me to a closet off the studio’s control room. I get the sense I am about to get a consolation prize for standing trapped in an elevator for the last 30 minutes. He pulls a guitar case off the shelf—it’s stenciled in paint with the words “Little Steven” on its top—snaps open the latches, and instantly I am face to face with Van Zandt’s well-worn 1957 Stratocaster. Sanoff hands it to me, and I’m suddenly holding what may as well be the thunderbolt of Zeus for an E Street Band fan. My jaw drops when he lets me plug it in so he can get some levels on his board, and the clean, snappy quack of the nearly 70-year-old pickups fills the studio. For decades, Springsteen nuts have enjoyed a legendary 1978 filmed performance of “Rosalita” from Phoenix, Arizona, that now lives on YouTube. This is the Stratocaster Van Zandt had slung over his shoulder that night. It’s the same guitar he wields in the famous No Nukes concert film shot at Madison Square Garden a year later, in 1979. My mind races. The British Invasion is all well and essential. But now I’m thinking about Van Zandt’s relationship with his guitars.
Stevie Van Zandt's Gear
Van Zandt’s guitar concierge Andy Babiuk helped him plunge deeper down the Rickenbacker rabbit hole. Currently, Van Zandt has six Rickenbackers backstage: two 6-strings and four 12-strings.
Guitars
- 1957 Fender Stratocaster (studio only)
- ’80s Fender ’57 Stratocaster reissue “Number One”
- Gretsch Tennessean
- 1955 Gibson Les Paul Custom “Black Beauty” (studio only)
- Rickenbacker Fab Gear 2024 Limited Edition ’60s Style 360 Model (candy apple green)
- Rickenbacker Fab Gear 2023 Limited Edition ’60s Style 360 Model (snowglo)
- Rickenbacker 2018 Limited Edition ’60s Style 360 Fab Gear (jetglo)
- Two Rickenbacker 1993Plus 12-strings (candy apple purple and SVZ blue)
- Rickenbacker 360/12C63 12-string (fireglo)
- Vox Teardrop (owned by Andy Babiuk)
Amps
- Two Vox AC30s
- Two Vox 2x12 cabinets
Effects
- Boss Space Echo
- Boss Tremolo
- Boss Rotary Ensemble
- Durham Electronics Sex Drive
- Durham Electronics Mucho Busto
- Durham Electronics Zia Drive
- Electro-Harmonix Satisfaction
- Ibanez Tube Screamer
- Voodoo Labs Ground Control Pro switcher
Strings and Picks
- D’Addario (.095–.44)
- D’Andrea Heavy
Van Zandt has reached a stage of reflection in his career. Besides the Grammy-nominated HBO film, Stevie Van Zandt: Disciple, which came out in 2024, he recently wrote and published his autobiography, Unrequited Infatuations (2021), a rollicking read in which he pulls no punches and makes clear he still strives to do meaningful things in music and life.
His laurels would weigh him down if they were actually wrapped around his neck. In the E Street Band, Van Zandt has participated in arguably the most incredible live group in rock ’n’ roll history. And don’t forget Southside Johnny and the Asbury Jukes or Little Steven and the Disciples of Soul. He created both the Underground Garage and Outlaw Country radio channels on Sirius/XM. He started a music curriculum program called TeachRock that provides no-cost resources and other programs to schools across the country. Then there’s the politics. Via his 1985 record, Sun City, Van Zandt is credited with blasting many of the load-bearing bricks that brought the walls of South African apartheid tumbling into dust. He also acted in arguably the greatest television drama in American history, with his turn as Silvio Dante in The Sopranos.
Puzzlingly, Van Zandt’s autobiography lacks any detail on his relationship with the electric guitar. And Sanoff warns me that Van Zandt is “not a gearhead.” Instead he has an organization in place to keep his guitar life spinning like plates on the end of pointed sticks. Besides Sanoff, there are three others: Ben Newberry has been Van Zandt’s guitar tech since the beginning of 1982. Andy Babiuk, owner of Rochester, New York, guitar shop Fab Gear and author of essential collector reference books Beatles Gear and Rolling Stones Gear (the latter co-authored by Greg Prevost) functions as Van Zandt’s guitar concierge. Lastly, luthier Dave Petillo, based in Asbury Park, New Jersey, oversees all the maintenance and customization on Van Zandt’s axes.
“I took one lesson, and they start to teach you the notes. I don’t care about the notes.” —Stevie Van Zandt
I crawl onto Zoom with Van Zandt for a marathon session and come away from our 90 minutes with the sense that he is a man of dichotomies. Sure, he’s a guitar slinger, but he considers his biggest strengths to be as an arranger, producer, and songwriter. “I don’t feel that being a guitar player is my identity,” he tells me. “For 40 years, ever since I made my first solo record, I just have not felt that I express myself as a guitar player. I still enjoy it when I do it; I’m not ambivalent. When I play a solo, I am in all the way, and I play a solo like I would like to hear if I were in the audience. But the guitar part is really part of the song’s arrangement. And a great solo is a composed solo. Great solos are ones you can sing, like Jimi Hendrix’s solo in ‘All Along the Watchtower.’”
In his autobiography, Van Zandt mentions that his first guitar was an acoustic belonging to his grandfather. “I took one lesson, and they start to teach you the notes. I don’t care about the notes,” Van Zandt tells me. “The teacher said I had natural ability. I’m thinking, if I got natural ability, then what the fuck do I need you for? So I never went back. After that, I got my first electric, an Epiphone. It was about slowing down the records to figure out with my ear what they were doing. It was seeing live bands and standing in front of that guitar player and watching what they were doing. It was praying when a band went on TV that the cameraman would occasionally go to the right place and show what the guitar player was doing instead of putting the camera on the lead singer all the time. And I’m sure it was the same for everybody. There was no concept of rock ’n’ roll lessons. School of Rock wouldn’t exist for another 30 years. So, you had to go to school yourself.”
By the end of the 1960s, Van Zandt tells me he had made a conscious decision about what kind of player he wanted to be. “I realized that I really wasn’t that interested in becoming a virtuoso guitar player, per se. I was more interested in making sure I could play the guitar solo that would complement the song. I got more into the songs than the nature of musicianship.”
After the Beatles and the Stones broke the British Invasion wide open, bands like Cream and the Yardbirds most influenced him. “George Harrison would have that perfect 22-second guitar solo,” Van Zandt remembers. “Keith Richards. Dave Davies. Then, the harder stuff started coming. Jeff Beck in the Yardbirds. Eric Clapton with things like ‘White Room.’ But the songs stayed in a pop configuration, three minutes each or so. You’d have this cool guitar-based song with a 15-second, really amazing Jeff Beck solo in it. That’s what I liked. Later, the jam bands came, but I was not into that. My attention deficit disorder was not working for the longer solos,” he jokes. Watch a YouTube video of any recent E Street Band performance where Van Zandt solos, and the punch and impact of his approach and attack are apparent. At Nationals Park in Washington, D.C., last year, his solo on “Rosalita” was 13 powerful seconds.
Van Zandt and Bruce Springsteen’s relationship goes back to their earliest days on the Jersey shore. “Everybody had a different guitar; your guitar was your identity,” recalls Van Zandt. “At some point, a couple of years later, I remember Bruce calling me and asking me for my permission to switch to Telecaster. At that point, I was ready to switch to Stratocaster.”
Photo by Pamela Springsteen
Van Zandt left his Epiphone behind for his first Fender. “I started to notice that the guitar superstars at the time were playing Telecasters. Mike Bloomfield. Jeff Beck. Even Eric Clapton played one for a while,” he tells me. “I went down to Jack’s Music Shop in Red Bank, New Jersey, because he had the first Telecaster in our area and couldn’t sell it; it was just sitting there. I bought it for 90 bucks.”
In those days, and around those parts, players only had one guitar. Van Zandt recalls, “Everybody had a different guitar; your guitar was your identity. At some point, a couple of years later, I remember Bruce calling me and asking me for my permission to switch to Telecaster. At that point, I was ready to switch to Stratocaster, because Jimi Hendrix had come in and Jeff Beck had switched to a Strat. They all kind of went from Telecaster to Les Pauls. And then some of them went on to the Stratocaster. For me, the Les Paul was just too out of reach. It was too expensive, and it was just too heavy. So I said, I’m going to switch to a Stratocaster. It felt a little bit more versatile.”
Van Zandt still employs Stratocasters, and besides the 1957 I strummed, he was seen with several throughout the ’80s and ’90s. But for the last 20 or 25 years, Van Zandt has mainly wielded a black Fender ’57 Strat reissue from the ’80s with a maple fretboard and a gray pearloid pickguard. He still uses that Strat—dubbed “Number One”—but the pickguard has been switched to one sporting a purple paisley pattern that was custom-made by Dave Petillo.
Petillo comes from New Jersey luthier royalty and followed in the footsteps of his late father, Phil Petillo. At a young age, the elder Petillo became an apprentice to legendary New York builder John D’Angelico. Later, he sold Bruce Springsteen the iconic Fender Esquire that’s seen on the Born to Run album cover and maintained and modified that guitar and all of Bruce’s other axes until he passed away in 2010. Phil worked out of a studio in the basement of their home, not far from Asbury Park. Artists dropped in, and Petillo has childhood memories of playing pick-up basketball games in his backyard with members of the E Street Band. (He also recalls showing his Lincoln Logs to Johnny Cash and once mistaking Jerry Garcia for Santa Claus.)
“I was more interested in making sure I could play the guitar solo that would complement the song. I got more into the songs than the nature of musicianship.” —Stevie Van Zandt
“I’ve known Stevie Van Zandt my whole life,” says Petillo. “My dad used to work on his 1957 Strat. That guitar today has updated tuners, a bone nut, new string trees, and a refret that was done by Dad long ago. I think one volume pot may have been changed. But it still has the original pickups.” Petillo is responsible for a lot of the aesthetic flair seen on Van Zandt’s instruments. He continues, “Stevie is so much fun to work with. I love incorporating colors into things, and Stevie gets that. When you talk to a traditional Telecaster or Strat player, and you say, ‘I want to do a tulip paisley pickguard in neon blue-green,’ they’re like, ‘Holy cow, that’s too much!’ But for Stevie, it’s just natural. So I always text him with pickguard designs, asking him, ‘Which one do you like?’ And he calls me a wild man; he says, ‘I don’t have that many Strats to put them on!’ But I’ll go to Ben Newberry and say, ‘Ben, I made these pickguards; let’s get them on the guitar. And I’ll go backstage, and we’ll put them on. I just love that relationship; Stevie is down for it.”
Petillo takes care of the electronics on Van Zandt’s guitars. Almost all of the Strats are modified with an internal Alembic Stratoblaster preamp circuit, which Van Zandt can physically toggle on and off using a switch housed just above the input jack. Van Zandt tells me, “That came because I got annoyed with the whole pedal thing. I’m a performer onstage, and I’m integrated with the audience and I like the freedom to move. And if I’m across the stage and all of a sudden Bruce nods to me to take a solo, or there’s a bit in the song that requires a little bit of distortion, it’s just easier to have that; sometimes, I’ll need that extra little boost for a part I’m throwing in, and it’s convenient.”
In recent times, Van Zandt has branched out from the Stratocaster, which has a lot to do with Andy Babiuk's influence. The two met 20 years ago, and Babiuk’s band, the Chesterfield Kings, is on Van Zandt’s Wicked Cool Records. “He’d call me up and ask me things like, ‘What’s Brian Jones using on this song?’” explains Babiuk. “When I’d ask him why, he’d tell me, ‘Because I want to have that guitar.’ It’s a common thing for me to get calls and texts from him like that. And there’s something many people overlook that Stevie doesn’t advertise: He’s a ripping guitar player. People think of him as playing chords and singing backup for Bruce, but the guy rips. And not just on guitar, on multiple instruments.”
Van Zandt tells me he wanted to bring more 12-string to the E Street Band this tour, “just to kind of differentiate the tone.” He explains, “Nils is doing his thing, and Bruce is doing his thing, and I wanted to do more 12-string.” He laughs, “I went full Paul Kantner!” Babiuk helped Van Zandt plunge deeper down the Rickenbacker rabbit hole. Currently, Van Zandt has six Rickenbackers backstage: two 6-strings and four 12-strings. Each 12-string has a modified nut made by Petillo from ancient woolly mammoth tusk, and the D, A, and low E strings are inverted with their octave.
Van Zandt explains this to me: “I find that the strings ring better when the high ones are on top. I’m not sure if that’s how Roger McGuinn did it, but it works for me. I’m also playing a wider neck.”
Babiuk tells me about a unique Rick in Van Zandt’s rack of axes: “I know the guys at Rickenbacker well, and they did a run of 30 basses in candy apple purple for my shop. I showed one to Stevie, and purple is his color; he loves it. He asked me to get him a 12-string in the same color, and I told him, ‘They don’t do one-offs; they don’t have a custom shop,’ but it’s hard to say no to the guy! So I called Rickenbacker and talked them into it. I explained, ‘He’ll play it a lot on this upcoming tour.’ They made him a beautiful one with his OM logo.”
The purple one-off is a 1993Plus model and sports a 1 3/4" wide neck—1/8" wider than a normal Rickenbacker. Van Zandt loved it so much that he had Babiuk wrestle with Rickenbacker again to build another one in baby blue. Petillo has since outfitted them with paisley-festooned custom pickguards. When guitar tech Newberry shows me these unique axes backstage, I can see the input jack on the purple guitar is labeled with serial number 01001.“Some of my drive is based on gratitude,” says Van Zandt, “feeling like we are the luckiest guys in the luckiest generation ever.”
Photo by Rob DeMartin
Van Zandt also currently plays a white Vox Teardrop. That guitar is a prototype owned by Babiuk. “Stevie wanted a Teardrop,” Babiuk tells me, “but I explained that the vintage ones are hit and miss—the ones made in the U.K. were often better than the ones manufactured in Italy. Korg now owns Vox, and I have a new Teardrop prototype from them in my personal collection. When I showed it to him, he loved it and asked me to get him one. I had to tell him, ‘I can’t; it’s a prototype, there’s only one,’ and he asked me to sell him mine,” he chuckles. “I told him, ‘It’s my fucking personal guitar, it’s not for sale!’ So I ended up lending it to him for this tour, and I told him, ‘Remember, this is my guitar; don’t get too happy with it, okay?’
“He asked me why that particular guitar sounds and feels so good. Besides being a prototype built by only one guy, the single-coil pickups’ output is abnormally hot, and the neck feels like a nice ’60s Fender neck. Stevie’s obviously a dear friend of mine, and he can hold onto it for as long as he wants. I’m glad it’s getting played. It was just hanging in my office.”
Van Zandt tells me how Babiuk’s Vox Teardrop sums up everything he wants from his tone, and says, “It’s got a wonderfully clean, powerful sound. Like Brian Jones got on ‘The Last Time.’ That’s my whole thing; that’s the trick—trying to get the power without too much distortion. Bruce and Nils get plenty of distortion; I am trying to be the clean rhythm guitar all the time.”
If Van Zandt has a consigliere like Tony Soprano had Silvio Dante, that’s Newberry. Newberry has tech’d nearly every gig with Van Zandt since 1982. “Bruce shows move fast,” he tells me. “So when there’s a guitar change for Stevie, and there are many of them, I’m at the top of the stairs, and we switch quickly. There’s maybe one or two seconds, and if he needs to tell me something, I hear it. He’s Bruce’s musical director, so he may say something like, ‘Remind me tomorrow to go over the background vocals on “Ghosts,”’ or something like that. And I take notes during the show.”
“Everybody had a different guitar; your guitar was your identity. At some point, a couple of years later, I remember Bruce calling me and asking me for my permission to switch to a Telecaster.” —Stevie Van Zandt
When I ask Newberry how he defines Van Zandt’s relationship to the guitar, he doesn’t hesitate, snapping back, “It’s all in his head. His playing is encyclopedic, whether it’s Bruce or anything else. He may show up at soundcheck and start playing the Byrds, but it’s not ‘Tambourine Man,’ it’s something obscure like ‘Bells of Rhymney.’ People may not get it, but I’ve known him long enough to know what’s happening. He’s got everything already under his fingers. Everything.”
As such, Van Zandt says he never practices. “The only time I touch a guitar between tours is if I’m writing something or maybe arranging backing vocal harmonies on a production,” he tells me.
Before we say goodbye, I tell Van Zandt about my time stuck in his elevator, and his broad grin signals that I may not be the only one to have suffered that particular purgatory. When I ask him about the 1957 Stratocaster I got to play upon my release, he recalls: “Bruce Springsteen gave me that guitar. I’ve only ever had one guitar stolen in my life, and it was in the very early days of my joining the E Street Band. I only joined temporarily for what I thought would be about seven gigs, and in those two weeks or so, my Stratocaster was stolen. It was a 1957 or 1958. Bruce felt bad about that and replaced that lost guitar with this one. So I’ve had it a long, long time. Once that first one was stolen, I decided I would resist having a personal relationship with any one guitar. But that one being a gift from Bruce makes it special. I will never take it back on the road.”
After 50 years of rock ’n’ roll, if there is one word to sum up Stevie Van Zandt, it may be “restless”—an adjective you sense from reading his autobiography. He gets serious and tells me, “I’m always trying to catch up. The beginning of accomplishing something came quite late to me. I feel like I haven’t done nearly enough. What are we on this planet trying to do?” he asks rhetorically. “We’re trying to realize our potential and maybe leave this place one percent better for the next guy. And some of my drive is based on gratitude, feeling like we are the luckiest guys in the luckiest generation ever. That’s what I’m doing: I want to give something back. I feel an obligation.”
YouTube It
“Rosalita” is a perennial E Street Band showstopper. Here’s a close-up video from Philadelphia’s Citizens Bank Park last summer. Van Zandt’s brief but commanding guitar spotlight shines just past the 4:30 mark.
Featuring Bluetooth input, XLR inputs, and advanced amplifier platform, the KC12 is designed to offer exceptional sound quality and versatility for a wide range of applications.
The KC12 is a first-of-its-kind, 3-way, 3000-watt active loudspeaker system encompassing the visual aesthetic of a column loudspeaker while surpassing the acoustic performance of conventional designs. Simple and easy to deploy, the elegant KC12, available in black and white, is ideal for a wide range of customers and applications from solo entertainers, musicians and bands, mobile entertainers and DJs to corporate AV, event production, and static installations.
Column-style portable loudspeaker systems are most often put into service due to their unobtrusive form factor. However, typical designs lack clarity and definition, particularly when pushed to high output levels, forcing the user into a form-over-function compromise. Solving this common dilemma, the KC12 cleverly utilizes a 3-way design featuring QSC’s patented LEAF™ waveguide (first introduced in L Class Active Line Array Loudspeakers) combined with a true 1-inch compression driver, two 4-inch midrange drivers, and a high output 12-inch subwoofer, while still maintaining the desired, elegant appearance of a “column” system. The KC12 produces an outstanding full-range horizontal coverage of 145 degrees and 35 degrees of audience-directed vertical coverage with clean and natural sound at all output levels.
The system features three inputs: a Bluetooth ® input combined with a 3.5 mm TRS stereo input, as well as two combo XLR inputs (Mic/Line/Hi-Z and Mic/Line/+48 V), with independent, assignableFactory Presets for each XLR input, making it ideal for small events where two microphones are needed for different uses. The rear panel incorporates a multi-function digital display, offering control and selection of several loudspeaker functions, including Global Parametric EQ, Subwoofer level, Presets and Scenes, Bluetooth configuration, Delay (maximum of 200 ms), or Reverb. Bluetooth functionality also provides True Wireless Stereo (TWS), which ensures low latency pairing between the music source and both left and right loudspeakers simultaneously.
Additionally, the KC12 can be deployed with or without its lower column pole, making the system ideally suited for utilization on a floor, riser or raised stage. The system is backed by a 6-year Extended Warranty (with product registration).
“The KC12 exquisitely resolves the form-over-function compromise that has frustrated users of this category of products since they made their market introduction over 20 years ago,” states David Fuller, VP of Product Development, QSC Audio. “With the benefit of time, experience, extensive customer research, and cutting-edge innovation, our talented design team has truly created something very different from the status quo – not simply a differentiated product, but an overall better solution for the customer.”
The feature set and performance characteristics of the KC12 are complemented by a new, advanced amplifier platform, first incorporated into the L Class LS118 subwoofer released this past October. Fuller adds, “Among the platform’s key attributes are layers of real-time telemetry and protection to ensure uninterrupted performance day after day, which is a foundational QSC brand attribute.”
“Just like our first K Series reset the bar for powered loudspeakers, elevating customers’ expectations for performance, quality, reliability, usability, and professional appearance, the K Column offers a compelling, new approach to a familiar category and is destined to redefine the whole notion of what a ‘column’ is for users of portable PA products,” states Ray van Straten, VPBrand, Marketing & amp; Training, QSC Audio. “The product is simply stunning in its sleek and elegant appearance, but with the marketing tagline, ‘Just Listen’, we’re confident that once again, QSC sound quality will ultimately be the reason customers will quickly embrace the K Column as the next ‘New Standard’ in its category.”
The QSC KC12 K Column carries a MAP price of $1,999.
For more information, please visit qsc.com.
This pedal is designed to offer both unique distortion qualities and a tonal palette of sonic possibilities.
At the heart of the Harvezi Hazze pedal is a waveshaper designed around a unijunction transistor - a relic from the early days of the semiconductor industry unearthed from the e-waste bins of flea markets in Tbilisi, Georgia, the Eastern European country's largest city.
The unijunction transistor offers unique properties allowing one simple component to replace a number of very complex devices. Therefore. depending on the operating mode, users can access a distortion, a limiter, a waveshaper and a generator - with smooth transitions among each of these.
The name "Harvezi Hazze" translates from Georgian as "a fault on the transmission line" or "signal jamming", and both the semantic and phonetic nature of these translations imply what users can expect: an impediment to the input signal, which can range from pleasant harmonic distortions to complete obliteration. The signal chain of Harvezi Hazze consists of an optical compressor with fixed parameters; a dual-mode distorting amplifier with either softer or harsher clipping; a waveshaper built around a unijunction transistor; and a tone stack section designed to tame these sonic building blocks.
Signal flow and controls
Following the input, the signal goes to the Compressor, Distorting Amplifier, Waveshaper, and then to the Tone Stack and output stages. Harvezi Hazze features six control knobs, a three-way switch and a footswitch.
- Gain Control: This controls the output amplitude of the signal in the distorting amplifier section. Depending on the position of the switch, the distortion introduced by this section is soft (with the switch in the left position) or more aggressive with an abundance of high harmonics (with the switch in the middle position).
- Spoil and Spread: This knob controls the operation of the unijunction transistor (waveshaper section). Spoil sets the point on the amplitude axis at which the wave will fold, and Spread sets the amplitude of the folding. The higher the Spread value, the more severe the distortion will be, while Spoil will change the timbre and response threshold. By adjusting Spoil, users can achieve various gating and cutoff effects; at low Spread values, distortion sounds are mixed into the clean sound.
- Tone: This knob adjusts the brightness of the sound. With higher values, higher harmonics become present in the signal.
- Three-way switch. This feature regulates either the distortion mode in the amplifier section (left and center positions), or turns on the total feedback mode (right position) when the values of all knobs begin to influence each other. In this position, effects occur such as resonance at certain frequencies and self-oscillation.
- Level knob: This controls the output volume of the signal.
- Footswitch: This routes the signal through the effect circuitry or from input to output directly (true bypass).
The array of switches on the side of the unit provides even further tonal options; the lower position of the switch enables the specific function:
- Tone Stack: Routes the signal through the tone stack section (Tone knob).
- Bass Boost: Enhances bass frequencies.
- Tone Mode: Changes the behavior of the Tone knob (tilt or lowpass).
- Notch Freq: Changes the central frequency of the filter.
- High Cut: Attenuates high frequencies.
- Compressor: Routes the signal through the compressor.
Harvezi Hazze is priced at €290. To learn more, please visit https://somasynths.com/harvezi-hazze/.
Phil X’s signature boost and overdrive is a powerful chameleon that transforms from searing to corpulent with ease.
Fantastically chameleonic. Highly interactive but intuitive controls. Great scathing-to-fat drive characteristics.
Expensive.
$349
J. Rockett PXO
jrockettpedals.com
Though J. Rockett builds excellent effectsoutside the drive realm, you get the feeling that the company loves a tasty overdrive first and foremost. Various incarnations of their Archer OD are regarded as among thefinest klones available. Lately, they’ve delved into drives built to capture theessence or specific needs of high-profile players. The PXO Boost and Overdrive may be designed for Bon Jovi guitarist Phil X, but its capabilities transcend arena rock.
“The range in each of the effects alone, and the surprising ways that the controls interact with each other, are what makes the PXO a surgeon’s scalpel.”
A primary source of the PXO’s flexibility is its ability to switch the order of boost and overdrive. But the range in each of the effects alone, and the surprising ways that the controls interact with each other, are what makes the PXO a surgeon’s scalpel. Extremes in the boost’s tilt EQ control, for example, can sound excessive. The trebliest of these settings, though, can be an incredible asset when coaxing presence and cut in a lead from a muddy amp. That opens up many more possibilities when used in conjunction with the overdrive section’s flexible bass and treble controls, which in turn take on vastly different characteristics depending on where you set the equally interactive output volume and gain. The PXO was conceived as a tool for coping with changing backlines. But the PXO is so adaptable in that capacity that it significantly enhances the vocabulary of a single guitar, too. While I spent most of my time with the PXO using a black-panel Vibrolux and a Jazzmaster, the PXO made it easy to coax sounds that you could sell as a chunky humbucker to a blindfolded listener