Premier Guitar features affiliate links to help support our content. We may earn a commission on any affiliated purchases.

Fear of Digital

The architecture of a basic DSP system. Digital. The very mention of the word causes many guitarists to wince, conjuring memories of harsh, inspiration-crushing tone from early rack gear

The architecture of a basic DSP system.

Digital. The very mention of the word causes many guitarists to wince, conjuring memories of harsh, inspiration-crushing tone from early rack gear and floor-based multi-effectors. The common misconception that everything digital somehow sounds cold and sterile isn’t entirely unfounded. Back in the early days of digital signal processing (DSP), processing power was extremely limited. Early digital audio systems suffered from low sample rates and bit depths, poor dynamic range, and harsh clipping characteristics. The result was that many digital effects designers were forced to use creative tricks and compromises to overcome the limitations of their early digital systems. Whether it was a flanger, reverb, or distortion, the tone was often less than stellar compared to the vintage effects we all knew and loved. And so, over the years analog gear and effects have gained a fondness in our minds—a sort of pre-digital innocence and beauty. It’s analog, so it has to be better right?

Let’s take a look at some of the specs of early digital systems and their impact on audio quality. Due to a lack of sophisticated integrated circuit (IC) chips, the digital effects of the early ’80s were generally digital delay line effects—that is, delay, chorus, and flanging. These systems implemented 12-bit converters running at sample rates as low as 15 kHz. In a digital system, each bit of resolution will theoretically give you about 6 dB of dynamic range. So, a 12-bit converter would be capable of only 72 dB of dynamic range. The highest frequency that can be reproduced is half the sample rate, so that would be 7.5 kHz in a 15 kHz-sampled system. These specs are so out of line with current technology that they have earned a place as “old school” or “vintage digital.” If you’ve ever played through a bit-crusher pedal, you’ve experienced the sound of low bit depths and sample rates as a special effect.

By the late ’80s, digital effects had CD-player specs of 16 bits (yielding a 96 dB dynamic range) and a sample rate of 44.1 kHz or 48 kHz. During the same period, more advanced digital IC chips became available, allowing for implementation of multi-effects, reverbs, and nonlinear effects like digital distortion and compression. This new standard was still plagued with shortcomings, as the audio converter technology required the use of sharp “brick wall” filters that created non-linear phase distortion at the top end of the audio spectrum, resulting in subjective “listener fatigue” and “harshness.” Additionally, the processing power was still very limited for the ambitious applications being pioneered. This led to sonic compromises that manifested themselves as harsh clipping, metallic tonalities, and fuzzy or fluttering note decays.

Fortunately, we’re at the point now where we have a massive amount of processing power available and vastly better analog-to-digital (A/D) and digital-to-analog (D/A) converters capable of well above 110 dB of dynamic range. Some stompboxes now have more processing power available than early-’80s Cray supercomputers. Simply being in a digital system is no longer a limitation. On the contrary, digital systems can do things that simply aren’t possible in 100-percent analog designs. And effects that few studios could have afforded only a decade ago are now in the price range of the humble musician.

I have to admit I get frustrated seeing comments on forums like, “It sounds digital.” The truth now is that there are no inherent sonic qualities to a digital system. Digital effects, for better or worse, sound exactly how their designers have built their hardware and algorithms. If we think of a digital system as a blank canvas, a DSP engineer wields the brush, and whatever algorithm he or she writes ends up coloring your guitar tone.

Let’s take a look at the architecture of a basic DSP system: The guitar signal arrives at the input and is buffered by some kind of analog input circuitry. Then the signal is sent to an A/D converter. From that point, the signal is represented by a binary stream that can be easily processed. Usually this is done by a DSP circuit with some memory connected to it. The DSP circuit will run whatever algorithm it’s been programmed with and send the result to a D/A converter, then to the output jacks. Modern 24-bit, 192 kHz A/D and D/A converters can provide excellent signal-to-noise, THD (total harmonic distortion), and latency specs. Luckily, the problems that plagued early digital systems have become mostly a non-issue with modern converters and processors.

Digital effects are getting better all the time. Some of the digital gear currently on the market brings us closer to the old analog glory than we’ve ever been before. And some of it takes us to places never before possible with analog effects. Fear not—and happy shredding!

Terry Burton is an engineer at—and the founder of—Strymon.

With a team of experts on hand, we look at six workhorse vintage amps you can still find for around $1,000 or less.

If you survey the gear that shows up on stages and studios for long enough, you’ll spot some patterns in the kinds of guitar amplification players are using. There’s the rotating cast of backline badasses that do the bulk of the work cranking it out every day and night—we’re all looking at you, ’65 Deluxe Reverb reissue.

Read MoreShow less

Alex LIfeson, Victor

Anthem Records in Canada and Rhino Records will reissue the first-ever solo albums of Rush's Alex Lifeson and Geddy Lee. Lifeson’s 1996 album Victor and Lee’s 2000 offering My Favourite Headache will be re-released on August 9, 2024.

Read MoreShow less

George Benson’s Dreams Do Come True: When George Benson Meets Robert Farnonwas recorded in 1989. The collaboration came about after Quincy Jones told the guitarist that Farnon was “the greatest arranger in all the world.”

Photo by Matt Furman

The jazz-guitar master and pop superstar opens up the archive to release 1989’s Dreams Do Come True: When George Benson Meets Robert Farnon, and he promises more fresh collab tracks are on the way.

“Like everything in life, there’s always more to be discovered,”George Benson writes in the liner notes to his new archival release, Dreams Do Come True: When George Benson Meets Robert Farnon. He’s talking about meeting Farnon—the arranger, conductor, and composer with credits alongside Frank Sinatra, Tony Bennett, and Vera Lynn, among many others, plus a host of soundtracks—after Quincy Jones told the guitarist he was “the greatest arranger in all the world.”

Read MoreShow less

The new Jimi Hendrix documentary chronicles the conceptualization and construction of the legendary musician’s recording studio in Manhattan that opened less than a month before his untimely death in 1970. Watch the trailer now.

Read MoreShow less