The cold, hard truth for guitar players like myself is that playing dynamics are first found in the hands. We might hope to find an instrument, effect box, or amplifier that can recast our ham-fisted guitar approach into something more nuanced, but for better or worse, there's nothing that's going to change our poor Johnny Ramone impressions into “Sultans of Swing."
Let's assume for the moment that you've developed the technique and taste required to have a dynamic playing style. You've moved beyond just hitting the notes and have endeavored to imbue each one with a particular attitude. How do we preserve that hard-fought dynamism and keep it from being obliterated by our stompbox designs?
Touch-sensitivity has become a bit of a buzzword in the effects marketplace. It means many things to many different people, but it might be easiest to describe by what it isn't. A piece of gear with limited touch-sensitivity offers little to no variation in output when a dynamic input is applied. A Townshend windmilled 6-string barre chord produces a shotgun blast of sound. A slight tickling of the strings? A similar scatter shot. This insensitivity isn't necessarily bad (i.e. the Guess Who's “American Woman"), but if you can play a single note 100 different ways, in some circumstances you might want a device that produces just as varied an output.
To make a pedal dynamic, responsive, and touch-sensitive is a bit of a black art. Effect circuits don't have to be complicated, but even the most elementary of circuits can produce sonic complications that belie the simplicity of their schematics. Since there's no closed-form solution for what sounds good, and pedal designers typically use components in ways that make electronic datasheet authors despondent, it's good to try to develop some conceptual rules of thumb and then refine them in real-world applications after the fact. Let's take a simplified look at op-amp clipping and dynamics.
In Fig. 1, you can see an operational-amplifier-based gain circuit with both soft clipping and hard clipping. These two types of clipping have been covered in these pages before, but I'll sum them up here. In soft clipping, the two diodes are in the feedback loop of the op amp, and once a certain threshold is reached, those diodes begin conducting and reduce the gain of the op amp in a limiting action. For higher gain settings, this abrupt reduction in gain can be a relatively hard limit, but at lower gains, the transition into limiting is comparatively gentle in onset. The hard-clipping diodes are capable of a more brick-wall characteristic. At a certain threshold, the diodes become an effective short-to-ground and, depending on the surrounding components, can truncate the input wave very aggressively. As you increase the input signal past the clipping threshold, you get very little change in output.
Ibanez Tube Screamers famously use soft-clipping (although this has led some forumites to mistakenly call anything with a similar setup a Screamer derivative). Pro Co RATs use hard clipping to good results. Some pedals like the Nobels ODR-1 use both clipping styles in the same circuit. So can either scheme make a dynamic effect?
The answer depends on a host of specifics, but here are some general rules of thumb. At lower gain settings, the soft-clipper circuit might feel more dynamic as the limiting characteristic isn't as aggressive. This is where a tube-like voicing can be found. The hard-clipper setup does live up to its name, but, counterintuitively, can still feel dynamic under higher gain. I believe this is due to the fact that it's somewhat easier to play “under" the hard-limiting action. While the soft-knee function of the soft clippers begins compressing and limiting sooner, the hard clippers stay open longer and then abruptly close. So light playing can sneak through unlimited, but once the circuit begins distorting significantly, more gain and more input doesn't add a great deal of dynamic difference. I've watched players like Tom Bukovac play a hard-clipping RAT and really manipulate their signal right around that threshold, staying shy of it when needed and launching over it deftly.
Disciplined hands and well-trained ears can coax dynamic range from almost anything, but pedals can certainly help or hinder the process. Don't buy pedals based on their schematics but listen and consider how those schemes might influence your playing and approach to your instrument's sound.
The PG Pettyjohn Rail review.
RatingsPros:A warm, thick-voiced fuzz with heaps of gain when you want it, and a very original take on the format overall, for those seeking alternatives in the dirt department. Cons: Simply be aware that use and performance are quite different from traditional fuzzes overall, if that’s more your line. Street: $199 Pettyjohn Electronics Rail pettyjohnelectronics.com | Tones: Ease of Use: Build/Design: Value: |
Ain’t it something—that more than five-and-a-half decades after the first commercial fuzz was introduced, clever companies still build creative new takes on the form? Pettyjohn Electronics definitely took the path less travelled with the new Rail fuzz, which forgoes transistors and clipping diodes for a circuit that utilizes op-amps and voltage rails to generate complex overdrive to full-on fuzz tones. While this approach to fuzz building is unusual, Pettyjohn is not the only builder to employ a variation of this design technique. Yet the Rail often feels and sounds unlike anything else out there.
Compact and Flexible
The Rail, which is from Pettyjohn’s new, more compact Core Series, is a comparatively streamlined affair. There’s not a mini toggle or tiny knob anywhere, and the enclosure is downright austere compared to its bigger, more feature-rich cousins.
Controls on the Rail are mostly simple and self-explanatory, though the drive knob, in a departure from convention, is an 8-position rotary switch. The level governs overall output, and the “highs” and “lows” tap wide-ranging active EQ stages. The lows control sweeps from 30 Hz to 1 kHz and is situated before the gain stage, which can add considerable heft to the distorted output. The highs control sweeps from 1 kHz to 22 kHz and is situated after the gain stage, which enables you to hype or tame distortion-accentuated high harmonics. Both the level and highs controls are independently buffered from the rest of the circuit, to avoid loading the signal. (Pettyjohn also claims that this arrangement makes the Rail more stackable than many fuzz pedals.) As with other Pettyjohn pedals, on/off status is indicated by a big Fender-amp-like jewel light. The footswitch is a soft-relay true bypass unit, though a hard-click true bypass is available as a Custom Shop option.
Riding the Rails
Rather than relying on transistor and/or diode clipping to excite the guitar signal like most traditional fuzzes do, the Rail uses op-amps to crank extremely high gain into the circuit’s voltage rails, which produces dynamic fuzz and distortion. Additionally, the pedal’s voltage-doubling power circuit will mirror the input from any regulated, isolated DC source of 7–18V, and because the effect generates clipping by overdriving the power rails, the voltage you employ shapes the sonic character and response of the fuzz considerably.
I used a tweed Deluxe-style combo, a Freidman Small Box head and 2x12 cab, a Novo Serus J with P-90s, and a Hahn 228 with single-coil Tele pickups to test the Rail. And even with these very familiar instruments and amplifiers, the Rail opened up scores of new and unfamiliar tone flavors. It takes a little time to understand how the Rail’s controls translate to specific sounds, and the powerful EQ controls can significantly transform the output in ways that seem less than immediately familiar. But that doesn’t mean the pedal isn’t ultimately intuitive.
The 8-position drive knob sometimes seems to transform the Rail into a different pedal at each position. But while the gain profile can be profoundly different from position to position, each voice shares the same girthy core sound and impressive capacity for articulation.
As great sounding as the lower gain settings are, the Rail is really about the distortion and fuzz. And from the 4th through 8th positions, the Rail reveals many interesting and individual fuzz tones. The sounds are predominantly thick, creamy, warm, and soulful. And the Rail often has the feel of a hybrid distortion and fuzz because there’s less of the raspy, spitty, Velcro-y tones that distinguish many pure fuzz circuits. The big payoff is that it can simultaneously be heavy, musical, and clear.
The 8th position, Infinity Mode, is genuinely gnarly—generating temperamental, gated fuzz sounds with unpredictable decay characteristics. At 15 volts, the distortion sounds even more extreme and, in general, higher voltage makes each voice hotter and tighter with discernably more headroom.
The Verdict
The ruggedly built Rail is a creative twist on traditional fuzz circuitry. Deviation from same-old transistors and clipping diodes fuzz formulas adds up to an impressive variety of overdrive-to-fuzz settings. It’s also surprisingly dynamic and responsive. It may not replace every fuzz in your collection, particularly if you love the compression, sag, and unpredictability of vintage circuits. But if crafting tight, articulate, and controlled fuzz-tinged distortion is your obsession, the Rail hits the nail on the head.
Watch the Demo:
Mods that will take your MXR Distortion Plus to a bigger, meaner level
Many years ago distortion pedals were much more limited than they are today. MXR released a simple hard clipping device called the “Distortion Plus” in the late seventies. Randy Rhoads, among others, used this pedal to achieve more distortion in his amps. Guitarists everywhere mistakenly thought that this little device was the secret to Randy’s tone. Since then, there have been many, many different versions of this type of circuit. Let’s take a look at it a bit closer; there are a great many mods that can be done to turn it into a tone monster.
Here''s the stock circuit:
The signal enters where C1 and C2 intersect. C1 is a low pass filter, throwing some highs to ground pre-clipping. C2 allows mainly mids and highs through into the clipping section. The R1 limits the signal going into the opamp and R5 sets bias for the opamp.
R4, C3, R2, and R3 control the gain and frequencies getting boosted and clipped in a traditional “non-inverting” method of opamp circuit. R3 is labeled as a gain control, however you’ll notice that it changes the tonality depending on its setting. This is because it is changing the frequency response of the opamp at the same time. With the gain control all the way up it only clips frequencies 723hz and higher, though it is at max gain. In its minimum gain setting it is boosting and clipping almost all frequencies (3.4hz and higher) though it has much less gain. This is why it sounds muddy and undefined when the the gain is lower and why it thins out when you turn the gain up.
After the signal is boosted it exits through C4 and then through R6. D1 and D2 clip the signal using a “hard clipping” method while C5 works with R6 as a low pass filter to filter out 6db worth of frequencies 15.9khz and above, which the human ear can’t really distinguish too much. Most likely this was to filter out some odd harmonic overtones and/or noise. A much better use would be to wire a 100k pot in series with a .0022uF cap in place of C5. This will act as a tone control.
D1 and D2 are 1n34a type Germanium diodes in the stock version. This leads itself to a bit of a fuzzy compressed tone with not much volume left over after being clipped.
The signal exits via the 10k pot on the output.
The Dod OD250 and YJM308 circuits are almost identical to this and these mods will work for these pedals as well.
Here some of my favorite mods that I like to make to this type of circuit:
- Use an SPST switch to insert a .01uf cap in parallel with a .001uf cap in place of C2. This will give a ''more/less compression'' type of function, or a ''smooth/open'' tonality. For a more dramatic effect, make the .01uf a .047uf or so.
- Add an SPST switch around C3 to add more bass by adding a .33uf cap in parallel with C3.
- Change R2 and C3 to a 1k/.22uf for the same high gain frequency response but more gain potential
- Change R4 to a 1m audio taper pot for better response through gain adjustment.
- Add an SPST switch to add in diodes in parallel with R4. I have 1n34a and 1n4001 diodes shown here, though any can be used.
- Change D1 and D2 to 1n34a and 1n4001 diodes (in series) in place of each stock diode for louder output as well as better dynamics.
- Change C5 to a .0022uf and wired in series with a 1m audio taper pot to act as a tone control.
These mods will make your pedal into a much bigger, fuller, nicer (or meaner) sounding distortion or overdrive. While not all of the mods are necessary, I encourage you to experiment to find what you like and don’t like and tailor your own pedal to your needs.
Happy Soldering!