Premier Guitar features affiliate links to help support our content. We may earn a commission on any affiliated purchases.

Gone Wireless

A look at the pros and cons of going wireless.

What?! Gone wireless? Well, err… yes. It may seem unusual, since I’ve been immersed in a boutiquey kind of world where wireless systems tend to be scoffed at versus the more organic cable. In fact, it’s been 20 years since I last used my cheap little Samson wireless system mounted to my pedalboard. I actually liked the tone and compression that unit had, but after spilling a beer on the Samson unit, I’ve stuck with cable ever since.

Recently, Line 6 turned me on to their new Digital Guitar Wireless System and asked if I’d like to give it a try on tour. They had acquired the X2 company, whose digital
technology wireless systems had already developed a reputation for being totally transparent, adding no compression or artifacts to the tone. It seemed like a perfect opportunity to give the system a whirl, as I’ve been using close to 80 feet of cable from the pedalboard back to my rig, with buffer pedals to keep the signal clear. We have the signal as clean as plugging straight into the amps with a short cable – there’s a very clear tone with no signal loss. Therefore, we would be able to do a fair, working comparison between cable and wireless tone.

The first thing I noticed using the XDR95 was the immediate pick attack and pure, chimey clarity like I’d never heard before. It wasn’t a synthetic sounding high-end, but the amp in its purest form – like connecting the guitar to the amp with a 3-foot cable. My tech and I ran a direct comparison back and forth with cables, and the highs remained present but slightly rolled off with a slurred kind of pick attack. It had sounded fine before, but this roll-off became noticeable after we A/B’d with the X2 wireless. We’re using high-end cables on this tour, so it’s still a favorable tone – possibly even preferred by some. There is definitely nothing wrong with a guitar and cable straight into an amp!

With the wireless, I had to re-adjust my tone settings on the amps, rolling off some highs while pronouncing more mids to avoid being too bright through the PA. I’m also using a Moollon Line Buffer/DI pedal with a boost circuit to push the front end a little, which I had used with the cables as well. Even after the adjustments, the tone and attack have remained significantly improved, with amazing dynamic clarity and a great feel under the fingers. Over the course of two weeks, jumping back and forth between cable and wireless – even in the middle of a show – I’ve totally adjusted to the improved tone the Line 6 Digital Wireless System has afforded me.

Of course, wireless systems do have their issues, a common one being interference or dropouts. However, only once so far have I run into interference problems, which was at our recent show in London’s Hyde Park. We were told that it was a common problem with previous shows in the park; beyond that occasion the unit has been flawless.

Another issue is battery life. I can’t put a time frame on it yet, but one thing we’ve noticed is that the rechargeable batteries we’ve tried do not seem to sustain well. They have a very short life, so the unit still requires alkalines.

With a street price around $500 for the rack system ($400 for the XDS-Plus smaller pedalboard-mounted version) it’s a fairly affordable option for a significant tonal boost. And needless to say, I can now pirouette freely across the stage.

Peter Stroud
is co-founder of 65amps

The trio bandleader and Jason Mraz backer breaks down her journey through guitar academia, how to play with other musicians, and whether theory still matters.

Read MoreShow less

Amazon Prime Day is here (July 16-17). Whether you're a veteran player or just picking up your first guitar, these are some bargains you don't want to miss. Check out more deals here!

Read MoreShow less

A technicolor swirl of distortion, drive, boost, and ferocious fuzz.

Summons a wealth of engaging, and often unique, boost, drive, distortion, and fuzz tones that deviate from common templates. Interactive controls.

Finding just-right tones, while rewarding, might demand patience from less assured and experienced drive-pedal users. Tone control could be more nuanced.


Danelectro Nichols 1966


The Danelectro Nichols 1966, in spite of its simplicity, feels and sounds like a stompbox people will use in about a million different ways. Its creator, Steve Ridinger, who built the first version as an industrious Angeleno teen in 1966, modestly calls the China-made Nichols 1966 a cross between a fuzz and a distortion. And, at many settings, it is most certainly that.

Read MoreShow less

The author standing next to a Richardson gunstock lathe purchased from Gibson’s Kalamazoo factory. It was used to make six necks at a time at Gibson in the 1950s and 1960s.

Keep your head down and put in the work if you want to succeed in the gear-building business.

The accelerated commodification of musical instruments during the late 20th century conjures up visions of massive factories churning out violins, pianos, and, of course, fretted instruments. Even the venerable builders of the so-called “golden age” were not exactly the boutique luthier shops of our imagination.

Read MoreShow less