New technologies make it easier than ever to access electronic sounds from your fretboard.
I confess: I donāt like MIDI guitar. Or I didnāt. I guess what I donāt actually like is the accepted notion of MIDI (Musical Instrument Digital Interface) guitar, which is to turn our beloved 6-string into a controller to trigger cheesy synth sounds like pan flute, digital piano, or sampled sax. When you factor in tracking delays (the lag time between plucking a note on a guitar string and when a synth sound actually comes out of a speaker), note misfires, extra cables, special pickups, interfaces, extra floor pedals, and patching into a PA, the sonic promise of MIDI guitar seems musically questionable. In the past, I figured this technology was best left to YouTube noodle-nerds.
But on the other hand, I like effects. I like new sounds. I like trying to push sonic limits, especially since I get bored with stock guitar pretty easily. And though I can kind of get around on the keyboard, I have much greater facility on the guitar. So for sequencing or software-based notation, being able to just play guitar rather than hunt and peck on a keyboard would sure be nice.
After 30 years of MIDI guitar development, most guitarists now stay clear of using the guitar as a controller. Sure, MIDI is commonly used on floor controllers to change patches on multi-effect units or true-bypass pedal loopers, but this is different from using the guitar itself to play a synthesizer or control effect parameters.
We live in an incredible age of music software and synthesis, so it seems well worth taking a fresh look at MIDI guitar, especially in light of new ways to convert guitar notes to MIDI signals. And imagine the rewards if you could make MIDI work: Youād be able to tap into the vast galaxy of software synths and plug-in effects, create unique sounds, and input MIDI signals into sequencing software with ease. Rather than getting frustrated by the inherent quirks of using guitar as a MIDI controller, perhaps one can have a more Zen-like attitude. In this article, weāll explore a bit of guitar synth history, the current state of MIDI guitar, and ways to take advantage of MIDI while minimizing the guitar-specific pitfalls.
A Brief History of Guitar Synthesizers
The early ā70s saw the introduction of guitar āsynthesizers,ā which were really analog effect units that created synth-like tones from a guitar pickupās output while preserving the sound of a normal electric guitar. While these systems occasionally found users, few guitarists adopted them. They were expensive, unwieldy, and sonically limited or disappointing āespecially when compared to a keyboard.
True guitar synths started to appear in the late ā70s. Rather than merely processing a guitar signal, these systems analyzed the pitches played on a guitar and then used the resulting information to control synthesizer circuitry. Roland developed a system that was widely adopted. They started with the GS500, followed by improved versions in the form of the GR300 and associated compatible guitars (G303 and G808). These guitar synths were polyphonic, had musically viable sounds, and delivered tracking speed and accuracy that some say has yet to be eclipsed.
By the mid ā80s, MIDI had become established as a way of sending note on/off signals and other musical information from one device to another. Now there was a standardized way to control one synthesizer from a MIDI-compatible keyboard, or, as interest to us here, from a guitar equipped with a hexaphonic pickup and a pitch-to-MIDI conversion system. Roland, Ibanez, Charvel, and a host of other manufacturers offered pitch-to-MIDI conversion systems, with Rolandās GK hexaphonic pickups becoming the standard with their 24-pin (and later 13-pin) connection systems. In 1988, Casio introduced the MG-510 a Strat-style guitar with a built-in hexaphonic pickup, converter, and synth sounds.
Compared to the early Roland guitar synths, these MIDI-based guitar synths had latency issuesāthe time it takes between when a note is first plucked to when a synth sound is emitted. (For a detailed look at how I measure latency, check out the sidebar.) While keyboards have the advantage of directly triggering a MIDI note, a guitar has a vibrating string that needs to cycle around at least once before it can be recognized by the pitch-to-MIDI system as a musical note. For low notes, it can take over 10 milliseconds (ms) just for a cycle to complete itself, and longer for a note to stabilize and be a recognizable pitch. When combined with the delays inherent in the MIDI synths of the day, tracking delays of well over 50 ms for the guitarās lowest notes were the rule. This is easily enough time to create a bothersome pause between physical action and hearing a sound.
To get around this tracking delay, a few manufacturers created guitar-like controllers that produced no sound on their own, like the SynthAxe and the Yamaha G10, but provided reduced tracking delays by bypassing the pitch-to-MIDI conversion process. While a few well-known guitarists like Allan Holdsworth and Lee Ritenour employed the SynthAxe, guitar-like controllers never gained traction in the broader guitar marketplace. Instead, the dominant MIDI guitar technology from the early ā90s to today remains a hexaphonic pickup driving a pitch-to-MIDI conversion circuit, sometimes built into a synth unit (like Rolandās series of rack and floor guitar synths, such as the currently produced GR-55).
In the last few years, there have been two notable advances in polyphonic MIDI guitar technology. The first is the Fishman TriplePlay guitar pickup, which transmits MIDI data wirelessly to a USB dongle for direct access to software synths and sequencing software. Tracking delays with the TriplePlay are dependent on software settings (sample rate and buffer size), but typical values for the Fishman TriplePlay seem to be comparable or perhaps slightly better than Rolandās current systems.
The second recent advance is Jam Originās MIDI Guitar software for computer or iOS devices, which requires no special pickup yet allows for polyphonic MIDI conversion. You connect your guitar to an audio interface, route it through MIDI Guitar, enable a software synth, and route out to a PA or amp. Measured tracking delays with MIDI Guitar software running as a VST plug-in within Ableton Live using a Zoom TAC-2 Thunderbolt audio interface set to a 44.1 kHz sample rate with a buffer setting of 64 samples, fell between about 30 ms for low notes and 20 ms for high notes.
While not perfect, these two systems offer a convenientāand thus very appealingāway to tap into the unlimited palettes of software synths and computer-based effects.
Setup
If you want to have a MIDI guitar setup that works in live situations, the first thing to consider is whether you want synth sounds to go to your amp or a PA. With a unit like the Roland GR-55 (which requires a divided pickup similar to the Roland GK-3), separate outputs are available for synth and guitar sounds. You can also route your standard, non-processed guitar signal to the synth outputs and send a blend of both signals to an amp or a PA.
With a laptop or tablet-based MIDI guitar synth setup, things can get a little more complicated. Fig. 1 is a diagram of one way to set things up.
Fig. 1
The limitation of the setup in Fig. 1 is that you canāt route computer-based effects or synth sounds to your amp. Fig. 2 shows an alternative setup that will route laptop-based synth sounds or processed guitar to your amp.
Fig. 2
With this second setup, the laptop essentially becomes an effects unit placed in a true bypass loop. Itās easy to switch the laptop in and out by simply hitting one button. With this approach, you need at least three separate output channels on your interface, or if youāre using a Mac, you can create an aggregate device in the Audio MIDI Setup utility to combine the interface and built-in outputs. With an aggregate device, you can run the Macās stereo outs to a PA system and your guitar from a mono output on your interface back into the true bypass looper. You select the channels on which to route guitar or synth sounds via software.
Fig. 3
Take a look at Fig. 3 to see how Iād set this up in Ableton Live. This screen shot shows Ableton Live running Jam Originās MIDI Guitar as a plug-in in the configuration illustrated in Fig. 2. Notice that the 2nd and 4th tracks are routed to output 3 (guitar amp) and the synth is routed to the master output stereo channels 1 and 2 (PA).
Fig. 4 shows my preferred settings in MIDI Guitar when running it as a plug-in in Ableton Live. Note that the buffer is set to 128 samples (upper left region), which typically provides very good low-latency performance, particularly with a Thunderbolt audio interface such as a Zoom TAC-2.
Fig. 4
All the following audio examples use MIDI Guitar, because I like being able to play any of my electric guitars with MIDI without having a special pickup or pitch-to-MIDI interface.
Now What?
Once your guitar is set up as a MIDI controller, it would be easy to open a software synth plug-in and start noodling away, playing all the things one normally plays on guitar. The results could be passable, but often theyāre cringe-worthy. Tracking delay (even with the respectable results MIDI Guitar provides) can ruin a groove, the subtleties of muted notes and pick variations are lost, and slides and other guitaristic gestures can sound comical as translated by a synth.
And almost always, you have to play extremely cleanly to not trigger wrong and even out-of-key note blips. This can hamper your fluidity. Of course you can always blend in your guitar, so your musical intention is better captured, but this can lead to a dated, stacked-synth sound. In this realm, more is usually not better. What to do? The universe is infinite, but here are a few starting points to explore:
- Use synth sounds that have a soft attack to minimize the perceived tracking delay.
- Use slicer/chopping plug-ins post-synth to create in-the-pocket rhythms.
- Use MIDI plug-ins like arpeggiators and harmonizers to play things that would be impossible on the guitar.
- Trigger non-musical sounds, like speech snippets or noises.
- Use the guitar as a controller to trigger effects parameters, channel muting, and any other MIDI-controllable parameters that respond to note on/off messages.
The audio examples Iāve included here have two goals: (1) to avoid simply turning the guitar into a bogus keyboard and working within the limitations of using vibrating strings to control MIDI, and (2) to inspire you to think of novel ways to use your guitar with MIDI.
Talk about cheating! In Ex. 1 and Ex. 2, I play single notes and let MIDI Guitarās built-in arpeggiator function do the hard work. The guitar is panned slightly to the left, with the synths a bit to the right. (To hear the audio examples for this article, go to premierguitar.com.)
After listening to Ex. 3, you might say, āI donāt hear any MIDI guitar in this.ā Iāve set up Ableton Live to have three different effects that are turned on or off only by specific notes (E3, A3, and G4). In guitar terms, those refer to the open 6th string, the A at the 5th fret of the 6th string, and G on the 15th fret of the 6th string. Whenever I hit the open E the signal is sent to a panned delay effect.
The effect on the A note is a bit more complicated. It triggers a pre-made MIDI clip in Live thatās a chromatic scale that starts on A and descends. This clip serves as a controller for the QuikQuakās PitchWheel plug-in, which receives audio from the guitar channelās send and MIDI from the chromatic MIDI clip. When A is struck, the clip starts (sending MIDI data to PitchWheel) and the send on the guitar input channel jumps from 0 to maximum, which sends audio to PitchWheel. To not have this chromatic pitch effect stay on, I have to hit the note again.
The high G thatās triggered when I hit the E minor chord sends audio from the guitar input to a return channel with Ableton Liveās Grain Delay plug-in with the Bubbles preset. Take a look at Fig. 5 to see the PitchWheel plug-in in action.
Fig. 5
Unfortunately, functions triggered with a MIDI note in Live are not momentary, so normally you would have to hit a note a second time to turn off a mapped parameter (as I did with the A3 triggered clip/effect). But thanks to the Momentary 8 plug-in made by Max for Ableton Live, incoming note messages are transformed from toggle to momentary. Thus, when the note stops, the effect is turned off.
In Ex. 4, I took audio of an auctioneer and matched his voice to a MIDI drum rack in Ableton Live. You can hear my original guitar track on the left side and the resulting triggered audio on the right. This example was inspired by the great drummer Deantoni Parks, who in his latest record, Technoself, samples speech, chops it up, and plays the deconstructed words on a keyboard with his right hand while he plays drums with his left hand. The effect is mesmerizing.
For this example (unlike the others), I slightly time-corrected the entire MIDI auctioneer sample track by 30 ms to roughly compensate for the latency I measured with MIDI Guitar that occurs in the pitch-to-MIDI process. Though it sounded good without the correction, it was just tighter with it.
Hereās another example (Ex. 5) of using specific notes on the guitar to trigger effects. In this case, the effects are all within Izotopeās Stutter Edit. I start by playing F notes, with ascending upper notes (starting on a high D) that will trigger various Stutter Edits presets. Then I play an arpeggiated figure, and finally some funk rhythm stuff. Because MIDI Guitar software is polyphonic, it can recognize notes that are within a chord, so that chords that contain particular notes will also trigger the effect.
Okay, finally an example of pure synth being playing by the guitar. But there would be no way to really play Ex. 6 accurately without the help of rhythm-chopping plug-ins. Frankly, to my ears and from my experience trying, the current state of MIDI guitar is just not good enough to play rhythmically with a synth plug-in, particularly if you hope to capture all the funky note mutings and rhythmic scratches that help make rhythm guitar compelling. Perhaps it can be passable for simple rhythms, but generally, you cannot match what a good keyboard player can do rhythmically.
In Ex. 6, what I played on the guitar is pretty darn simple. I start with a basic single-note line and then go into some chords. But all Iām doing is holding chords for a half-note or full measureāthe software is doing all the rest. MIDI Guitar is routed to a TAL Softwareās excellent TAL-U-NO-LX synth, and then getting chopped up, gated, delayed, and panned by the super-cool Audio Damage BigSeq2 plug-in (Fig. 6). I could post my dry guitar track, but like the Great Oz, Iād rather just say, āPay no attention to that man behind the curtain.ā
Fig. 6
In this next example (Ex. 7), I play a melody in D minor and then at the end of the first phrase I hit a high D on the 1st string. This note is mapped to the channel āonā button of a synthesizer track in Ableton Live. Once you hit that note, the track is enabled. The channel has a scale plug-in before the synth set to harmonize all the notes I play up a third, but in the key of D natural minor/F major. I also bend notes here to illustrate MIDI Guitarās very usable pitch-bend tracking.
Sequencing and Notation
If you are ivory-challenged, using the guitar as a MIDI controller in conjunction with sequencing software or notation software can be a godsend. With sequencing software, latency and tracking delay concerns can be overcome since you can quantize or manually align notes. With most notation software, such as Sibelius or Finale, you can either import a MIDI part, or in some cases play directly into the software. Of course, you have to understand notation because inevitably youāll need to correct misinterpreted rhythms, simplify confusingly written rhythms, change enharmonic notes to ones that are easier to read, etc. But this isnāt unique to guitarāimported or played MIDI parts almost always require cleanup, regardless of what controller created the parts.
In this notation example (Ex. 8), you can hear the raw guitar track playing a relatively simple melody in A minor. The guitar was converted to MIDI with both MIDI Guitar and Ableton Liveās Convert Harmony to New MIDI Track function. The MIDI Guitar track was also copied and quantized. All three MIDI tracks were exported from Live as MIDI clips and imported into Overture notation software, which in my experience does as good a job at intelligently converting MIDI files to notation as any notation software.
While all three imports are in the ballpark, there are some problems (Fig. 7). First, the key signature was not automatically converted, so you need to know what key the clip is in. Second, the guitar should be written an octave higher than it soundsāstandard practice for guitar notation. Third, the triplet in the second measure was not captured properly. And finally, the third measure came out differently in all the three imports, with the Ableton Convert to Harmony being the closest. The last staff shows the phrase more properly and legibly notated, which I did manually. With even simpler lines, however, the chances of accurate MIDI transcription are higher, but you always need to be vigilant that the conversion-to-notation process was done accurately and legibly.
Fig. 7
Using the guitar as a MIDI controller does have its pitfalls, but it can be an excellent creative and useful tool. As Iāve attempted to demonstrate with the examples in this article, you can use your guitar to trigger extra MIDI notes with arpeggiators or harmonizers, trigger effects, and play sounds that donāt have to be ānormalā instruments or even synths. You can correct for MIDI tracking delay and overcome groove-busting lags by forcing sounds through synchronized gating effects. An added bonus is that you can use guitar to input MIDI for sequencing and notation, though some cleanup is usually required. Hopefully, these examples get your brain thinking about novel and cool ways to use MIDI with guitar. Surprises await.
Testing Latency
With Jam Originās MIDI Guitar 2, I measured overall latency (which includes tracking delay from pitch-to-MIDI conversion) using the following procedure:
- Record a simple one-note-per-string phrase from my guitar into a looper pedal to ensure performance consistency. From low to high, the notes were BbāEbāAbāDbāGbāB on the 6th and 7th frets.
- Route the looper pedal output to an input of the audio interface.
- Route an output from the audio interface to a miked amp.
- Route the microphone in front of amp speaker to second input on audio interface.
I then setup the following tracks in Ableton Live:
- Guitar input with MIDI Guitar 2 as a plug-in
- Guitar direct input
- MIDI track with keyboard plug-in (preferably using a sound with a sharp attack) receiving MIDI signal from MIDI Guitar 2 plug-in
- Miked amp track
Next, Iād play the looped phrase and simultaneously record direct guitar and miked amp synth signal. Once the parts were recorded, I would zoom in to tracks and measure the distance in milliseconds (ms) between the start of the direct guitar waveform and triggered synth signal.
I repeated the procedure above with various buffer settings, running MIDI Guitar 2 as both a plug-in and standalone app while switching between monophonic and polyphonic modes. With a sample rate of 44.1 kHz and a buffer setting of 64 samples, I measured the following average latencies between the onset of a note with direct guitar and miked synth through an amp while running MIDI Guitar 2 as a plug-in on a channel in Ableton Live:
Note (low to high, 6th and 7th frets) | Latency (milliseconds) |
---|---|
Bb | 38.0 |
Eb | 35.5 |
Ab | 30.0 |
Db | 26.8 |
Gb | 24.3 |
B | 21.2 |
I repeated the identical tests in Reaper, another DAW, and it yielded similar results.
Switching between monophonic and polyphonic modes in MIDI Guitar had little effect, though monophonic tended to show 1 to 3 ms less tracking delay. Trying different soft synth plug-ins also had little effect on the measurements, with perhaps a 1 or 2 ms difference between different soft synths. Running MIDI Guitar 2 as a standalone app and inputting MIDI from its virtual MIDI out or IAC Bus had little effect on latency performance, although with my system CPU performance was improved and I could get away with lower buffer sizes while running MIDI Guitar 2 in standalone mode rather than as a plug-in. Interestingly, the difference in measured latency between a 32-sample buffer and a 256-sample buffer in standalone mode was not too dramatic, while the CPU benefits can be very tangible.
Bear in mind these measured latency values include a software offset to make sure that output and recorded audio are in sync. With the test system hereāa MacBook Pro i5 2.9 GHz Intel Core i5 with 8 GB of RAM and a Zoom TAC-2 Thunderbolt audio interface running at 44.1 kHzāthe software offset needed (as measured in Reaper) is 185 samples, or 4.2 ms. Also, it is worth noting that the recorded MIDI data (the output from MIDI Guitar) was approximately 1/2 to 2/3 the latency of the recorded synth audio and generally under 20 ms. This seems to indicate that MIDI Guitar is remarkably fast at pitch-to-MIDI conversion.
A 6L6 power section, tube-driven spring reverb, and a versatile array of line outs make this 1x10 combo an appealing and unique 15-watt alternative.
Supro Montauk 15-watt 1 x 10-inch Tube Combo Amplifier - Blue Rhino Hide Tolex with Silver Grille
Montauk 110 ReverbThe two-in-one āsonic refractorā takes tremolo and wavefolding to radical new depths.
Pros: Huge range of usable sounds. Delicious distortion tones. Broadens your conception of what guitar can be.
Build quirks will turn some users off.
$279
Cosmodio Gravity Well
cosmod.io
Know what a wavefolder does to your guitar signal? If you donāt, thatās okay. I didnāt either until I started messing around with the all-analog Cosmodio Instruments Gravity Well. Itās a dual-effect pedal with a tremolo and wavefolder, the latter more widely used in synthesis that , at a certain threshold, shifts or inverts the direction the wave is travelingāin essence, folding it upon itself. Used together here, they make up what Cosmodio calls a sonic refractor.
Two Plus One
Gravity Wellās design and control set make it a charm to use. Two footswitches engage tremolo and wavefolder independently, and one of three toggle switches swaps the order of the effects. The two 3-way switches toggle different tone and voice options, from darker and thicker to brighter and more aggressive. (Mixing and matching with these two toggles yields great results.)
The wavefolder, which has an all-analog signal path bit a digitally controlled LFO, is controlled by knobs for both gain and volume, which provide enormous dynamic range. The LFO tremolo gets three knobs: speed, depth, and waveform. The first two are self-explanatory, but the latter offers switching between eight different tremolo waveforms. Youāll find standard sawtooth, triangle, square, and sine waves, but Cosmodio also included some wacko shapes: asymmetric swoop, ramp, sample and hold, and random. These weirder forms force truly weird relationships with the pedal, forcing your playing into increasingly unpredictable and bizarre territories.
This is all housed in a trippy, beautifully decorated Hammond 1590BB-sized enclosure, with in/out, expression pedal, and power jacks. I had concerns about the durability of the expression jack because itās not sealed to its opening with an outer nut and washer, making it feel more susceptible to damage if a cable gets stepped on or jostled near the connection, as well as from moisture. After a look at the interior, though, the build seems sturdy as any Iāve seen.
Splatterhouse Audio
Cosmodioās claim that the refractor is a āfirst-of-its-kindā modulation effect is pretty grand, but they have a point in that the wavefolder is rare-ish in the guitar domain and pairing it with tremolo creates some pretty foreign sounds. Barton McGuire, the Massachusetts-based builder behind Cosmodio, released a few videos that demonstrate, visually, how a wavefolder impacts your guitarās signalāI highly suggest checking them out to understand some of the principles behind the effect (and to see an ā80s Muppet Babies-branded keyboard in action.)
By folding a waveform back on itself, rather than clipping it as a conventional distortion would, the wavefolder section produces colliding, reflecting overtones and harmonics. The resulting distortion is unique: It can sound lo-fi and broken in the low- to mid-gain range, or synthy and extraterrestrial when the gain is dimed. Add in the tremolo, and youāve got a lot of sonic variables to play with.
Used independently, the tremolo effect is great, but the wavefolder is where the real fun is. With the gain at 12 oāclock, it mimics a vintage 1x10 tube amp cranked to the breaking point by a splatty germanium OD. A soft touch cleans up the signal really nicely, while maintaining the weirdness the wavefolder imparts to its signal. With forceful pick strokes at high gain, it functions like a unique fuzz-distortion hybrid with bizarre alien artifacts punching through the synthy goop.
One forum commenter suggested that the Gravity Well effect is often in charge as much the guitar itself, and thatās spot on at the pedal's extremes. Whatever you expect from your usual playing techniques tends to go out the window āgenerating instead crumbling, sputtering bursts of blubbering sound. Learning to respond to the pedal in these environments can redefine the guitar as an instrument, and thatās a big part of Gravity Wellās magic.
The Verdict
Gravity Well is the most fun Iāve had with a modulation pedal in a while. It strikes a brilliant balance between adventurous and useful, with a broad range of LFO modulations and a totally excellent oddball distortion. The combination of the two effects yields some of the coolest sounds Iāve heard from an electric guitar, and at $279, itās a very reasonably priced journey to deeply inspiring corners you probably never expected your 6-string (or bass, or drums, or Muppet Babies Casio EP-10) to lead you to.
Kemper and Zilla announce the immediate availability of Zilla 2x12ā guitar cabs loaded with the acclaimed Kemper Kone speaker.
Zilla offers a variety of customization to the customers. On the dedicated Website, customers can choose material, color/tolex, size, and much more.
The sensation and joy of playing a guitar cabinet
Sometimes, when thereās no PA, thereās just a drumkit and a bass amp. When the creative juices flow and the riffs have to bounce back off the wall - thatās the moment when you long for a powerful guitar cabinet.
A guitar cabinet that provides āthatā well-known feel and gives you that kick-in-the-back experience. Because guitar cabinets can move some serious air. But these days cabinets also have to be comprehensive and modern in terms of being capable of delivering the dynamic and tonal nuances of the KEMPER PROFILER. So here it is: The ZILLA 2 x 12ā upright slant KONE cabinet.
These cabinets are designed in cooperation with the KEMPER sound designers and the great people from Zilla. Beauty is created out of decades of experience in building the finest guitar cabinets for the biggest guitar masters in the UK and the world over, combined with the digital guitar tone wizardry from the KEMPER labs. Loaded with the exquisit Kemper Kone speakers.
Now Kemper and Zilla bring this beautiful and powerful dream team for playing, rehearsing, and performing to the guitar players!
ABOUT THE KEMPER KONE SPEAKERS
The Kemper Kone is a 12ā full range speaker which is exclusively designed by Celestion for KEMPER. By simply activating the PROFILERās well-known Monitor CabOff function the KEMPER Kone is switched from full-range mode to the Speaker Imprint Mode, which then exactly mimics one of 19 classic guitar speakers.
Since the intelligence of the speaker lies in the DSP of the PROFILER, you will be able to switch individual speaker imprints along with your favorite rigs, without needing to do extensive editing.
The Zilla KEMPER KONE loaded 2x12ā cabinets can be custom designed and ordered for an EU price of Ā£675,- UK price of Ā£775,- and US price of Ā£800,- - all including shipping (excluding taxes outside of the UK).
For more information, please visit kemper-amps.com or zillacabs.com.
Does the type of finish on an electric guitarāwhether nitro, poly, or oil and waxāreally affect its tone?
Thereās an allure to the sound and feel of a great electric guitar. Many of us believe those instruments have something special that speaks not just to the ear but to the soul, where every note, every nuance feels personal. As much as we obsess over the pickups, wood, and hardware, thereās a subtler, more controversial character at play: the role of the finish. Itās the shimmering outer skin of the guitar, which some think exists solely for protection and aesthetics, and others insist has a role influencing the voice of the instrument. Builders pontificate about how their choice of finishing material may enhance tone by allowing the guitar to ābreathe,ā or resonate unfettered. They throw around terms like plasticizers, solids percentages, and āthin skinā to lend support to their claims. Are these people tripping? Say what you will, but I believe there is another truth behind the smoke.
Itās the shimmering outer skin of the guitar, which some think exists solely for protection and aesthetics, and others insist has a role influencing the voice of the instrument. Builders pontificate about how their choice of finishing material may enhance tone by allowing the guitar to ābreathe,ā or resonate unfettered. They throw around terms like plasticizers, solids percentages, and āthin skinā to lend support to their claims. Are these people tripping? Say what you will, but I believe there is another truth behind the smoke.
Nitrocellulose lacquer, or ānitro,ā has long been the finish of choice for vintage guitar buffs, and itās easy to see why. Used by Fender, Gibson, and other legendary manufacturers from the 1950s through the 1970s, nitro has a history as storied as the instruments itās adorned. Its appeal lies not just in its beauty but in its delicate nature. Nitro, unlike some modern finishes, can be fragile. It wears and cracks over time, creating a visual patina that tells the story of every song, every stage, every late-night jam session. The sonic argument goes like this: Nitro is thin, almost imperceptible. It wraps the wood like silk. The sound is unhindered, alive, warm, and dynamic. Itās as if the guitar has a more intimate connection between its wood and the player's touch. Of course, some call bullscheiĆe.
In my estimation, nitro is not just about tonal gratification. Just like any finish, it can be laid on thick or thin. Some have added flexibility agents (those plasticizers) that help resist damage. But as it ages, old-school nitro can begin to wear and ācheck,ā as subtle lines weave across the body of the guitar. And with those changes comes a mellowing, as if the guitar itself is growing wiser with age. Whether a tonal shift is real or imagined is part of the mystique, but itās undeniable that a nitro-finished guitar has a feel that harkens back to a romantic time in music, and for some thatās enough.
Enter the modern era, and we find a shift toward practicalityāpolyurethane and polyester finishes, commonly known as āpoly.ā These finishes, while not as romantic as nitro, serve a different kind of beauty. They are durable, resilient, and protective. If nitro is like a delicate silk scarf, poly is armorāsometimes thicker, shinier, and built to last. The fact that they reduce production times is a bonus that rarely gets mentioned. For the player who prizes consistency and durability, poly is a guardian. But in that protection, some say, comes a price. Some argue that the sound becomes more controlled, more focusedābut less alive. Still, poly finishes have their own kind of charm. They certainly maintain that showroom-fresh look, and to someone who likes to polish and detail their prized possessions, that can be a big plus.
āWith those changes comes a mellowing, as if the guitar itself is growing wiser with age.ā
For those seeking an even more natural experience, oil and wax finishes offer something primal. These finishes, often applied by hand, mostly penetrate the wood as much as coating it, leaving the guitarās surface nearly bare. Proponents of oil and/or wax finishes say these materials allow the wood to vibrate freely, unencumbered by āheavyā coatings. The theory is thereās nothing getting in the wayāsort of like a nudist colony mantra. Without the protection of nitro or poly, these guitars may wear more quickly, bearing the scars of its life more openly. This can be seen as a plus or minus, I imagine.
My take is that finishes matter because they are part of the bond we have with our instruments. I canāt say that I can hear a difference, and I think a myth has sprouted from the acoustic guitar world where maybe you can. Those who remove their instrumentās finish and claim to notice a difference are going on memory for the comparison. Who is to say every component (including strings) went back together exactly the same? So when we think about finishes, weāre not just talking about toneāweāre thinking about the total connection between musician and instrument. Itās that perception that makes a guitar more than just wood and wire. The vibe makes it a living, breathing part of the musicāand you.