Premier Guitar features affiliate links to help support our content. We may earn a commission on any affiliated purchases.

Speaker Geeks: Tone Is in the Cone

Speaker Geeks: Tone Is in the Cone
These laser scans show the cone behavior of a guitar speaker and a PA speaker at 300 Hz and 3000 Hz. The contrasting dark and light colors indicate the peaks and troughs in movement of points on the cone surface. Even at a relatively low frequency like 300 Hz, the guitar speaker shows significant break up, whereas the PA speaker acts more like a piston. At 3000 Hz, the woofer is coming to the end of its useable bandwidth and starting to break up, yet the guitar speaker still exhibits a great amount of cone resonance.

Discover how a speaker’s parts and assembly methods impact cone movement, and why this is important to guitarists.

You may have heard this before, but it bears repeating: The lion’s share of what we think of as “guitar speaker tone” comes from the cone. Specifically, it’s the complex movement across the cone’s surface that creates the tonal magic. More than anything else, the cone’s physical attributes—its shape, weight, density, and material—give a guitar speaker its unique sound.

A speaker used for sound reinforcement, such as a woofer you’d find in a venue’s PA, is made to be stiff and unyielding so it behaves as much like a piston as possible. This piston-like action—theoretically the “ideal” behavior for a loudspeaker—allows it to more faithfully reproduce the input signal, while adding a minimum of unwanted coloration.

A guitar speaker behaves very differently. To add complexity and desirable colorations to the output, we encourage resonances within the cone—we want it to “wobble about” rather than simply move back and forth. Imagine you’re throwing rocks into a lake: In a PA speaker, the cone’s movement is like a single rock hitting the water and creating concentric outward ripples. These resemble the predictable motion of a stiff cone moving forward and backward. But with a guitar speaker, the cone behaves more as if you’ve thrown a handful of pebbles into the water, thus creating a collection of interfering ripples. Complex patterns moving across the cone’s surface effectively add character and a broad coloration to the speaker’s sonic output.

For the guitar speaker designer, the challenge is to find the best ways to guide and control—and not interfere with—that complex pattern of vibration. To discourage flexibility in a PA cone, we add such materials as polyamide or glass fibers to the paper mix and then make the cone thick. The guitar speaker cone has no such stiffening agents and is made as thin as physically practical to better encourage the desirable vibration across the surface.

A consequence of the frequency of coil movement, a cone’s resonant flexing is the largest contributor to a speaker’s tonal signature. The better we are at designing and building the speaker, the more of the cone’s pure tonality we preserve and the fewer undesirable colorations we introduce into the output.

At low frequencies, when the cone is vibrating in the “piston band,” it moves as a single entity. At higher frequencies, the movement gets
a lot more complicated.

Basically, we want the cone to vibrate in the most natural way possible. This requires careful consideration of how all the elements required to build the speaker, as well as the methods used to assemble it, will impact cone movement.

It takes considerable expertise to find the most sympathetic way to integrate the other constituent parts with the cone. In addition to selecting the most appropriate materials, we might consider the surround, the “springiness” of the suspension, and the size of the voice coil and dust dome. There are many other small elements to consider as well, and taken together they can have a noticeable impact.

We make these choices for practical reasons. For example, we’d select a particular voice coil to achieve a desired power-rating target. We know this choice will alter the overall sonic signature because of how it influences the cone’s movement, so the challenge is to ensure that the overall effect is positive.

At low frequencies, when the cone is vibrating in the “piston band,” it moves as a single entity. At higher frequencies, the movement gets a lot more complicated. As frequency increases, neighboring parts of the cone begin moving in opposite directions from each other and become decoupled. Known as modes of vibration, these movements are generally predictable because they, too, are resonant frequencies of the membrane. The frequencies at which this occurs are dictated by the weight, thickness, and density of the cone material, the cone shape, and the cone’s “boundary conditions” (how it’s clamped at the inner and outer edges). The cone will break up into radial modes that extend out from the center of the cone, as well as concentric modes that form circular patterns of movement on the cone surface.

A speaker’s parts all influence how the modes’ vibrations manifest themselves over the cone surface, and this is where we see the impact of a given design. We’re looking for a smooth transition between cone modes. This is what delivers a tone free of unpleasant and unwanted colorations. It’s the complex interaction of the cone’s vibrational characteristics, summed into one harmonious collection, that yields great tone. Ultimately, the best thing we can do is let that cone sing!

Duane Denison of the Jesus Lizard, EGC Chessie in hands, coaxing some nasty tones from his Hiwatt.

Photo by Mike White

After 26 years, the seminal noisy rockers return to the studio to create Rack, a master class of pummeling, machine-like grooves, raving vocals, and knotty, dissonant, and incisive guitar mayhem.

The last time the Jesus Lizard released an album, the world was different. The year was 1998: Most people counted themselves lucky to have a cell phone, Seinfeld finished its final season, Total Request Live was just hitting MTV, and among the year’s No. 1 albums were Dave Matthews Band’s Before These Crowded Streets, Beastie Boys’ Hello Nasty, The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill, Korn’s Follow the Leader, and the Armageddonsoundtrack. These were the early days of mp3 culture—Napster didn’t come along until 1999—so if you wanted to hear those albums, you’d have to go to the store and buy a copy.

Read MoreShow less

Big time processing power in a reverb that you can explore for a lifetime.

An astoundingly lush and versatile reverb of incredible depth and flexibility. New and older BigSky algorithms included. More elegant control layout and better screen.

It’s pricey and getting the full use out of it takes some time and effort.

$679

Strymon BigSky MX
strymon.net

5
5
4
4

Strymon calls the BigSky MX pedal “one reverb to rule them all.” Yep, that’s a riff on something we’ve heard before, but in this case it might be hard to argue. In updating what was already one of the market’s most comprehensive and versatile reverbs, Strymon has created a reverb pedal that will take some players a lifetime to fully explore. That process is likely to be tons of fun, too.

Read MoreShow less
Fender Player II Stratocaster HSS & Jaguar Demos
- YouTube
Refined necks and delectable sounds elevate the jamming experience in this evolution of the accessibly priced Player Series.
Read MoreShow less

It’s this easy!

This convenient, easy-to-use controller can open up an entire world of sonic shape-shifting. Here are some tips to either inspire you to try one or expand how you’re currently using this flexible, creative device.

If you’re not yet using expression pedals, you should consider them. They have the power to expand and control your sonic universe. For the uninitiated, expression pedals are controllers that typically look like volume or wah pedals. Of course, traditional volume and wah pedals are expression pedals, too, but they are dedicated to controlling only those two effects.

Read MoreShow less