Scott Ian, Rob Caggiano, and Charlie Benante discuss the long-awaited, new studio release from Anthrax, reuniting with original singer Joey Belladonna, and how an Anthrax song comes together.
Hear two tracks from Worship Music: |
To fully appreciate just how monumental this albumās release is, you have to understand a bit about Anthraxās history. As one of the pioneers of thrash metal, Anthrax came into prominence in the mid- to late ā80s with Joey Belladonna as the voice behind classic albums like Spreading the Disease and Among the Living. In 1992, shortly after crossing-over into the mainstream with the thrash meets rap āBring the Noiseā collaboration with Public Enemy, Belladonna was fired and replaced by John Bush, who had just disbanded Armored Saint. In 2005, Belladonna was asked to perform with the band again for a one-off reunion tour. Bush, who was still officially the vocalist at the time, was also asked to take part on the tour and share the vocal duties, but declined. Although Belladonna sang on that tour, he was not asked to rejoin the band. The slot was saved for Bush, but he had quit the band by the time the tour was over. Anthrax then recruited vocalist Dan Nelson in 2007 and began work on what would become Worship Music. After recording most of the album, Nelson unexpectedly quit the band (or was fired, depending on who you ask) in 2009, leaving Anthrax with a mostly-finished album and no vocalist.
Metallicaās induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame turned out to be the catalyst for change. Founding members Scott Ian and Charlie Benante were having a drink with Lars Ulrich when Ulrich brought up the possibility of a Big 4 tour featuring Metallica, Megadeth, Slayer, and Anthrax. The tour materialized and in 2010, Belladonna was brought back onboard since he was the voice of Anthrax from 1985 to 1992, the years the Big 4 came to prominence. The third time proved to be the charm for Belladonnaāhe ended up re-recording the vocals forWorship Music and is now officially back in the band. The album, co-produced by guitarist Rob Caggiano and producer Jay Ruston, marks Anthraxās 30th anniversary and is Belladonnaās first studio album with the band since 1990ās Persistence of Time.
Many feel that Worship Music blows virtually every metal release this year out of the water. Songs like āIn the End,ā an homage to the late Ronnie James Dio and Dimebag Darrell, the knock-your-head-off thrash of āEarth on Hell,ā and the Anthrax-meets-AC/DC riffage of āThe Devil You Knowā (streamed above) will quench the thirst of fans that consider Belladonna to be the Anthrax vocalist and who have waited more than two decades to hear his voice on a new Anthrax album. A few days before their Big 4 hometown gig at Yankee Stadium, Premier Guitar caught up with guitarists Scott Ian and Rob Caggiano, and drummer/principal songwriter Charlie Benante.
Worship Music was just about finished when singer Dan Nelson left. What was the game plan at that point?
Caggiano: We didnāt really know what to think or what to expect. The only thing that was inevitable was that we had to put the thing on ice for a while, until we figured out what we were going to do. We actually got pretty far with the album, all the way up to the mixing stage. Iād say it was about 85 percent done when all that stuff went down.
Benante: He quit the day we were going to Europe to finish up a festival. He quit that day.
Thatās really screwed up.
Benante: Uh, yeah. Think about how we felt. That day I had all of these thoughts in my head, like āNow what?ā But the thing is, Iāve been doing this for so long that I couldnāt let a little bump like that hurt me.
How did Joey Belladonna get back into the picture?
Benante: I had written some acoustic songs that didnāt really fit with Anthrax. I was looking for a vocalist to do a side project with so I had actually reached out to Joey awhile back. I sent him some songs, we started to talk, and our relationship started to become good again. Then Metallica dropped this Big 4 thing. Thatās when we started taking the idea of Joey coming back into the band more seriously.
Ian: We literally just called him up. It was early 2010 and we all ended up getting together to meet. We just sat around and bullshitted for a little while and then made the decision to move forward with this being the band until there is no more band, hopefully.
You had most of the songs done by the time Joey came back in. Did you have to rework them to accommodate his style?
Ian: We had about 13 or 14 songs in some state of being finished or almost finished. And after not listening to them for about a year, we pretty much spent all of our time in the dressing room listening to the songs last fall when we were on tour with Slayer and Megadeth. We took a song per day and then made decisions. Does it still hold up? Are we still in love with it? Do we still think itās awesome?
After that run, we narrowed it down to the 10 that we felt either completely held up or just needed some rewriting and re-recording. There were about three or four other songs that either got thrown in the trash or just got put on the shelf until we could spend more time on them.
Benante: Joeyās approach to it was way different, at least different than I imagined. He brought a different flavor to it and it was so apparent that we found what was missing. It sounds like Anthrax now.
Caggiano: Joey basically came in and did his own take on the songs, injecting his own sound on them. There were three songs that we actually went in and re-tracked. āFight āEm āTill You Canātā is one of them. That song didnāt really changeāitās just that weād been playing it live, so we felt that we could play it better after doing it for a couple of years. āIn the End,ā which was originally called āDown Goes the Sun,ā was also re-cut, re-tweaked, and rewritten.
Benante: I really fought for āIn the End.ā I felt it needed to be on the record because it was so different than anything else.
Charlie, what kind of resistance did you face with that song?
Benante: These guys just felt like it wasnāt ready yet. We had a problem with the chorus of the song and it went back and forth like, āYeah I like itā to āNah, I donāt like it.ā It was that type of thing. And then the guys said to me, āWork on it some more.ā I did, but the song turned out to be seven minutes long. But it was good because it didnāt feel like seven minutes, and who cares if itās seven minutes long?
I sent everybody a demo version and that was itāeverybody liked it. It has a melancholy feel, which is probably why I thought of Dimebag. If he were here, heād probably be playing on this album. We would have asked him to.
I understand that this record is the first time you guys were not present at the vocal sessions. Thatās a pretty big level of trust especially considering itās been so long since youāve recorded with Joey.
Benante: Joey has a pretty good relationship with Jay Ruston and Jay was pretty much producing the vocals, so we felt like we didnāt need to be there. Plus, I don't think we needed to be the jury in the room. Personally, I wanted to give Joey the room and the freedom to do whatever he wanted.
Ian: We got mp3s sent to us every night. We made notes and stuff but we werenāt sitting in the room with them all day long.
Why was Joey fired the first time?
Benante: I really should clarify a lot of this stuff. I must say that back when this all went down, we were all very young men [laughs]. I donāt think we were mature enough to handle certain high-pressure situations and I think the easiest way to handle them was to just get rid of them. Certain people had issues with other people, they just built up, and that was it, basically.
So it was a personality conflict?
Benante: Correctamundo.
Is Joey here to stay now?
Benante: Oh heās definitely here to stay.
Caggiano: Absolutelyāas long as he wants to. I mean we love him, the vibe is great, and the shows are great.
The music business has totally changed since your last album, with piracy at an all-time high. Considering what an affair itās been to get this album out, are you worried about this?
Ian: No. Why would we worry about that? Weāve never been the kind of band that had any use for the industry other than it being a distribution channel for getting our music out there. Weāre a thrash-metal band that started in the underground and weāre still here 30 years later. We do everything ourselvesāthe same way weāve always done it. We worry about things that we can control like making records and playing live.
Benante: I donāt think thereās a quick fix or even a long-term fix for the music business. They totally screwed it up and now we suffer for it. You go through all this hard work making an album, and what happens? A certain demographic out there considers it free. Itās like, āHello idiots. Itās not free. It costs money to make this.ā
As much as I love Apple and iTunes, I think theyāre partly responsible for a lot of this too. I miss those days of going to a Tower Records and shopping for hours just discovering new things.
Ian (signature Jackson in hand) and Rob (with his ESP Custom Shop Horizons)
Even with your enormous fan base, eight years is a long time between album releases. Were you concerned that youād lose fans because the wait was so long?
Ian: I never thought about that in my whole life.
Caggiano: Even though we took a long time, I think it worked to our advantage because we had all of this time to really sit with our songs and tweak them. We were tweaking things to the 11th hour and the songs are as good as they could possibly be. I think theyāre great.
Benante: I was just talking to someone else about this. The problem we have nowadays is the immediacy of everything. Everything is āget it done right now,ā and I think it hurts in a sense because as fast as it comes is as fast as it goes. It has no longevity. So I think making people wait for something is good.
Can you talk us through the writing of an Anthrax song from beginning to end?
Ian: We get in a room and we jam. We arrange it and we just know what sounds right. āOkay, this sounds like a verse and okay, this sounds like a chorus.ā And you just start arranging things until youāre happy.
Benante: Either Iāll come in with the basic framework for a song or Iāll come in with a whole song. Then Scott, Frankie Bello, and I will sit in our rehearsal room and Iāll show them the ideas. It grows from there where Iāll bounce ideas off them and theyāll add something to it. āEarth on Hellā was one of those songs that was already done when I brought it in and āIn the Endā was another one. Sometimes they just come out that way, but sometimes the guys will modify a riff or add something to it. Once we have a start and a finish, Scott will take the song and come up with some lyrics and Frankie will work on the melodies. This time, I wrote a lot of the melodies with the guys too. Joey also added his two cents to it.
Caggiano: Charlieās been one of the main songwriters in Anthrax for a long time and he definitely has that whole shtick down, so the tunes are in a pretty good place when he brings them in. Thereāll be arrangement tweaks or like, āPlay this chord here instead of that.ā We just mold it into what the band is all about.
Benante: The songs stay pretty much true to the way they were when brought in, although sometimes theyād get altered a little bit.
What about something like that catchy riff in āJudas Priest?ā Was that added in later?
Benante: Yeah. Rob came up with that lead section. It was one of my favorite parts that he did on the record. Rob has a really good ear for that kind of stuff and I like his leads because theyāre like songs within a song.
Caggiano: Each one of us brings our own stamp to the music and it definitely gets to the next level that way. Itās funny that you mentioned that one because thatās another one of the songs that we went back and re-tracked. It was originally called āManiacal,ā and the original solo on that song was my favorite on the entire record. I was really into it but after all that shit went down with the singer, we kind of felt like that song had a negative vibe to it. We felt like we needed to rework it. Charlie came in to recut some stuff and the song is completely different, other than that opening riff.
Rob, you played some great solos on this album, like the one in āThe Devil You Know.ā Are your solos worked out?
Caggiano: I donāt really like to plan things out because I find that it makes it sound stale. I like to keep the spontaneity and the fire. What I do is put the song on really loud in the studio and just jam to the track. Iāll do like three or four passes and then itāll start to take shape in my head. Iāll listen back to the performances and I might like that part from this take or that melody line from that take, and Iāll just make mental notes. Then Iāll come up with the plan in my head and go for it. Itās not practiced or rehearsedāitās very off-the-cuff.
āCrawlā begins with some haunting chords. Can you tell us about that?
Benante: It was played on a 12-string. I have a Jackson doubleneck thatās like a Jimmy Page replica and I played it down near the bridge. I wanted Allison, the cellist on that song, to give it a John Williams, Jaws effect. Thatās probably another one of my favorite songs because itās so different. I remember being a little worried about showing everybody that song, but they liked it.
Charlie, a lot of the songs you write have very rhythmic guitar parts. Does that come from being a drummer?
Benante: Most of the songs are written from a guitar point of view, but the drummer is still inside of me so itās a very rhythmic thing. I like to be rhythmic and percussive on the guitar. Honestly dude, when Iām there in my room writing riffs, Iām almost possessed by the whole thing.
āThe Giantā is very rhythmic.
Benante: It is very rhythmic. You know, I gotta say if thereās one song I wish I could do over, drumming-wise, it would be that one. I hear it in a different way now.
Then how will you play it live? The way it was recorded or the way youāre hearing it in your head now?
Benante: Thatās a good point. I donāt know [laughs]. It may start off the way I played it on the record and it may evolve later on. That happens to a lot of our songs when we play them live. They evolve, they change, and they become something different. Thereās a great quote from Sting where he said, āThe way we do music is wrong. We write a song, record it, and go out and play it. But after you play it through a tour youāre playing it different and so much better. Thatās when you should go record it.ā
Tell us about your guitars.
Caggiano: I use ESP Custom Shop Horizons and I have a signature model on its way. Most of my guitars are loaded with Dimarzio Tone Zone pick-ups but Dimarzio is working on a brand new signature bridge pickup right now based on some ideas I have. I use Sperzel (or ESP) Locking Tuners on all my guitars and I play a fixed bridge most of the time.
Benante: I have a Van Halen āSharkā replica with Dimarzio Super Distortion pickups, a 1980 Charvel Starbody also with Super Distortion pickups, a Gibson Howard Roberts "fusion" with stock pickups, and a 2005 Jackson custom double-neck Jimmy Page replica, just to name a few.
Ian: Which guitars? I have about 70 guitars. On tour I use all my new Jackson signature models. In the studio, two Jackson signature models as well as a 1982 Randy Rhoads model and old Soloist model (the one with the NY logo on it).
Scott, as I understand youāve used that NY Yankees Jackson on every record.
Ian: Yeah. I used those two and my 1981 Gibson V on every record.
Charlie, a Gibson Howard Roberts guitar seems like an odd choice for a guy in Anthrax. What prompted you to get it?
Benante: Okay, Iāll tell you a funny story about that guitar. Back in 1992 we had just signed to Elektra and I got some money and I always wanted a Howard Roberts so I went and bought it. The reason I got that guitar is that the guys from the Cure spoke highly of it. And I was totally absorbed with that whole sound they were getting back then.
The Cure! Who would have guessed? Have you used the Howard Roberts guitar on any Anthrax recordings?
Itās been played on some Anthrax songs like āBlack Lodgeā and āWalk All Over You,ā an AC/DC cover song that we did. I tried to use it on this record but it didnāt work.
Charlie, who made your Van Halen Shark replica guitar?
Benante: A friend of mine named Mark. I also have two other Van Halen replicas.
What about amps?
Caggiano: I use Fryette Pitbull Ultra-Lead heads with KT88s and matching cabs.
Benante: My Vox amps are still my favorites. I have two AC30sāmy original from 1990 and a newer model from 2006.
Ian: I use my Randall Signature series amp exclusively. Dave Friedman made three modules based on tones from previous records. The first one called āMalcom,ā has clean rock AC/DC-type sounds, the middle one is called 1987 and itās basically my main rhythm tone that Iāve had forever, and then the last module called āThe Nutsā is more high-gain and modern sounding, comparable to an EVH. Dave Friedman re-built my Randall cab from the ground up. I always thought the Randall cabs sounded like shoe boxes. Dave pointed out a few problems that made them sound that way and we fixed it for them.
Scott, youāre a really heavy hitter yet you use .88 mm picks, a relatively light gauge.
I used to use 1 mm picks. At some point someone said to me, āTry using a lighter pick,ā and there was an .88 mm lying around. I used it and it felt good. Way, way back in the early ā80s, I actually used a .73 mm, but I felt those were too bendy. Then I jumped to the 1 mms and later the .88 mms.
Staying in tune is important to me and I have a pretty heavy right hand. I really dig in and when playing live, the last thing I want is for the chords to ring out of tune. I use a custom set of strings with a heavy top and a heavier bottomāI think itās .011, .016, .022 (wound), .030, .044, and .059.
Anthrax Gear Boxes
Scott Ian
Guitars: Jackson Scott Ian Signature, 1982 Jackson Randy Rhoads (studio only), 1987 Jackson Soloist with NY Yankees logo (studio only), 1981 Gibson Flying V (studio only. All guitars outfitted with Seymour Duncan JB pickups.
Amps & Cabs: Randall Scott Ian RM100SI with EL34s and Dave Friedman modules based on tones from previous records, Dave Friedman-modified Randall SI412 cab, Marshall JCM 800 (Rebuilt by Steven Fryette, studio).
Effects: MXR Carbon Copy Delay, MXR EVH Flanger, MXR Micro Chorus, DigiTech Whammy, and Dunlop 404 CAE Wah. Effects controlled by Ground Control switcher.
Accessories: D'Addario custom set: .011, .016, .022 (wound), .030, .044, and .059, Monster Cables, Shure wireless, Mono Cases strap, Dunlop .88mm picks.
Guitars: ESP Custom Shop Horizons. All guitars outfitted with DiMarzio Tone Zone pickups and Sperzel or ESP locking tuners, most with a fixed bridge.
Amps & Cabs: Fryette Pitbull Ultra Lead heads (with KT88s) and matching cabs.
Effects: Dunlop Cry Baby Classic, Boss Tuner, MXR GT-OD, Death By Audio Interstellar Overdriver Deluxe, Rockbox Boiling Point, MXR Smart Gate, MXR EVH Phase 90, MXR Micro Chorus, and Boss DD-5. Effects controlled by Musicom Lab EFX MKII.
Accessories: D'Addario .010s, DiMarzio cables, Mono Cases straps and DiMarzio Straps, Dunlop Yellow Tortex picks.
A candid reply to internet trolls slinging mud at the unorthodox designs of fearlessly forward-thinking German luthier Uli Teuffel.
Just prior to finishing the issue youāre holding in your eager hands (or reading on your favorite digital device), most of the PG staff had put in several long days at the Summer NAMM show in Nashville. We hate to brag, but we wonāt lie, eitherāwhen it comes to gear coverage, we absolutely dominated the show. No matter where you were on the floor, you could pretty much turn your head and see one of our eight editors in their highly visible black PG T-shirt, cruising from one booth to the next to snap photos and shoot HD videos. If you couldnāt be in Nashville to visit the show yourself, all you had to do was keep an eye on our Facebook wall (facebook.com/premierguitar) throughout the day to see a continuous strings of postsāwith specs and a nice pictureāon the cool new guitar and bass goodies. And by nightfall each day, we had several video demos from the show up on premierguitar.com and on our YouTube channel.
It was a grueling trip, to be sure. But thatās because weāre sort of the freaks of guitar-media universe. No other guitar outlet gets you pics and info in virtual real time, and then provides you with video demos on the latest gear as fast or as professionally as we do. (We usually get you reviews of that new gear before the other guys, too.) Thatās why our YouTube channel is at 15 million views and counting.
For me, one of the most enjoyable videos of the show was a demo we shot of the Teuffel Tesla Prodigy guitar. Iāve known of Ulrich Teuffelās gorgeously futuristic designs for years, but Iād never seen one in person, let alone heard one played in front of me. We asked Jamie Gale, Teuffelās North American distributor, to demo the guitar. Though Jamie had only been working with the German company for a few weeks and had hardly played the rather strangely outfitted instrumentāwhich has three momentary switches for a 60-cycle-hum generator, a kill switch, and a feedback generatorāhe agreed to do so. I felt bad asking him to do it, because I knew it would be daunting to come up with a musical way to incorporate such avant-garde features on the spur of the moment, but I didnāt want to let that opportunity slip through our fingersāif PG didnāt get a nice-looking, well-micād demo of the Tesla Prodigy, who else would?
It didnāt take long for the traditionalist haters/trolls to descend on Jamie and Teuffel after weād uploaded the video to YouTube. The comments section was filled with predictable shots about the unusual looks and not-for-everyone features, in addition to a lot of over-the-top jackass comments from people with closed minds and/or insecure egos. Several people were sure that I, as the interviewer, shared their sentiments.
They couldnāt have been further from the truth: Though I felt bad for putting Jamie on the immortalized-on-YouTube spot with such an unusual instrumentāa guitar I wouldāve been scared to demo on such short notice, tooāif I couldāve chosen one instrument from the NAMM-show floor to take home and mess around with for a while, it probably wouldāve been the Tesla Prodigy. And I stand behind the video, too: Jamie did a great job under such duress, and the audio from the video speaks for itself. Even if you think the three weirdo switches are uncalled for, thereās no denying that the guitar generated fantastic tones through the tiny Blackstar combo blasting into our SM57.
A day or two after the show, I got a call from Jamie. As a businessman, he was worried about his clientās wares being slagged in the slums of YouTube comment sections. Of course, as a player, he also hated being unfairly crapped on every bit as much as you and I would. He wondered if it would be best to take the video down. I left it up to him, but I told him my take on the whole situation: āFly your freak flag high, man!ā
Jamie agreed we should leave the video up after we ruminated on how the internetās anonymity can turn otherwise decent people into know-it-all jerksāitās a pastime for a certain element of societyāand after I reiterated that there was really no other place online where you could find a video that focused on Teuffelās handsome guitar like ours did. More importantly, though, I reminded him that a lot of the stuff we consider totally mundane nowādistortion, flanging, backward effects, and radical pitch shifting, to name a fewābegan their existence as magnets for societyās dung-bomb throwers. Hell, can you imagine what people were saying about Paul Bigsby when he built that first solidbody for Merle Travis while everyone else was building acoustics and semi-hollow guitars?
Iām not saying someday weāll all have 60-cycle-hum buttons on our guitars, but I believe in a future thatās wide open for people to shake off the shackles of convention and keep blazing a trail forward while taking what they need/want from the tried-and-true approaches of the past. The Tesla Prodigy may or may not be for you, but thatās not the point. The point is that the audacious spirit embodied by Ulrich Teuffelās design is the very spirit that led to practically all the musical innovations we treasure todayāboth in the instruments we play and the music we listen to. Those who fly their freak flags high are those who are remembered. Think of just about any legendary musician or instrument builder out there, and I think youāll see exactly what Iām talking about.
Freakishly yours,
Shawn Hammond
shawn@premierguitar.com
Gretsch authority Ed Ball takes us back in time to explain the genesis and evolution of one of the companyās most revered and coveted guitarsāthe Duo Jet.
A close-up of the DeArmond Dynasonic-equipped 1954 Silver Jet. Courtesy of Matt Riz/Photo by Rachel Thoele
In the summer of 1953, the Gretsch Company responded to the new threat of solidbody electric guitars from both Gibson and Fender with its own offeringāthe Gretsch Duo Jet model 6128. With its dual DeArmond Dynasonic pickups, the 6128 possessed contours that were clearly inspired by the Gibsonās highly successful Les Paul model introduced in 1952. The Duo Jet was also the first Gretsch electric model to facilitate truss-rod adjustments via a headstock mechanism concealed by a bullet-shaped cover. Unlike the Les Paulās metallic āgoldtopā finish, the Gretsch Duo Jet featured a black top made of Nitron plastic. And although it was considered a solidbody instrument, it in fact employed a chambered body that reduced weight and contributed to the modelās signature tone.
Upon returning to production after World War II, the Gretsch factory in Brooklyn, New York, initiated a sequential serial-numbering system that marked instruments with stamped paper labels that were applied inside the guitars. Jet solidbodiesā labels were inside the large control cavity in the back of the guitar. A unique feature not shared by other Gretsch models is the fact that the Duo Jet also had its serial number handwritten on the outside edge of the black plate covering the large control cavity. This was done to relieve the retailer from having to remove the plate to document the number.
A rare example of an early 1954 Gretsch Silver Jet from the fi rst production batch to include the
sparkly variation on the Duo Jet design. Guitar Courtesy of Matt Riz/Photo by Rachel Thoele
Birth and a Sparkly Evolution
The Gretsch factory was known to have produced guitars in batches, typically 50 or 100 units of a particular model at a time. However, the debut 6128 batch consisted of 150 units with serial numbers from 11900 to 12049. These are considered the sole examples of 1953-model-year Duo Jets. The identifying feature of these debut-batch Duo Jets is the āscriptā-style logo inlaid on their headstocksāa carryover from the companyās Synchromatic guitar line, which had a similar type style in its headstock logos. The limited production of these 1953 script-logo Duo Jets makes them quite popular with collectors.
The second batch of Duo Jets also had 150 units (serial numbers 12950ā13099). These are considered the first of the 1954 model year. These ā54 Jets featured a new inlaid headstock logo commonly referred to as the Gretsch āT-roof ā logo. Included in this batch was a new iteration of the Jet solidbody known as the Silver Jet model 6129. This variation on the Duo Jet theme featured a lustrous silver-sparkle top made from the same material that the Gretsch factory used to cover drum shells. This model represents the first example of the Jet solidbody format expanded with new finish options. Subsequent Jet solidbody batches would be produced with a mix of both model 6128 Duo Jets and model 6129 Silver Jets.
The second batch of Jets included the new Gretsch āT-roofā logo inlay. Courtesy of Matt Riz/Photo by Rachel Thoele
The ā54 Silver Jet above is serial number 12955ājust six units into the batchāand it might just be the first example of the Silver Jet ever produced. It displays a model stamp on itās interior label of 6128, with a hand-penciled āSā next to it, suggesting that the 6129 model stamps prevalent in later specimens of this model were not yet available. But the most exciting aspect of this amazing guitar is the fact that it retains the script-logo headstock motif thought to have been abandoned after the ā53 debut batch. But recent research confirms that Duo Jet number 12951 also displays the script-logo headstock, corroborating the fact that the first few specimens from this second Jet solidbody production batch apparently received the last of the script-logo headstocks. Research also shows that the switch to the new-for-ā54 T-roof headstock motif was complete by serial number 12958, which means this holy grail Silver Jet is one of the last guitars to receive the script logo on its headstock.
So this Silver Jet, plausibly the first of its 6129 kind, might simultaneously be the last of its kind relative to the script-logo headstock. It remains to be seen if any of the other eight guitars from the beginning of that second batch (serial numbers 12950ā 12957) were Silver Jets with the rare script-logo headstock. Regardless, this specimen is a unique and historically significant instrument coveted by many Gretsch aficionados.
This rare example of a 1957 Jet (serial number 25545) has all the characteristics of the fi rst Cadillac-green batch, including standard 6128 Duo Jet labels and August 1957 potentiometer codes. Photo courtesy of Billy Straus
Firebirds and Cadillacs
In the 1955 model year, Gretsch designers expanded the Jet solidbody options again with the introduction of the Jet Firebird model 6131. Sharing identical features and hardware with its siblings, this variation offered an Oriental red top finish and black back and sides. This model went on to be associated with the great Bo Diddley, who could be seen playing it on the cover of his 1959 album Go Bo Diddley.
Upon this third finish optionās inclusion in the Jet solidbody lineup, all subsequent Jet batches included all three models (6128, 6129, and 6131). These guitars would represent the Jet solidbody offering until sometime in late 1957, when Gretsch introduced two special limited-run mini batches with a new finish and a different hardware package. These mini batches began with serial numbers 255XX and 262XX, and they consisted of Jet solidbodies with a Cadillac-green finish that previously had been exclusive to the companyās Country Club model 6196 electric archtop. In addition to this new finish, the hardware on guitars in these mini batches was gold-platedāan upgrade option not available on the other three existing Jet models. These Cadillac green Jets have labels with the standard 6128 Duo Jet model stamp, and their potentiometer codes date from August 1957. Another unique feature on many (if not all) of these Cadillac-green Jets is a banjo-style armrest, an accoutrement only shared with the legendary White Penguin model 6134āwhich, perhaps not-so-coincidentally, was produced in batch 263XX immediately after the second mini batch of Cadillac-green Jets.
The Cadillac-green fi nish on certain 1957 Jets had previously only been available on Gretsch Country
Club 6196 models, while the armrest also appeared on White Penguin 6134 models that were produced
immediately after the batch this specimen came from. Photo courtesy of Billy Straus
Because of their relative rarityāonly 50ā75 specimens are believed to have been producedāand their elegant aesthetic, these green-and-gold Jets are also holy grail guitars to many Gretsch collectors. Other Jets with later serial numbers and model-year features have surfaced in this finish, but they are almost certainly one-off custom orders. These minibatch examples, with their classic ā57-model-year āhumpblockā fretboard inlays are the original, and a greatly sought-after prize.
Ed Ball is an authority on vintage Gretsch guitars. His book Gretsch 6120: The History of a Legendary Guitar was published by Schiffer Books in 2010.