Premier Guitar features affiliate links to help support our content. We may earn a commission on any affiliated purchases.

Bass Bench: Pondering the Cabinet Conundrum

Bass Bench: Pondering the Cabinet Conundrum
Cutaway view of a typical bass speaker: (1) magnet, (2) voice coil, (3) suspension, (4) diaphragm.

Should bassists pay more attention to the humble speaker enclosure?

In recent decades, the bass has expanded its frequency range—not only in the lower register, but also in the higher realms. That’s not just because of newer extended range basses. It’s also because of what today’s players and listeners accept as a modern bass sound. Which begs the question: In contrast to all the attention we lavish on the details of our instruments, do we devote enough time to pondering the functionality and details of our cabinets?

In addition to checking the wattage rating, here is what most of us expect from a “good” cabinet: fairly linear, unaltered amplification over the complete frequency range. Sounds almost simple, right? However, in terms of physical acoustics, cabinet and speaker designs are spiked by so many compromises one wonders how much of what we’re hearing accurately reflects the sound of the string we’ve just plucked. And the deeper one digs, the more confusing and unsolvable the physical limits appear to be, especially after phase, direction, and room acoustics are factored in.

Let’s start with the “sweet spot”—something we understand from listening to home stereo systems. It’s not only the location that’s an equal distance from both speakers. It’s also the position where we get to hear the complete frequency range because our ears are at the same height and (almost) perpendicular to the area of the speaker cones. This is because speakers “beam” at higher frequencies, meaning the higher the frequency, the more a speaker’s output shifts from omnidirectional to directed.

In terms of physical acoustics, cabinet and speaker designs are spiked by so many compromises one wonders how much of what we’re hearing accurately reflects the sound of the
string we’ve just plucked.

As musicians, we’re all familiar with this effect, yet it’s rare to encounter an explanation. And no, it’s not because the higher the frequency, the more it comes from the conical center of the speaker. It has more to do with the overall geometrical parameters of the speaker and cabinet, and a direct relationship of speaker size to wavelength. Or more generally: The larger the source is compared to a certain wavelength, the more directional the beam. (If you want to dig deeper, the Huygens-Fresnel Principle makes a good starting search term.)

Here are some numbers about the range we’re talking about. Let’s say the lower end should be around 20 Hz, which isn’t far from the fundamentals of a low F#. This frequency has a wavelength of 678 inches, which is 56.5 feet or 17.2 meters. On good hi-fi systems, the upper end is often 20 kHz or above, with 15 kHz being an optimistic limit for aging rock stars, while a practical upper limit for bass is around 10 kHz. At 10 kHz, the corresponding wavelength is 1.36 inches, which is 0.11 feet or 0.03 meters. It would be naive to expect linear, uncolored output over this huge range, especially because most bass cabinets sport an array of identically sized speakers, perhaps augmented with a tweeter. And if you think the answer lies in an array of different speakers, having more than one source of waves means there will be phase correlations and places of total cancelation.


Polar plot of a loudspeaker going from omnidirectional to directed, and it’s as complicated as it looks!
Illustration courtesy of commons.wikimedia.org

If we examine the details, even one speaker is more than a single source. And then there’s room acoustics that generate reflections, cancelations, resonances, and standing waves from the walls. With all of this, how can we make sure everybody in a rehearsal room is hearing the same thing? We can’t. But there’s no need to freak out, because in real life all this supposed chaos works surprisingly well.

Still, a few things become obvious once we learn more about the physical basics: For example, as opposed to many guitarists, bassists use closed cabinets because an open cabinet acoustically short-changes our critical low range. Apropos low range: It helps to place bass cabinets in a room’s corner to circumvent the long waves’ omnidirectional spread and keep them directed.

Beaming in higher frequency ranges explains why some 4x12 guitar cabinets have two tilted upper speakers, and why some guitarists use wedges and tilting helpers for small guitar combos. And the more we bass players break into higher frequency ranges, the more we should think about this, too, whether it’s using wedges, putting a greater distance between ourselves and the sound source, or exploring other solutions to more directly face our own speakers instead of wobbling the air around our trousers.

With a team of experts on hand, we look at six workhorse vintage amps you can still find for around $1,000 or less.

If you survey the gear that shows up on stages and studios for long enough, you’ll spot some patterns in the kinds of guitar amplification players are using. There’s the rotating cast of backline badasses that do the bulk of the work cranking it out every day and night—we’re all looking at you, ’65 Deluxe Reverb reissue.

Read MoreShow less

Amazon Prime Day is here (July 16-17). Whether you're a veteran player or just picking up your first guitar, these are some bargains you don't want to miss. Check out more deals here! https://amzn.to/3LskPRV

Read MoreShow less

A technicolor swirl of distortion, drive, boost, and ferocious fuzz.

Summons a wealth of engaging, and often unique, boost, drive, distortion, and fuzz tones that deviate from common templates. Interactive controls.

Finding just-right tones, while rewarding, might demand patience from less assured and experienced drive-pedal users. Tone control could be more nuanced.

$199

Danelectro Nichols 1966
danelectro.com

4.5
4
4
4.5

The Danelectro Nichols 1966, in spite of its simplicity, feels and sounds like a stompbox people will use in about a million different ways. Its creator, Steve Ridinger, who built the first version as an industrious Angeleno teen in 1966, modestly calls the China-made Nichols 1966 a cross between a fuzz and a distortion. And, at many settings, it is most certainly that.

Read MoreShow less

The author standing next to a Richardson gunstock lathe purchased from Gibson’s Kalamazoo factory. It was used to make six necks at a time at Gibson in the 1950s and 1960s.

Keep your head down and put in the work if you want to succeed in the gear-building business.

The accelerated commodification of musical instruments during the late 20th century conjures up visions of massive factories churning out violins, pianos, and, of course, fretted instruments. Even the venerable builders of the so-called “golden age” were not exactly the boutique luthier shops of our imagination.

Read MoreShow less