Porcupine Tree’s Steven Wilson and the Aristocrats’ Guthrie Govan conjure a prog juggernaut with a little help from studio giant Alan Parsons.
Steven Wilson likes creepy stuff—he must. There’s no other explanation for the Porcupine Tree frontman’s new solo album, The Raven That Refused to Sing (and Other Stories)—a prog-rock opus featuring six supernatural tales in the vein of M.R. James and Edgar Allan Poe, and eerie artwork by German illustrator Hajo Mueller. It certainly explains a lot of his other activities, including producing Opeth’s 2001 death-metal masterpiece Blackwater Park and collaborating with Opeth frontman Mikael Åkerfeldt on the decidedly macabre, Grammy-nominated Storm Corrosion project.
As with his compatriots in Porcupine Tree, Wilson seems to gravitate toward monster musicians, too. After touring with Aristocrats drummer Marco Minnemann and keyboardist Adam Holzman in support of his previous solo effort, 2011’s Grace for Drowning, Wilson also brought terrifyingly talented Aristocrats guitarist Guthrie Govan into the fold. Govan’s incredible legato technique and stunning phrasing lend The Raven a tastefully virtuosic guitar element that brings new dimensions to Wilson’s majestic vocabulary, and it was perhaps Govan’s presence in an already fire-breathing band that gave Wilson the courage to track the album almost completely live—a feat he never felt confident enough to attempt before. Of course, it helped that Wilson tapped one of the giants of studio engineering—Alan Parsons, renowned both for his work on Pink Floyd’s The Dark Side of the Moon and his many hits with the Alan Parsons Project—to oversee the sessions at L.A.’s equally legendary East West Studios.
With a lush guitar tone courtesy of a PRS Custom 22 plugged into Vox AC30 and Marshall amps, Wilson pumps out chiming, expansive rhythm parts that form a locus around which Minnemann, Govan, and Holzman—as well as bassist Nick Beggs and flute, sax and clarinet player Theo Travis—rally their estimable talents on tracks that evoke classic Yes, King Crimson, U.K., Genesis, and even Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young. “Luminol” features Steve Howe-inspired staccato licks and a massive, half-time Mellotron coda, while “Drive Home” has a lush shuffle buoyed by EBow’d guitars and a wriggling Govan solo, and the 3/4-time acoustic epic “The Watchmaker” boasts the album’s most memorable vocal and lyrical touches—and they’re possibly the heaviest, darkest harmonies Wilson has ever composed.
The Raven is the first time you’ve recorded a live band—what prompted that?
For me, that’s quite an unusual way to work.
I’ve simply never felt confident enough with
the whole team to do that. But with this band
and this engineer, I thought it was time to
try it—and it came out great. We recorded
the entire album live, in seven days, with the
exception of vocals and a few other things I
did later. There were seven songs originally,
but one didn’t make the final record. Every day
when we showed up, we’d pick a song and run
through it a few times while Alan would be
in the control room tweaking the sounds, and
then it was, “Okay, let’s go for a few takes.”
We’d do a few takes, then go into the control
room to listen back, pick our favorite one, add
some keyboard or guitar overdubs, and that
was it—finished. Next song, next day. I’m a
convert to that approach now. And the results
speak for themselves. In some of the solos, for
instance, you can really hear Marco responding
to the way Guthrie is phrasing, and those types
of moments become cumulative over a whole
record. They absolutely give the record a more
organic and warm feeling.
What was it like capturing such big,
pristine sounds with a legendary engineer
like Alan Parsons?
He did a fantastic job. It’s funny, but my
only concern with Alan was, “Will this
guy, who is really a producer, be okay with
taking on the engineer role again?” And he
was great—very happy to defer to me on
production. We had a great connection in
the studio.
So you weren’t interested in having him
act in more of a production role?
Alan had a number of good ideas in that
respect, and he is credited as associate producer
on the album, but I’m afraid I can
never be really produced. I’m too much of a
control person. No, I couldn’t do it—but I
do understand the philosophy. It’s interesting
to put yourself in the hands of someone
who perhaps doesn’t have the same ideas
that you do, but I just don’t know if I could
do that. If I’ve written songs, I know how
I want them to be born, y’know what I
mean? But having someone come in with
cool ideas about how to record things?
That’s fabulous—that’s just what I wanted.
“Let’s try this mic” or “Let’s try putting that
instrument through a Leslie cabinet” … great! But the sort of producer mentality of
“Can we shorn this bit?” or “Can we make
this bit longer?”—no, that’s not for me.
Forget it, mate!
Steven Wilson performs with his solo band in Belgium on March 12, 2013. Photo by Tom Van Ghent
Tell us about bringing Guthrie
Govan aboard.
I didn’t know about the Aristocrats when
Marco came onboard and, admittedly,
that kind of fusion music is not my thing.
But I went to see them play and, watching
Guthrie, I just thought, “This guy could do
some amazing things for my music.” I knew
he could help me take my music to a much
higher level. Of course, the worry with guys
at that level is whether there’s enough to
keep them interested. I mean, I don’t like
shredding and I don’t like fast playing just
for the sake of it. I like guys who will play
one note that will break your heart, if that’s
the right thing to do. So the first thing
was to figure out if Guthrie was going to
be okay with that. And he absolutely was.
He’s a truly great musician—not because
he’s technically phenomenal—but because,
despite that, he always understands how to
play what is right for the song. There are
things on the record—like the title track, for instance—where he
only plays three notes. He
did exactly what I’d hoped
he would do, which is to
take the whole record to
another level.
In addition to blazing
solos, he plays quite a few
nice, melodic lines with a
lot of warm, jazzy tones.
Yes, we did a lot with that
“jazzy” guitar tone. We call
it the “Lonely Swede Lost
in the Forest” sound—a sort
of jazzy, warm, and dark
clean sound that’s mixed
with a mono plate reverb.
I love that sound—it’s on
many ’70s records, and it’s
especially noticeable on old
Scandinavian records. My
buddy Mikael Åkerfeldt
from Opeth uses that sound
quite a lot. The use of mono
plate reverb, in particular,
came from working on the
old King Crimson records
that I remixed. I learned from
working with Robert Fripp that a lot of the
time they kept the reverbs mono, and they
kept the reverb returns with the instrument. If
the flute was on the right, that’s exactly where
the reverb was, too. They didn’t do that very
’80s thing, where you take a guitar, keyboard,
or drum sound and put it through a massive
stereo reverb—wide-screen cinema!—and suddenly
you’ve lost all this space in your mix and
you wonder why there’s no space for anything
else. That mono reverb has a wonderful character
about it, an aura—almost a halo around
the sound.
You write such great chord changes—they’re often for rock songs—and Guthrie
is such a master of outlining chords using
chord tones and modal playing.
That’s something I really notice from old
records, ’70s records—musical phrases and
sections repeat, but they don’t completely
repeat, if you know what I mean. It’s one of
the malaises of modern music that sections
of songs and musical moments literally
repeat verbatim—like someone’s gone and
copied and pasted them. If you listen to
records from the ’70s, sure, they’re playing
riffs, but usually the guitarist is constantly
noodling around those riffs,
adding little colors, little textures. And it’s
something that comes, again, from the idea
of a band, in the studio, rehearsing and
writing together—playing live together in
the studio. So, in a way, the music is always
in a state of flux. Because of computer technology
and the way we tend to record in a
very piecemeal way these days, we tend to
edit the [expletive] out of things so that all
of those happy accidents where the guitar
player is noodling in the background just
behind the vocal—which is a lot of what
Guthrie was doing—are lost. I don’t hear
that on many modern records. In fact, I
don’t hear it on any modern records.
Guthrie Govan on Soaring with The Raven
Steven Wilson is still incredulous. “I mean, we’d gotten this LaRose Classic Jazz [Jazzmaster-style] guitar with a Sustainiac sustainer circuit in the studio on the second day, and I asked Guthrie what he thought of it,” Wilson recounts. “He picked the thing up and, literally, the first thing he played was the solo on ‘Drive Home’—the solo that made the album. First time, first take. Isn’t that insane?”
Photo by Tom Van Ghent
Even crazier is that, during the solo—which Govan tracked live with the band—you can hear the E-string popping out of the saddle, forcing Govan to play the rest of the solo without it. “I later learned,” the Aristocrats chopsmaster explains, “that the Jazzmaster bridge/tailpiece design is famously ill-equipped to deal with extravagant string bending!” While Govan thought later versions of the solo sounded “a little more perfect,” the other players unanimously preferred the first take. “I suppose the first one did have a certain vibe to it,” he shrugs, “presumably because I was still getting used to an utterly unfamiliar instrument, which made me play a little differently. And, having played a lot with Marco in the Aristocrats, I think we had a couple of spontaneous interactive moments during that solo which could have only happened in real time.”
As far as his approach to Wilson’s Raven sessions on the whole, Govan says, “Steven described the overall guitar vibe he wanted for this album, and I just tried to serve the music as best I could, whilst remaining true to myself—but without making any effort to leave a giant GG thumbprint all over the record.” Govan called on a small coterie of pedals, including a Suhr Koko Boost, a Z.Vex Mastotron Fuzz, a DLS RotoSIM, and a TC Electronic Hall of Fame Reverb, and he typically recorded time-domain effects live, per Wilson’s request. While darker textures and clean-toned lines do make up a significant portion of Govan’s contribution, there are plenty of scorching, dramatic solos, too.
“I did try not to go too over the top with the frantic technical stuff, but a couple of ‘sheets of sound’ moments probably slipped through the net anyhow,” he laughs. “I’ve gathered that there are some folks in the progressive rock community who get turned off when a guitar player exceeds their chosen notes-per-second quota. But as I remember once observing to Steven, these are often the same people who would be perfectly happy to hear a sax player playing at a comparable velocity. So I try not to worry too much about those people!”
Presumably, you demoed all this material
in Logic Pro beforehand, like you
have on past projects. That must be quite
a challenge, demoing 11-minute songs,
each with several sections, as well as
tempo and time-signature changes. The
drum parts alone …
Yes, but that’s exactly why they really have
to be demoed in full. But, yeah, I spend
a lot of time working on the song structures.
I use the EXS24 sampler in Logic to program the drums—I play the basic
drumbeat ideas on a keyboard controller—and then I send that to Marco. From
those demos, he learns the structures and
basic rhythms, and then throws it all away
and plays it like only Marco can. The thing
is, with this kind of music, you cannot
divorce what the drums are doing from the
songs—they’re integral parts of what makes
the song what it is. If you’re a Neil Young
or Bob Dylan sort of songwriter, your song
is basically you and the guitar or piano. You
don’t have to think too hard about what
the drums are going to do—it’s fairly obvious.
But with this type of music, the drums
may be the lead instrument, in a sense: They may be the basis for a phrase, a whole
part, or even the entire tune. So you have
to really think about that, and you have to
write that into the composition.
The same is true of the other instruments. A lot of the music was written on the bass guitar, too. For example, the way the album starts, with “Luminol.” You can clearly hear that the bass figure is the foundation of that part of the song, so of course I had to demo it on the bass guitar. Basically, when I’m in the studio demoing these songs, I’ve got guitars and basses and keyboards and drum modules around me, and I’m essentially doing my less-than-spectacular versions of what I want the guys to eventually play. It’s not just about sketching each part, but about showing the guys how it all works together—how the whole musical story unfolds. And they are musical stories, not just in the sense of the way I use the ghost stories around them—that’s another thing entirely—but also the way all the different sections unfold.
In a way, while progressive rock gives me all this freedom to throw traditional pop song structures out the window, it’s also a bit of a mind [expletive], because I have all these different sections to deal with and no set way to arrange them. In fact, I can easily write all the different sections of one of these multi-section songs in a single day, but I can then spend an entire week juggling them all around before I arrive at the right order. That’s when I know I’ve found the key to a track, especially some of these longer pieces. This also means I have to fly things around in Logic and tweak tempos to make sure the parts fit together well before I take it to the players. Because you may decide one section makes sense following another section, but then the tempo may seem sluggish in comparison and you need to bump it up two or three beats per minute, and then it’ll feel just a little more right than it did before.
Which guitars, amps, and effects did you
favor for this album?
I used the same PRS Custom 22 that I’ve
used for a long time. I’m now endorsed by
PRS, but the very first PRS I bought when
I was very young is still my favorite one. I
have to confess I don’t know a great deal
about guitars—people ask me what guitar
I play, and I say “a red one.” I also used
a Stratocaster a bit on “The Raven That
Refused to Sing.” In terms of pedals, I used
a bunch of the new TC Electronic TonePrint
pedals, including the delay, the reverb, and
the vibrato. I love very subtle modulation on
guitar tones. I don’t like choruses, flangers,
or phasers, but I do love a little vibrato or
tremolo, or sometimes a bit of Leslie—we
put one of Guthrie’s solos through the Leslie
on “The Pin Drop.” Tremolo, vibrato, and
rotary speaker give color to guitar sounds
that might otherwise be sort of flat. My
amps for the sessions were a Vox AC30 and a
pair of old Marshall 100-watt heads.
There’s a lot of great acoustic playing and
very lush, distinctive acoustic tones on
the album.
Most of the acoustic on this record is
an Ovation in Nashville tuning, which is basically all the higher strings of a
12-string guitar. It has that wonderful
crystalline quality—I find it incredibly
inspiring. And adding a capo to
the second fret gives it even more of a
mandolin-like register. I didn’t know
much about Nashville tuning until
about a year ago. We were on tour and
a fan brought me an Ovation guitar as
a gift. It was so nice that I said I simply
couldn’t accept such a generous gift,
and I had little use for another acoustic
guitar anyway. Well, Tonto, my guitar
tech, said it’s a lovely gift, why don’t you
accept it and I’ll string it up for you in
Nashville tuning? I said, what is that?
Well, immediately upon playing it, I
knew it was going to inspire something.
I ended up writing “The Watchmaker”
and “Drive Home” on it.
Steven Wilson's Gear
Guitars
PRS Custom 22, AlumiSonic Ultra 1100, Visionary Instruments Video Guitar, Babicz Dreadnought Cutaway, Ovation acoustic (Nashville tuning), PRS SE Mike Mushok signature baritone, Fender Stratocaster
Amps
Vox AC30, Bad Cat Lynx 50 head driving a Bad Cat 4x12 with Celestion Vintage 30s
Effects
TC Electronic Flashback Delay/Looper, TC Hall of Fame Reverb, TC Shaker Vibrato, Dunlop Cry Baby wah, Boss FV-500L Stereo Volume Pedals, TC Electronic G-System, Boss SD-2 Dual Overdrive, Source Audio Soundblox Multiwave Distortion,
Carl Martin Compressor/Limiter, Option 5 Destination Rotation Single, Boss GE-7 Equalizer, TheGigRig MIDI-8 foot controller
Strings, Picks, and Accessories
D’Addario EXL110 sets (electric), D’Addario EJ10 sets (acoustic), D’Addario EJ38H sets (Nashville-tuned acoustics), D’Addario EXL140 sets (detuned electrics), Jim Dunlop Tortex 1 mm picks, Providence E205 guitar and P203 patch cables
I tend to double-track the Nashville parts with an electric guitar, which warms it up and gives it a bit more body. That’s pretty much the big rhythm sound you hear on “The Watchmaker” and “Drive Home.” Interestingly, though, apart from that I have actually taken to not double-tracking stuff on this album, with one or two exceptions. The exceptions would be the acoustic guitars, which I tend to double or even quadruple track.
Why?
Another thing I noticed about the classic
’70s albums I was remixing is the economy
of overdubbing. Double-tracking
tends to sound impressive in the studio,
but it also takes away from some of the
character of the performance as it irons
out the quirks that give a part so much of
its personality.
Do you have any tips for recording—perhaps how to best capture a solo or favorite plug-ins for guitars or mixing? My favorite plug-ins for mixing are the Universal Audio ones, especially the EMT 140 plate reverb, the 1176 compressor, and the SSL channel strip. The native Logic EQ is also great for the basics. But I have to say that, generally speaking, the guitars are untreated once they’re recorded—perhaps just a little EQ to filter out low end or add a little more air at the top end, but that’s all. I can’t think of any particular approach for getting a solo to sit right—but sometimes a really nasty EQ, or heavy compression, or just making it very loud.
YouTube It
Watch a live performance of music from The Raven, as well as
some intimate behind the scenes footage from the studio sessions.
The 2012 Raven band—featuring guitarist Niko
Tsonev—performs “Luminol”
live in Mexico City.
Steven Wilson and his lineup
of monster players hash out
some of the arrangements
while working on “Luminol”
at East West Studios in L.A.
Tracking “The Watchmaker”
with Alan Parsons at the
console. Govan’s beautifully
fluid solo overdub begins
at 1:45.
Leveraging 3D printing technology, the new Floyd Rose Original locking nuts are designed to deliver unmatched precision and consistency, replacing the traditional “lost wax” casting method that dominated for decades.
The shift to 3D printing allows for intricate detailing and tighter tolerances, ensuring each nut meets exact specifications.
The process begins with powdered metal, which is precisely 3D printed into the desired shape using advanced metal printing technology. After printing, the parts are depowdered and cleaned before undergoing a sintering process—an advanced heat treatment—during which the parts achieve full density and hardness. Lastly, the nuts are CNC “kiss-cut” to exacting specifications for consistency and control of the fit before receiving a premium electroplating finish.
“Floyd Rose has always been synonymous with innovation, and by embracing this incredible new technology we are able to continue that legacy,” said Andrew Papiccio, president of AP International Music Supply of which Floyd Rose is a division. “The accuracy and flexibility of the new 3D printing method will allow us to make a more consistent piece while also giving us full control of the manufacturing right here in the USA.”
Initially, the 3D-printed locking nuts will be available in ten classic sizes with a 10” radius, with plans to expand the range to accommodate various fretboard radii in Spring 2025. This augmentation will offer players more options for customizing their setups to match a wide variety of fretboard curvatures.
To get a sneak peek at the new Floyd Rose USA Series, come visit us at NAMM in booth 5734 in Hall D.
With flexible voltage adjustments, precise control, customizable protection, compact design, and affordable pricing at $299, the Brownie is the ultimate solution for optimizing tone and safeguarding your gear.
AmpRx, the trusted name behind the industry-renowned BrownBox, has unveiled its newest innovation: The Brownie, a voltage-optimizing power supply for modern amps and the first of its kind.
Designed by AmpRx co-owner and CEO Cassandra Sotos (2024 NAMM Female Entrepreneur of the Year), the Brownie provides unparalleled control, flexibility, and protection specifically for modern tube amplifiers by allowing the player to both increase and decrease voltage with volt-by-volt precision.
Priced at $299, the Brownie offers an affordable and essential solution for protecting your investment in your high-quality tube amp. It allows you to optimize your tone and safeguard your gear from variations in voltage by givingthe ultimate advantage: knowing exactly what you’re feeding your amp.
Known as the secret weapon of touring professionals, AmpRx products have been spotted on stage with bands like the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Zac Brown Band, Iron Maiden, and many more. AmpRx is now bringing its game-changing technology to an even broader audience with this compact, affordable, and versatile product. Try the Brownie for yourself and discover exactly why artists, amp designers, and technicians rely on AmpRx to provide consistent sound, performance, and extend the life of their gear.
The Brownie will be available January 20th, 2025, presented at NAMM Global Media Day and on display at Booth #5630.
WHAT MAKES THE BROWNIE SPECIAL? Building on the success of the flagship BrownBox, the Brownie offers key innovations tailored for modern amplifiers:
- Flexible Voltage Adjustments: The Brownie is the first in the AmpRx line to both decrease and increase voltage, providing optimal performance for modern tube amps (often at 117-120V).
- Precise Control: Adjust voltage in ultra-precise -1V increments when decreasing, and by +3V or +5Vwhen increasing, allowing musicians to fine-tune their tone with precision.
- Customizable Protection: The Brownie ensures safe operation, putting control directly in the player's hands, and includes two fuse options: 2A for smaller setups and 4A for larger setups, ensuring compatibility with diverse gear.
- Compact and Portable Design: Smaller and lighter than the original BrownBox, the Brownie is perfect for musicians seeking portability, durability, and streamlined functionality. It can even fit on a pedalboard or in a backpack.
- Wide Accessibility: At just $299, the Brownie offers professional-grade voltage control at a price point that’s accessible to musicians everywhere.
Email sales@brownbox.rocks to order and stop by NAMM Booth #5630 to see the Brownie in action, talk with the owners, team and artists, and see exactly why so many people insist onAmpRx products when they make music.
For more information, please visit brownbox.rocks.
When every guitar claims to be special, how can any guitar truly stand out?
In the guitar world, a transformation is underway that reminds me of the rise and fall of empires. The modern boutique guitar market, which once felt to me like an underground treasure trove, now seems poised on the precipice. It has grown, matured, and, in my opinion, overextended itself. Are we cresting the wave? Has the boutique boom run its course, or is it simply shedding its skin in metamorphosis?
Guitar building has been around for centuries, mostly as an individual, artisanal endeavor until the late 19th century, when it began to be dominated by manufacturing entities. The boutique guitar category as we know it today began as a reaction to the hegemony of big brands. It was a calling and philosophy—a return to individual builders and small shop manufacturers in the mainstream consciousness. Builders crafted instruments that evoked the patinated romance of vintage instruments as well as the hot-rod aesthetic. What started with a handful of outliers has now become an ecosystem. But, like all trends, there’s a limit to how far it can stretch before it must adapt or collapse.
Pioneers to Proliferation
In the early 1970s, builders like Rick Turner, John Suhr, Michael Gurian, and Bernie Rico, among others, stook as renegades of the modern boutique scene. They were voices bucking the production-line trend with craftsmanship that evoked past masters like D’Angelico, Bigsby, or even Stradivarius. These builders weren’t just producing instruments; they were making statements. A guitar by Parker or a Manzer wasn’t just a tool, it was a declaration of the builder’s ethos and vision—something that might have been lost in the guitar boom of the ’60s.
Today, the boutique world is a crowded stage where hundreds, if not thousands, of builders compete for the attention of an audience with only so much disposable income. Plus, the custom allure is no longer the sole province of artisans; custom shop offerings from major brands like Fender, Gibson, and PRS have blurred the lines. CNC machining and production streamlining have made “boutique” features practical, even necessary, for larger operations. To their credit, unlike at the birth of the vintage market, the big guys saw the wave as well. The once-clear delineation between boutique and mainstream is murkier than ever, which by its nature dilutes everyone’s impact in the segment.
In economic terms, this is a textbook example of market saturation. There are only so many players willing and able to spend $5,000, $10,000, or more on a guitar. Supply has exploded, but demand may be plateauing. Handmade boutique guitars, once a rarefied niche, are now ubiquitous at trade shows, online marketplaces, and across social media feeds. This leads me to a pressing question: When every guitar claims to be special, how can any guitar truly stand out?
The Instagram Paradox
Online, custom guitars have become as much about image as they are about sound. It seems any builder with a board and a butter knife is trolling for your approval. A scroll through Instagram reveals a sea of small-batch instruments, but there’s a creeping sense of déjà vu. How many “offset” guitars with stained burl tops and pre-distressed finishes can one truly appreciate before they begin to blur together? Social media, once a powerful tool for builders to connect with their clientele, has become a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s never been easier to showcase work to a global audience. On the other, the sheer volume of content has weakened the impact.
“A guitar by Parker or a Manzer wasn’t just a tool, it was a declaration of the builder’s ethos and vision—something that might have been lost in the guitar boom of the ’60s.”
The Buyer’s Shift
Meanwhile, players too are evolving. With the pandemic-fueled spike in sales fading, some tastes are turning away from the museum-worthy builds in favor of simpler, more traditional guitars. In a way, the legacy brands may now be a salve for the disaffected. In an ironic twist, they are seen as the true foundation of the industry—the original and genuine as opposed to a hip fad.
What Comes Next?
So, has the boutique guitar market peaked? Perhaps. But a peak doesn’t necessarily signal decline. Just as the boutique segment was born from a reaction to mass production, the next wave may be driven by a return to fundamentals. Builders who adapt to a changing landscape or who have built their own legacy will continue to thrive. Those who have not entered the general consciousness may find themselves left behind.
In the end, the boutique guitar market will endure, not because of its size, but because of its soul. Just as guitar building began as an individual endeavor, that heritage will continue. The challenge is to capture the essence of what makes a guitar special in the first place: the connection between builder and player—and the magic of turning wood and wire into music.