How do different magnet mixes help us find sonic bliss? Fender pickup guru Tim Shaw explains the laws of attraction behind our favorite guitar sounds.
Close your eyes for a second and imagine your favorite electric guitar sound. What do you hear? Whether itās a crystalline clean, a bulldog-growl crunch, or a hurricane of distortion, what do you envision?
Maybe youāre seeing the contours and finish of your guitar, the different pieces of wood that comprise the whole; a certain brand of strings ricocheting in microscopic variances; the woven grille in front of your ampās speaker vibrating in a sonic windstorm; or perhaps your hands, both working in harmony to create exactly the right sound. Itās unlikely that when you think of your specific sonic nirvana, you picture the little bits of metal compounds that we call magnets.
Yet itās magnets which are the catalyst for the boundless wealth of sounds we can produce with modern electric guitars. Beginning with their first applications in guitar pickups in the early 1930s, magnets have evolved into one of the most critical factors in how we get the tones we love. Theyāve bloomed from a rustic and rudimentary technology to a precise, booming cottage industry. And while dedicated tone hunters spend a lot of time discussing pickups, the particulars of the cylinders and strips of precision-machined magnetized materials that give each pickup its tonal signature arenāt often in the spotlight.
These mysterious bits of earth elements and their invisible force fieldsāthe strengths of which are measured in a unit called a Gaussābreathe life into everything from hushed fingerstyle jazz acrobatics to industrial-grade doom-metal sludge. So how do we know what magnets can help achieve which tones? We need to understand some science, for sure. But we also need to know the history that created the pickup magnets we know and love.
This blueprint, filed along with the patent application in 1934, demonstrates the A-22ās ingenuity, and the pickup magnetās configuration.
A History of Attraction
The very first electric guitar pickups, circa 1931, probably wouldnāt be much fun to play through. They were created by American inventor George Beauchamp and Swiss-American engineer Adolph Rickenbacker, who together foundedāyou guessed itāthe Rickenbacker company, first named Ro-Pat-In, then Rickenbacher, before they settled on their final designation. The duo built the Electro A-22, nicknamed the Frying Pan (take a quick look and itās fairly easy to guess why), an aluminum lap-steel guitar constructed to capitalize on the popularity of Hawaiian music at the time. It was the first stringed instrument to bear pickups.
The A-22ās chunky pickup magnet, crafted from an iron alloy with around 36 percent cobalt steel, was incredibly weak and unfocused. But it established a universal principle that shaped the future of the guitar: A magnetās field can magnetize guitar strings, and together with a spool of wire, the magnets can generate enough output current to send to an amplification system. The basic process of capturing and amplifying sounds hasnāt changed much in the 90 years since Beauchamp and Rickenbacker slapped a big, magnetic rock on a guitar that looked like kitchenware, but the tools to accomplish it have.
āA lot of what Leo Fender did involved war surplus stuff in Southern California ācause there was tons of it around for all the aircraft factories.ā
Tim Shaw, chief engineer with Fender, has been building pickups for the past half century. Heās spent the last 27 years in various capacities with Fender, prior to which he ran research and development for Gibson, operated a repair shop, and helped Fishman establish their OEM pickup system. But before all of that, he learned how to make pickups from Bill Lawrence, the German-American builder who changed Gibsonās trajectory in the late 1960s. Lawrence, says Shaw, was the real dealāhe had a coil-winder in the trunk of his Cadillac, which was functionally the same as Leo Fenderās original winder. And he didnāt suffer fools.
āHe was pretty crusty,ā Shaw recalls. āHe would cuss me out in Polish and German. But I learned a tremendous amount from him. He would explain these things very clearly, very logically, in a very German way. It was priceless.ā Lawrence, who came to pickup design with a respectable music career and a background in physics, instructed Shaw on which magnets to use, and how many turns of what gauge wire were required for certain sounds.
Tim Shaw has been building pickups for nearly half a century. When it comes to magnet materials, he says guitarists stick to what they know.
Perhaps the most important lesson that Lawrence taught Shaw was that he shouldnāt get into the pickup business to be an artist. āMost of the time, youāre not making something which never was,ā says Shaw. āYouāre working with an established vocabulary. So much of what we do is āin the style of.āā The reality of magnet selection and pickup design, says Shaw, is that there isnāt a whole lot of room for experimentation. āThe big fight with all of this is guitar players,ā he says. āThereās a conservatism: We know what we like, we play what weāve played. If you have something thatās interesting but radically different, there arenāt as many people as you would like to think who will just a priori accept that and go for it. I could literally do a pickup brand from all the stuff that people didnāt want.ā
Instead, when he designs pickups, Shaw follows the same three principles that guide musical instrument production: They have to give us the sound we want, at the volume we have to play, and we have to want to play them. āIf you donāt get all three of those things right,ā says Shaw, āyouāve got a decorative wall hanging.ā
From alnico to neodymium, magnets have gotten stronger and changed how our electric guitar playing sounds and feels. Theyāve radically altered how pickups themselves are designed and builtāif a builder worked with the same design specs and material ratios for a ceramic-driven pickup as they did for an alnico-powered pickup, the result would probably be unbalanced at best.
Letās look at the popular magnet materials that have been wired up by pickup designers over the last century. Along the way, weāll dig into how their construction, physical composition, and magnetic properties change how our guitars sound.
Alnico Alloys
The first alnico alloyāaluminum (Al), nickel (Ni), and cobalt (Co), plus ironāemerged in the late 1930s. Since then, five different versions of the alnico magnet have grown in favor among pickup builders: alnicos 2, 3, 4, 5, and 8. The first four are the most common ones and can be used in both rod and bar form.
Alnico 3, which paradoxically contained no cobalt thanks to a Korean War-era embargo on the substance, is the least powerful, but it became the first go-to alnico alloy in Fenderās early electrics. I think a lot of what Leo Fender did involved war surplus stuff in Southern California cause there was tons of it around for all the aircraft factories,ā says Shaw. āSo he had access to a lot of alnico 3 rod material, which he got cut into lengths that made sense for him.ā Gibson, meanwhile, was cutting it into bars to outfit their P-90 pickups.
Making alnico magnets was a nasty business. Shaw describes alnico factory lines as ā14th-century-looking stuff,ā where a massive ladle is filled with over 600 pounds of iron, cobalt, copper, and aluminum shot, heated to the materialsā respective melting points, then poured into molds. But the magnets that came out often varied massively in composition and sound. Aluminum has a much lower melting point than its ladle-mates, and as it boiled off while waiting for the others to melt, the mixtureās composition would change. One would need to continue adding aluminum through the process to maintain the correct ratios. The magnets made on a Wednesday morning shift could be totally different from the ones poured the night before, explains Shaw. āThatās one of the explanations for why vintage pickups do not all sound the same,ā he notes.
Technically speaking, alnico 2s are slightly more powerful than 3s, with 4s and 5s topping both for magnetic strength, and, therefore, output. In terms of sonic characteristics, Shaw says the alnico 3s have the slowest attack, and the āwarmest and woofiestā sound. Alnico 2 dials back that thick character a bit, while alnico 4, says Shaw, is sharp but āpolite:ā āIt almost has a smirk to it,ā he grins. Shaw describes alnico 5s as the boldest of the bunchāthe magnet that says, āYeah, weāre gonna go for it, guys.ā Fender P-basses were initially outfitted with alnico 3s until Leo Fender realized it tends toward what Shaw dubs a ādrunken elephants dancingā tonality. He swapped in alnico 5s around the mid 1950s for their brighter, harder sounding magnets, a decision that cemented the brandās signature sound. āLeo was all about attack,ā observes Shaw.
The high-output alnico 8s are the strongest of their alloy class thanks to their inclusion of titanium. The 8s are so powerful that they can pull strings out of their arc in the right conditions: if you raise your neck pickup too high and play above the 12th fret, you might hear weird tones thanks to this phenomenon.
Ceramics
Like Leo Fender favoring cheap metals that he could get in bulk nearby, other regional pickup-design characteristicsāand the sounds they encouragedācan also be traced back to geographical and industrial particulars. The former Chicago-based discount guitar manufacturer Harmony turned to Toledo, Ohioās Rowe Industries and lead designer Harry DeArmond to find cheap pickup materials. In response to booming demand, Rowe was turning out rubberized ferrite magnetsāthe kind youād find on your grandparentsā refrigeratorsāwhich Harmony popped into their jazz guitar pickups. These are the magnets that power the infamous gold-foil pickup.
By the early ā70s, barium and strontium ferrites (compounds which are ādeadly poison to be around,ā notes Shaw) were developed. These were much stronger than their rubberized ferrite predecessors, and cost far less to produce than alnico alloys thanks to the elimination of the need for smelting. Instead, theyāre created through a compacting and heating process called powder metallurgy. They became popular across a huge spread of sectors, and before long, pickup designers like Rick Turner at California manufacturer Alembic Inc. began to recognize that these stronger, harder ferritesānow known as ceramicsācould be applied in guitars.
āI could design a whole guitar around a magnet if I wanted.ā
Under Bill Lawrenceās direction, Gibson began employing these bar-shaped ceramics in humbuckers, which lent their guitars a sharper attack that paired well with playersā growing interest in heavier overdrive and gain. Lawrenceās Super Humbuckers were the first major pickups produced with ceramics. To deal with unwanted feedback and to prevent their covers from vibrating, designers like Lawrence epoxy-potted the pickups.
Ceramics found in pickups are usually ceramic 8s, which on a Gauss meter typically clock in at around twice the power of an alnico 4. Thanks to their magnetic flux at the pole pieces, ceramic 8s grab the strings quicker than regular humbuckers, and deliver a brighter, harder attack. These qualities make them especially well-suited for high-gain guitar playing without sacrificing definition, and builders like EMG and players like Kirk Hammett have gravitated toward them since.
Cunife
The original patents for the cunife magnets, made from copper, nickel, and iron, date back to the late 1930s, at which time there was a growing need for a magnetic material with high ductilityāthe ability to be manipulated and reshaped without breaking. Cunife magnets of all different shapes were used in speedometers, altimeters, and tachometers (a function that lent them the nickname ātach-rodā).
āThe big fight with all of this is guitar players. Thereās a conservatism: we know what we like, we play what weāve played.ā
By the early 1970s, Fender was looking for a response to Gibsonās humbucking pickups. Seth Lover, who created the humbucker for Gibson before switching teams to Fender, came up with a unique opponent: the wide-range cunife pickup. The cunife magnetās ductility meant that, unlike alnico, it could be machined into screw-like pole pieces like the humbuckerās steel slugs, and Lover discovered that when paired with more winds of wire, cunifeās higher inductance translated to more bottom end and low mids without sacrificing Fenderās classic high-end clarity. By the end of the decade, though, digital appliances were becoming more prevalent, so cunifeās industrial and consumer utility was swept away and production lines for the magnet vanished. Pickup builders like Lover realized there wouldnāt be any material left to build with, so it was abandoned in most pickupsāuntil a few years ago.
Tim Shaw managed to track down some incredibly expensive cunife magnets to design a new, revitalized line of vintage-correct wide range cunife pickups for Fender. But building with the magnet was trickyāhe had to balance the physical and aesthetic demands with the cunife magnetās needsānamely, a larger wire coil. āIt could only be so tall if I wanted to fit it in a vintage guitar,ā says Shaw. āI could design a whole guitar around a magnet if I wanted, but what I ended up doing from a practical standpoint was finding something that worked inside that form factor.ā
Cunife-loaded pickups tend to strike a balance between humbuckers and single-coils: As their trademark name implies, they capture a wider range of frequencies than your average Strat pickup, but they donāt quite dive to Les Paul humbucker depths on the low end.
Neodymiums are the strongest pickup magnets around, and builders like Q-tuner have pioneered eye-catching new designs around the material.
Neodymium
Neodymium is a powerful, expensive rare-earth metal thatās still relatively rare to find in guitar pickups. Commonly used in iPhone speakers, neodymiumās strong magnetic field means that its application in pickups looks different than other magnetsāthanks to its high output, only a small amount is required, which impacts how itās inserted and oriented in a pickup context. Proponents celebrate the magnetās ability to capture a wide dynamic range with detail and sensitivity. Fishman fits their magnetic pickups with neodymium magnets, for example, and builder Q-tuner has been churning out eye-catching neodymium pickups for almost 30 years.
But while some pickups can be swapped out without much worry to achieve different tones, stronger materials like neodymium require a bit more engineering. For example, Shaw says it wouldnāt be wise to simply replace a Stratās alnico pickups with neodymiums. āI have, and you wouldnāt like the way it sounded,ā he says. āItās bright, and very forceful. Insistent, if you will.ā
- 5-Way Frenzy: Vintage-Style Strat Pickup Review Roundup āŗ
- Lollar Pickups El Rayo Humbuckers Review āŗ
- Guitar Pickups 101 āŗ
While the pedal builders at Sehat Effectors are in the game for their love of the 6-string, theyāve since begun exploring what effects pedals mean to other kinds of instrumentalists.
This time, Iād like to share my perspective as a pedal builder on how our effects pedalsāoriginally crafted with guitarists in mindāare experiencing an exciting evolution in use. Our customer base spans around the globe, and as it turns out, many of them arenāt guitarists. Instead, our pedals are finding their way into the hands of non-guitarist musicians like DJs, synth players, movie sound directors, and even drummers. Yes, a drummer once used one of my fuzz pedals in a drum miking setupāquite an extreme yet bold experiment! This made me wonder: How did such a phenomenon come about?
Most of the pedals I build are fuzz effects and other experimental types, all primarily tested within guitar setups. But then I visited a friendās studio; he goes by āBalanceā onstage. Heās a well-known musician and producer here in Indonesia, and a member of the hip-hop group JHF (Jogja Hip Hop Foundation). Now, hereās the kickerāBalance doesnāt play guitar! Yet, heās one of my customers, having asked for a fuzz and modulation pedal for his modular synthesizer rig. Initially, I was skeptical when he mentioned his plans. Neither my team nor I are familiar with synthesizers, let alone Eurorack or modular formats. I know guitars and, at best, bass guitar. My colleague has dabbled with effects experimentation, but only within the guitar framework.
So, my visit to his studio was a chance to study and research how guitar effects pedals could be adapted to a fundamentally different instrument ecosystem. The following is an interview I did with Balance to get a deeper understanding of his perspective.
As a modular synthesizer user, arenāt all kinds of sounds already achievable with a synth? Why mix one with guitar effects?
Balance: Some unique sounds, like those from Hologram Effectsā Microcosm or the eccentric pedals from Sehat Effectors, are hard to replicate with just a synth. Also, for sound design, I find it more intuitive to tweak knobs in real-time than rely on a computerādirect knob control feels more human for me.
Are there challenges in integrating guitar pedals with a modular synthesizer setup? After all, their ecosystems are quite different.
Balance: There are indeed significant differences, like jack types, power supplies, and physical format. Modular synthesizers are designed to sit on a table or stand, while guitar pedals are meant for the floor and foot control. However, they share a common thread in the goal of manipulating signals, eventually amplified through a mixing board and amplifier. The workaround is using converters/adapters to bridge the connection.āIf youāre a saxophonist who buys a guitar pedal, itās yours to use however you like.ā
Are you the only modular synth user combining them with guitar pedals?
Balance: Actually, I got the idea after seeing other musicians experiment this way. Effects like fuzz or distortion are iconic to guitar but absent in synthesizer sound options. I believe signal manipulation with fuzz or distortion is a universal idea that appeals to musicians creating music, regardless of their instrument.
This brief chat gave me new insight and sparked my curiosity about different frameworks in music-making. While Iām not yet tempted to dive into modular synths myself, I now have a clearer picture of how fuzz and distortion transcend guitar. Imagine a saxophonist at a live show using a pedalboard with a DigiTech Whammy and Boss Metal Zoneāabsurd, maybe, but why not? If youāre a saxophonist who buys a guitar pedal, itās yours to use however you like. Because, in the end, all musicians create music based on their inner concernsāwhether itās about romance, friendship, political situations, war, or anger. Eventually, they will explore how best to express those concerns from many angles, and of course, āsoundā and ātoneā are fundamental aspects of the music itself. Good thing my partner and I named our company Sehat Effectors and not Sehat Guitar Works. Haha!
Reverend Jetstream 390 Solidbody Electric Guitar - Midnight Black
Jetstream 390 Midnight BlackReverend Contender 290 Solidbody Electric Guitar - Midnight Black
Contender 290, Midnight BlackMetalocalypse creator Brendon Small has been a lifetime devotee and thrash-metal expert, so we invited him to help us break down what makes Slayer so great.
Slayer guitarists Kerry King and Jeff Hanneman formed the original searing 6-string front line of the most brutal band in the land. Together, they created an aggressive mood of malcontent with high-velocity thrash riffs and screeching solos thatāll slice your speaker cones. The only way to create a band more brutal than Slayer would be to animate them, and thatās exactly what Metalocalypse (and Home Movies) creator Brendon Small did.
From his first listen, Small has been a lifetime devotee and thrash-metal expert, so we invited him to help us break down what makes Slayer so great. Together, we dissect King and Hannemanās guitar styles and list their angriest, most brutal songs, as well as those that create a mood of general horribleness.
This episode is sponsored by EMG Pickups.
Use code EMG100 for 15% off at checkout!
Learn more: emgpickups.com
Pearl Jam announces U.S. tour dates for April and May 2025 in support of their album Dark Matter.
In continued support of their 3x GRAMMY-nominated album Dark Matter, Pearl Jam will be touring select U.S. cities in April and May 2025.
Pearl Jamās live dates will start in Hollywood, FL on April 24 and 26 and wrap with performances in Pittsburgh, PA on May 16 and 18. Full tour dates are listed below.
Support acts for these dates will be announced in the coming weeks.
Tickets for these concerts will be available two ways:
- A Ten Club members-only presale for all dates begins today. Only paid Ten Club members active as of 11:59 PM PT on December 4, 2024 are eligible to participate in this presale. More info at pearljam.com.
- Public tickets will be available through an Artist Presale hosted by Ticketmaster. Fans can sign up for presale access for up to five concert dates now through Tuesday, December 10 at 10 AM PT. The presale starts Friday, December 13 at 10 AM local time.
earl Jam strives to protect access to fairly priced tickets by providing the majority of tickets to Ten Club members, making tickets non-transferable as permitted, and selling approximately 10% of tickets through PJ Premium to offset increased costs. Pearl Jam continues to use all-in pricing and the ticket price shown includes service fees. Any applicable taxes will be added at checkout.
For fans unable to use their purchased tickets, Pearl Jam and Ticketmaster will offer a Fan-to-Fan Face Value Ticket Exchange for every city, starting at a later date. To sell tickets through this exchange, you must have a valid bank account or debit card in the United States. Tickets listed above face value on secondary marketplaces will be canceled. To help protect the Exchange, Pearl Jam has also chosen to make tickets for this tour mobile only and restricted from transfer. For more information about the policy issues in ticketing, visit fairticketing.com.
For more information, please visit pearljam.com.