Guitarist Tim Sult and Producer Machine share Clutch’s “riffs in your face” recipe for the band’s new album “Earth Rocker”
“Earth Rocker might be the best Clutch album that has ever existed,” proudly states Clutch guitarist Tim Sult. While hardcore Transnational-or-bust fans may roll their eyes on the standard optimism the guitarist shares regarding his band’s 10th studio album, the statement is better conveyed from producer Machine’s perspective.
“Clutch is a jam band. That’s their birthplace—four dudes, who got along, shared a love for heavy rock, threw back some beer, and played music together,” Machine says. “They’re still learning to write songs in a conventional way—hell, so am I [laughs]—because they didn’t come from a traditional school of songwriting and Earth Rocker shows all four of the band’s members on top of their games as song crafters.”
Earth Rocker builds off the Clutch’s base recipe. “Unto the Breach” matches the intensity and malice on anything from Pure Rock Fury or Blast Tyrant. “Maybe people expected us to go more acoustic or bluesy, but this album definitely showcases a riffs-in-your-face kind of style,” says Sult. “These songs ended up being faster and a bit more rocking.” Even with a heavy dose of rocking that Sult says was inspired by tour mates Thin Lizzy and Motörhead, the new album still has room for Clutch to bring in From Beale Street to Oblivion-era bluesier jams like “D.C. Sound Attack” and “Cyborg Bette.”
But as Clutch always does, fresh ingredients have been added into their smorgasbord of influences, further bolstering the band’s song-building chops. “Gone Cold” is a stripped-down, spaghetti-Western-shootout acoustic number and “Oh Isabella” puts the tranquil Sult in the spotlight with two octave-pedal-based solos, including a reversed-solo section done with the help of his Line 6 DL4.
Clutch’s soft-spoken riffmaster, Sult, tells us how he recorded with a new guitar-and-amp combo, what he looks for in a good wah pedal, and what he’d play if he were Willie Nelson. (Added bonus: Earth Rocker producer Machine offers some inside recording tips from the sessions.)
The last few album cycles for Clutch—Strange Cousins From the West and From Beale Street to Oblivion—were more experimental, but with Earth Rocker you guys had extensive pre-production jams and hashed out almost everything prior to entering the studio. How did that preparation affect the sessions and the overall experience of recording this time around?
For me, I think my solos were the most affected part of my playing. They felt, at the time, and sound, now that the album is done, more focused and deliberate. I know, as a band, recording this album was much less open-ended like in previous records, but saying that there are some songs, arrangement-wise that do go on a trip for a while [laughs].
I would’ve never expected to be playing as many solos on this album, but they definitely had more of a direction than they usually do. It definitely took a lot more concentration, but I walked away from this album liking them more than I have on any other album. I just decided to trust the producer this time and not try to second-guess myself. Having Machine there really helped.
Was the focus and mild restraint on purpose or more of a happy coincidence due to having the songs dialed-in pretty well before recording?
Honestly, I think a lot of it can be attributed to us working with Machine. His production style is a little more dialed-in. He helped us really give shape to things prior to entering the studio. We don’t normally enter the studio haphazardly and decide “let’s make a record.” But our ideas aren’t as solidified or the direction isn’t 100 percent figured out, so in the past that has led us to dwell on songs or solos too long and things tend to get overworked or extended.
Earth Rocker feels a lot more like the more aggressive Clutch records in the early 2000s—Blast Tyrant and Pure Rock Fury
come to mind, which were also produced by Machine—than your most recent
albums. Was that a cognitive decision to go heavier again or was it
something that organically happens when you’re paired with Machine?
I think the connections between Earth Rocker and Blast Tyrant are
definitely made through the production credits belonging to Machine.
The songs we were writing were a little faster and aggressive and it
just seemed like the new material really fit his production style. In
terms of our musical influences and reemphasis on heavy, I’d say that
was more to our extensive tours with Thin Lizzy and Motörhead. We wrote
and came up with a lot of our song ideas while on the road with those
guys, so to it’s hard not to hear that music everyday and not have it
sink into your thoughts and bones. Earth Rocker is a cross between Thin Lizzy and Motörhead played by the guys in Clutch [laughs].
Photo by JJ Koczan
You’ve been a big user of mid ’70s Gibson Les Paul Customs plugged into ’70s Marshall Super Leads and Orange OR120s or Tiny Terrors for a while. Did you use your old recipe or try out a new setup for those old tones?
Everything is still pretty simple and old school by using a JTM45, but the other amp I played through mostly was a Marshall JCM900. I felt like my tone was getting a little too clean, so I tried to dirty it up a little bit with a different amp and gain structure because I don’t use overdrive or distortion pedals.
The only reason I actually decided to try out a 900 again was because Laura Pleasants from Kylesa told me Buzz [Osborne] from the Melvins was playing one when those two bands played together. I plugged one in at my local shop, Action Music in Falls Church, Virginia, and it was exactly what I was looking for.
And for guitars I actually used an early ’90s Les Paul Jr. with a single P-90 in the bridge. Again with the different guitar, I wanted to get a dirtier, more aggressive tone and the P-90 sound was a bit more in your face, immediate, and heavier than my usual Les Paul tone—especially with the tone knob wide open—which seemed to fit the album’s vibe a bit more.
Between Strange Cousins From the West and Earth Rocker, you guys re-recorded some acoustic tracks from the Blast Tyrant-era for Basket of Eggs. And on Earth Rocker there’s also an acoustic element in the form of the eerie song “Gone Cold.” Coming off those acoustic, stripped-down sessions was that something you guys wanted to try for this album?
“Gone Cold” was based on an old, slow blues song that JP (Jean-Paul Gaster, drummer) was jamming a lot during the 2012 tour. We copped the vibe from that slow song and just added some funkadelic parts with the deep reverb and washing delays. I’m playing my early ’60s Gibson Folksinger acoustic during that song while Neil (Fallon, vocals and guitar) plays the electric parts. For the solo, I really wanted it to sound like a Willie Nelson-in-the-desert vibe.
Speaking of heavy, The Transnational and Clutch vibe really shines in “Unto the Breach,” which is clearly your heaviest guitar tone on the new album. What did you use to goose your tone even more?
That song is something we’ve been jamming on and messing around with for years. We just never really could finish it or—even in its infancy—find a spot for it on an album, so it was just shelved.
Tonally, I think what you’re hearing during the main riff is me playing the Les Paul Jr. through the JCM900 with a half-cocked wah pedal.
You’ve been a real big proponent of the wah and used several different models over the years. What did you use on Earth Rocker and what do you look for in a good wah pedal?
Teese RMC1 Real McCoy Custom is the one I’m currently using and that also made it on the record. I like pedals that are simple—the less tweakability the better. I like wahs that can be kicked on and sound amazing straight out of the box and the Real McCoy custom RMC1 has been doing good for a while.
You’ve said that you tend to break wahs quite often. Is that still the case?
Oh yeah [laughs]… I think I’ve had this one for a few months now. For a while I was busting them every two to three weeks. I tend to bounce back and forth between the Teese wahs and the Custom Audio Electronics MC404 wah—those seem to be the best-built wahs for what I do to them.
Do you think the wahs are built unsatisfactory or are you the one to blame with your stomping?
[Laughs] I’d like to think other guitarists have issues with their wahs, too, but I definitely think it’s a “me” problem. I’m just too abusive so I should just get an auto wah or a rackmount version.
“Oh Isabella” features two great pitch-shifting, octave-driven solo parts over top more standard-fare Clutch riffage. Similar tones show up during the last minutes of “The Wolfman Kindly Requests….” What effects did you use to achieve those tones?
I used the Electro-Harmonix Micro POG for the octave, pitch-shifting funk parts in conjunction with a Line 6 DL4. This octave pedal is a recent addition to my pedalboard. I like to play it during slower, more funk-based solos just to add a bit of a different texture than a wah, which I would normally use on that style of improv part.
How did you get the reverse effect in the second solo?
Yeah, that’s where the DL4 really comes into effect. For that portion of
the song, I flipped it into the reverse mode, played with the tweak and
tweaz knobs. That part also is played with the Micro POG, too. I think
that’s probably my favorite solo on the entire record because it seems
to flow very well with a very lyrical nuance to it. I personally think
my best work is done when I play within a theme like in “Gone Cold” and
the old West feel or follow the song’s groove like in “Oh Isabella.” I’d
rather play those type of solos rather than just shred as fast as I can
… I’m not a shredder nor do I ever want to be.
Gear
Guitars
Early ’90s Gibson Les Paul Jr.
Early ’60s Gibson F-25 Folksinger Acoustic
Amps
Marshall JCM900
’70s Marshall JTM45
Orange 2x12 with Celestion Vintage 30s
Marshall 1960A 4x12 with Celestion Vintage 30s
Effects
Electro-Harmonix Micro POG
Line 6 DL4
Teese RMC1 Real McCoy wah
Strings, Picks, and Accessories
Jim Dunlop Heavy Core .012–.054 strings
Jim Dunlop Tortex .73 mm picks
When writing or coming up with riffs that accompany Neil’s harmonica parts like in “D. C. Sound Attack” on Earth Rocker or earlier pieces like “Electric Worry,” how do you configure where you’ll play on the neck and what you’ll play? Are there any tonal considerations you consciously make when tracking songs he plays harmonica in?
For “D.C. Sound Attack,” we didn’t add the harmonica part until last. It was something we decided to do once we recorded most of the song and felt it would go real well with the bluesy-rock vibe of the song. I think figuring out how to tonally set up my amp or how or where I’m going to play my guitar alongside Neil on harmonica is more of a factor live. And, we actually toured in the mid-2000s with a harmonica player, so it was a factor for many tours, but still, the goal is real simple—just don’t step all over each other and avoid crossing into each other’s frequencies especially during the other guys’ solos.
And because of that, tonally, I wanted to get a more classic, raw overall sound that I haven’t had in recent years—I set my sights on Transnational- or S/T-era tones.
Producer Machine on Making Earth Rocker
Finding the Mojo
“They are one of my favorite bands to work with and one of my favorite bands to listen to as a fan, too,” says Earth Rocker producer Machine. “Any time they come knocking, it’s not a problem to spend time with a band like that [laughs].” Machine initially worked with Clutch on 2001’s Pure Rock Fury and 2004’s Blast Tyrant—which, at the time, was an unlikely pairing.
“I met them on the premise that I was going to help them make radio songs—that’s not the best foot to get off on with a group of guys like Clutch,” Machine recalls, laughing. “It wasn’t an obvious choice for us to collaborate in 2001 when we were first matched up together because they had just signed to a major label [Atlantic] and I was put in touch with them through an A&R guy since I was working with bands like Coal Chamber, Hed PE, and Lost Prophets that were getting radio airtime.”
Once the band and Machine figured out each other’s working style and recording quirks, Machine assured them he could take the right position and make a great Clutch album. Their collaboration forged a distinct, structural shift in Clutch’s overall sonic landscape with a more melodic songwriting bent, fine-tuned aggressiveness, and harnessing of the band’s live energy and flow.
“It was about a year ago when they reached out to me and I went to one of their shows and afterwards they asked me if I wanted to make a record with them again,” Machine says. “I told them that I’d do it, no matter to my other commitments—I was onboard.”
Almost a decade had passed since their last recording session together, but both Clutch and Machine reconvened wiser and stronger within their craft.
“They admitted to me that I did things differently from other producers and in hindsight they learned so much about constructing, arranging, and developing songs from our time together in the early 2000s,” says Machine. “When we work together, we prefer to use extensive preproduction sessions and this time we met at JP’s house and there were a lot more things to work from. The overall flow, arrangement, direction of the album, and completed songs were done in each of those three preproduction cycles.” After they completed the third preproduction at drummer JP’s house, they headed straight into the studio on the wave of momentum the new material created. This provided audible differences immediately.
“They knew they had a killer album in the bag and they were loose, but decisive in the studio. It was second nature and it was a great time. Even still, with a band like Clutch, you’re still going to have some of the 11th hour added parts or changes— like the jamming outros to ‘D.C. Sound Attack’ and ‘Book, Saddle, Go’—and you have to embrace the spontaneity as a producer or get left behind [laughs].”
Machine vs. Machines
Machine gives a breakdown of his studio mindset when recording Clutch’s Earth Rocker:
“We used two Marshall amps—the JTM45 and the JCM900—but relied heavily on the 900 and mixed in only the JTM45 where it was needed for a denser tone, added character, or just overall heft by moving those cab mics further outside the cone for just low-end chunk. For cabinets, we tried a whole bunch of stuff and landed upon a happy accident with the Orange 2x12 with Celestion Vintage 30s. We were trying a bunch of 4x12s and weren’t getting the sound Tim had in his head, so we figured that the size of this particular Orange 2x12 had more real estate per speaker than the 4x12s did because it was an oversized 2x12—it was a little less than 2/3 the cabinet, but only half the speakers of the 4x12. And because of that, the extra space pushed a lot more air, and clear low end, which really made a distinctive sound difference when we were A-Bing all the cabs.
I always use a SM57 on one speaker and a Sennheiser MD 421 II on another speaker when recording guitar. Both mics are on the grill just on the outside edge of the cone and then I blend the mics through my old Amek console because putting multiple mics on a cab doesn’t necessarily mean you have double the tones.
For ‘Gone Cold,’ the lone acoustic track on the album, we recorded traditionally by mic’ing outside the soundhole with an AKG C 480 B cardioid microphone. That was actually the same mic I used on the acoustic track ‘Regulator’ on Blast Tyrant. I remember recording that song at JP’s house and I searched and searched for the perfect mic to record the acoustic guitar parts for that song and I stumbled upon that mic as one of the last things I hadn’t tried. Once it was setup and he was playing—I just felt that it was the mic for that song. And for ‘Gone Cold,’ how could I not use the AKG?! I blended it with a AKG C 414 B, but again, the 480 is the main mic where the 414 is just adding to the mix to fill in nooks and crannies that the 480 is missing in the high highs and low lows.
“I positioned the 480 out in front of the guitar, to the right of the soundhole, with the center of the mic pointing at the last fret of the guitar where the neck joint meets the body. I feel that’s the sweetest spot to get best qualities of the acoustic guitar without getting too much wooliness or overloading the mic. The best secret I’ve found working with acoustic instruments is getting a solid pair of isolating headphones and doing real-time adjustments of mic positioning with the second mic because acoustic guitar will let you know you’re too close by getting woofy and bassy or you get too far away or to the sides and it’s thin, nasally, and constricted.
The Shure 520DX is the harmonica sound for ‘D.C. Sound Attack.’ Without that mic, you don’t have that classic, signature harmonic tone. If you sing through that mic, you sound like you’re using a tin can in a boxcar [laughsthat harmonica sound.”
Day 6 of Stompboxtober is here! Today’s prize? A pedal from Revv Amplification! Enter now and check back tomorrow for the next one!
Revv G3 Purple Channel Preamp/Overdrive/Distortion Pedal - Anniversary Edition
The Revv G3 revolutionized high gain pedals in 2018 with its tube-like response & tight, clear high gain tones. Suddenly the same boutique tones used by metal artists & producers worldwide were available to anyone in a compact pedal. Now the G3 returns with a new V2 circuit revision that raises the bar again.
Beauty and sweet sonority elevate a simple-to-use, streamlined acoustic and vocal amplifier.
An EQ curve that trades accuracy for warmth. Easy-to-learn, simple-to-use controls. It’s pretty!
Still exhibits some classic acoustic-amplification problems, like brash, unforgiving midrange if you’re not careful.
$1,199
Taylor Circa 74
taylorguitars.com
Save for a few notable (usually expensive) exceptions, acoustic amplifiers are rarely beautiful in a way that matches the intrinsic loveliness of an acoustic flattop. I’ve certainly seen companies try—usually by using brown-colored vinyl to convey … earthiness? Don’t get me wrong, a lot of these amps sound great and even look okay. But the bar for aesthetics, in my admittedly snotty opinion, remains rather low. So, my hat’s off to Taylor for clearing that bar so decisively and with such style. The Circa 74 is, indeed, a pretty piece of work that’s forgiving to work with, ease to use, streamlined, and sharp.
Boxing Beyond Utility
Any discussion of trees or wood with Bob Taylor is a gas, and highly instructive. He loves the stuff and has dabbled before in amplifier designs that made wood an integral feature, rather than just trim. But the Circa 74 is more than just an aesthetic exercise. Because the Taylor gang started to think in a relatively unorthodox way about acoustic sound amplification—eschewing the notion that flat frequency response is the only path to attractive acoustic tone.
I completely get this. I kind of hate flat-response speakers. I hate nice monitors. We used to have a joke at a studio I frequented about a pair of monitors that often made us feel angry and agitated. Except that they really did. Flat sound can be flat-out exhausting and lame. What brings me happiness is listening to Lee “Scratch” Perry—loud—on a lazy Sunday on my secondhand ’70s Klipsch speakers. One kind of listening is like staring at a sun-dappled summer garden gone to riot with flowers. The other sometimes feels like a stale cheese sandwich delivered by robot.
The idea that live acoustic music—and all its best, earthy nuances—can be successfully communicated via a system that imparts its own color is naturally at odds with acoustic culture’s ethos of organic-ness, authenticity, and directness. But where does purity end and begin in an amplified acoustic signal? An undersaddle pickup isn’t made of wood. A PA with flat-response speakers didn’t grow in a forest. So why not build an amp with color—the kind of color that makes listening to music a pleasure and not a chore?
To some extent, that question became the design brief that drove the evolution of the Circa 74. Not coincidentally, the Circa 74 feels as effortless to use as a familiar old hi-fi. It has none of the little buttons for phase correction that make me anxious every time I see one. There’s two channels: one with an XLR/1/4" combo input, which serves as the vocal channel if you are a singer; another with a 1/4" input for your instrument. Each channel consists of just five controls—level, bass, middle, and treble EQ, and a reverb. An 11th chickenhead knob just beneath the jewel lamp governs the master output. That’s it, if you don’t include the Bluetooth pairing button and 1/8" jacks for auxiliary sound sources and headphones. Power, by the way, is rated at 150 watts. That pours forth through a 10" speaker.Pretty in Practice
I don’t want to get carried away with the experiential and aesthetic aspects of the Circa 74. It’s an amplifier with a job to do, after all. But I had fun setting it up—finding a visually harmonious place among a few old black-panel Fender amps and tweed cabinets, where it looked very much at home, and in many respects equally timeless.
Plugging in a vocal mic and getting a balance with my guitar happened in what felt like 60 seconds. Better still, the sound that came from the Circa 74, including an exceedingly croaky, flu-addled human voice, sounded natural and un-abrasive. The Circa 74 isn’t beyond needing an assist. Getting the most accurate picture of a J-45 with a dual-source pickup meant using both the treble and midrange in the lower third of their range. Anything brighter sounded brash. A darker, all-mahogany 00, however, preferred a scooped EQ profile with the treble well into the middle of its range. You still have to do the work of overcoming classic amplification problems like extra-present high mids and boxiness. But the fixes come fast, easily, and intuitively. The sound may not suggest listening to an audiophile copy of Abbey Road, as some discussions of the amp would lead you to expect. But there is a cohesiveness, particularly in the low midrange, that does give it the feel of something mixed, even produced, but still quite organic.
The Verdict
Taylor got one thing right: The aesthetic appeal of the Circa 74 has a way of compelling you to play and sing. Well, actually, they got a bunch of things right. The EQ is responsive and makes it easy to achieve a warm representation of your acoustic, no matter what its tone signature. It’s also genuinely attractive. It’s not perfectly accurate. Instead, it’s rich in low-mid resonance and responsive to treble-frequency tweaks—lending a glow not a million miles away from a soothing home stereo. I think that approach to acoustic amplification is as valid as the quest for transparency. I’m excited to see how that thinking evolves, and how Taylor responds to their discoveries.
The evolution of Electro-Harmonix’s very first effect yields a powerful boost and equalization machine at a rock-bottom price.
A handy and versatile preamp/booster that goes well beyond the average basic booster’s range. Powerful EQ section.
Can sound a little harsh at more extreme EQ ranges.
$129
Electro-Harmonix LPB-3
ehx.com
Descended from the first Electro-Harmonix pedal ever released, the LPB-1 Linear Power Booster, the new LPB-3 has come a long way from the simple, one-knob unit in a folded-metal enclosure that plugged straight into your amplifier. Now living in Electro-Harmonix’s compact Nano chassis, the LPB-3 Linear Power Booster and EQ boasts six control knobs, two switches, and more gain than ever before.
If 3 Were 6
With six times the controls found on the 1 and 2 versions (if you discount the original’s on/off slider switch,) the LPB-3’s control complement offers pre-gain, boost, mid freq, bass, treble, and mid knobs, with a center detent on the latter three so you can find the midpoint easily. A mini-toggle labeled “max” selects between 20 dB and 33 dB of maximum gain, and another labeled “Q” flips the resonance of the mid EQ between high and low. Obviously, this represents a significant expansion of the LPB’s capabilities.
More than just a booster with a passive tone, the LPB-3 boasts a genuine active EQ stage plus parametric midrange section, comprising the two knobs with shaded legends, mid freq and mid level. The gain stages have also been reimagined to include a pre-gain stage before the EQ, which enables up to 20 dB of input gain. The boost stage that follows the EQ is essentially a level control with gain to allow for up to 33 dB of gain through the LPB-3 when the “max” mini toggle is set to 33dB
A slider switch accessible inside the pedal selects between buffered or true bypass for the hard-latch footswitch. An AC adapter is included, which supplies 200mA of DC at 9.6 volts to the center-negative power input, and EHX specifies that nothing supplying less than 120mA or more than 12 volts should be used. There’s no space for an internal battery.
Power-Boosted
The LPB-3 reveals boatloads of range that betters many linear boosts on the market. There’s lots of tone-shaping power here. Uncolored boost is available when you want it, and the preamp gain knob colors and fattens your signal as you crank it up—even before you tap into the massive flexibility in the EQ stage.
“The preamp gain knob colors and fattens your signal as you crank it up—even before you tap into the massive flexibility in the EQ stage.”
I found the two mid controls work best when used judiciously, and my guitars and amps preferred subtle changes pretty close to the midpoint on each. However, there are still tremendous variations in your mid boost (or scoop, for that matter) within just 15 or 20 percent range in either direction from the center detent. Pushing the boost and pre-gain too far, particularly with the 33 dB setting engaged, can lead to some harsh sounds, but they are easy to avoid and might even be desirable for some users that like to work at more creative extremes.
The Verdict
The new LPB-3 has much, much more range than its predecessors, providing flexible preamp, boost, and overdrive sounds that can be reshaped in significant ways via the powerful EQ. It gives precise tone-tuning flexibility to sticklers that like to match a guitar and amp to a song in a very precise way, but also opens up more radical paths for experimentalists. That it does all this at a $129 price is beyond reasonable.
Electro-Harmonix Lpb-3 Linear Power Booster & Eq Effect Pedal Silver And Blue
Intermediate
Intermediate
• Learn classic turnarounds.
• Add depth and interest to common progressions.
• Stretch out harmonically with hip substitutions.
Get back to center in musical and ear-catching ways.
A turnaround chord progression has one mission: It allows the music to continue seamlessly back to the beginning of the form while reinforcing the key center in a musically interesting way. Consider the last four measures of a 12-bar blues in F, where the bare-bones harmony would be C7-Bb7-F7-F7 (one chord per measure). With no turn around in the last two measures, you would go back to the top of the form, landing on another F7. That’s a lot of F7, both at the end of the form, and then again in the first four bars of the blues. Without a turnaround, you run the risk of obscuring the form of the song. It would be like writing a novel without using paragraphs or punctuation.
The most common turnaround is the I-VI-ii-V chord progression, which can be applied to the end of the blues and is frequently used when playing jazz standards. Our first four turnarounds are based on this chord progression. Furthermore, by using substitutions and chord quality changes, you get more mileage out of the I-VI-ii-V without changing the basic functionality of the turnaround itself. The second group of four turnarounds features unique progressions that have been borrowed from songs or were created from a theoretical idea.
In each example, I added extensions and alterations to each chord and stayed away from the pure R-3-5-7 voicings. This will give each chord sequence more color and interesting voice leading. Each turnaround has a companion solo line that reflects the sound of the changes. Shell voicings (root, 3rd, 7th) are played underneath so that the line carries the sound of the written chord changes, making it easier to hear the sound of the extensions and alterations. All examples are in the key of C. Let’s hit it.
The first turnaround is the tried and true I-VI-ii-V progression, played as Cmaj7-A7-Dm7-G7. Ex. 1 begins with C6/9, to A7(#5), to Dm9, to G7(#5), and resolves to Cmaj7(#11). By using these extensions and alterations, I get a smoother, mostly chromatic melodic line at the top of the chord progression.
Ex. 2 shows one possible line that you can create. As for scale choices, I used C major pentatonic over C6/9, A whole tone for A7(#5), D Dorian for Dm9, G whole tone for G7(#5), and C Lydian for Cmaj7(#11) to get a more modern sound.
The next turnaround is the iii-VI-ii-V progression, played as Em7-A7-Dm7-G7 where the Em7 is substituted for Cmaj7. The more elaborate version in Ex. 3 shows Em9 to A7(#9)/C#, to Dm6/9, to G9/B, resolving to Cmaj7(add6). A common way to substitute chords is to use the diatonic chord that is a 3rd above the written chord. So, to sub out the I chord (Cmaj7) you would use the iii chord (Em7). By spelling Cmaj7 = C-E-G-B and Em7 = E-G-B-D, you can see that these two chords have three notes in common, and will sound similar over the fundamental bass note, C. The dominant 7ths are in first inversion, but serve the same function while having a more interesting bass line.
The line in Ex. 4 uses E Dorian over Em9, A half-whole diminished over A7(#9)/C#, D Dorian over Dm6/9, G Mixolydian over G9/B, and C major pentatonic over Cmaj7(add6). The chord qualities we deal with most are major 7, dominant 7, and minor 7. A quality change is just that… changing the quality of the written chord to another one. You could take a major 7 and change it to a dominant 7, or even a minor 7. Hence the III-VI-II-V turnaround, where the III and the VI have both been changed to a dominant 7, and the basic changes would be E7-A7-D7-G7.
See Ex. 5, where E7(b9) moves to A7(#11), to D7(#9) to G7(#5) to Cmaj9. My scale choices for the line in Ex. 6 are E half-whole diminished over E7(#9), A Lydian Dominant for A7(#11), D half-whole diminished for D7(#9), G whole tone for G7(#5), and C Ionian for Cmaj9.
Ex. 7 is last example in the I-VI-ii-V category. Here, the VI and V are replaced with their tritone substitutes. Specifically, A7 is replaced with Eb7, and G7 is replaced with Db7, and the basic progression becomes Cmaj7-Eb7-Dm7-Db7. Instead of altering the tritone subs, I used a suspended 4th sound that helped to achieve a diatonic, step-wise melody in the top voice of the chord progression.
The usual scales can be found an Ex. 8, where are use a C major pentatonic over C6/9, Eb Mixolydian over Eb7sus4, D Dorian over Dm11, Db Mixolydian over Db7sus4, and once again, C Lydian over Cmaj7(#11). You might notice that the shapes created by the two Mixolydian modes look eerily similar to minor pentatonic shapes. That is by design, since a Bb minor pentatonic contains the notes of an Eb7sus4 chord. Similarly, you would use an Ab minor pentatonic for Db7sus4.
The next four turnarounds are not based on the I-VI-ii-V chord progression, but have been adapted from other songs or theoretical ideas. Ex. 9 is called the “Backdoor” turnaround, and uses a iv-bVII-I chord progression, played as Fm7-Bb7-Cmaj7. In order to keep the two-bar phrase intact, a full measure of C precedes the actual turnaround. I was able to compose a descending whole-step melodic line in the top voice by using Cmaj13 and Cadd9/E in the first bar, Fm6 and Ab/Bb in the second bar, and then resolving to G/C. The slash chords have a more open sound, and are being used as substitutes for the original changes. They have the same function, and they share notes with their full 7th chord counterparts.
Creating the line in Ex. 10 is no more complicated than the other examples since the function of the chords determines which mode or scale to use. The first measure employs the C Ionian mode over the two Cmaj chord sounds. F Dorian is used over Fm6 in bar two. Since Ab/Bb is a substitute for Bb7, I used Bb Mixolydian. In the last measure, C Ionian is used over the top of G/C.
The progression in Ex. 11 is the called the “Lady Bird” turnaround because it is lifted verbatim from the Tadd Dameron song of the same name. It is a I-bIII-bVI-bII chord progression usually played as Cmaj7-Eb7-Abmaj7-Db7. Depending on the recording or the book that you check out, there are slight variations in the last chord but Db7 seems to be the most used. Dressing up this progression, I started with a different G/C voicing, to Eb9(#11), to Eb/Ab (subbing for Abmaj7), to Db9(#11), resolving to C(add#11). In this example, the slash chords are functioning as major seventh chords.
As a result, my scale choices for the line in Ex. 12 are C Ionian over G/C, Eb Lydian Dominant over Eb9(#11), Ab Ionian over Eb/Ab, Db Lydian Dominant over Db9(#11), and C Lydian over C(add#11).
The progression in Ex. 13 is called an “equal interval” turnaround, where the interval between the chords is the same in each measure. Here, the interval is a descending major 3rd that creates a I-bVI-IV-bII sequence, played as Cmaj7-Abmaj7-Fmaj7-Dbmaj7, and will resolve a half-step down to Cmaj7 at the top of the form. Since the interval structure and chord type is the same in both measures, it’s easy to plane sets of voicings up or down the neck. I chose to plane up the neck by using G/C to Abmaj13, then C/F to Dbmaj13, resolving on Cmaj7/E.
The line in Ex. 14 was composed by using the notes of the triad for the slash chord and the Lydian mode for the maj13 chords. For G/C, the notes of the G triad (G-B-D) were used to get an angular line that moves to Ab Lydian over Abmaj13. In the next measure, C/F is represented by the notes of the C triad (C-E-G) along with the root note, F. Db Lydian was used over Dbmaj13, finally resolving to C Ionian over Cmaj7/E. Since this chord progression is not considered “functional” and all the chord sounds are essentially the same, you could use Lydian over each chord as a way to tie the sound of the line together. So, use C Lydian, Ab Lydian, F Lydian, Db Lydian, resolving back to C Lydian.
The last example is the “Radiohead” turnaround since it is based off the chord progression from their song “Creep.” This would be a I-III-IV-iv progression, and played Cmaj7-E7-Fmaj7-Fm7. Dressing this one up, I use a couple of voicings that had an hourglass shape, where close intervals were in the middle of the stack.
In Ex. 15 C6/9 moves to E7(#5), then to Fmaj13, to Fm6 and resolving to G/C. Another potential name for the Fmaj13 would be Fmaj7(add6) since the note D is within the first octave. This chord would function the same way, regardless of which name you used.
Soloing over this progression in Ex. 16, I used the C major pentatonic over C6/9, E whole tone over E7(#5), F Lydian over Fmaj13, and F Dorian over Fm6. Again, for G/C, the notes of the G triad were used with the note E, the 3rd of a Cmaj7 chord.
The main thing to remember about the I-VI-ii-V turnaround is that it is very adaptable. If you learn how to use extensions and alterations, chord substitutions, and quality changes, you can create some fairly unique chord progressions. It may seem like there are many different turnarounds, but they’re really just an adaptation of the basic I-VI-ii-V progression.
Regarding other types of turnarounds, see if you can steal a short chord progression from a pop tune and make it work. Or, experiment with other types of intervals that would move the chord changes further apart, or even closer together. Could you create a turnaround that uses all minor seventh chords? There are plenty of crazy ideas out there to work with, and if it sounds good to you, use it!