With their new prog-rock duo, Steve Hackett and Chris Squire discover the joys of retro harmony in A Life Within a Day.
āItās a genuine fusion of our separate ideas,ā says former Genesis guitarist Steve Hackett about his creative relationship with Yes bassist Chris Squire. āThere seemed to be a natural harmony there. We listened to each other, which is refreshing. Musicians arenāt always good listeners. You often get gifted control freaks running bands, but they donāt always make the greatest listeners.ā
These two progressive rock veterans came together to do sessions on each otherās projects, and almost before they knew it, theyād formed a duo called Squackett and finished an entire album. Produced by keyboardist Roger King, A Life Within a Day offers a seamless merging of the finer elements heard in Yes, ā70s-era Genesis, and Hackettās solo work. Eschewing an epic self-indulgent note fest, A Life Within a Day focuses on tight songs, stellar vocal harmonies, signature musicianship, and a few stylistic surprises.
Recently, PG met with Hackett and Squire to find out how this project came together and explore the creative process that produced A Life Within a Day.
The new record sounds great.
Hackett: Thank you.
Squire: I donāt know if it was luck or judgment that got us making this album, but it certainly turned out to be really satisfying.
How did you guys first meet?
Hackett: I met Chris when I was doing a show with Steve Howe. We were doing GTR and playing a show in Los Angeles. We had a good conversation after it. We seemed to hit it off straight away and I complimented him on lots of the stuff that Yes had done. He told me how much he liked A Trick of the Tail with Genesis.
We seemed to have an immediate rapport. He asked me if Iād play on his Christmas album. That turned into him appearing on a couple of solo things of mine, and then eventually this combined project.
Squire: After the Christmas album was released, I went to Steveās studio and played some stuff for him thinking it was going to be for projects of his own. As that process went on he gave me a CD of ideas he had. It progressed to the fact that we were working together on stuff that didnāt have any designation at that time. It just evolved organically, and we suddenly realized that we were sort of involved in making an album together. It was a very comfortable way of going in with no pressure. It was a very comfortable situation for both of us.
Were there any songs that the two of you created from scratch?
Hackett: āTall Ships.ā Chris was trying out a bass in my studio in Twickenham and straight away he started playing what became the thing that anchors the whole of that track. I said, āDo you think you can repeat that? If you can, I think we can turn that into a song.ā He said, āYeah I think I can repeat that.ā So he played exactly the same thing. Most musicians when you say to them, āYou just played something great, can you play that again?ā They say, āI was just messing around. I canāt remember that.ā Thatās 99.999% of what goes on in the studios and the moment is lost. But he said, āYeah. I can remember that.ā And thatās the first thing we put down.
The title track goes to so many places and has stylistic elements from both your careers.
Squire: It does and definitely gets the record going at the beginning.
Hackett:A lot of British bands have an aspect of all sorts of stuff. Thereās an aspect of an Eastern influence, thereās an aspect of progressive stuff, and modern bands. Thereās the syncopation that originally came from the States, but the Eastern Europeans had that with BĆ©la Bartāk and their folk music. Itās a fast trip around the world of music with that composition. I think itās the most developed track.
Once you realized you were working on a project for the both of you, did you attempt to mold it into some sort of specific vision?
Squire: Not really. We were just working on the individual songs. Then of course we said, āIf this were an album, which song would go best before the other one,ā etc. The whole thing evolved very organically. The last thing that we did was the first track, āA Life Within a Day.ā We pretty much wrote it from the ground up together. It ended up being the first track on the album and indeed the title of the album as well.
Instead of an epic prog fest, itās very much a vocal record. How did you divide up the vocal duties?
Hackett: We enjoy working together as singers. Chris and I share this love of harmonies and bands that use harmonies well. I think we made up this third singer between us.
Squire: We discovered that if one of us sang in unison along with the first vocal, it made a really good noise. It had a sound with the combination of what our voices produced.
Hackett: It comes from our backgrounds of listening to everything from The Everly Brothers, The Beatles, The Beach Boys, and The Mamas & the Papasāharmony bands.
Squire: We each brought in some of the melodies and Iād do harmonies on his stuff, and heād do harmonies on my stuff. Eventually we were writing melodies together. On some tracks, he sang the vocal and on some tracks I did.
Who brought in āDivided Self?ā
Squire: That was Steveās. Itās a cool track.
Itās very different from what most people would expect from either of you.
Squire: Itās got a ā60s Byrds feeling about it and a bit of The Police in there as well.
Iām hearing XTC.
Squire: Very much. Iām very familiar with their work. Thatās very much part of their arsenal as well.
Hackett: Itās mainly a harmony-based tune. Then thereās a chorus where weāre both singing on it and doubling every part that we did individually, so there are quite a lot of singers on it by the time we finished tracking up.
I was thinking of something that had a ā60s feel, but the track becomes progressively more retro as it continues. You have a guitar solo that sounds more like the 1950s with a clean tone. Then it ends up with a nod to the kind of music you might hear before the main feature in a cinema of the 1940s with the Wurlitzer coming up through the floor. Thereās a little bit of English humor there with The Beatles and the vaudevillian approach. Itās a nod to an earlier era. It also gives it another dimension that weāre not taking ourselves too seriously.
Is that a Rickenbacker guitar on the song?
Hackett: Yes. Iām using a 6-string owned by my cousin. With Chris playing a Rickenbacker and me playing a Rickenbacker, thereās something about those guitars. Iām also playing a Fernandes guitar with a Sustainer pickup a lot of the time. Itās a Les Paul-shaped Burny model. They made me one as a present, which was in the shape of my Gibson goldtop. It also has a Floyd Rose tremolo as well.
The acoustic sounds youāre getting on āAliensā are gorgeous.
Hackett: The acoustics are a Zemaitis 12-string and a Yairi nylon-string guitar. Thereās also a bit of sitar guitar. Iāve been a fingerstyle player for many years and when I play electric, itās without a pick. But when I was working on this stuff with Chris, I discovered that to get the 12-string sound he really wanted, I needed to use a pick. It gave a real percussive definition to the sound.
Iām actually very bad with a pick. I make a lot of mistakes, but it does create a different kind of rhythm sound with a percussive edge that can be very beautiful.
How did you get such a huge bass sound on the song āStormchaser?ā
Squire: Steve and Roger just wanted the bass to be loud. Thatās all there is on it. They wanted it to sound like classic me. Who was I to complain about that? [Laughs.] Thatās the Ricky. Apart from the first two tracks, the whole album is my Rickenbacker 4001. On the first track I play my green Mouradian bass, and on the second track I was beta testing a brand-new Yamaha they gave me.
The bass sounds on āStormchaserā and āDivided Selfā are so different.
Squire: Itās the same bass. I was happy to turn my sound over to Roger because heās good at what he does.
Youāre known for playing with a pick. Do you ever switch to fingers?
Squire: I do sometimes. Over the last 10 or 15 years, Iāve actually developed a style where after the very initial attack on the strings with the pick, my thumb hits the string as well. The very first attack is from the pick itself, but then the rest of the follow-through actually comes from hitting the string with my thumb. Thatās something thatās developed organically within my playing over the years. Thatās pretty much how I play now.
Thereās a wonderful soaring guitar sound that youāre getting throughout the record.
Hackett: Thatās the Fernandes guitar with the Sustainer.
What are your main guitars?
Hackett: These days I tend to use the Fernandes goldtop with the Sustainer and the Yairi nylon. I have several Yairi guitarsāsome are cutaways and some have more of the Ramirez shape. I use the Zemaitis 12-string a fair amount. I also have a Jerry Jones sitar guitar thatās called a Baby Sitar. Itās like a Danelectro copy and it works really well.
How about amps?
Hackett: I enjoy using two Marshall 50-watt heads from 1987. I also use a [Tech 21] SansAmp, which is a mainstay, but everything else is interchangeable. I use various wah-wah pedalsāsometimes a Cry Baby or a Vox. I use a DigiTech Whammy pedal and the green Line 6 [DL4] pedal that does some backwards effects. But thereās no beating a nylon-string guitar for writing.
Chris, give us a rundown of the gear you normally use.
Squire: I always take my Rickenbacker 4001, which Iāve had since 1964, and then the green Mouradian bass, which gets quite a bit of use in the studio. I also have a Lakland bass, which is sort of like a jazz bass. I also have a Fender Jazz bass, which Iāve used on various things over the years.
I have some Tobias 5-string basses and a specialized bass that Mike Tobias built for me in the ā80s. Itās a 4-string bass, but it has a really long neck. I tune it BāEāAāD. Currently Iām using it on this tour as a standup bass. On the summer tour Iām probably going to break out my triple-neck bass. Originally it was a Wal bass, but in actual fact that bass is hanging in a Hard Rock Cafe somewhere. [Laughs.] I had a copy made by a Japanese maker by the name of Kidz. He made an exact replica of the Wal bass and itās actually much better than the original Wal.
Steve Hackettās Gear
Guitars
Fernandes goldtop, Yairi nylon string, Yairi cutaway nylon string, Zemaitis 12-string, Jerry Jones Baby Sitar
Amps
Marshall 1987 50-watt head driving Marshall 1960A 4x12 cabinets
Effects
Vox wah, DigiTech Whammy Pedal, Tech 21 SansAmp GT2 Distortion Pedal, Line 6 DL4 Delay
Strings, Picks, and Accessories
Ernie Ball Extra Slinky (.008, .011, .014, .022, .030, .038), DāAddario EJ43 Pro-Arte light tension nylon strings, Fender medium picks, Ernie Ball straps, Boss TU-12 tuner
Chris Squireās Gear
Basses
ā64 Rickenbacker 4001, Mouradian 4-string, MPC Electra, Lakland 4-string
Amps
Marshall 100-watt head, Marshall 4x12 cabinets, two Ampeg SVT-2Pro, two SVT 8x10 cabinets
Effects
Maestro Fuzz-Tone, custom tremolo, TC Electronics Chorus/Flanger, TC Electronics Reverb, TC Electronics Delay, vintage ā70s Mu-Tron III
Strings, Picks, and Accessories
Rotosound Swing Bass 66 (.045, .065, .080, .105), Herco heavy gauge picks, Mannyās Custom Straps, Samson UR-5D wireless system
How about amps?
Squire: For a long time Iāve used my ā60s 100-watt Marshall with a 4x12 cabinet. Iāve used that pretty much since the beginning. Itās got more top end on it than most of the lead amps. I use my SVT Ampeg rig as well, and also a couple of 8x10 cabinets that go with it. I always run both the Ampeg and Marshall live. Theyāre both micāed and mixed at the desk.
You wire your basses in stereo, right?
Squire: All my basses have stereo output jacks. Thatās mainly to facilitate my effects rack, because I learned a long time ago that certain things like fuzz boxes always sound fantastic on the bass pickup, but sound too harsh on the treble pickup. So when I kick the fuzz in, itās only the bass pickup that goes through it, and the treble pickup cuts out. For various other effects, I run the bass pickup or treble pickup, or sometimes both. It depends on the effect.
Tell us about your effects.
Squire: For years Iāve had a custom made tremolo unit that I still have. I still use a Maestro Fuzz-Tone, and TC Electronic chorus, flanging, echo, and reverb devices. I also have an auto-wah and a Mu-Tron pedal.
Any plans for the members of Genesis to ever work together again?
Hackett: Iām working on Genesis material myself and Iāll take a version of that on the road at some point, probably next year. Iām revisiting the past with a difference with the Genesis material. Iām putting a fresh spin on it and I hope it will be finished this autumn.
Itās unlikely that the original band will see the light of day because some people are retiring. When I was approached some years ago, I said, āYes. Call me when you need me.ā My door is open but itās unlikely to happen.
Whatās coming up for Yes?
Squire: Yes is doing a summer tour in the states in July and August. Procol Harum are going to be opening for us. After that weāre looking at doing Squackett live stuff probably in Europe in the fall. Weāre getting offers! [Laughs.]
Youtube It
Check out Steve Hackettās solo on āFirth of Fifthā from 2004 in Budapest. Heās using his Fernandes goldtop with the Sustainer.
If youāre unfamiliar with Steve Hackettās guitar work, this live version of āSpectral Morningsā will give you a good introduction to his soaring guitar style.
Weāre giving away pedals all month long! Enter Stompboxtober Day 11 for your chance to win todayās pedal from Hotone Audio!
Hotone Wong Press
Cory Wong Signature Volume/Wah/Expression Pedal
Renowned international funk guitar maestro and 63rd Grammy nominee Cory Wong is celebrated for his unique playing style and unmistakable crisp tone. Known for his expressive technique, heās been acclaimed across the globe by all audiences for his unique blend of energy and soul. In 2022, Cory discovered the multi-functional Soul Press II pedal from Hotone and instantly fell in love. Since then, it has become his go-to pedal for live performances.
Now, two years later, the Hotone team has meticulously crafted the Wong Press, a pedal tailored specifically for Cory Wong. Building on the multi-functional design philosophy of the Soul Press series, this new pedal includes Coryās custom requests: a signature blue and white color scheme, a customized volume pedal curve, an adjustable wah Q value range, and travel lights that indicate both pedal position and working mode.
Coryās near-perfect pursuit of tone and pedal feel presented a significant challenge for our development team. After countless adjustments to the Q value range, Hotone engineers achieved the precise WAH tone Cory desired while minimizing the risk of accidental Q value changes affecting the sound. Additionally, based on Coryās feedback, the volume control was fine-tuned for a smoother, more musical transition, enhancing the overall feel of volume swells. The team also upgraded the iconic travel lights of the Soul Press II to dual-color travel lightsāblue for Wah mode and green for Volume modeāmaking live performances more intuitive and visually striking!
In line with the Hotone Design Inspiration philosophy, the Wong Press represents the perfect blend of design and inspiration. Now, musicians can channel their inner Cory Wong and enjoy the freedom and joy of playing with the Wong Press!
A more affordable path to satisfying your 1176 lust.
An affordable alternative to Cali76 and 1176 comps that sounds brilliant. Effective, satisfying controls.
Big!
$269
Warm Audio Pedal76
warmaudio.com
Though compressors are often used to add excitement to flat tones, pedal compressors for guitar are often ā¦ boring. Not so theWarm Audio Pedal76. The FET-driven, CineMag transformer-equipped Pedal76 is fun to look at, fun to operate, and fun to experiment with. Well, maybe itās not fun fitting it on a pedalboardāat a little less than 6.5ā wide and about 3.25ā tall, itās big. But its potential to enliven your guitar sounds is also pretty huge.
Warm Audio already builds a very authentic and inexpensive clone of the Urei 1176, theWA76. But the font used for the modelās name, its control layout, and its dimensions all suggest a clone of Origin Effectsā much-admired first-generation Cali76, which makes this a sort of clone of an homage. Much of the 1176ās essence is retained in that evolution, however. The Pedal76 also approximates the 1176ās operational feel. The generous control spacing and the satisfying resistance in the knobs means fast, precise adjustments, which, in turn, invite fine-tuning and experimentation.
Well-worn 1176 formulas deliver very satisfying results from the Pedal76. The 10ā2ā4 recipe (the numbers correspond to compression ratio and āclockā positions on the ratio, attack, and release controls, respectively) illuminates lifeless tonesāadding body without flab, and an effervescent, sparkly color that preserves dynamics and overtones. Less subtle compression tricks sound fantastic, too. Drive from aggressive input levels is growling and thick but retains brightness and nuance. Heavy-duty compression ratios combined with fast attack and slow release times lend otherworldly sustain to jangly parts. Impractically large? Maybe. But Iād happily consider bumping the rest of my gain devices for the Pedal76.
Check out our demo of the Reverend Vernon Reid Totem Series Shaman Model! John Bohlinger walks you through the guitar's standout features, tones, and signature style.
Reverend Vernon Reid Totem Series Electric Guitar - Shaman
Vernon Reid Totem Series, ShamanWith three voices, tap tempo, and six presets, EQDās newest echo is an affordable, approachable master of utility.
A highly desirable combination of features and quality at a very fair price. Nice distinctions among delay voices. Controls are clear, easy to use, and can be effectively manipulated on the fly.
Analog voices may lack complexity to some ears.
$149
EarthQuaker Silos
earthquakerdevices.com
There is something satisfying, even comforting, about encountering a product of any kind that is greater than the sum of its partsāthings that embody a convergence of good design decisions, solid engineering, and empathy for users that considers their budgets and real-world needs. You feel some of that spirit inEarthQuakerās new Silos digital delay. Itās easy to use, its tone variations are practical and can provoke very different creative reactions, and at $149 itās very inexpensive, particularly when you consider its utility.
Silos features six presets, tap tempo, one full second of delay time, and three voicesātwo of which are styled after bucket-brigade and tape-delay sounds. In the $150 price category, itās not unusual for a digital delay to leave some number of those functions out. And spending the same money on a true-analog alternative usually means warm, enveloping sounds but limited functionality and delay time. Silos, improbably perhaps, offers a very elegant solution to this canāt-have-it-all dilemma in a U.S.-made effect.
A More Complete Cobbling Together
Silosā utility is bolstered by a very unintimidating control set, which is streamlined and approachable. Three of those controls are dedicated to the same mix, time, and repeats controls you see on any delay. But saving a preset to one of the six spots on the rotary preset dial is as easy as holding the green/red illuminated button just below the mix and preset knobs. And you certainly wonāt get lost in the weeds if you move to the 3-position toggle, which switches between a clear ādigitalā voice, darker āanalogā voice, and a ātapeā voice which is darker still.
āThe three voices offer discernibly different response to gain devices.ā
One might suspect that a tone control for the repeats offers similar functionality as the voice toggle switch. But while itās true that the most obvious audible differences between digital, BBD, and tape delays are apparent in the relative fidelity and darkness of their echoes, the Silosā three voices behave differently in ways that are more complex than lighter or duskier tonality. For instance, the digital voice will never exhibit runaway oscillation, even at maximum mix and repeat settings. Instead, repeats fade out after about six seconds (at the fastest time settings) or create sleepy layers of slow-decaying repeats that enhance detail in complex, sprawling, loop-like melodic phrases. The analog voice and tape voice, on the other hand, will happily feed back to psychotic extremes. Both also offer satisfying sensitivity to real-time, on-the-fly adjustments. For example, I was tickled with how I could generate Apocalypse Now helicopter-chop effects and fade them in and out of prominence as if they were approaching or receding in proximityāan effect made easier still if you assign an expression pedal to the mix control. This kind of interactivity is what makes analog machines like the Echoplex, Space Echo, and Memory Man transcend mere delay status, and the sensitivity and just-right resistance make the process of manipulating repeats endlessly engaging.
Doesn't Flinch at Filth
EarthQuaker makes a point of highlighting the Silosā affinity for dirty and distorted sounds. I did not notice that it behaved light-years better than other delays in this regard. But the three voices most definitely offer discernibly different responses to gain devices. The super-clear first repeat in the digital mode lends clarity and melodic focus, even to hectic, unpredictable, fractured fuzzes. The analog voice, which EQD says is inspired by the tone makeup of a 1980s-vintage, Japan-made KMD bucket brigade echo, handles fuzz forgivingly inasmuch as its repeats fade warmly and evenly, but the strong midrange also keeps many overtones present as the echoes fade. The tape voice, which uses aMaestro Echoplex as its sonic inspiration, is distinctly dirtier and creates more nebulous undercurrents in the repeats. If you want to retain clarity in more melodic settings, it will create a warm glow around repeats at conservative levels. Push it, and it will summon thick, sometimes droning haze that makes a great backdrop for slower, simpler, and hooky psychedelic riffs.
In clean applications, this decay and tone profile lend the tape setting a spooky, foggy aura that suggests the cold vastness of outer space. The analog voice often displays an authentic BBD clickiness in clean repeats thatās sweet for underscoring rhythmic patterns, while the digital voiceās pronounced regularity adds a clockwork quality that supports more up-tempo, driving, electronic rhythms.
The Verdict
Silosā combination of features seems like a very obvious and appealing one. But bringing it all together at just less than 150 bucks represents a smart, adept threading of the cost/feature needle.