
Satch on the "Black Swans and Wormhole Wizards" recording and songwriting process, juggling Chickenfoot with solo material, and the gear he can''t get enough of
While on hiatus from the supergroup Chickenfoot featuring Sammy Hagar, Michael Anthony, and Chad Smith, Satriani took some time out from the mayhem to return to the quiet refuge of his solo universe. The process for the new record evolved from home demos and ultimately morphed into a piece of work that traverses the middle ground between the soulful and the bombastic.
While past recordings touched on similar themes and textures, this new release is much more compositionally fluid and displays more depth and range as a songwriter. Weāre swept away on an intergalactic flight (with comfortable seating and leg room) that guides us from the mesmerizing to the emotional. His masterfully organized tracklist glides seamlessly from epic rock, contemplative solo guitar, to Middle Eastern atmospherics and back again.
As always he brings tuneful melodies, but this time weaves slow-handed, Scofield-esque behind-the-beat phrasing, emotive gospel stylings, and a stellar band that knows how to breathe as well as rock. PG caught up with Joe the week before the album's October 5 release to learn more about how Black Swans And Wormhole Wizards came together, and the gear heās digging right now.
Howās it going?
Iām having a good day testing chorus pedals.
Find anything good?
I like the newly-made A/DA Flanger, which isnāt really a chorus pedal, but itās so neat sounding. It kind of covers chorus. I still like the Voodoo Lab Analog Chorus, and for some reason the Boss Super Chorus is also very clean and not noisy. It helps if youāre using distortion. If youāre not using distortion, then TC Electronicās chorus is pretty good, along with Analog Man and Red Witch pedals. Even the Electro-Harmonix choruses are okay as long as youāre not using any distortion. Once you get gain going in the circuit, some pedals can get kind of noisy, so that always leads me back to the A/DA, the Voodoo Labs, and the Super Chorus.
You have to check out those pedals clean as well as dirty or youāll get a weird surprise.
Yeah, basically the old bucket brigade style choruses were very noisy. They cut a lot of low end and high end out. Theyāve been sort of upgraded, but as they get cleaner sounding, they lose some kind of soul. When you go from analog to digital, you get the headroom, thereās no distortion, you keep your low end, but itās not wild and crazy like a foot pedal should be. Itās more like a studio effect. Thatās kind of like what youāre always balancing with. Theyāre all pretty good. They all do their job, but when youāre zeroing in on just a few very important attributes, you start to see that there are some units that are better than others.
Whatās been going on since you finished the record?
Itās been very busy. As soon as I finished mixing the record in Vancouver, I was back home doing Chickenfoot demos. I handed ten songs off to Sammy, then we did two shows about a week ago. Thatāll be it for the rest of the year for Chickenfoot as far as shows go. Then weāre hoping to be in the studio at the end of January when my solo tour takes a break. Iām very excited about it. I think itās going to be a great record. I canāt wait to see what Sammy decides to sing about.
Tell me about how the process began with Black Swans And Wormhole Wizards?
It started with John Cuniberti, my longtime co-producer and good friend. He came over and helped me redesign my studio. We turned my studio around 180 degrees and put up a lot of sound dampening stuff. He did a real professional job with it to get the room to be as dead as possible. I repositioned my desk, I upgraded all my Pro Tools, got a new screen, started using my Meyer HD-1, and I got rid of all my old keyboards and my V-Drum set, which is what I used to build my demos. I started doing everything with Native Instruments and BFD. It really helped my demo process.
Coming back from the Experience Hendrix tour in March, I was able to crank out lots of demos really fast. It didnāt slow down my writing process, which was what my old system was doing. The upgrade really helped. The room sounded great. I could work in it for eight or ten hours and my ears would never get tired. I wound up writing a lot of songs and had two months to get all the demos together for the guys. I wound up doing about sixty percent of the guitars or more at home, and some of the keyboard work as well.
Do you carry a little recorder around with you to catch ideas as they come to you, or do you wait until you get to your studio to make stuff up from scratch?
Weāre all surrounded with digital devices now. The demo that we used for the arrangement of āLittle Worth Laneā was actually recorded on my iPhone on a backstage piano on the Hendrix tour. That became the blueprint of that song. Iāve got a lot of the Zoom products like the Q3 and H4 for video as well as audioāamazing sounding audio recording device. I use that a lot.
When you have a studio in your house, itās easy. It takes about two minutes to fire everything up and Iām recording. I record most of the guitars direct and sometimes even go through an amp. That allows me to get unusual performances recorded, and then go into a real studio and re-amp them into as many amps as I want. I can turn them up, get creative with speakers, and things like that.
I ask because the new record, while very melodic, doesnāt sound overly produced like a lot of guitar instrumental records. It breathes and grooves. Does that come from melodies made up in your head or improvising over grooves?
There are a lot of people who should take credit for how the whole thing turned out eventually. The thing about the groove is very important. I always keep a very keen eye on the fact that Iām a rock ānā roll artist and I want to make rock ānā roll records. I donāt want things to sound hastily thrown together, but I donāt want them to sound overly produced. I want it to be fun to listen to. I want people to be able to listen to it over and over again for decades.
For me, that means that there has to be some kind of looseness and playfulness even if youāre doing a song about a dire situation or something sad. There has to be life in everybodyās performance, which means when you get into the studio with the band, you have to let everybody feel that they can contribute. You gotta listen to what theyāre telling you about their parts. As a writer you have it in your mind what you think the song could doāhow it could achieve its goal. When you make demos of course, itās really sort of a pale version of whatās in your mind and in your heart about the song. So I always tell the guys, āHey, this is just a demo. Some of the parts weāll use but feel free to explore your parts.ā
It really helps the atmosphere so everybody feels creative. A take is just a take. Weāll do a lot of them so you might as well explore. Sooner or later weāre all smiling at each other because we realize itās really coming together. Itās way better than what the demo had suggested. Weāre off in a new area.
Give me an example of that.
āGod Is Cryingā had a really different beginning in the demo. It was just bass and guitar. I was just hammering out the riff. I never really liked it, but I was kind of waiting for something to happen in the studio. When these guys got together, the chemistry was really good. Every time we would get ready for a song, thereād be all this crazy jamming. Weād have to be told to stop and concentrate on the song at hand.
I really like that you let Mike Keneally loose on the piano solo to āWind In The Trees.ā It adds so much to the flowing quality of the record.
He is a genius. When I started making the demos for the record, I was keen on having keyboards as one of my themes. Iām a chordal player. I donāt really solo or anything, so I started to build into the songs these sections where I wanted somebody to answer me. I wanted somebody to be my foil against the melody. At times I was thinking I wanted to hear a piano stretched out somehow. So I started thinking, āWho do I know who is a great piano player, but understands what a guitar player likes to do?ā It came to my mind that Mike Keneally is probably one of the few who can actually understand that concept, and probably the only guy who can really blow on both instruments. Heās just amazing.
I was lucky enough to give him a call and find out that he was available for the sessions. I basically left these big holes for him and said, āYou just do whatever you want.ā Other places I said, āElectric piano.ā Iād have him replace parts that I had done where I already had their texture kind of in the ballpark. He became the fourth member, which was extremely important. He didnāt just come and overdub. He was there cutting the basics. He was able to expand upon my ideas beyond where I thought they could go.
It sounds like a real band in the same room playing off each other.
You hit the nail right on the head. He was listening to my weird Auto-Tuned melody guitar, then heās listening to my Sustainiac pickup solo guitar, and I said, āWhen itās your turn, you just go off.ā I gave him a lot of measures to just kind of go off and finish the song. Every take he played a brilliant solo. It was so hard to pick one.
Did you use Auto-Tune on the solos to āLight Years Awayā and āPyrrhic Victoria?ā
No. Those are two different sounds. On āLight Years Awayā itās just a straight-ahead guitar.
It sounds like thereās a subtle octavia sound going on.
You might just be hearing upper harmonics. Mike Fraser is an amazing mixer and he makes everything sound very rich. Thatās actually the guitar tone I got here at my home studio. On āPyrrhic Victoria,ā thatās one of the solos that we cut live with the band. On that one I think I was using a Fulltone Deja Vibe or something like that. That basically gives a frequency shift. It makes the guitar sound a bit like an organ or like an old Hendrix tone.
With the Auto-Tune thing, we used it as an effect only on that one song, āWind In The Treesā as a melody. What it does is, it doesnāt allow the guitar to stray. Not only out of tune, but out of key. Iāve used it before on a techno album called Engines Of Creation, but it really just made the guitar sound like a keyboard so it wasnāt very interesting.
I realized that I had been using it in the wrong way. I hadnāt been using it like a guitar player does with chorus pedals or wah-wah pedals, where you plug into it and then you react to what you hear. I thought, Iāll set up something where Iām going to only be listening to what it sounds like coming out of the Auto-Tune. I realized if I played like a drunken idiot, that the program would work so hard to get me in tune, that it would create this other soundāwhich was this sort of vocal quality. The software was working hard to pull me back into the key. It started to sound really interesting. So if I did a wild vibrato bar bend going Wwrrrrrrrrrr, it would go Wrrddddddd, and make sure every stop along the way was in the key that I had programmed it. I thought it was the funniest thing ever. It was like guitar playerās revenge. [Laughing]
Did you use the Saturator or the Ice Nine pedals at all?
I believe the Saturator was used for the solo in āLight Years Away.ā That would have been through an old [Marshall] 6100 amp and then probably through my old Millennia FTP 1 which functions just like a light compressor and a DI, and went straight into Pro Tools. That was done at home. I donāt think I used the Saturator on anything else. Everything else was just basically the Marshall JVM amp for 90 percent of the work, and some Wizard amps for a couple of songs. I have a specially-made custom reverb by Two-Rock they made for me early in the year that sounds really nice.
Was there any residual Chickenfootness that you brought to the record?
[Laughing] I spent quite a lot of time recording, going on tour, and doing the live DVD with Chickenfoot. During the writing sessions I started to get the sense that I was really enjoying the process of being with a band, seeing where the band can really morph your ideas rhythmically, and how something can play out. In the studio I put it to Mike Fraser that I really wanted the album to have a band sound. I wanted everybody to feel like they had room to inject some of their own ideas into the songs, and I wanted the guitar to have this emotional impact that we had never yet achieved.
Mike and I have been doing records together since ā96 ā ā97, so weād done a lot of work together. He mixed the Chickenfoot album as well, so I think he understood what I was going for. Since he had mixed the Chickenfoot Get Your Buzz On live DVD, he had a good handle on what I meant by trying to capture a live feel. So I think that was the Chickenfootedness that spilled over.
Have you stopped using the Peavey JSX amps completely?
I havenāt used the JSX amps since the Chickenfoot tour started over a year ago. We did that first club tour through the U.S. back in May of last year. When I got back, I met Sammy at his studio. We both plugged into some Marshalls that we had and we thought, āWe gotta go back to playing Marshalls!ā We knew what Chickenfoot really needed. He was playing is own Crate model before that. Just like that, the two of us switched to Marshall. The next week we flew to Vienna and Marshall had a bunch of amps waiting for us. Then I started trying to figure out how to use the JVMs, and Iāve had a lot of fun with those amps. Theyāve been really amazing sounding on the Chickenfoot tour, and they wound up having a great presence on my new solo record.
Theyāre so articulate, which is so unusual when youāre looking for an amp that can handle lots of levels of gain. The engineer Santiago Alvarez at Marshall figured out a way to get them to be big and ballsy. They have a way of being very articulate, which really helps me out when Iām trying to concentrate on phrasing. I want people to hear every little nuance of my picking.
I saw you on the Chickenfoot tour right after the switch. Your sound was a lot more rugged.
It was much bigger. Thereās no substitute for turning up loud and using an all tube amplifier. The EQ was passive, whereas the JSX had an active EQ. Part of the problem I had with Peavey is that after the amp initially came out, the changes that I wanted to see made to the amp were way too slow in coming. During the production of the Chickenfoot album we were working on a 50-watt head, and there was just no progress. It was grinding to a halt and I was wondering, āWhat is going on with you guys? How come there isnāt an engineer working on this stuff for me?ā
If an artist is going to endorse a product, they have to get support from the company. If they donāt, then they give up too much by always having to play this thing that their name and face are attached to. Peavey makes a lot of great things, but at the time it seemed like the engineer they had was not really responding to me or the other artists enough. I either needed to not be endorsed by somebody, or go to a company where they really did want to help me out quickly, and make changes as changes were needed.
Any surprises for the upcoming tour?
I think the whole tour is going to be a surprise. As I look at the set list, weāre playing a lot of the new album, and weāre pulling out a lot of songs that either Iāve never played live before, or havenāt been in the set list for years. For those people whoāve seen us live, theyāre gonna see a lot of surprises.
Joeās Gear Box
Guitars
Ibanez JS2400
Ibanez JS1200
Ibanez JS Single Coil Prototype
Amp
Marshall JVM410 (Modified)
Effects
Vox Saturator
Vox Big Bad Wah
Vox Time Machine
Vox Ice 9
Onstage, Tommy Emmanuel executes a move that is not from the playbook of his hero, Chet Atkins.
Recorded live at the Sydney Opera House, the Australian guitaristās new album reminds listeners that his fingerpicking is in a stratum all its own. His approach to arranging only amplifies that distinctionāand his devotion to Chet Atkins.
Australian fingerpicking virtuoso Tommy Emmanuel is turning 70 this year. Heās been performing since he was 6, and for every solo show heās played, heās never used a setlist.
āMy biggest decision every day on tour is, āWhat do I want to start with? How do I want to come out of the gate?āā Emmanuel explains to me over a video call. āA good opener has to have everything. It has to be full of surprise, it has to have lots of good ideas, lots of light and shade, and then, hit it again,ā he says, illustrating each phrase with his hands and ending with a punch.āYou lift off straightaway with the first song, you get airborne, you start reaching, and then itās time to level out and take people on a journey.ā
In May 2023, Emmanuel played two shows at the Sydney Opera House, the best performances from which have been combined on his new release, Live at the Sydney Opera House. The venueās Concert Hall, which has a capacity of 2,679, is a familiar room for Emmanuel, but I think at this point in his career he wouldnāt bring a setlist if he was playing Wembley Stadium. On the recording, Emmanuelās mind-blowingly dexterous chops, distinctive attack and flair, and knack for culturally resonant compositions are on full display. His opening song for the shows? An original, āCountrywide,ā with a segue into Chet Atkinsā āEl Vaquero.ā
āWhen I was going to high school in the ā60s, I heard āEl Vaqueroā on Chet Atkinsā record, [1964ās My Favorite Guitars],ā Emmanuel shares. āAnd when I wrote āCountrywideā in around ā76 or ā77, I suddenly realized, āAh! Itās a bit like āEl Vaquero!āā So I then worked out āEl Vaqueroā as a solo piece, because it wasnāt recorded like that [by Atkins originally].
āThe co-writer of āEl Vaqueroā is Wayne Moss, whoās a famous Nashville session guy who played āda da daā [sings the guitar riff from Roy Orbisonās āPretty Womanā]. And he played on a lot of Chetās records as a rhythm guy. So once when I played āEl Vaqueroā live, Wayne Moss came up to me and said, āYou know, you did my part and Chetās at the same time. Thatās not fair!āā Emmanuel says, laughing.
Atkins is the reason Emmanuel got into performing. His mother had been teaching him rhythm guitar for a couple years when he heard Atkins on the radio and, at 6, was able to immediately mimic his fingerpicking technique. His father recognized Emmanuelās prodigious talent and got him on the road that year, which kicked off his professional career. He says, āBy the time I was 6, I was already sleep-deprived, working too hard, and being forced to be educated. Because all I was interested in was playing music.ā
Emmanuel talks about Atkins as if the way he viewed him as a boy hasnāt changed. The title Atkins bestowed upon him, C.G.P. (Certified Guitar Player), appears on Emmanuelās album covers, in his record label (C.G.P. Sounds), and is inlaid at the 12th fret on his Maton Custom Shop TE Personal signature acoustic. (Atkins named only five guitarists C.G.P.s. The others are John Knowles, Steve Wariner, Jerry Reed, and Atkins himself.) For Emmanuel, even today most roads lead to Atkins.
When I ask Emmanuel about his approach to arranging for solo acoustic guitar, he says, āIt was really hit home for me by my hero, Chet Atkins, when I read an interview with him a long time ago and he said, āMake your arrangement interesting.ā And I thought, āWow!ā Because I was so keen to be true to the composer and play the song as everyone knows it. But then again, Iām recreating it like everyone else has, and I might as well get in line with the rest of them and jump off the cliff into nowhere. So it struck me: āHow can I make my arrangements interesting?ā Well, make them full of surprises.ā
When Emmanuel was invited to contribute to 2015ās Burt Bacharach: This Guitarās in Love with You, featuring acoustic-guitar tributes to Bacharachās classic compositions by various artists, Emmanuel expresses that nobody wanted to take ā(They Long to Be) Close to You,ā due to its āsyrupyā nature. But for Emmanuel, this presented an entertaining challenge.
He explains, āI thought, āOkay, how can I reboot āClose to You?ā So even the most jaded listener will say, āHoly fuckāI didnāt expect that! Wow, I really like that; that is a good melody!ā So I found a good key to play the song in, which allowed me to get some open notes that sustain while I move the chords. Then what I did is, in every phrase, I made the chord unresolve, then resolve.
Tommy Emmanuel's Gear
āIām writing music for the film thatās in my head,ā Emmanuel says. āSo, I donāt think, āIām just the guitar,ā ever.ā
Photo by Simone Cecchetti
Guitars
- Three Maton Custom Shop TE Personals, each with an AP5 PRO pickup system
Amps
- Udo Roesner Da Capo 75
Effects
- AER Pocket Tools preamp
Strings & Picks
- Martin TE Signature Phosphor Bronze (.012ā.054)
- Martin SP strings
- Ernie Ball Paradigm strings
- DāAndrea Pro Plec 1.5 mm
- Dunlop medium thumbpicks
āAnd then to really put the nail in the coffin, at the end, āClose to youā [sings melody]. I finished on a major 9 chord which had that note in it, but it wasnāt the key the song was in, which is a typical Stevie Wonder trick. All the tricks I know, the wonderful ideas that Iāve stolen, are from Michael Jackson, Stevie Wonder, Lionel Richie, James Taylor, Carole King, Neil Diamond. All of the people who wrote really incredibly great pop songs and R&B musicāI stole every idea I could, and I tried to make my little two-and-a -half minutes as interesting and entertaining as possible. Because entertainment equals: Surprise me.ā
I share with Emmanuel that the performances on Live at the Sydney Opera House, which include his popular āBeatles Medley,ā reminded me of another possible arrangement trick. In Harpo Marxās autobiography, Harpo Speaks, I preface, Marx writes of a lesson he learned as a performerāto āanswer the audienceās questions.ā (Emmanuel says heās a big fan of the book and read it in the early ā70s.) That happened for me while listening to the medley, when, after sampling melodies from āSheās a Womanā and āPlease Please Me,ā Emmanuel suddenly lands on āWhile My Guitar Gently Weeps.ā
I say, āIām waiting for something that hits more recognizably to me, and when āWhile My Guitarā comes in, thatās like answering my question.ā
āItās also Paul and John, Paul and John, George,ā Emmanuel replies. āYou think, āThatās great, thatās great pop music,ā then, āWow! Look at the depth of this.āāOften Emmanuelās flights on his acoustic guitar are seemingly superhumanāas well as supremely entertaining.
Photo by Ekaterina Gorbacheva
A trick I like to employ as a writer, I say to Emmanuel, is that when Iām describing something, Iāll provide the reader with just enough context so that they can complete the thought on their own.
āYou can do that musically as well,ā says Emmanuel. He explains how, in his arrangement of āWhat a Wonderful World,ā heāll play only the vocal melody. āWhen people are asking me at a workshop, āHow come you donāt put chords behind that part?ā I say, āIām drawing the melody and youāre putting in all the background in your head. I donāt need to tell you what the chords are. You already know what the chords are.āā
āWayne Moss came up to me and said, āYou know, you did my part and Chetās at the same time. Thatās not fair!āā
Another track featured on Live at the Sydney Opera House is a cover of Paul Simonās āAmerican Tuneā (which Emmanuel then jumps into an adaptation of the Australian bush ballad, āWaltzing Matildaā). Itās been a while since I really spent time with There GoesRhyminā Simon (on which āAmerican Tuneā was first released), and yet it sounded so familiar to me. A little digging revealed that its melody is based on the 17th-century Christian hymn, āO Sacred Head, Now Wounded,ā which was arranged and repurposed by Bach in a few of the composerās works. The cross-chronological and genre-lackadaisical intersections that come up in popular music sometimes is fascinating.
āI think the principle right there,ā Emmanuel muses, āis people like Bach and Beethoven and Mozart found the right language to touch the heart of a human being through their ears and through their senses ... that really did something to them deep in their soul. They found a way with the right chords and the right notes, somehow. It could be as primitive as that.
Tommy Emmanuel has been on the road as a performing guitarist for 64 years. Eat your heart out, Bob Dylan.
Photo by Jan Anderson
āItās like when youāre a young composer and someone tells you, āHave a listen to Elton Johnās āCandle in the Wind,āā he continues. āāListen to how those notes work with those chords.ā And every time you hear it, you go, āWhy does it touch me like that? Why do I feel this way when I hear those chordsāthose notes against those chords?ā I say, itās just human nature. Then you wanna go, āHow can I do that!āā he concludes with a grin.
āYou draw from such a variety of genres in your arrangements,ā I posit. āDo you try to lean into the side of converting those songs to solo acoustic guitar, or the side of bridging the genreās culture to that of your audience?ā
āI stole every idea I could, and I tried to make my little two-and-a-half minutes as interesting and entertaining as possible. Because entertainment equals: Surprise me.ā
āIf I was a method actor,ā Emmanuel explains, āwhat Iām doing isāIām writing music for the film thatās in my head. So, I donāt think, āIām just the guitar,ā ever. I always think it has to have that kind of orchestral, not grandeur, but ā¦ palette to it. Because of the influence of Stevie Wonder, Billy Joel, and Elton John, especiallyāthe piano guysāI try to use piano ideas, like putting the third in the low bass a lot, because guitar players donāt necessarily do that. And I try to always do something that makes what I do different.
āI want to be different and recognizable,ā he continues. āI remember when people talked about how some playersāyou just hear one note and you go, āOh, thatās Chet Atkins.ā And it hit me like a train, the reason why a guy like Hank Marvin, the lead guitar player from the Shadows.... I can tell you: He had a tone that I hear in other players now. Everyone copied himāthey just donāt know itāincluding Mark Knopfler, Eric Clapton, Jimmy Page, all those people. I got him up to play with me a few times when he moved to Australia, and even playing acoustic, he still had that sound. I donāt know how he did it, but it was him. He invented himself.ā
YouTube It
Emmanuel performs his arrangement of āWhat a Wonderful World,ā illustrating how omitting a harmonic backdrop can have a more powerful effect, especially when playing such a well-known melody.
Swirl deeper in an excellent rotary speaker simulationās complex, intoxicating charms.
Wide-ranging controls enable a wide spectrum of subtle-to-powerful modulation textures. Intuitive.
Jewel bypass/rate LED can be blinding.
$229
Keeley Rotary
robertkeeley.com
Certain facets of a rotary speakerās mystery and magic can be approximated via phasers, vibratos, choruses, or flangers. But replicating anything more than a small percentage of a rotary speakerās sonic complexity in a stompbox takes a keen-eared designer, a fair bit of R&D, and a digital engine that can crunch a few numbers. As a consequence, really good rotary simulations are typically pretty expensive. And because a lot of players view them as one-trick ponies, they are relatively few in number.
Keeleyās Rotary, as the name suggests, specializes in emulating the ineffable, Doppler-y, delicious tones of a Leslie. But it is hardly limited. In addition to super-thick, syrupy, and head-spinning sounds, the rangeful blend control enables many subtle, subdued, and just-barely-there modulation washesāthe kind that add critical, transformative, animating energy to spare arrangements. The drive control is a tasty thickening agent that adds color, equalization nuance, and significant push at more pronounced modulation levels. Keeley also added a 3-position mid boostāpresumably to help overcome perceived volume loss inherent to modulation effects, but also to add pep in moments where phase cancellation seems to swipe energy. In concert with the drive, it can be used as a dedicated tone controlāhelping match the pedal to different pickups, amps, and musical moods. Secondary controls for chasing extra-slow speeds and customizing ramp rates also make it easy to tailor the Rotary for very specific placement in a mix or an arrangement. But the real value in the Rotary for many will be the wobbly prettiness of the many modulations hereāparticularly in stereoāand the musical provocation they so readily supply.
Bergantino revolutionizes the bass amp scene with the groundbreaking HP Ultra 2000 watts bass amplifier, unlocking unprecedented creative possibilities for artists to redefine the boundaries of sound.
Bergantino Audio Systems, renowned for its innovative and high-performance bass amplification, is proud to announce the release of the HP Ultra 2000W Bass Amplifier. Designed for the professional bassist seeking unparalleled power and tonal flexibility, the HP Ultra combines cutting-edge technology with the signature sound quality that Bergantino is known for.
Operating at 1000W with an 8-ohm load and 2000W with a 4-ohm load, the HPUltra offers exceptional headroom and output, ensuring a commanding presence on stage and in the studio. This powerhouse amplifier is engineered to deliver crystal-clear sound and deep, punchy bass with ease, making it the perfect choice for demanding performances across any genre.
The HP Ultra incorporates the same EQ and feature set as the acclaimedBergantino FortĆ© HP series, offering advanced tonal control and versatility. It includes a highly responsive 4-band EQ, Bergantinoās signature Variable RatioCompressor, Lo-Pass, and Hi-Pass Filters, and a re-imagined firmware thatās optimally tuned for the HP Ultraās power module. The intuitive user interface allows for quick adjustments and seamless integration with any rig, making it an ideal solution for both seasoned professionals and rising stars.
As compared to previous forte HP iterations (HP, HP2, HP2X), Ultra is truly its own amp. Its behavior, feel, and tonal capabilities will be well noted for bass players seeking the ultimate playing experience. If youāve been wishing for that extreme lead sled-type heft/force and punch, along with a choice of modern or vintage voicings, on-board parallel compressor, overdrive; high pass and lowpass filters, and moreāall in a 6.9 lb., 2ru (8ā depth) package...the BergantinoHP Ultra is worth checking out.
Building on the forteā HP2Xās leading edge platform (including a harmonic enriching output transformer (X) and 3.5db of additional dynamic headroom (2),the HP Ultraās power focus is not about playing louder...itās about the ability to play fuller and richer at similar or lower volumes. Many players will be able to achieve a very pleasing bass fill, with less volume, allowing the guitars and vocals to shine thru better in a dense mix. This in turn could easily contribute to a lower stage volume...win-win!
Key Features of the Bergantino HP Ultra 2000W Bass Amplifier:
- Power Output: 1000W @ 8ohms / 2000W @ 4ohms, 1200W RMS @2-Ohms (or 1700W RMS @2.67-Ohms-firmware optimizable via USB
- Dual Voicing Circuits: offer a choice between vintage warmth and modern clarity.
- Custom Cinemag Transformer: elevates harmonic enrichment to new heights
- Variable Low-Pass (VLPF) and Variable High-Pass (VHPF) filters, critical for precise tone shaping and taming of the most challenging gigging environments.
- 4-Band Tone Controls: Bass: +/-10db @40hz, Lo-Mid:+/-10db @250hz,Hi-Mid: +/-10db @ 1khz, Treble: +/-10db @ 3.5khz
- Punch Switch: +4db @110hz
- Bright Switch: +7db @7kHz or +6db @2khz ā user selectableā Built-in parallel compression - VRC
- 3.5dB of additional dynamic headroom
- New Drive Circuit featuring our proprietary B.S.D (Bergantino SmartDrive) technology
- Auxiliary Input and Headphone Jack: for personal monitor and practice
- Rack Mountable with optional rack ears
- Effects send and return loop
- Studio quality Direct Output: software selectable Pre or Post EQ
- UPS ā Universal power supply 115VAC ā 240VAC 50/60Hz
- Weight: 6.9 pounds
- Dimensions: 13.25āW x 8.375āD x 3.75āH
- Street Price: $1895.00
For more information, please visit bergantino.com
The NEW Bergantino FortƩ HP ULTRA!!! - YouTube
When you imagine the tools of a guitar shredder, chances are you see a sharp-angled electric 6-string running into a smokinā-hot, fully saturated British halfstack of sortsāthe type of thing thatāll blow your hair back. You might not be picturing an acoustic steel-string or a banjo, and thatās a mistake, because some of the most face-melting players to walk this earth work unpluggedālike Molly Tuttle.
The 31-year old Californian bluegrass and folk artist has been performing live for roughly 20 years, following in a deep family tradition of roots-music players. Tuttle studied at Berklee College of Music, and has gone on to collaborate with some of the biggest names in bluegrass and folk, including BĆ©la Fleck, Billy Strings, Buddy Miller, Sierra Hull, and Old Crow Medicine Show. Her 2023 record, City of Gold, won the Grammy for Best Bluegrass Album.
The furious flatpicking solo on āSan Joaquin,ā off of that Grammy-winning record, is the subject of this unplugged episode of Shred With Shifty. Shiflett can shred on electric alright, but how does he hold up running leads on acoustic? Itās a whole different ballgame. Thankfully, Tuttle is on hand, equipped with a Pre-War Guitars Co. 6-string, to demystify the techniques and gear that let her tear up the fretboard.
Tune in to hear plenty of insider knowledge on how to amplify and EQ acoustics, what instruments can stand in for percussion in bluegrass groups, and how to improvise in bluegrass music.
Credits
Producer: Jason Shadrick
Executive Producers: Brady Sadler and Jake Brennan for Double Elvis
Engineering Support by Matt Tahaney and Matt Beaudion
Video Editor: Addison Sauvan
Graphic Design: Megan Pralle
Special thanks to Chris Peterson, Greg Nacron, and the entire Volume.com crew.