A modern funk guitar kingpin brings sly, slinky solos and soulful scratching to Karl Denson’s Tiny Universe.
Karl Denson’s Tiny Universe shakes your booty. The group is a perennial festival favorite and offers a feast of irresistible grooves, jazz stylings, and down-home feel-good boogie-woogie. And DJ Williams, KDTU’s guitarist, is point center of that proprioceptive assault.
Williams is a monster. His rhythm playing sits deep in the pocket and lays a solid foundation. But Williams isn’t limited to rhythm—as if that were a problem. He’s also an inventive, effective, and ear-catching soloist, armed with a warm tone and superior chops. Within those chops are two signatures: his use of shell chords to expand the sound of the Tiny Universe and his exceptional scratching technique, which makes his abbreviated moniker seem like a matter of fate.
Williams was born in New Jersey, but spent his first years in Liberia, in West Africa, his parents’ homeland. He relocated to Richmond, Virginia, as a youngster and still lives there. “It’s an absolutely amazing music scene,” he says. “So many talented musicians and so many different genres of music are based right here in the city.” Artists as disparate as Lamb of God and Pharrell Williams hail from the area. “There is definitely a family of musicians and everyone supports everybody, comes to each other’s shows, and are always sitting in. It’s really great to see.”
Williams didn’t start with guitar; his first instrument was piano. He also plays clarinet, drums, and bass. He took up guitar his senior year of high school and gigged in and around Richmond with a variety of groups, including his own band, the DJ Williams Projekt.
In the early 2000s, Williams rendezvoused with Karl Denson. “My band, the Projekt, opened up for Tiny Universe,” he says. “Karl sat in with my band and I sat in with his. We became pretty close and our bands toured together for a short while. We saw each other at festivals and I’d sit in with his band. When his guitar player left in 2011, Karl asked me if I wanted to join. I’ve been with him ever since.”
Williams tours extensively with Denson and is all over KDTU’s 2014 release, New Ammo. A new Tiny Universe album, tentatively titled Camping in Suits, is due in early 2016. The DJ Williams Projekt has a new album in the works as well, and both bands will be touring in support of their releases. “It’s going to be a busy 2016, for sure,” Williams says.
Premier Guitar spoke with Williams about the lost art of rhythm playing, sitting tight in the pocket, colorful comping, and how he crafts his incredibly warm tone.
Who are some of your influences? Who made you want to play the guitar?
I started playing classical piano. I didn’t really pick up guitar until later, in high school, so a lot of my influences are pianists—Robert Glasper, and a lot of classical cats like Rachmaninoff. But I think Curtis Mayfield is the one who really drew me to want to play guitar.
What was it about Curtis Mayfield?
I just remember being drawn to that wah-wah sound. My mother has this listening room and I remember her putting on those records. I remember her—what she was wearing and what the room smelled like—and I was like, “What is that sound that is happening right now?” I started learning Curtis Mayfield songs. And then my older sister turned me on to [Funkadelic’s] Maggot Brain and Led Zeppelin, Jimi Hendrix, the Beatles, Stevie Wonder. I just started stealing my parents’ vinyl…
But you didn’t start playing guitar until later in high school. What got you to pick one up?
Some people were talking after school about starting a band and I wanted to jump onboard.
Tell us about your approach to rhythm playing.
Rhythm playing is the most important element of guitar to me—it’s such a rhythmic instrument—and I think a lot of my influences came from African music. It’s really very much about the placement, finding the space, and using your ear to figure out where you want to put those chunks of [rhythm]. You’ve got to find where it fits in the pattern of what’s going on, especially in funk bands that are six, seven, eight people deep. That is pretty much what I’m doing. I’m listening more than anything and trying to figure out what polyrhythms connect with whatever is already going on.
Are you specifically trying to play polyrhythms against the rhythms the band is playing or are you trying to stay more in the pocket?
It depends on what the song calls for. I use my own judgment. Sometimes I like to play against and sometimes I like to play with.
Do you ever find, when playing repetitive rhythm parts, that you get into a zone?
Yes, and that is completely that Afro-rhythm thing. The longer you play something, it becomes a trance. Karl talks about that a lot, too. You keep playing your part over and over and it starts sounding like a train going down the track. It gets tighter and tighter and that’s how I feel it in my head.
Who should guitar players listen to, to learn how to do that?
Definitely a lot of the old funk players like Cornell Dupree. He played with everybody and he is on so many records. He’s one of my biggest influences when it comes to funk guitar.
How do you comp creatively—particularly in terms of choosing interesting chord voicings—without competing with the keyboardist who is doing the same thing?
Well, David [Veith], the keyboardist in Tiny Universe, is an amazing comper, so I’m always trying not to step on his toes [laughs]. Usually he has moments where he gets simple and I’m able to take over a lot of the voicings. A lot of the voicings I use come more from the gospel side of things. I love major ninths, major sevenths—whenever I get a chance to throw the pretty stuff in there, I like to do that.
You do that often, especially on some of the slower songs that are a bit more open. “Sure Shot,” the Beastie Boys cover from New Ammo, is a good example of that.
Oh yeah, that’s a song that I completely get to go jazz-wild on because Karl is doing the flute thing. That is one of those moments where I can really expand my chordal vocabulary without stepping on anyone’s toes.
Williams jams with former Allman Brothers Band and current Rolling Stones keyboardist Chuck Leavell at the 2015 Lockn’ Music Festival in Arrington, Virginia, in September. Photo by William David Lawrence
Do you find—similar to what a lot of players do in a jazz setting—that you stay away from playing a chord’s root and 5?
Yes, shell voicings, for sure. Especially in a band this big. I rarely ever play the root; I just play the shell of the chord.
You’ll just play the 3, 7, and a color note?
Yeah, and it’s gotten to the point where I just do it all the time out of habit. I’ll be playing by myself and I’ve got to remind myself to put the root in there when I’m playing solo.
Horn players tend to favor keys like Bb, F, and C as opposed to classic guitar keys like E and A. Does that ever get to be a challenge?
Ah, no, I love all the keys. There are some keys like F# and C# that I have to pay more attention to—they are such lonely, far-out-there keys that a lot of people don’t play in. But other than that, I’ve gotten pretty comfortable at playing in any key.
DJ Williams’ Gear
Guitars
Gibson ES-335
Fender reissue 1972 Thinline Telecaster
Fender Telecaster Deluxe with P-90s
Epiphone Sheraton II
ESP Viper 100
Amps
Fender Twin Reverb
Mesa/Boogie 4x12 with Celestion V30 speakers
Effects
Henretta Engineering 6 Speed (custom multi-effects box built by Kevin Henretta, with reverb, phase shifter, tremolo, fuzz, and overdrive)
Custom Fonesy Overdrive
Ernie Ball VP Jr. volume pedal
Vox V847 Classic Wah
T-Rex Replica Delay
Boss TU-2 Chromatic Tuner
Strings and Picks
DR Pure Blues (.011–.050)
Dunlop Tortex Picks .73 mm
Talk about soloing and your approach to getting beyond the blues scale.
I’d say my comfort zone is melodic minor. That’s pretty much how I approach everything when it comes to soloing.
How about songs with a more complex chordal structure? Do you have to think more like a jazz-head in terms of making changes?
I’m not really thinking in terms of jazz chops or anything. I always just think about being melodic. I try to tell a story. I usually start pretty simple and I either approach the solo very melodically or very funky. Sometimes I try to go back and forth between those two worlds. I usually like to reference the melody line somewhere in the solo, and I usually try to find some way to take that melody line and twist it inside out and find a way to drive it home.
What do you do to develop good habits and techniques?
One thing I always try to practice is getting the left and right hands to work together at the same time. Pre-show, I’ll sit backstage and do a lot of chromatic runs up and down the neck. I have different exercises that I do. I go four frets at a time, up and down each string chromatically. Then I do exercises in fourths, so that I am practicing skipping from string to string up and down the neck as well. And I do runs—probably about 20 to 30 minutes of those—before going onstage.
Are you playing a shape or are you changing fingerings between the 2nd and 3rd strings?
I’m playing fourths but I’m also going diagonally. It’s almost like a major 7 arpeggio as well.
Do you practice with a metronome?
No I don’t. I should [laughs].
Let’s talk about your tone. How do you get such a warm fuzz sound?
For the longest time I used this pedal called the Fonesy. It’s a custom overdrive pedal built by Brian Fones. He lives here in Richmond and made it for me. It’s one of the best overdrive pedals because it actually lets a lot of the natural tones of the guitar come through without putting any of that scratch and powder on top. It gives it that warm feeling. It’s more of the guitar being on top and the fuzz being on bottom.
So you’re relying on the pedal for your fuzz as opposed to your amp?
Yeah. I play through a Fender Twin because I love my cleans really clean. I piggyback the Twin through a Mesa/Boogie 4x12 cab, so I’m actually pushing all six 12s.
You also play a lot of semi-hollowbody guitars. What do you like about them?
It’s just that warm sound, plus I can get so many different tones out of it. I actually just got an artist deal with Gibson, so I’ve been playing this 335 that I got from the Gibson shop in Austin. I’ve wanted one forever and now that I finally have one, I’ve kind of neglected all of my other guitars.
YouTube It
Showing their deep soul-groove roots, Karl Denson’s Tiny Universe take on D.C. go-go legends the Soul Searchers’ “Ashley’s Roachclip.” DJ Williams keeps his rhythm tight until 2:38, when he breaks into a tasteful solo, and then he drops back in the pocket until 3:30, when he unfurls his superb scratching technique.
With all the funk you play, I would’ve thought you played a Telecaster and nothing else. Do you even own a Tele?
I do. When I first joined Tiny Universe that was my main axe. I have a 1972 Thinline Telecaster, which is the Telecaster, but it has humbuckers and it’s semi-hollow. It’s the one with the F-hole.
And finally, how do you create those cool record-scratching sounds?
It started with me seeing [Rage Against the Machine’s] Tom Morello do it back when I was a senior in high school. I thought, “I need to learn that immediately.” I read a bunch of interviews and I tried to find out how he did it. I did research online. I started experimenting with using the gain—I cut the guitar all the way back to the bridge pickup and I turned the gain really high up on one of my overdrives—but then I found out that if I turned the wah on and just left it in the up position, I could really get that high-pitched thing. I use my fingers to rub against the strings above the neck pickup and it sounds just like scratching a record.
On the recorded version we actually ran that through an old Echoplex machine. It sounds even crazier on the record than it does live. It was a lot of fun to play with the different sounds.
DJ Williams jams with fellow soul-funker Robert Randolph during Karl Denson’s Tiny Universe Run DMC Remixed concert at the Brooklyn Bowl on February 5, 2015. Photo by Marc Millman
Shell Voicings: A Simple Approach to Adding Harmonic Colors
Shell voicings are a tool DJ Williams uses to keep his comping simple. These voicings allow you to play complex chords without competing with your band’s other accompanists. They also allow you to expand your harmonic palette beyond simple barre chords and power chords.
Most guitar players love power chords because they contain only two notes: the root and fifth of a chord. Power chords are easy to play and—as an added bonus—allow for harmonic ambiguity. They don’t contain a third (the note in the chord that indicates major or minor) and are therefore perfect for blues-based rock and its derivatives including punk, metal, thrash, and you-name-it.
But in other musical contexts, particularly funk and jazz, more complex chords are not only more appropriate but—can I say it?—may even sound better. In those settings you need to include other chord tones like the 3 and 7, plus notes drawn from the upper tensions (like 9s, 11s, and 13s). If you try building those more complex chords using the power chord as your base (i.e. the standard barre chord), you end up with a thick soup of unnecessary and redundant sounds that clutter up the mix and don’t allow space for the music to breathe.
Shell voicings are the simple yet elegant solution. The foundation of shell voicings—similar to power chords—are based on just two notes. Those two notes, the 3 and the 7, are all you need to determine whether the chord is a major, dominant, or minor. That is the basic “shell” of the chord. They are easy to play, sound great with other instruments, and allow you to provide a creative accompaniment while still giving the soloist the freedom to add color or dissonance.
Here’s how to build your own.
Step one. Figure out the chord’s root. (Hint: It’s the name of the chord. For example, the root of Amaj7#11 is “A.”) You almost never need to play the root because another instrument (usually the bass) is already playing it. But even though you might not play it, you need to know what it is so you can determine the other notes.
Step two. Once you know the root, figure out the 3 of the chord. You only have two choices: either major or minor. For example, if the chord is C major-something, the 3 is E. If it is C minor-something, the 3 is Eb.
Step three. Determine the 7 of the chord. Again, you have only two note choices (in C it is either B or Bb), but depending on the 3 you could end up with one of four sounds. In C it looks like this:
• Major 7: E (major third) + B (major seventh)
• Dominant 7: E (major third) + Bb (minor seventh)
• Minor 7: Eb (minor third) + Bb (minor seventh)
• Minor/major 7: Eb (minor third) + B (major seventh) (the Get Smart chord)
The beauty of shell voicings is that once you know the 3 and 7, you can play them any way you choose. Either note can be above or below the other, and depending on context, the implied sound will always remain the same. You can leave it as is or add tension, and a tension note is always within reach.
There is a lot more to say about shell voicings, but discovering the simplest fingerings for your favorite chords is a great way to begin.
Stompboxtober is finally here! Enter below for your chance to WIN today's featured pedal from Diamond Pedals! Come back each day during the month of October for more chances to win!
Diamond Pedals Dark Cloud
True to the Diamond design ethos of our dBBD’s hybrid analog architecture, Dark Cloud unlocks a new frontier in delay technology which was once deemed unobtainable by standard BBD circuit.
Powered by an embedded system, the Dark Cloud seamlessly blends input and output signals, crafting Tape, Harmonic, and Reverse delays with the organic warmth of analog companding and the meticulous precision of digital control.
Where analog warmth meets digital precision, the Dark Cloud redefines delay effects to create a pedal like no other
Wonderful array of weird and thrilling sounds can be instantly conjured. All three core settings are colorful, and simply twisting the time, span, and filter dials yields pleasing, controllable chaos. Low learning curve.
Not for the faint-hearted or unimaginative. Mode II is not as characterful as DBA and EQD settings.
$199
EarthQuaker Devices/Death By Audio Time Shadows
earthquakerdevices.com
This joyful noisemaker can quickly make you the ringmaster of your own psychedelic circus, via creative delays, raucous filtering, and easy-to-use, highly responsive controls.
I love guitar chaos, from the expressionist sound-painting of Jimi Hendrix’s “Machine Gun” to the clean, clever skronk ’n’ melody of Derek Bailey to the slide guitar fantasias of Sonny Sharrock to the dark, molten eruptions of Sunn O))). When I was just getting a grip on guitar, my friends and I would spend eight-hour days exploring feedback and twisted riffage, to see what we might learn about pushing guitar tones past the conventional.
So, pedals that are Pandora’s boxes of weirdness appeal to me. My two current favorites are my Mantic Flex Pro, a series of filter controls linked to a low-frequency oscillator, and my Pigtronix Mothership 2, a stompbox analog synth. But the Time Shadows II Subharmonic Multi-Delay Resonator is threatening their favored status—or at least demanding a third chair. This collaboration between Death By Audio and EarthQuaker Devices is a wonderful, gnarly little box of noise and fun that—unlike the two pedals I just mentioned—is easy to dial in and adjust on the fly, creating appealing and odd sounds at every turn.
Behind the Wall of Sound
Unlike the Mantic Flex Pro, the Time Shadows is consistent. You can plug the Mantic into the same rig, and that rig into the same outlet, every day, and there are going to be slight—or big—differences in the sound. Those differences are even less predictable on different stages and in different rooms. The Time Shadows, besides its operating consistency, has six user-programmable presets. They write with a single touch of the button in the center of the device’s tough, aluminum 4 3/4" x 2 1/2" x 2 1/4" shell. Inside that shell live ghosts, wind, and unicorns that blow raspberries on cue and more or less on key. EQD and DBA explain these “presences” differently, relating that the Time Shadow’s circuitry combines three delay voices (EQD, II, and DBA) with filters, fuzz, phasing, shimmer, swell, and subharmonics. There’s also an input for an expression pedal, which is great for making the Time Shadows’ more radical sounds voice-like and lending dynamic control. But sustaining a tone sweeping the time, span, and filter dials manually is rewarding on its own, producing a Strickfaden lab’s worth of swirling, sweeping, and dipping sounds.
Guitar Tone from Roswell
Because of the wide variety of sounds, swirls, and shimmers the Time Shadows produces, I found it best to play through a pair of combos in stereo, so the full range of, say, high notes cascading downwards and dropping pitch as they repeat, could be appreciated in their full dimensionality. (That happens in DBA mode, with the time and span at 10 and 4 o’clock respectively, with the filter also at 4, and it’s magical.) The pedal also stands up well to fuzz and overdrives whether paired with humbucker, P-90, or single-coil guitars.
I loved all three modes, but the more radical EQD and DBA positions are especially excellent. The EQD side piles dirt on the incoming signal, adds sub-octave shimmer, and is delayed just before hitting the filters. Keeping the filter function low lends alligator growls to sustained barre chords, and single notes transform into orchestral strings or brass turf, with a soft attack. Pushing the span dial high creates kaleidoscopes of sound. The Death By Audio mode really hones in on the pedal’s delay characteristics, creating crisp repeats and clean sounds with a little less midrange in the filtering, but lending the ability to cut through a mix at volume. The II mode is comparatively clean, and the filter control becomes a mix dial for the delayed signal.
The Verdict
The closest delay I’ve found comparable to the Time Shadows is Red Panda’s function-rich Particle 2 granular delay and pitch-shifter, which also uses filtering, among other tricks. But that pedal has a very deep menu of functions, with a larger learning curve. If you like to expect the unexpected, and you want it now, the Time Shadows supports crafting a wide variety of cool, surprising sounds fast. And that’s fun. The challenge will be working the Time Shadows’ cascading aural whirlpools and dinosaur choirs into song arrangements, but I heard how the pedal could be used to create unique, wonderful pads or bellicose solos after just a few minutes of playing. If you’d like to easily sidestep the ordinary, you might find spelunking the Time Shadows’ cavernous possibilities worthwhile.
This little pedal offers three voices—analog, tape, and digital—and faithfully replicates the highlights of all three, with minimal drawbacks.
Faithful replications of analog and tape delays. Straightforward design.
Digital voice can feel sterile.
$119
Fishman EchoBack Mini Delay
fishman.com
As someone who was primarily an acoustic guitarist for the first 16 out of 17 years that I’ve been playing, I’m relatively new to the pedal game. That’s not saying I’m new to effects—I’ve employed a squadron of them generously on acoustic tracks in post-production, but rarely in performance. But I’m discovering that a pedalboard, particularly for my acoustic, offers the amenities and comforts of the hobbit hole I dream of architecting for myself one day in the distant future.
But by gosh, if delay—and its sister effect, reverb—haven’t always been perfect for the music I like to write and play. Which brings us to the Fishman EchoBack Mini Delay. The EchoBack, along with the standard delay controls of level, time, and repeats—as well as a tap tempo—has a toggle to alternate between analog, tape, and digital-delay voices.
I hooked up my Washburn Bella Tono Elegante to my Blues Junior to give the EchoBack a test run. We love a medium delay—my usual preference for delay settings is to have both level and repeats at 1 o’clock, and time at 11 o’clock. With the analog voice switched on, I heard some pillowy warmth in the processed signal, as well as a familiar degradation with each repeat—until their wake gave way to a gentle, distant, crinkly ticking. Staying on analog and adjusting delay time down to 8 o’clock and repeats to about 11:30, some cozy slapback enveloped my rendition of Johnny Marr’s part to “Back to the Old House,” conjuring up thoughts of Elvis trapped in a small chamber, but in a good way. It sounded indubitably authentic. The one drawback of analog delay for me, generally, is that its roundness can feel a bit under water at times.
Switching over to tape, that pillowy warmth evaporated, and in its place came a very clear replication of my tone—but with just a bit of the highs shaved off the top. With the settings at the medium-length mode listed above, I could see the empty, glass hall the pedal sent my sound bouncing down. I heard several pronounced pings of repeats before the signal fully faded out. On slapback settings (time at 8 o’clock, repeats at 11:30), rather than Elvis, I heard something more along the lines of a honky-tonk mic in a glass bottle. Still relatively crystalline, which actually was not my favorite. I like a bit more crinkle—so maybe analog is my bag....“That pillowy warmth evaporated, and in its place came a very clear, pristine replication of my tone—but with just a bit of the highs shaved off the top.”
Next up, digital. Here we have the brightest voice, and as expected, the most faithful repeats. They ping just a few times before shifting to a smooth, single undulating wave. When putting its slapback hat on, I found that the effect was a bit less alluring than I’d observed for the analog and tape voices. This is where the digital delay felt a little too sterile, with the cleanly preserved signal feeling a bit unnatural.
All in all, I dig the EchoBack for its replications of analog and tape voices, and ultimately, lean towards tape. While it’s nice having the digital delay there as an option, it feels a bit too clean when meddling with time of any given length. Nonetheless, this is surely a handy stomp for any acoustic player looking to venture into the land of live effects, or for those who are already there.
A silicon Fuzz Face-inspired scorcher.
Hot silicon Fuzz Face tones with dimension and character. Sturdy build. Better clean tones than many silicon Fuzz Face clones.
Like all silicon Fuzz Faces, lacks dynamic potential relative to germanium versions.
$229
JAM Fuzz Phrase Si
jampedals.com
Everyone has records and artists they indelibly associate with a specific stompbox. But if the subject is the silicon Fuzz Face, my first thought is always of David Gilmour and the Pink Floyd: Live at Pompeii film. What you hear in Live at Pompeii is probably shaped by a little studio sweetening. Even still, the fuzz you hear in “Echoes” and “Careful With That Axe, Eugene”—well, that is how a fuzz blaring through a wall of WEM cabinets in an ancient amphitheater should sound, like the sky shredded by the wail of banshees. I don’t go for sounds of such epic scale much lately, but the sound of Gilmour shaking those Roman columns remains my gold standard for hugeness.
JAM’s Fuzz Phrase Fuzz Face homage is well-known to collectors in its now very expensive and discontinued germanium version, but this silicon variation is a ripper. If you love Gilmour’s sustaining, wailing buzzsaw tone in Pompeii, you’ll dig this big time. But its ’66 acid-punk tones are killer, too, especially if you get resourceful with guitar volume and tone. And while it can’t match its germanium-transistor-equipped equivalent for dynamic response to guitar volume and tone settings or picking intensity, it does not have to operate full-tilt to sound cool. There are plenty of overdriven and near-clean tones you can get without ever touching the pedal itself.
Great Grape! It’s Purple JAM, Man!
Like any Fuzz Face-style stomp worth its fizz, the Fuzz Phrase Si is silly simple. The gain knob generally sounds best at maximum, though mellower settings make clean sounds easier to source. The output volume control ranges to speaker-busting zones. But there’s also a cool internal bias trimmer that can summon thicker or thin and raspy variations on the basic voice, which opens up the possibility of exploring more perverse fuzz textures. The Fuzz Phrase Si’s pedal-to-the-metal tones—with guitar volume and pedal gain wide open—bridge the gap between mid-’60s buzz and more contemporary-sounding silicon fuzzes like the Big Muff. And guitar volume attenuation summons many different personalities from the Fuzz Phrase Si—from vintage garage-psych tones with more note articulation and less sustain (great for sharp, punctuated riffs) as well as thick overdrive sounds.
If you’re curious about Fuzz Face-style circuits because of the dynamic response in germanium versions, the Fuzz Phrase Si performs better in this respect than many other silicon variations, though it won’t match the responsiveness of a good germanium incarnation. For starters, the travel you have to cover with a guitar volume knob to get tones approaching “clean” (a very relative term here) is significantly greater than that required by a good germanium Fuzz Face clone, which will clean up with very slight guitar volume adjustments. This makes precise gain management with guitar controls harder. And in situations where you have to move fast, you may be inclined to just switch the pedal off rather than attempt a dirty-to-clean shift with the guitar volume.
“The best clean-ish tones come via humbuckers and a high-headroom amp with not too much midrange, which makes a PAF-and-black-panel-Fender combination a great fit.”
The best clean-ish tones come via humbuckers and a high-headroom amp with not too much midrange, which makes a PAF-and-black-panel-Fender combination a great fit if you’re out to extract maximum dirty-to-clean range. You don’t need to attenuate your guitar volume as much with the PAF/black-panel tandem, and you can get pretty close to bypassed tone if you reduce picking intensity and/or switch from flatpick to fingers and nails. Single-coil pickups make such maneuvers more difficult. They tend to get thin in a less-than-ideal way before they shake the dirt, and they’re less responsive to the touch dynamics that yield so much range with PAFs. If you’re less interested in thick, clean tones, though, single-coils are a killer match for the Fuzz Phrase Si, yielding Yardbirds-y rasp, quirky lo-fi fuzz, and dirty overdrive that illuminates chord detail without sacrificing attitude. Pompeii tones are readily attainable via a Stratocaster and a high-headroom Fender amp, too, when you maximize guitar volume and pedal gain. And with British-style amps those same sounds turn feral and screaming, evoking Jimi’s nastiest.
The Verdict
Like every JAM pedal I’ve ever touched, the JAM Fuzz Phrase Si is built with care that makes the $229 price palatable. Cheaper silicon Fuzz Face clones may be easy to come by, but I’m hard-pressed to think they’ll last as long or as well as the Greece-made Fuzz Phrase Si. Like any silicon Fuzz Face-inspired design, what you gain in heat, you trade in dynamics. But the Si makes the best of this trade, opening a path to near-clean tones and many in-between gain textures, particularly if you put PAFs and a scooped black-panel Fender amp in the mix. And if streamlining is on your agenda, this fuzz’s combination of simplicity, swagger, and style means paring down pedals and controls doesn’t mean less fun.