Filling Big Shoes: What It’s Like to Have to Shred Someone Else’s Licks
Brad Gillis, Stacey Blades, Tommy Thayer, Ron Thal, and Jon Levin talk about stepping in to replace a legend
Band lineups change. Sometimes egos get in the way and musicians quit in acrimony and bitterness. Sometimes guitar players simply want a change of pace. And other times, tragic circumstances force difficult decisions. Such was the case in late 1982 when a young San Francisco Bay Area guitarist was invited to audition for a pretty big band. Originally, he thought the outlandish offer had to be a practical joke. However, after woodshedding on 18 songs for two days, he flew to New York and made his way to a luxurious suite in the Helmsley Palace Hotel. He played some of rock music’s most famous riffs on a red ’62 Fender Stratocaster—without an amp—while a British heavy metal legend sat cross-legged on the floor, watching his intricate solo. Then the Brit jumped up and hugged him.
And that’s how Brad Gillis assumed the guitar duties for Ozzy Osbourne after the legendary Randy Rhoads perished in a tragic plane crash.
Brad Gillis onstage with Night Ranger and his battered ’62 Strat, which is equipped with an original Floyd Rose tremolo. Gillis first found fame when he was tapped to replace Randy Rhoads in Ozzy Osbourne’s band.
There are countless stories like Gillis’, stories of previously unknown players getting their chance at some measure of fame and glory while filling the shoes of better-known guitarists who’ve moved on for one reason or another. But while these opportunities are in many ways a dream come true for the replacement axe men, their high-profile new gigs aren’t without their unique and sometimes frustrating challenges. To get a sampling of those challenges, we spoke with Gillis, Guns N’ Roses’ Ron Thal, Kiss’ Tommy Thayer, L.A. Guns’ Stacey Blades, and Dokken’s Jon Levin.
Lacing Up
Ozzy initially tapped Irish guitarist Bernie Tormé to fill in after Rhoads’ death, but his sound and style was deemed too different for the Prince of Darkness. After a few days of observing Tormé perform with the band, Gillis plugged in and took over.
“I had never played with the band, never rehearsed with the band, and there was my first show—sold out, to 8000 people in Binghamton, New York,” Gillis recalls. Today, he’s preparing for a big summer tour with his band Night Ranger, which is perhaps best known for the huge 1984 power ballad “Sister Christian.” Gillis says last year was one of the band’s best ever and that they anticipate building on that success with as many as 70 tour stops in 2010. But Gillis originally cemented his shredder reputation with that challenging stint with Ozzy back in ’82.
Whenever a new guitarist comes in and has to play classic tunes, the fans sit back and start speculating. Will the new guy totally change everything in an attempt to put his own stamp on things? Or, will he simply mimic the original runs and bring nothing new or different to the table? For the musician in question, it can seem like an unwinnable situation.
“It was quite a trying experience and the first two weeks were really tough for me,” Gillis says. “A lot of the fans weren’t expecting me and were giving me that look like, ‘Let’s see what you can do.’ I had guys in the audience flipping me off, holding up ‘Randy Rhoads lives’ signs, and just giving me that look.”
Stacey Blades of L.A. Guns has the difficult task of performing in a band that carries his predecessor’s name. He joined the group in 2003 and set out to win over fans by performing the songs and solos as they were originally recorded by Tracii Guns. His choice to honor the original music was not only out of respect for the audience but also his own personal tastes and interests.
“As a fan of the band, I wanted to learn those leads like they are on the record,” Blades says. “I wouldn’t play it any other way.” He says that after seven years in the band, he seldom receives negative feedback from concertgoers today. Rarely, a person shows up to a gig expecting the original Tracii Guns, but Blades strives to win them over.
“I had to tell a guy in Laughlin, Nevada, that I’m not Tracii,” Blades says of a recent gig. “He got this confused look on his face and said, ‘You still rock, bro.’”
If Blades rocks in a band named for the guy he replaced, at least he gets to wear his own footwear. For current Kiss guitarist Tommy Thayer, the adage about filling in someone’s shoes is literal. After working in various capacities with the Kiss organization for years, Thayer officially assumed the role of the Spaceman in 2003 when he donned the costume made famous by original guitarist Ace Frehley. After a few smaller gigs the preceding year, Thayer’s first real show with the face-painted rockers was with the Melbourne Symphony Orchestra in Australia. That concert involved 70 additional musicians and different song arrangements, and it was also recorded for CD and DVD releases.
“It was a really diverse set with a lot going on,” Thayer says. “That was playing on my nerves more than anything, but I got through it and it turned out just great.”
Since that initial introduction in the silver platform boots, Thayer has performed hundreds of Kiss gigs across the globe. In some ways, he is arguably one of the most controversial guitar players in rock music. Any reference to him and Kiss on the Internet elicits a stream of comments from people who either criticize the slightest difference between his work and Frehley’s or write him off as a carbon copy.
“I have so much respect for that guy,” says Guns N’ Roses guitarist Ron Thal. “Because to be in the most legendary band, to be in such a situation, and have the strength of character he must have to be able to do it.”
Ultimately, all replacement rockers have to soldier on, shred as much as possible, and just keep working to win over the audience. Ignoring internet trolls, playing as well as possible, and remaining committed to the gig are the prescribed tasks for guitarists taking over for a departed legend.
“It’s going to be tough at first, and you’ve got to have thick skin and take your lumps,” says Thal. “You have to stop reading your email and stop Googling your name. My advice is always, ‘Don’t do it for the people that don’t like it. You have to do it for the people who do.’”
Dedication pays off, says Jon Levin, who cranks out sizzling leads associated with George Lynch for Dokken. “With time and persistence, you can change people’s minds and win over fans.”
It’s a Rock Thing
The argument can be made that the audience’s obsession over the guitarist in the spotlight and his approach to trademark tunes is uniquely tied to the rock and heavy metal genres. Few hepcats in a jazz club are going to sneer, “He didn’t play that Miles Davis solo note.”
And no classical fan is going to go the other direction and accuse the third chair violin player of being a Paganini clone.
“It’s so bombastic and there are so many variations, as far as rock artists go. I think it’s the whole package thing,” Blades says in regards to the passion with which fans view their favorite guitarists. “That’s why people hold it so dear and debate band combinations as opposed to a symphony or orchestra.” Few things are more hotly debated among fans than replacement band members.
An orchestra can have as many as 100 musicians, all dressed similarly, all sitting down, partially hidden behind music stands and instruments. And jazz outfits frequently feature guest artists, change lineups, and have other musicians jam on different songs.
“In rock, you have a more personal connection to the artists and who the artist is as a person,” Thal says. “It’s about the person. And because of that, you start feeling a relationship and a loyalty to that person.” The music and the licks are connected to that guitarist, the image of them performing is burned into the fans’ memories.
Thayer expresses a similar sentiment. “It just seems that, with rock and roll bands in particular, people just seem to care that much more about what goes on,” he says. “It’s a very emotional thing, really. It’s almost a religious thing or a cultish thing to a lot of people, and they live their lives by a band like Kiss. I can understand why people feel that way.”
LEFT: Ron Thal took on the daunting task of filling Slash’s shoes in Guns N’ Roses. Photo by Chad Batka MIDDLE: Jon Levin and his Charvel now take care of the duties once executed by George “Mr. Scary” Lynch in Dokken. Photo by Jeff Findley RIGHT: Former Ace Frehley guitar tech Tommy Thayer now wears the Spaceman outfit onstage with Kiss. Photo by Glenn La Ferman
To Cop or Not to Cop? That is the Question
In spite of the audience’s fear that new axe slingers will trash all the licks and leads they hold dear, the consensus amongst replacement guitar players themselves seems to be that they should remain true to the original recordings.
“Primarily, the approach I take is to play the songs the way they were originally written and recorded,” says Thayer as Kiss prepares to depart for a sold-out European tour.
“That’s the way I like it and the way I want to hear it if I’m seeing another band that had a new guitarist come in.”
While most the guitar players we talked to for this article prefer to honor the originals, each musician does have varying degrees of alterations they’re willing to make. In short, it’s about being respectful without being slavish. A few slight changes are acceptable, if judiciously applied.
“You want to show respect to the song as it was written, as it was successful, in the way people have grown to love the song,” says Thal. However, there may be room within the context of the show for the guitarist to introduce some differences. “If it’s ‘Paradise City,’ you’re certainly not going to change that main hook. But when it comes to the long solo at the end of the song—not the part that people are humming and singing—it’s okay to take some liberties.”
During his tenure with Ozzy, Gillis found a few opportunities during the show to stretch out, too. “I wanted to interject a little of my style here and there throughout the set,” Gillis says. “I tried to stay close to Randy’s classic solos, but then each of us in the band had our individual solos every night, so I was able to do my whammy-bar thing.”
Interestingly enough, not one single guitarist interviewed for this article was told to play a certain way. When they auditioned and during their tenure, they were largely given free reign.
“No, not once did Axl Rose ever tell me how to play,” says Thal.
“I was never told what I had to play,” Gillis agrees.
“Don [Dokken] never told me what to do in any way, shape, or form,” says Levin.
Rethinking Rigs As guitarists strive to settle into an established band and replace an icon, they must make a choice about changing their equipment or sticking with what they’ve previously used.
For Thal, his initial introduction into Guns N’ Roses required a few equipment changes. Famous for the unique Vigier guitars he uses at his solo shows, Thal had to add some classic gear when he hit the stage with GNR.
“When I switched my gear up and got things closer to what they should be, it made a big difference to people,” Thal says. “Now, I get no complaints—like in the past when I was using a guitar shaped like a foot.”
Other musicians require less alteration. Levin, a Charvel endorsee, has always played so-called “super Strats” that provide tones and capabilities like those associated with George Lynch. Blades favors B.C. Rich guitars that fall in line with the classic Sunset Strip sleaze-metal tones.
Thayer already played Gibson Les Pauls, just as Frehley did, so none of his gear needed to be updated. However, a select few songs required alterations because of equipment differences. He points to songs from the ’80s, when former Kiss guitarists Vinnie Vincent and Bruce Kulick were employing new techniques and new instruments, as examples of tunes that required adjustment.
“We’re talking about Charvels and Jacksons with a whammy bar,” Thayer says. “There’s a little disconnect between that and the classic approach to Kiss, which is what we are today. Sometimes I do have to adapt it to playing a Les Paul as opposed to a Strat with a Floyd Rose.”
A Chance to Make a Mark
As replacement guitarists tour the country playing their predecessor’s tunes—even when it’s been over the course of many years—it can still feel like a temporary gig. But the opportunity to record with the band offers a chance to solidify their standing.
Up until the recording and release of Guns N’ Roses’ 2008 album, Chinese Democracy, Thal says he felt like he was “just being a gracious guest.” It wasn’t so much that fellow band members viewed the guitarist in a less-than-permanent way, but rather the public’s attitude.
“You could be best friends with the guys in the band and do everything that a band does, but for the whole world, truth is perception,” he says. “If the world perceives you as just some fill-in guy, it’s tough to continually disassociate yourself with everybody’s reality and live in your own. But once the album came out, it’s like, ‘All right—this is mine now!’”
For Thayer, the release of Sonic Boom, the first Kiss studio album in a decade, marked a milestone in his own identity as a musician.
“It’s a big stepping stone for me, in terms of my place in the band and my identity,” he says. “This last year and this year—coming into an era of me writing and singing and playing guitar on a new Kiss record that’s been received so well— that’s been a great step for me.”
A Walk to Remember
The musicians quoted here give the impression that playing someone else’s music isn’t as big a deal as the fans imagine. While message boards may light up with arguments over the new guy’s approach to the classic material or whether someone will fit in with the band, the guitarists simply play.
“I don’t need to have written something or recorded something to enjoy playing it,” says Thal. “I enjoy making music with people, and it doesn’t matter where the music originated. We’re doing it right now, and we’re having a great time—and people are having a great time with us.”
You may not have to replace an icon on short notice. But joining an established band in your hometown can still be a stressful situation. Here are some tips to help you pull it off.
• Be prepared for the audition. Know the music, be confident—but not cocky— and focus on establishing chemistry with the other band members. “Everybody plays guitar well to a certain degree, but I think the personalities, how you get along, and how you work together and interact is huge,” says Thayer. “People underestimate that.”
• Ease your way into the classic tunes. The fans will expect to hear the songs played a certain way. Do it that way at first. Over time, you can stretch out a bit. “At least in the beginning, don’t shake things up too much,” says Levin. “As you get more established, you can start deviating more and more.”
• Find a mentor or confidante in the band. Gillis explains, “I would go to [bassist] Rudy Sarzo and he’d say, ‘You’re doing a great job, don’t worry about it.’”
• Plow forward. Be confident in your work and accept the fact that you’re not going to please everyone. “If someone doesn’t like it, it just means that it’s not for them,” says Thal. “It’s not their taste and they can go and find something else that they like.”
Just like guitarists, audiophiles are chasing sound. It may be a never-ending quest.
“What you got back home, little sister, to play your fuzzy warbles on? I bet you got, say, pitiful, portable picnic players. Come with uncle and hear all proper. Hear angel trumpets and devil trombones.”—Alexander DeLarge (Malcolm McDowell) in the film A Clockwork Orange.
We listen to recorded music for enjoyment and inspiration, but few of us expect recordings to rival the experience of live music. Most guitarists know that the average home sound system, let alone Bluetooth boomboxes, cannot reproduce the weight and depth equal to standing in a room with a full-blown concert guitar rig. Also, classical music lovers recognize that a home system won’t reproduce the visceral envelope of a live orchestra. Still, much like guitarists, audiophiles spend huge amounts of time and money chasing the ultimate “realistic” audio experience. I wonder if sometimes that’s misguided.
My exposure to the audio hobby came early, from my father’s influence. My dad grew up in the revolution of home electronics, and being an amateur musician, he wanted good reproduction of the recordings he cherished. This led him to stock our home with tube components and DIY electrostatic hybrid speakers that rivaled the size and output of vintage Fender 2x12s. I thought this was normal.
Later, I discovered a small shop in my hometown that specialized in “high end” audiophile gear. They had a policy: No sale is final until you are completely satisfied. I became an almost weekly visitor (and paying customer) and was allowed to take equipment home to audition, which was dangerous for a young man on a low budget. It was through this program I started to understand the ins and outs of building a cohesive system that met my taste. I began to pay much more attention to the nuances of audio reproduction. Some gear revealed a whole new level of accuracy when it came to acoustic or vocal performance, while lacking the kick-ass punch I desired of my rock albums. I was seeking reproduction that would gently caress the sounds on folk, classical, and jazz recordings, but could also slay when the going got heavy. This made me a bit of an odd bird to the guys at the audio shop, but they wanted to please. With their guidance I assembled some decent systems over time, but through the decades, I lost interest in the chase.
Recently, I’ve begun perusing online audiophile boards and they seem oddly familiar, with tube versus solid-state discussions that might feel at home to guitarists—except the prices are now beyond what I’d imagined. For the most part, they mirror the exchanges we see on guitar boards minus the potty-mouth language. Enthusiasts exchange information and opinions (mostly) on what gear presents the widest soundstage or most detailed high-frequency delivery, all in flowery language usually reserved for fine wines.
Speaking of whining, you’ll rethink your idea of expensive cables when you hear folks comparing 18", $1,700 interconnects for their DACs. Some of the systems I’ve seen are more costly than an entire guitar, amplifier, and studio gear collection by a serious margin. Mostly, the banter is cordial and avoids the humble-bragging that might go along with the purchase of a $10,000 set of PAF humbuckers. Still, I have a lack of insight into what exactly most are trying to accomplish.
If you’ve ever worked in a big-time studio, you know that the soundscape blasting out of huge monitors is not what most of us have in our homes. My experience rewiring pro-studio patchbays is that less emphasis is placed on oxygen-free, silver-plated, directional cables than the room treatment. I’ve found myself wondering if the people on those audio boards—who have spent many tens or even hundreds of thousands of dollars on their home systems—have ever been in a studio control room listening to music as loud as a 28,000 horsepower traffic jam of NASCAR racers. That might be an eye-opener.
One of my takeaways is that even though music recording began as an attempt to reproduce what actually happens in a room, it hasn’t been just that for a long time. With all our effects and sonic wizardry on display, recording is like playing an instrument itself, and much more complex. This is not a new revelation to Beatles fans.
What amazes me is that both audiophiles and guitar fanatics pursue the sounds we hear on recordings for differing reasons and with subjective results. It’s a feedback-loop game, where we chase sounds mostly exclusive to the studio. So, how do we determine if our playback is accurate? Will we ever be satisfied enough to call the sale final?
I’m not convinced, but just the same, I’ll continue my own search for the holy grail of affordable, kick-ass sound that still loves a folk guitar
Kirk Hammett has partnered with Gibson Publishing to release The Collection: Kirk Hammett, a premium hardcover coffee-table photo book where Kirk tells the stories behind his rare and collectible instruments.
“I am thrilled to announce the launch of The Collection: Kirk Hammett. I’ve worked diligently on this curated collection of vintage and modern guitars for the book. I feel the book captures the rich history and artistry behind each of these unique and rare instruments. Every picture tells a story and thanks to Ross Halfin and his exceptional photography, every picture in this book is worth a million words! This book could not be possible without the help of Gibson, so I’d like to thank them for making my passion for Greeny, and guitars a reality. I hope all of you enjoy this journey as much as I did.”
“It’s exciting the time has come to release The Collection: Kirk Hammett by Gibson,” adds Cesar Gueikian, President and CEO of Gibson. “We have been working on this project with Kirk for years now, and I had the opportunity to work closely with Kirk on the composition of the collection for the book. It was a thrill to put this together and it took a village to get it done! I hope everyone appreciates the work that went into this book and enjoys every story behind the guitars.”
The Collection: Kirk Hammett, Custom Edition is limited to just 300 numbered copies signed by KIRK HAMMETT and comes in a huge 19 x 14.5” (490 x 370mm) presentation box featuring custom artwork and an outstanding case candy package. In addition to the large-format 17 x 12” (432 x 310mm) hardcover version of the book with a stunning lenticular cover, the boxset includes a frameable 16 x 11.6” (407 x 295mm) art print of a Ross Halfin portrait of KIRK HAMMETT signed by both Halfin and the Metallica guitarist. Other case candy includes an Axe Heaven miniature replica of Hammett’s 1979 Gibson Flying V with case and stand, an exclusive pick tin complete with six Dunlop® Kirk Hammett signature Jazz III guitar picks, and a Gibson Publishing Certificate of Authenticity.
Explore The Collection: Kirk Hammett book HERE.
The collection includes Cobalt strings with a Paradigm Core, Tim Henson Signature Classical Strings, and the Tim Henson Signature FretWrap by Gruv Gear.
Engineered for maximum output, clarity, and durability, these strings feature:
- Cobalt with a Paradigm Core (not RPS) for added durability
- Nano-treated for maximum lifespan and corrosion resistance
- Gauges 9.5, 12, 16, 26, 36, 46 (Turbo Slinky set)
- Available individually or as part of the Tim Henson Signature Bundle
Tim Henson Signature Classical Strings
Crafted for dynamic, percussive tonality, these strings pair fluorocarbon trebles with silver-plated copper basses to deliver exceptional response and clarity.
- Gauges: 24, 27, 33, 30, 36, 42
- Available individually or as part of the Tim Henson Signature Bundle
Tim Henson Signature FretWrap by Gruv Gear
An essential string-dampening tool, the Tim Henson Signature FretWrap is designed for cleaner playing by eliminating unwanted overtones and sympathetic vibrations.
- Features Tim Henson’s custom ‘Cherub Logo’ design
- Size Small, fits 4-string basses, 6-string electric/acoustic guitars, and ukuleles
- Ideal for live performance and studio recording
- Ernie Ball collaboration with Gruv Gear
- Available individually or as part of the Tim Henson Signature Bundle
The Ernie Ball Tim Henson Accessory Bundle Kit
For players who want the complete Tim Henson experience, the Ernie Ball Tim HensonSignature Bundle Kit includes:
- Tim Henson Signature Electric Strings (9.5-46)
- Tim Henson Signature Classical Strings (Medium Tension)
- Tim Henson Signature FretWrap by Gruv Gear (Small)
- Tim Henson Signature Cable (Exclusive 10ft white dual-conductor cable, only available in the bundle)
The Tim Henson Signature String & Accessory Collection is available starting today, March 19, 2025, at authorized Ernie Ball dealers worldwide.
For more information, please visit ernieball.com.
Ernie Ball: Tim Henson Signature Electric Guitar Strings - YouTube
Enjoy the videos and music you love, upload original content, and share it all with friends, family, and the world on YouTube.Teamwork makes the dream work for the Charleston, South Carolina, twosome, who trade off multi-instrumental duties throughout their sets.
Michael Trent and Cary Ann Hearst have been making music as Shovels & Rope since 2008. The husband-and-wife duo from South Carolina specialize in rootsy, bluesy rock, Americana, and alt-country, but they don’t confine themselves to traditional two-piece arrangements. They switch off on vocal, guitar, percussion, and synth duty throughout their shows, orchestrating a full-band ruckus with all available limbs.
Their seventh full-length, Something Is Working Up Above My Head, released in September last year, and while touring in support of it, they stopped at Nashville’s Brooklyn Bowl in late February. PG’s John Bohlinger caught up with Trent before the gig to see what tools he and Hearst use to maintain their musical juggling act.
Brought to you by D’Addario.Black Bird
Trent’s not a guitar snob: Generally speaking, he plays whatever he can get his hands on. While playing Eddie Vedder’s Ohana Fest, someone loaned him this Gretsch Black Falcon, and he fell in love with it. He likes its size compared to the broader White Falcon. It’s also the band’s only electric, so if it goes down, it’s back to acoustic. Hearst takes turns on it, too.
Trent loads the heaviest strings he can onto it, which is a set of .013s. It lives in standard tuning.
Ol' Faithful
As Trent explains, he and Hearst have done some DIY decorating on this beautiful Gibson J-45—it’s adorned with sweat droplets, stains, and fingernail dust. It runs direct to the venue’s front-of-house system with an LR Baggs pickup. This one is strung with Martin heavy or medium gauge strings; lighter ones are too prone to snapping under Trent’s heavy picking hand (which holds a Dunlop Max-Grip .88 mm pick). And it rolls around in an Enki tour case.
On Call
These second-stringers—a Loar archtop and an LR Baggs-equipped Recording King—are on hand in case of broken strings or other malfunctions.
Need for Tweed
Trent doesn’t trust amps with too many knobs, so this tweed Fender Blues Junior does the trick. It can get fairly loud, so there’s a Universal Audio OX Amp Top Box on hand to tame it for some stages.
Shovels & Rope's Pedalboard
Because Trent and Hearst trade off bass, guitar, keys, and percussion duties, all four of their limbs are active through the set. Whoever is on guitars works this board, with an MXR Blue Box, Electro-Harmonix Nano Big Muff, EarthQuaker Devices Hummingbird, and Boss OC-5, plus a pair of Walrus Canvas Tuners for the electric and acoustic. Utility boxes on the board include a Walrus Canvas Passive Re-Amp, Radial J48, Livewire ABY1, and a Mesa Stowaway input buffer.
A Roland PK-5 MIDI controller, operated by foot, sits on the lower edge of the board. It controls the board for “Thing 2,” one of two MicroKORG synths onstage.
Thing 1 and Thing 2
There’s no one backstage helping Hearst and Trent cook up all their racket; they handle every sound themselves, manually. During the first few sets of a tour, you’re liable to see some headaches, like forgetting to switch synth patches during a song, but eventually they hit a rhythm.
Affectionately given Seuss-ian nicknames, this pair of microKORGs handles bass notes through the set, among other things, via the foot-controlled PK5. “Thing 1” is set up at the drum station, and runs through a board with an EHX Nano Big Muff, EHX Bass9, EHX Nano Holy Grail, and a Radial Pro DI. A Walrus Aetos keeps them all powered up.
The board for “Thing 2,” beside the guitar amps, includes an EHX Mel9 and Bass9 powered by a Truetone 1 SPOT Pro, plus a Radial ProD2.