The legendary bassist and fingerstyle master reveal the origins and vision behind their star-packed jazz quartet.
The origins of Aziza, a collective jazz supergroup of sorts, started back in 2014 when legendary bassist Dave Holland and saxophonist Chris Potter were brainstorming for a project to tour with in 2015. “I just love playing with Chris,” says Holland, who brought Potter into his funky and soulful quintet in the early 2000s. After bouncing some ideas around, the duo decided to bring in guitarist Lionel Loueke and drummer Eric Harland. “Lionel approaches the instrument in a unique way and blends his African heritage and guitar styles with all the language and harmony of jazz music.”
None of the members were strangers: Loueke and Harland had spent time in trumpeter Terrance Blanchard’s group, and Holland, Loueke, and Potter all worked with pianist Herbie Hancock on the tour for his Joni Mitchell tribute project, The River. The tour was an immediate success with each member bringing in specific compositions for the band. “From day one, it was just all about the music,” says Loueke. “You’re playing with musicians that just listen so closely to whatever you’re doing and are very open-minded. We’re ready to take some risks and see where the music takes us.”
Halfway through that first tour, the band decided that their intense interplay and chemistry needed to be documented in the studio. The group booked two days at Sear Sound Studio, and each member brought in a pair of compositions for what became their self-titled debut. By now, the tunes had been road-tested with twists and turns added to each. One of Holland’s contributions, “Finding the Light,” is an introspective, odd-time piece built around a slightly off-putting ostinato that provides a joyous platform for Potter’s soprano sax flourishes. “I wrote a counterline specifically for Lionel,” says Holland. “I wanted it to be a layered thing.”
It was one of Loueke’s compositions, “Aziza Dance,” that gave Holland the idea for the name of the group. During the original tour, Holland took Loueke aside and asked him about the origins of the name. Loueke explained that Aziza is the name of a god of inspiration taken from Dahomey mythology, which is from his homeland of Benin. “It just sparked me,” says Holland. “I thought it would be a wonderful name for the band.”
When we spoke with Holland and Loueke, they had just finished a lengthy European tour. We asked them to describe recording Aziza and what it takes to channel their worldly influences into one of jazz’s most electrifying quartets.
Once the band members were selected, what was the overall vibe you had in mind in terms of composing for Aziza?
Holland: It’s the players involved. When we were all considering what music to bring in, we were really thinking about an idea of what the four of us playing together would sound like—even though we hadn’t heard it. We’re writing music for improvisers. We’re thinking about how each person approaches their instrument, what their concept is, and what language they like to explore. Then we try to find compositional vehicles that allow for the maximum amount of freedom for those players.
Loueke: You don’t have to write much for this band. “Aziza Dance” was written for my trio, but I knew that with these players, it would go in a whole different direction. That makes it easy, yet sometimes very challenging because you don’t expect something that works one night to be the same tomorrow. We’re thinking of doing a live recording because it’s a whole different energy. When you play the same music every night for six weeks, it just keeps growing into different shapes and never goes in the same box or direction.
Speaking of “Aziza Dance,” the tones you’re getting on the intro and solo are wild. What were you using there?
Loueke: I use a Kemper Profiler. On that patch, I used my regular sound with a lot of wah and two types of whammy. One is an octave higher to make the chords a little fatter. For the intro, I used that plus a whammy setting that bends an octave down. That gives me flexibility. The idea was to imitate the sound of a talking drum. I also have a ring modulator with different frequencies connected to the expression pedal. There’s a kind of crossfade between the whammy octave down and ring modulator going up. I think on the intro, I probably opened up all the patches!
Holland: The groove of “Aziza Dance” is just fun to lay into and explore. We look for new ways to bend it around and interpret it.
Dave, the fuzzy bass sound on “Sleepless Nights” seems a bit out of character. What’s the story behind that song?
Holland: Back in the day when I was with Miles, I had a fuzz/wah pedal I used on the bass guitar. I’ve worked with my engineer, James Farber, since the late ’80s, and every now and then he’ll say, “How about the fuzz on this one?” It’s a running joke at this point. But on this particular tune we tried it, and I liked it. But instead of a pedal, he used some kind of Pro Tools plug-in.
Loueke: I wrote this tune based on an application I did for iOS about African guitar styles, called GuitAfrica. I did some research based on different traditional instruments from different places, and I wrote some new tunes and grooves. By doing that research I learned a lot about the gimbri, which is a traditional instrument from Morocco. It’s something between a guitar and a bass. When I wrote that tune, I had the gimbri tone in mind, so I tuned my low string down to D and basically played the whole intro on that one string.
YouTube It
Taken from a stop on Aziza’s inaugural tour, this full-length set features four tunes from their self-titled album. Don’t miss Lionel Loueke’s wicked, effects-laden intro to “Aziza Dance” at 21:45.
“From day one it was just all about the music,” remembers Loueke, shown here with Aziza at Rhode Island’s fabled Newport Jazz Festival. “With these guys, you don’t have to say much—it just takes off naturally.” Photo by Douglas Mason
In terms of composing, Aziza is a true collective. With such an accomplished group of musicians, how do you communicate your vision of your compositions in the studio?
Holland: Sometimes we had individual parts or just lead sheets. I think we all had the same approach—what’s on the paper is merely a suggestion or starting point. Speaking for myself, I’m wide open to any kind of interpretation these wonderful players bring to the music. Very often, what they come up with is much more than whatever I could have thought of. It’s just a matter of postulating a starting point. The less you write, the more opportunity you offer for the creative power of the group to come through. I think Miles demonstrated that beautifully in the things he put together. There would often be a minimal amount of written material, but conceptually, the material would be very strong. Then he would find the right people to come in and fill up the gaps with their own creative ideas.
Loueke: With these guys, you don’t have to say much—it just takes off naturally. The tempo might be different or someone could come up with an idea that’s best for the song in that moment. That level of focus and embracing the music is important.
Dave Holland’s Gear
Basses
• Vintage French upright bass
• David Gage Czech-Ease Road Bass
Amp
• Gallien-Krueger 200MB
Pickups and Accessories
• David Gage Realist pickup
• Underwood pickup
• Klark Teknik DN 100 DI
• DPA d:vote 4099B mic
Lionel Loueke’s Gear
Guitars
• Sadowsky Semi-Hollow
• Private Stock PRS Singlecut Archtop
Amps and Effects
• Kemper Profiler
Lionel, you mentioned that you’re using a Kemper. Any digital all-in-one unit can be a real wormhole sometimes. Where does your tone start in this context?
Loueke: As you know, for most guitar players, sound is a big deal. When I got the Kemper, I tried to get all the analog sounds from the pedals I had. The magic thing about it for me is to find the right amp profile. I basically use two amps on the Kemper: an AC Morgan, mostly for the distorted sounds, and then I use another Morgan for clean sounds. It depends on what effects I’m using on top of the amp. I also use some stereo reverb, delay, and a phaser, but you can’t really tell because the mix is very low.
Do you use the Kemper for gigs and recording?
Loueke: Yeah, for this album I took a direct stereo out from the Kemper. When I use it live, I have a Mesa/Boogie 4x12 onstage. Sometimes that can scare people, but I’m not one of those guitarists who plays loud. For me, it’s more about the range of the cabinet. I don’t crank it, but at least I get a fat sound. Also, I mostly used my Sadowsky on the album, but I have a few PRS guitars, too. It just depends on the gig.
Dave, tell us about the upright bass you used on Aziza.
Holland: I’ve had my current bass since about 1995. I found it in an antique shop in France. It had been in a café that had been closed for about 30 years. The antique shop owner had bought the entire contents of the café. I was just taking a walk before leaving for the next gig when I saw the bass in the window and took down the number. A few weeks later I was back in the area and managed to see the bass and try it out. I thought it had a lot of promise, so I brought it back to New York and had David Gage renovate it. We believe it’s about 200 years old and of French origin, but there’s some discussion about that.
That’s so interesting that it’s not some high-end boutique instrument you sourced through a music store.
Holland: Yeah—there was something about the way it looked. It has very narrow shoulders, but a very deep bout. I thought the instrument had quite a potential for some real depth of sound. When I tried it, it certainly seemed that way and worth taking back to New York to find out how good it could be.
Do you bring it out on the road?
Holland: Until about nine years ago, I used it for everything. That was around the time when the airline started to change their policy about checked baggage. I was increasingly having problems with them checking it and I’d been struggling with it for a while. Then I discovered a travel instrument that David Gage designed called the Czech-Ease bass, and now that’s what I’ve been using on any gig I can’t drive to.
What’s your amp setup like?
Holland: I use two Klark Teknik DN 100 DIs—one for the David Gage Realist pickup and the other for an Underwood pickup that feeds my Gallien-Krueger 200MB onstage. The Klark DIs are wonderful. I also use a DPA d:vote 4099B bass mic.
Both of you have a reputation for making odd-time signatures very accessible. Lionel, do you think that came from years of listening to traditional African music?
Loueke: Yeah. Personally, I don’t like odd meters that make me feel like I’m doing physics or math. When it comes to composition, my process is that after recording 5 or 10 minutes of music, I go back and listen to it and find something I like. Then I figure out what meter it’s in. It just happens naturally. If something comes out at 21 1/2, then that’s what it’s going to be. If the bass line comes first, then I’ll use GarageBand to find a groove that is slightly against that bass line to give me some sort of cycle, or circular vibe, so it doesn’t sound like a skipping CD. Which can be a challenge—I spend a lot of time making the groove really sound natural.
Growing up in Benin, was there any sort of formal music education?
Loueke: It was all intuitive. There were no schools to go to—I just learned by playing traditional music. I grew up playing percussion and then played bass for a while before moving to guitar. I’ve always said I’m a frustrated bassist and percussionist, and that’s why I beat on the guitar.
Dave, I must ask about that famous story of the jam session you had with Jimi Hendrix. How did that come about?
Jimi had Electric Lady Studios in the city, and I got a call one day to go down there for a jam session with John McLaughlin and Buddy Miles. It was just the four of us in the studio and an engineer. There was no real plan, as far as I could tell. Jimi would just start up a riff and we’d pick it up and jam on it. We were playing a lot of the same festivals at the time, so our paths did cross a bit. I wasn’t a close friend or anything, but I was a huge fan. He loved Miles Davis and Miles loved him, and there had been some discussion of them doing something together, I think. Unfortunately, that was cut short. He was clearly moving on and looking for some new directions, and I think that was just a chance to try something out.
YouTube It
Here’s the result of Dave Holland’s only time jamming with Jimi Hendrix. It’s a free form instrumental affair with the legendary John McLaughlin on guitar and Buddy Miles on drums. Shortly after this session, Hendrix went on to form the Band of Gypsys with Miles and bassist Billy Cox.
During the group’s featured set at the Newport Jazz Festival, Dave Holland plucks away on a 200-year-old French bass that he found in an antique shop. Photo by Douglas Mason
Dave Holland’s 6-String History
Even a cursory glance at Holland’s extensive and impressive discography makes it obvious that he enjoys collaborating with some of the most revered guitarists of our time. It’s no surprise, considering his roots weren’t based in the low end. During the early ’50s in England, Holland was swept up in American rock ’n’ roll, and he soon found himself playing in a skiffle band that mixed elements of rock and folk. “My first bass was a skiffle bass made out of a box, broomstick, and a piece of string,” remembers Holland. On his 10th birthday, he received a guitar and started to learn popular songs on the radio. By 13 he had shifted to bass. PG asked Holland to share memories of playing with some of his best-known 6-string collaborators.
Jim Hall
I didn’t do much recording with Jim, but we did some duo things together. I’m hoping someday those recordings can come out. I first heard him live in ’65 with Jimmy Giuffre in London. It wasn’t until we connected in New York in the ’90s that we really started to play together.
Derek Bailey
I met Derek in London in the mid ’60s and he had quite an extraordinary conceptual idea of the guitar. In fact, I heard him in ’62 before I knew who he was. When I was 17, I happen to be on tour with a big band. We stayed in a hotel where a guitar trio was playing this Bill Evans-influenced music. I found out much later that it was Derek. By the time I got to know him and play with him he had developed this completely unique language. He had a tremendous impact on the open-improvisation scene in London.
John Abercrombie
I first heard John in the late ’60s. Jack DeJohnette brought us together in the Gateway trio and we had many, many great years of playing together. John really thinks outside the box and has a very personal sound that is completely steeped in the tradition.
Kevin Eubanks
During the ’80s I was running the Banff school [the summer jazz workshop at the Banff Centre for Arts and Creativity in Alberta, Canada] and one year Abercrombie couldn’t make it. Robin Eubanks recommended his brother Kevin who was already coming up to Banff. From the very first day we played as a duo, I had this immediate connection with him. I asked Kevin if he’d be interested in working together and that resulted in the Extensions album.
Pat Metheny
We first met around the time of Bright Size Life. Pat had asked me to do that album, but because I was working with Sam Rivers I wasn’t available. That’s probably the best thing that could have happened because who could be better on that album than Jaco? We didn’t get a chance to play together until the Parallel Realities tour with Jack DeJohnette. What Pat has accomplished is quite extraordinary.
Leveraging 3D printing technology, the new Floyd Rose Original locking nuts are designed to deliver unmatched precision and consistency, replacing the traditional “lost wax” casting method that dominated for decades.
The shift to 3D printing allows for intricate detailing and tighter tolerances, ensuring each nut meets exact specifications.
The process begins with powdered metal, which is precisely 3D printed into the desired shape using advanced metal printing technology. After printing, the parts are depowdered and cleaned before undergoing a sintering process—an advanced heat treatment—during which the parts achieve full density and hardness. Lastly, the nuts are CNC “kiss-cut” to exacting specifications for consistency and control of the fit before receiving a premium electroplating finish.
“Floyd Rose has always been synonymous with innovation, and by embracing this incredible new technology we are able to continue that legacy,” said Andrew Papiccio, president of AP International Music Supply of which Floyd Rose is a division. “The accuracy and flexibility of the new 3D printing method will allow us to make a more consistent piece while also giving us full control of the manufacturing right here in the USA.”
Initially, the 3D-printed locking nuts will be available in ten classic sizes with a 10” radius, with plans to expand the range to accommodate various fretboard radii in Spring 2025. This augmentation will offer players more options for customizing their setups to match a wide variety of fretboard curvatures.
To get a sneak peek at the new Floyd Rose USA Series, come visit us at NAMM in booth 5734 in Hall D.
With flexible voltage adjustments, precise control, customizable protection, compact design, and affordable pricing at $299, the Brownie is the ultimate solution for optimizing tone and safeguarding your gear.
AmpRx, the trusted name behind the industry-renowned BrownBox, has unveiled its newest innovation: The Brownie, a voltage-optimizing power supply for modern amps and the first of its kind.
Designed by AmpRx co-owner and CEO Cassandra Sotos (2024 NAMM Female Entrepreneur of the Year), the Brownie provides unparalleled control, flexibility, and protection specifically for modern tube amplifiers by allowing the player to both increase and decrease voltage with volt-by-volt precision.
Priced at $299, the Brownie offers an affordable and essential solution for protecting your investment in your high-quality tube amp. It allows you to optimize your tone and safeguard your gear from variations in voltage by givingthe ultimate advantage: knowing exactly what you’re feeding your amp.
Known as the secret weapon of touring professionals, AmpRx products have been spotted on stage with bands like the Red Hot Chili Peppers, Lynyrd Skynyrd, Zac Brown Band, Iron Maiden, and many more. AmpRx is now bringing its game-changing technology to an even broader audience with this compact, affordable, and versatile product. Try the Brownie for yourself and discover exactly why artists, amp designers, and technicians rely on AmpRx to provide consistent sound, performance, and extend the life of their gear.
The Brownie will be available January 20th, 2025, presented at NAMM Global Media Day and on display at Booth #5630.
WHAT MAKES THE BROWNIE SPECIAL? Building on the success of the flagship BrownBox, the Brownie offers key innovations tailored for modern amplifiers:
- Flexible Voltage Adjustments: The Brownie is the first in the AmpRx line to both decrease and increase voltage, providing optimal performance for modern tube amps (often at 117-120V).
- Precise Control: Adjust voltage in ultra-precise -1V increments when decreasing, and by +3V or +5Vwhen increasing, allowing musicians to fine-tune their tone with precision.
- Customizable Protection: The Brownie ensures safe operation, putting control directly in the player's hands, and includes two fuse options: 2A for smaller setups and 4A for larger setups, ensuring compatibility with diverse gear.
- Compact and Portable Design: Smaller and lighter than the original BrownBox, the Brownie is perfect for musicians seeking portability, durability, and streamlined functionality. It can even fit on a pedalboard or in a backpack.
- Wide Accessibility: At just $299, the Brownie offers professional-grade voltage control at a price point that’s accessible to musicians everywhere.
Email sales@brownbox.rocks to order and stop by NAMM Booth #5630 to see the Brownie in action, talk with the owners, team and artists, and see exactly why so many people insist onAmpRx products when they make music.
For more information, please visit brownbox.rocks.
When every guitar claims to be special, how can any guitar truly stand out?
In the guitar world, a transformation is underway that reminds me of the rise and fall of empires. The modern boutique guitar market, which once felt to me like an underground treasure trove, now seems poised on the precipice. It has grown, matured, and, in my opinion, overextended itself. Are we cresting the wave? Has the boutique boom run its course, or is it simply shedding its skin in metamorphosis?
Guitar building has been around for centuries, mostly as an individual, artisanal endeavor until the late 19th century, when it began to be dominated by manufacturing entities. The boutique guitar category as we know it today began as a reaction to the hegemony of big brands. It was a calling and philosophy—a return to individual builders and small shop manufacturers in the mainstream consciousness. Builders crafted instruments that evoked the patinated romance of vintage instruments as well as the hot-rod aesthetic. What started with a handful of outliers has now become an ecosystem. But, like all trends, there’s a limit to how far it can stretch before it must adapt or collapse.
Pioneers to Proliferation
In the early 1970s, builders like Rick Turner, John Suhr, Michael Gurian, and Bernie Rico, among others, stook as renegades of the modern boutique scene. They were voices bucking the production-line trend with craftsmanship that evoked past masters like D’Angelico, Bigsby, or even Stradivarius. These builders weren’t just producing instruments; they were making statements. A guitar by Parker or a Manzer wasn’t just a tool, it was a declaration of the builder’s ethos and vision—something that might have been lost in the guitar boom of the ’60s.
Today, the boutique world is a crowded stage where hundreds, if not thousands, of builders compete for the attention of an audience with only so much disposable income. Plus, the custom allure is no longer the sole province of artisans; custom shop offerings from major brands like Fender, Gibson, and PRS have blurred the lines. CNC machining and production streamlining have made “boutique” features practical, even necessary, for larger operations. To their credit, unlike at the birth of the vintage market, the big guys saw the wave as well. The once-clear delineation between boutique and mainstream is murkier than ever, which by its nature dilutes everyone’s impact in the segment.
In economic terms, this is a textbook example of market saturation. There are only so many players willing and able to spend $5,000, $10,000, or more on a guitar. Supply has exploded, but demand may be plateauing. Handmade boutique guitars, once a rarefied niche, are now ubiquitous at trade shows, online marketplaces, and across social media feeds. This leads me to a pressing question: When every guitar claims to be special, how can any guitar truly stand out?
The Instagram Paradox
Online, custom guitars have become as much about image as they are about sound. It seems any builder with a board and a butter knife is trolling for your approval. A scroll through Instagram reveals a sea of small-batch instruments, but there’s a creeping sense of déjà vu. How many “offset” guitars with stained burl tops and pre-distressed finishes can one truly appreciate before they begin to blur together? Social media, once a powerful tool for builders to connect with their clientele, has become a double-edged sword. On the one hand, it’s never been easier to showcase work to a global audience. On the other, the sheer volume of content has weakened the impact.
“A guitar by Parker or a Manzer wasn’t just a tool, it was a declaration of the builder’s ethos and vision—something that might have been lost in the guitar boom of the ’60s.”
The Buyer’s Shift
Meanwhile, players too are evolving. With the pandemic-fueled spike in sales fading, some tastes are turning away from the museum-worthy builds in favor of simpler, more traditional guitars. In a way, the legacy brands may now be a salve for the disaffected. In an ironic twist, they are seen as the true foundation of the industry—the original and genuine as opposed to a hip fad.
What Comes Next?
So, has the boutique guitar market peaked? Perhaps. But a peak doesn’t necessarily signal decline. Just as the boutique segment was born from a reaction to mass production, the next wave may be driven by a return to fundamentals. Builders who adapt to a changing landscape or who have built their own legacy will continue to thrive. Those who have not entered the general consciousness may find themselves left behind.
In the end, the boutique guitar market will endure, not because of its size, but because of its soul. Just as guitar building began as an individual endeavor, that heritage will continue. The challenge is to capture the essence of what makes a guitar special in the first place: the connection between builder and player—and the magic of turning wood and wire into music.