Engineer/Producer Bil VornDick, the master of recording acoustic guitar, shares his secrets.
Experienced acoustic musicians know that when it comes to making stellar recordings, there are only a few engineer/producers who get the call, and Nashville legend Bil VornDick is at the very top of the list. He’s worked on more than 40 Grammy-nominated projects and eight have been Grammy winners—to say nothing of the dozens of other awards his recordings have won. Starting as a guitar player in Virginia, he was encouraged by Chet Atkins to relocate to Nashville, where he found his calling as a recording engineer and producer. Though he is especially renowned for his ability to capture incredibly natural, lifelike, and detailed performances on acoustic instruments—with a particular love for acoustic guitar—VornDick can and does record every style.
He’s also well known for giving back to the music community, with his involvement in organizations such as the AES (Audio Engineering Society), the All Star Guitar Night charity concerts, the Audio Masters Benefit Golf Tournament, and many more. VornDick recalls how he went from his teenage rock band to taking advice from Chet Atkins, who introduced him to Nashville’s Belmont University, his alma mater and a place where he now mentors the next generation of engineers and producers through teaching.
You started as a musician in your teens?
Yes, I was in a rock ’n’ roll band. I was in the 7th grade playing lead guitar
with a bunch of guys that were seniors, and then just kept playing.
The bass player was Harry Dailey, who was the first guy Jimmy Buffett
hired for the Coral Reefer Band. He wrote some songs with Jimmy.
How did you go from being in a Virginia rock band to connecting
with Chet Atkins?
A friend of mine, Frank Grist, worked for RCA in the mid-Atlantic
area, out of Washington, D.C. Chet was coming to the Stardust
Lounge in Waldorf, Maryland, and I got to have dinner with him.
Then Grist brought me to Nashville and I signed some songs to
Cedarwood Publishing Company. Chet always invited me to stop
by, to say hi when I was in town. He was the one who told me
about Belmont [University]. He helped me get into Belmont, and
shortly after I graduated I became Marty Robbins’ chief engineer.
How did you make that connection?
I used to hang out at CBS Studios when I was going to Belmont and
many of those engineers knew me. Marty was looking for a chief
engineer and he came in one day when I was doing demos for Loretta
Lynn’s publishing company in his studio and asked me if I could meet
with him the next day. I had no idea what it was about. He asked me
to be his chief engineer. He was the best guy I ever worked for. Great
sense of humor. A stylist … I mean, when you count the unique
voices of the world, you’ve got your toes on your feet and your fingers
on your hand and then everybody else kind of copies those.
How did you start to branch out to other artists?
When I was in college I used to go to bluegrass festivals in the mid-
Atlantic area and I would get in for free and get cheeseburgers and
French fries and Cokes if I did the sound. I figured, what a deal!
The guy who had the sound company was [renowned bluegrass banjoist] Eddie Adcock, so I had pretty
deep roots in bluegrass because of all of
those festivals and meeting so many musicians.
I loved the music because it was one
form of music where everybody could play
and sing or they didn’t work, unlike some
of the other forms of music.
[Dobro player] Jerry Douglas and [banjo player] Béla Fleck were old friends, and when Marty passed, I guess around ’83, I built and was chief engineer for what is now Curb Studios on 16th Avenue. I helped with the construction of that and the design, and started working with Béla Fleck and continued through most of the Flecktone records, then Jerry Douglas, Alison Krauss, Rhonda Vincent, Claire Lynch, and some of the prominent names of bluegrass. It was not as lucrative as country music, but it sure was a whole lot of fun!
The session crew for David Holt’s Grandfather’s Greatest Hits. Back (L to R): Mark O’Connor, Duane Eddy, Jerry Douglas, Larry Paxton, Steve Turner, Doc Watson. Front (L to R): Steve Heller, Chet Atkins, David Holt, Bil VornDick.
Bluegrass was your primary area early on,
but you branched out to jazz, country,
Celtic, and rock.
Well, I’m doing a lot of pop music now,
with artists from the past that were established
on major labels. I’m working on Jon
Pousette-Dart’s new album right now. He
was on Capital for all those years. Tomorrow
I go into pre-production with Lynn
Anderson, who had “I Beg Your Pardon, I
Never Promised You a Rose Garden.”
But I guess we’re talking about guitar players ... I worked with Bryan Sutton early on, when he was doing his first album. And the tribute album for Merle Travis on Shanachie Records with Chet and Thom Bresh, who is Merle Travis’ son. They sent in Merle Travis’ guitars from L.A., from the vault, for the sessions, so anybody could pick up those guitars and play them on the session. I also recorded many albums with Doc Watson, and I’m very fortunate to have engineered an album [On Praying Ground, 1990] that won a Grammy for Doc. I will miss Doc a whole lot. He was such a kind man and I sort of started playing the guitar by listening to his albums when I was young.
When you’re working with an artist like
that, who has a very established style, do
you see yourself more in the engineer role
or more as the producer?
A producer to me is a mediator. In the
case of the Merle Travis thing, I was the
producer and engineer. But with Doc
Watson, [bassist] Michael Coleman was
the producer—he’d been on the road with
Doc for years. As an engineer you try and
make everyone sound like they want to be
heard. I’ve always felt that the producer was
the person who could answer the question,
“What do you think?” correctly … or as
correctly as you can, within the political
compound that you’re in.
As a producer or engineer who’s been
hired for a project, do you start in pre-production
or do things start for you
when the project comes into the studio?
As an engineer, I’ve always been involved in
the pre-production. As a producer, of course,
you’re in it for months beforehand finding
songs, going to meetings, and then helping
the artist do the arrangements. And then
trying to find the theme of the album, not
so that all the songs are necessarily about
the same thing, but so that the album has a
motif—like a painter painting a picture where
all the different elements come together.
How much, as a producer, do you have to
draw performances out of artists?
A lot. Every artist is different and unique.
Everybody has their good day, and everybody
has their bad day, from musician to
engineer to producer. Many of those artists
come in and knock it right out. That’s
one thing good about Nashville: There are
so many great musicians and guitar players.
But there are times when a producer
needs to show the artist how to become the
song—get inside of it and project it in their
performance. That’s hard to explain, but
when the artist gets there in emotion, and it comes out, that is when the hair goes up on
the back of your neck.
You’re a big fan of guitar.
I love guitar so much that I volunteer to
be the stage manager at the All Star Guitar
Night at [Summer] NAMM. I guess I have
for about 10 years. I do it to raise money
so that children can get instruments, and
that’s very important to me. I don’t charge;
I let them beat me up on their scheduling
for weeks ahead of time, “I want my
soundcheck here.” Stage managing is mediating,
but we all do it for the children with
dreams of playing music.
The 3:1 Rule
Bil VornDick always uses the 3:1 Rule when mic’ing instruments in stereo. Here’s how it works: If your two microphones are each one unit— for example, 1'—away from the instrument, then there should be three units (3' in this example) between the two microphones. VornDick also recommends keeping the two microphones between 90 and 120 degrees of each other.
Following the 3:1 Rule ensures that your recordings will be in phase, without danger of cancellation problems later in the mixing process.
Let’s talk specifics. How do you mic up
Béla Fleck’s banjo?
I use a 3:1 mic’ing technique normally on
Béla [see sidebar, “The 3:1 Rule”].
As to which mics I use, it really depends
on what banjo he’s playing. It depends on
the timbre of the instrument. With Earl
Scruggs, I’d normally used a [Neumann]
KM 84 and a [Neumann] U 87. I used
the KM 84 on the high side and the U
87 on the low side. That’s what he liked.
But every banjo is different. If it was a
very mellow banjo, then I would probably
put a Milab DC-96B on the low
side or a Sony ECM-33P on the low side
and a KM 84 or a Miktek C5 on the
high—I’m using that one a lot. But you
really have to listen to the instrument
first before you just stick mics up.
How important is the room that you’re
recording in to the final result you get?
Very important. I have the musician
move around in the room to find the
spot that translates best for the overtones
of the instrument. The bass is very particular
to axial modes [resonances caused
by sound bouncing between two parallel
surfaces] in the room, where the guitar
wouldn’t be as much. So if I’m going
into a new room, I’ll have the musician
walk around and play, sit, and then
move around some more. Find where the
instrument sounds like the instrument to
them, then the rest of it’s easy.
Do you mic acoustic guitar the same
way that you do banjo, using two
microphones?
Yes, I do. Because I hear in three dimensions
and you can’t get three dimensions
with one mic.
Do you have go-to acoustic guitar mics?
Yeah, I have a pair of [Neumann] KM
54s that I like a lot. Then the Miktek
C5s—I’m using those a lot more than
the KM 84s. I used to use KM 84s all
the time, but the C5, I really believe in
that mic.
That’s great to hear because that mic is
fairly affordable compared to the others
you mentioned.
When it comes down to it, it’s the performance.
You could record it on a Shure
SM57, and if you’ve got the performance,
that’s what the people driving down the
road are going for. A lot of people use
SM81s. The KSM141s, the new mics by
Shure, a lot of people are using those. It
depends on the budget that you have.
How far away do you place the two mics
when you’re recording acoustic guitar?
They’re about 8" off. If you’re sitting
with the guitar in your lap, there’s one
coming in to where the curve reaches the
neck; it’s not faced toward the hole. And
the other one is off the player’s shoulder,
the right shoulder coming down. If you
look at the symmetry and the angles,
they’re facing to the back of the hole
on the guitar, which is where the sound
comes resonating from.
You’re trying to capture the sound of
the whole body of the instrument, not
just getting the surface of it?
Exactly.
So you place the mics fairly close up?
It depends … if it’s a solo guitar, I move
them back. But if it’s in an ensemble,
with a bunch of people sitting around,
it’s usually about 8" or so.
I use the 3:1 rule, then move the mics around with the artist playing the instrument. If you’re going to mic in stereo, put the headphones on and make sure that the left mic is left and the right mic is right and then move them around, and ask the player, “Does this sound like your guitar?”
You’d be amazed, if you move a microphone just a little bit in, a little bit to the left, a little bit to the right, what a difference that will make, depending on the overtone series of the instrument and the key that it’s in. And the instrument, of course, is going to resonate in different keys.
Do you end up panning those two
microphones across the stereo field or
do you bring them pretty close together?
I bring them to 9 and 3 o’clock. If you
pan them all the way left and right, once
it gets to a transmitter on a radio station
you could have phase cancellation. I’m
still old school, making records for radio.
But if I were stacking a couple of guitars, I
wouldn’t have them both panned that way.
I’d have one at 8 o’clock and 1 o’clock and
the other one at 10 o’clock and 4 o’clock.
Do you worry about bleed between the
instruments when you record multiple
musicians at the same time?
If you get your angles and your positioning
of your microphones, and you have
them pretty much out of phase with the
mics on the other players, then there
really isn’t that much problem if you’re in a cardioid pattern. A good example: I had
Jerry Douglas, Tony Rice, and Earl Scruggs
sitting within three feet of each other on
one of Jerry’s recent albums, and I was able
to punch some stuff in fine.
You’ve been involved with some very interesting
projects for Fishman, creating the
guitar images for the Aura system, and also
the new Retro series guitars for Martin.
The idea was that you took guitars into
the studio and recorded “images” of them,
which are then embedded in the guitar
electronics. Were those guitars recorded in
a tightly controlled room?
Yes, I had them in an environment where
there was a baffle behind the guitar, so I
wasn’t receiving any environment in the signal
path. All you were hearing was the guitar.
How did you get involved in the
Martin project?
I got a call from Larry [Fishman], who
said that Martin wanted to put out a series of the old famous Martins: the D-18, the
D-28, the D-45, and the OM. He said,
“They’re going to bring down the guitars
from the [Martin] museum and we’re going
to image them and try to get the new
guitars—when someone plugs in with the
Aura—to sound like the old guitars.”
We really didn’t know what was going to happen until Larry processed some of the signal into an Aura and actually plugged it in, to see if it would work. We were both amazed.
That’s a fun project!
It took a couple of days. They came to the
studio here at the house and unloaded a
million dollars worth of Martins. [Laughs.]
Then I went out and got a slew of microphones—an Electro-Voice 639, I got that
from RCA Studio B. It was one of [legendary
Nashville producer] Owen Bradley’s
microphones. I got a Telefunken ELA
M251 from there, and Wes Dooley let me
use some of his ribbon mics.
So you didn’t just use the original vintage
guitars, you also used original vintage
microphones.
Yes, because there are a lot of traditional
players that want—but can’t afford—an old
vintage Martin, but they want it to sound
like it would have sounded in the ’30s, ’40s,
or ’50s. That’s how we were able to accomplish
it.
How much does the rest of the gear that
you use—the preamps, EQs, compressors—factor into the sounds that you get?
Quite a bit. On [the Retro series], I was
shooting four microphones at one time
and I went through APIs [mic preamps]. I
needed a defined and uncolored sound on
them, so that’s what we used.
What about when you’re recording someone
like Jerry Douglas or Béla Fleck?
The Great River [MEQ-1NV preamp] and
a pair of [Neumann] U 67s are normally
what I use on Jerry. On Béla it would vary
depending on the banjo. I use Neve preamps
a lot or APIs.
How much equalization did you end up
doing once you capture those sounds?
Mainly just high passing. It would be very
good for the people who are reading this
to know that they need to know the frequency
range and the lowest note on the
instrument that they are recording. Once
you put that high-pass filter in, the instrument
will feel like it is lifting itself out of
the speakers.
Other than that, there’s no EQ?
No, not much, if any.
What about when you’re making a record?
Sometimes there are different hot spots in
some guitars. The older guitars usually have
a boom between 160 and 240 Hz that you
have to taper a little bit. But usually that’s
about it. It depends on what key they’re in.
It can vary from song to song?
Right. The key of the song is very important.
It’s like tuning a vocal. If you don’t
know what key the vocal is in, you could be
searching all day for the right notes.
What advice do you have for someone
who’s trying to record acoustic instruments
at home, who doesn’t have an ideal
acoustic environment?
Base it all on performance.
Don’t stress about the sound quality?
Well, sound quality is good, but the people that
are driving down the road, I think they’re more
interested in the performance than they are
in, “Whoa, what microphone did you use on
that?” I don’t know of anybody driving down
the road listening to the radio calling anybody
and asking them, “What mic are you using?”
Well, I do get those calls, I guess. [Laughs.]
It’s all about the song.
It is about the song. The main thing is, if it’s
not happening, walk away. Get something
to eat, make sure your blood sugar’s right,
and go in and try again. The hardest thing
for most artists is knowing when to stop and
walk away. In all the decades I’ve been doing
this, usually when I have an artist who’s getting
frustrated because they can’t play exactly
what they’re hearing in their head and their
fingers aren’t working with their mind, if you
get them away for 10 or 15 minutes, they’ll
go right back in and knock it right out.
That’s the psychologist part of being a
producer … knowing when to have the
artist step back.
Exactly.
What’s the hardest instrument to record?
Probably the hardest instrument to mic
is the hammered dulcimer because of the
overtone series it generates. The mics have
to be perfectly in phase. I normally use KM
84s. I’m getting ready to do my 88th album
on Craig Duncan soon.
Wow, 88 albums?
He does instrumental albums for the gift
markets and tourist places that sell a lot of
product. You’d be amazed how many people
want to listen to the melody, but they don’t
want somebody screaming at them. And
pretty much in music today, it’s how loud
can you make it and how compressed is the
vocal? A lot of people say, “Why are they
screaming at me?” So listening to instrumental
music is pleasing and relaxing.
It’s an industry perception, rather than a
listener perception, that a recording has
to be made that loud.
I learned that a long time ago. My daughter
had a birthday party and the girls found my
collection of vinyl. They had never seen vinyl
records before, so I showed them how to set
the needle down. What I noticed was that
when they put the needle down, they turned
it up and listened to it. Then later, I came
down, you know, delivering the pizzas and
the Cokes and stuff, and they had the CD
player out and they were playing a CD, pushing
play and then turning it down. That told
me a whole lot.
When you mic the hammered dulcimer,
do you mic that in stereo?
Yes, in stereo, using the 3:1 rule. But I keep
the mics up and away because the hammers
are moving so fast that he doesn’t have a
chance to hit any of the mics.
What about upright bass?
I usually mic it with a C5 up on the
top and usually one of my Neumann U
47s on the low end. If we’re going more
“organic,” I’ll use an RCA 77DX. The
new Shure KSM353 is really nice, and
the A440 from AEA, if you’re looking
for a traditional thing. But on [jazz bassist]
Charlie Haden’s album [Rambling
Boy], I used a [Telefunken] 460 on
the top end and a U 47 on the low
side and ran them through two [Neve]
1073 preamps. Charlie [recipient of the
Lifetime Achievement Award at the 2013
Grammys] was in seventh heaven, which
made me very happy that he was happy.
Half of it is making the instrument sound
like the instrument when the musician
comes into the control room.
Have you done much bluegrass recording
where you record everything with one
microphone?
In the old days, but we still would address the
bass, because the bass is usually nondescript
back there. I did one artist … I was still going
to Belmont, I guess, working on the weekends
at the studios in Hendersonville that the Oak
Ridge Boys owned. And a very prominent
bluegrass artist came in. I think it took me
45 minutes to record that album. We went
straight to 2-track. It was nice because the studio
paid me for the day. [Laughs.] By the time
I had the 1/4" tape edited and the box written
on with all the information, it was probably
20 minutes after 11. We started at 10.
People don’t make albums like that
these days.
I did an album like that with Richard
Greene, a fiddle player. It was fun because I
mixed it as we went.
If somebody’s putting together a home
studio, where should they put their dollars?
What should be the priority?
Interface and word clock. The word clock
runs everything, and your audio interface
is your converter. If you have some really
good mic preamps—you’d be amazed what
an SM57 and an SM58 sound like with a
really good mic pre. If you’re a guitar player,
save up and get the microphones that will
last you a lifetime instead of just buying
something that’s going to get you by. The
same thing with mic preamps. I usually
tell my students, have a good stereo signal
path—mics and mic preamps—and then
for vocals, have a good mic preamp and a
couple of mic choices.
A lot of people still cut their tracks in the bigger studios. Most of your time is going to be spent overdubbing.
So keep the focus there rather than trying
to set up a home studio where you can
track a whole band all at once and have to
sacrifice the quality of the gear to do it?
Exactly, because it’s cheaper in the long
run to go in to a bigger room. Be prepared,
be rehearsed. The Beatles went in and did
their first album in 11 hours, something
like that. If you’re prepared, you can go
into a studio and rent it for a day for less
than it would cost to buy a half-decent
microphone.
Then you can take the tracks home and
spend the time there working on the
details and overdubs.
Exactly. What’s so funny is that I work
with a lot of artists that should be just artists,
but they also want to be engineers,
and they don’t realize that there are two
hats. The artist will waste a lot of time and
their creativity trying to figure out how the
computer works or the interface works or
plug-ins work or what to use, instead of
being creative. It happens with songwriters.
A songwriter will write a hit song, then
they’ll go out and buy a bunch of gear and
have a studio in their house and then they
stop writing songs. The same thing with
artists—they stop singing or a guitar player
will stop spending time practicing. For the
hours of figuring out how to hook up a
microphone and get the best signal, why
not have somebody who actually knows
how to do that and spend your time practicing
and working toward that moment
when you’ll be working with that engineer?
You have to figure out what you want to be
in life. Do you want to be an artist or do
you want to be someone that has a really
steep learning curve to become an engineer?
Have you noticed that lately with artists?
Are they not able to knock it out in one
or two takes?
No, normally they can knock it out. There’s
a group that I work with called MilkDrive.
They’re like a new New Grass Revival out
of Austin. They can come in and they just
knock it out.
Because they’re focusing on being artists.
Yes, they all have their Pro Tools 002s and
003s and they play around to get their ideas
and their demos down, but not a master
recording for release.
The Hillbenders is another group out of Missouri. They all go down live—vocals, everything. There are still groups out there that can do it.
Selected Bil VornDick Discography
Alison Krauss and Union Station, I’ve Got That Old Feeling
Rhonda Vincent, Taken
Charlie Haden and Family, Rambling Boy
Ralph Stanley, Clinch Mountain Country (featuring Bob Dylan, Vince Gill,
Dwight Yoakam, Kentucky Headhunters, Diamond Rio, Marty Stuart, Ricky
Skaggs, and many more)
Béla Fleck and the Flecktones, Flight of the Cosmic Hippo,
Tales from the Acoustic Planet, and many more solo and with the Flecktones
Mark O’Connor, The New Nashville Cats
Doc Watson, On Praying Ground and many more
Shawn Lane, Power of Ten
Jerry Douglas, Russ Barenberg, and Edgar Meyer, Skip, Hop & Wobble
Jerry Douglas, Slide Rule and many more
Marty Robbins, Legend and many more
“Practice Loud”! How Duane Denison Preps for a New Jesus Lizard Record
After 26 years, the seminal noisy rockers return to the studio to create Rack, a master class of pummeling, machine-like grooves, raving vocals, and knotty, dissonant, and incisive guitar mayhem.
The last time the Jesus Lizard released an album, the world was different. The year was 1998: Most people counted themselves lucky to have a cell phone, Seinfeld finished its final season, Total Request Live was just hitting MTV, and among the year’s No. 1 albums were Dave Matthews Band’s Before These Crowded Streets, Beastie Boys’ Hello Nasty, The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill, Korn’s Follow the Leader, and the Armageddonsoundtrack. These were the early days of mp3 culture—Napster didn’t come along until 1999—so if you wanted to hear those albums, you’d have to go to the store and buy a copy.
The Jesus Lizard’s sixth album, Blue, served as the band’s final statement from the frontlines of noisy rock for the next 26 years. By the time of their dissolution in 1999, they’d earned a reputation for extreme performances chock full of hard-hitting, machine-like grooves delivered by bassist David Wm. Sims and, at their conclusion, drummer Mac McNeilly, at times aided and at other times punctured by the frontline of guitarist Duane Denison’s incisive, dissonant riffing, and presided over by the cantankerous howl of vocalist David Yow. In the years since, performative, thrilling bands such as Pissed Jeans, METZ, and Idles have built upon the Lizard’s musical foundation.
Denison has kept himself plenty busy over the last couple decades, forming the avant-rock supergroup Tomahawk—with vocalist Mike Patton, bassist Trevor Dunn (both from Mr. Bungle), and drummer John Stanier of Helmet—and alongside various other projects including Th’ Legendary Shack Shakers and Hank Williams III. The Jesus Lizard eventually reunited, but until now have only celebrated their catalog, never releasing new jams.
The Jesus Lizard, from left: bassist David Wm. Sims, singer David Yow, drummer Mac McNeilly, and guitarist Duane Denison.
Photo by Joshua Black Wilkins
Back in 2018, Denison, hanging in a hotel room with Yow, played a riff on his unplugged electric guitar that caught the singer’s ear. That song, called “West Side,” will remain unreleased for now, but Denison explains: “He said, ‘Wow, that’s really good. What is that?’ And I said, ‘It’s just some new thing. Why don’t we do an album?’” From those unassuming beginnings, the Jesus Lizard’s creative juices started flowing.
So, how does a band—especially one who so indelibly captured the ineffable energy of live rock performance—prepare to get a new record together 26 years after their last? Back in their earlier days, the members all lived together in a band house, collectively tending to the creative fire when inspiration struck. All these years later, they reside in different cities, so their process requires sending files back and forth and only meeting up for occasional demo sessions over the course of “three or four years.”
“When the time comes to get more in performance mode, I have a practice space. I go there by myself and crank it up. I turn that amp up and turn the metronome up and play loud.” —Duane Denison
the Jesus Lizard "Alexis Feels Sick"
Distance creates an obstacle to striking while the proverbial iron is hot, but Denison has a method to keep things energized: “Practice loud.” The guitarist professes the importance of practice, in general, and especially with a metronome. “We keep very detailed records of what the beats per minute of these songs are,” he explains. “To me, the way to do it is to run it to a Bluetooth speaker and crank it, and then crank your amp. I play a little at home, but when the time comes to get more in performance mode, I have a practice space. I go there by myself and crank it up. I turn that amp up and turn the metronome up and play loud.”
It’s a proven solution. On Rack—recorded at Patrick Carney’s Audio Eagle studio with producer Paul Allen—the band sound as vigorous as ever, proving they’ve not only remained in step with their younger selves, but they may have surpassed it with faders cranked. “Duane’s approach, both as a guitarist and writer, has an angular and menacing fingerprint that is his own unique style,” explains Allen. “The conviction in his playing that he is known for from his recordings in the ’80s and ’90s is still 100-percent intact and still driving full throttle today.”
“I try to be really, really precise,” he says. “I think we all do when it comes to the basic tracks, especially the rhythm parts. The band has always been this machine-like thing.” Together, they build a tension with Yow’s careening voice. “The vocals tend to be all over the place—in and out of tune, in and out of time,” he points out. “You’ve got this very free thing moving around in the foreground, and then you’ve got this very precise, detailed band playing behind it. That’s why it works.”
Before Rack, the Jesus Lizard hadn’t released a new record since 1998’s Blue.
Denison’s guitar also serves as the foreground foil to Yow’s unhinged raving, as on “Alexis Feels Sick,” where they form a demented harmony, or on the midnight creep of “What If,” where his vibrato-laden melodies bolster the singer’s unsettled, maniacal display. As precise as his riffs might be, his playing doesn’t stay strictly on the grid. On the slow, skulking “Armistice Day,” his percussive chording goes off the rails, giving way to a solo that slices that groove like a chef’s knife through warm butter as he reorganizes rock ’n’ roll histrionics into his own cut-up vocabulary.
“During recording sessions, his first solo takes are usually what we decide to keep,” explains Allen. “Listen to Duane’s guitar solos on Jack White’s ‘Morning, Noon, and Night,’ Tomahawk’s ‘Fatback,’ and ‘Grind’ off Rack. There’s a common ‘contained chaos’ thread among them that sounds like a harmonic Rubik’s cube that could only be solved by Duane.”
“Duane’s approach, both as a guitarist and writer, has an angular and menacing fingerprint that is his own unique style.” —Rack producer Paul Allen
To encapsulate just the right amount of intensity, “I don’t over practice everything,” the guitarist says. Instead, once he’s created a part, “I set it aside and don’t wear it out.” On Rack, it’s obvious not a single kilowatt of musical energy was lost in the rehearsal process.
Denison issues his noisy masterclass with assertive, overdriven tones supporting his dissonant voicings like barbed wire on top of an electric fence. The occasional application of slapback delay adds a threatening aura to his exacting riffage. His tones were just as carefully crafted as the parts he plays, and he relied mostly on his signature Electrical Guitar Company Chessie for the sessions, though a Fender Uptown Strat also appears, as well as a Taylor T5Z, which he chose for its “cleaner, hyper-articulated sound” on “Swan the Dog.” Though he’s been spotted at recent Jesus Lizard shows with a brand-new Powers Electric—he points out he played a demo model and says, “I just couldn’t let go of it,” so he ordered his own—that wasn’t until tracking was complete.
Duane Denison's Gear
Denison wields his Powers Electric at the Blue Room in Nashville last June.
Photo by Doug Coombe
Guitars
- Electrical Guitar Company Chessie
- Fender Uptown Strat
- Taylor T5Z
- Gibson ES-135
- Powers Electric
Amps
- Hiwatt Little J
- Hiwatt 2x12 cab with Fane F75 speakers
- Fender Super-Sonic combo
- Early ’60s Fender Bassman
- Marshall 1987X Plexi Reissue
- Victory Super Sheriff head
- Blackstar HT Stage 60—2 combos in stereo with Celestion Neo Creamback speakers and Mullard tubes
Effects
- Line 6 Helix
- Mantic Flex Pro
- TC Electronic G-Force
- Menatone Red Snapper
Strings and Picks
- Stringjoy Orbiters .0105 and .011 sets
- Dunlop celluloid white medium
- Sun Studios yellow picks
He ran through various amps—Marshalls, a Fender Bassman, two Fender Super-Sonic combos, and a Hiwatt Little J—at Audio Eagle. Live, if he’s not on backline gear, you’ll catch him mostly using 60-watt Blackstar HT Stage 60s loaded with Celestion Neo Creambacks. And while some boxes were stomped, he got most of his effects from a Line 6 Helix. “All of those sounds [in the Helix] are modeled on analog sounds, and you can tweak them endlessly,” he explains. “It’s just so practical and easy.”
The tools have only changed slightly since the band’s earlier days, when he favored Travis Beans and Hiwatts. Though he’s started to prefer higher gain sounds, Allen points out that “his guitar sound has always had teeth with a slightly bright sheen, and still does.”
“Honestly, I don’t think my tone has changed much over the past 30-something years,” Denison says. “I tend to favor a brighter, sharper sound with articulation. Someone sent me a video I had never seen of myself playing in the ’80s. I had a band called Cargo Cult in Austin, Texas. What struck me about it is it didn’t sound terribly different than what I sound like right now as far as the guitar sound and the approach. I don’t know what that tells you—I’m consistent?”
YouTube It
The Jesus Lizard take off at Nashville’s Blue Room this past June with “Hide & Seek” from Rack.
Big time processing power in a reverb that you can explore for a lifetime.
An astoundingly lush and versatile reverb of incredible depth and flexibility. New and older BigSky algorithms included. More elegant control layout and better screen.
It’s pricey and getting the full use out of it takes some time and effort.
$679
Strymon BigSky MX
strymon.net
Strymon calls the BigSky MX pedal “one reverb to rule them all.” Yep, that’s a riff on something we’ve heard before, but in this case it might be hard to argue. In updating what was already one of the market’s most comprehensive and versatile reverbs, Strymon has created a reverb pedal that will take some players a lifetime to fully explore. That process is likely to be tons of fun, too.
Grinding out impressive DSP power via an 800 MHz tri-core ARM processor with 32-bit floating-point processing, the BigSky MX introduces seven brand-new reverb algorithms, allows users to load any compatible convolution reverb (or impulse response) as well as to use two reverbs simultaneously—in series, parallel, and split—plus it delivers several other mind-bending features. Given this wealth of goodies, it’s impossible to test and discuss every sound and function, but what we heard is exciting.
Infinite Space
The updated MX will look very familiar to those who know the original BigSky. The form factor is nearly identical, though the MX is a bit larger. Its control interface is similar too, albeit rearranged into a single row of knobs that looks more balanced. Rotary controls include decay, pre-delay, tone, mod, parameter 1, parameter 2, and mix. A value knob enables effect-level manipulation on the larger, clearer OLED screen. It also allows you to select between the older or “classic” algorithms from the original BigSky and the seven new ones. Three footswitches allow for preset selection, bank up or down (two switches pressed together), and an infinite hold/sustain switch that’s always available. The rotary “type” knob in the upper-left corner spins between 12 basic reverb voices. As with most things Strymon, many of these controls are multi-function.
Also very Strymon-like are the top-mounted, 5-pin DIN MIDI I/O connections, which come in handy if you want to maximize the pedal’s potential in a MIDI-controlled rig. But you can access more than enough right from the pedal itself to satisfy the needs of most standard pedalboard-based setups. A USB-C port enables computer connection for MIDI control via that route, use of the Nixie 2 editing app, or firmware updates.
There are stereo jacks for both input and output, plus a multi-function 1/4" TRS/MIDI expression jack for use with a further range of external controllers. The standard center-negative power jack requires a DC supply offering at least 500 mA of current draw.
It is utterly hypnotic and addictive once you settle in and work a little more intuitively.
Sky’s the Limit
The BigSky MX was, initially, a bit mind-boggling on account of the seemingly endless possibilities. But it is utterly hypnotic and addictive once you settle in and work a little more intuitively. Suffice it to say, the core quality of the reverb sounds themselves are excellent, and the sheer variety is astounding. Beyond the standard emulations, I really dug several permutations of the cloud reverb, the chorale mode (which adds tenor and baritone harmonizing tones), and bloom mode (which generates deep synthesizer-style pads), and I could have gotten lost in any of these for hours if there wasn’t so much more to explore. Among the highlights: There is now an option to pan reverbs across the stereo field. The MX also uses audio design concepts borrowed from tape delays to create rhythmic pattern-based reverbs, which is an excellent compositional tool.
The Verdict
This latest evolution of the already impressive and super-capable BigSky is the kind of pedal that could cause you to disappear into your basement studio, never to return. The sounds are addictive and varied and can be configured in endless creative ways. The programmability and connectivity are also superb. Additionally, the new algorithms weren’t added at expense of the old BigSky algos. There’s no doubt that it will be flat-out too much horsepower for the guitarist that needs a few traditional sounds and, perhaps, a few more spacious options. And it would be interesting to know what percentage of the pedal’s customers end up being synth artists, engineers, or sound designers of one kind or another. If you’re the kind of guitar player that enjoys stretching the sound and capabilities of your instrument as far as they will go, the BlueSky MX will gladly ride along to the bounds of your imagination. It may test the bounds of your budget, too. But in many ways, the BigSky MX is as much a piece of outboard studio gear as a stompbox, and if you’re willing to invest the time, the BigSky MX has the goods to pay you back.
“The Player II Series represents our continued evolution in design and functionality,” said Justin Norvell, EVP of Product, FMIC. “We listened to the feedback from musicians around the world and incorporated their insights to refine and innovate our instruments. The re-introduction of rosewood fingerboards is a restoration of the ‘original Fender recipe’ and will no doubt be a fan favorite - but we didn’t want to stop there. We’ve also incorporated our rolled fingerboard edges for a broken-in feel, upgraded hardware, and have some new body options as well- which underscores our commitment to providing players and creators with the tools they need to express their unique sound and style. The Player II Series is not just an upgrade, it's a detailed re-imagining of our core silhouettes, highlighting our dedication to quality and the continuous refinement of our instruments.”
Additionally, Player II offers new options for chambered ash and chambered mahogany bodies for the Player II Stratocaster and Telecaster models, which will be available in October. Designed for musicians ready to elevate their craft, the Player II Series sets a new standard for quality and performance in the mid-price range.
Fender Player II Stratocaster HSS Electric Guitar - Coral Red
Player II Strat HSS RW, Coral RedFender Player II Jaguar Electric Guitar - Aquatone Blue
Player II Jaguar RF, Aquatone BlueThis convenient, easy-to-use controller can open up an entire world of sonic shape-shifting. Here are some tips to either inspire you to try one or expand how you’re currently using this flexible, creative device.
If you’re not yet using expression pedals, you should consider them. They have the power to expand and control your sonic universe. For the uninitiated, expression pedals are controllers that typically look like volume or wah pedals. Of course, traditional volume and wah pedals are expression pedals, too, but they are dedicated to controlling only those two effects.
Modern expression pedals allow you to assign and control parameters of your stomps or modelers by moving the expression pedal as you would a volume or wah. Dunlop, Boss, Ernie Ball, Yamaha, Behringer, Mission Engineering, and other manufacturers make these handy devices.
Many, but not all, of today’s stompboxes and modelers have expression pedal inputs that allow for manipulation of one or more parameters of those devices. In the past, this required bending over and turning a knob, or trying to turn a small knob with your foot—both of which can hamper your playing. The freedom of an expression pedal is the control you have over more aspects of your sound, especially in a live setting.
Although some of the uses for expression pedals below can also be accomplished by creating multiple presets, that will not allow real-time control over the parameters like an expression pedal will. Here are some notes about expression pedal use that might get you thinking about how one could help you.
Delay Repeats: Controlling the timing of a delay with tap tempo is very common, but how about controlling the number of repeats? With an expression pedal, by setting the expression control on your delay to control the number of repeats, you can easily go from a few for your rhythm sound to more for your lead sound, and then back off again.
Reverb and Delay Mix: The mix control on reverb and delay pedals allows you to balance the amount of wet to dry signal that you hear. There is often a delicate line to having just the right amount of wet signal with these two effects. If you have too much, your sound can be washed out and undefined. Too little and it can be dry and lack space. The part you are playing, and the venue you are in, can also change the amount of mix you need for these effects. By using an expression pedal for the mix control on reverb or delay, you can alter the sound on the fly to compensate for the part and the room, including turning down the mix for busy parts and up for parts with fewer notes.“Some uses for expression pedals can also be accomplished by creating multiple presets, but that will not allow real-time control over the parameters like an expression pedal will.”
Modulation Depth: The depth of a modulation effect, like a phaser, can drastically alter your guitar sound. A light amount can create a feeling of subtle movement, while a heavy amount can give a thick, underwater-type sound. An expression pedal can help you create a constant feeling of change throughout a song, allowing you to build up and break down the depth for different sections as you see fit.
Tremolo Speed: While the speed of tremolo can often be controlled by tap tempo, using an expression pedal for the same parameter offers other creative uses of the effect. With an expression pedal, you can easily speed the tremolo up to make subtle increases to the energy of a part or slow it down to decrease the energy. You can also create drastic changes in the speed that sound like a fan accelerating or slowing down. Or you can abruptly turn the tremolo off. This last option can be an exciting way to end a song or part.
EQ Change: Every guitar player uses EQ to sculpt their sound—whether via the tone controls on your instrument or amp (modelers included), or a dedicated equalizer used as part of your rig. Subtle tweaks can help you do things like balance out different guitars, cut through the mix more, or compensate for a boomy stage. Real-time control of EQ with an expression pedal is more common in the modeler world than the amp and pedal world, but it does exist in both. For example, increasing the midrange can give you more clarity and cut for solos. Decreasing it can create a flatter sound that can help you stay in the mix with the rest of the band. An expression pedal allows you to have one setting and alter it for multiple situations or guitars as opposed to having separate presets.
While this is a very short list of options for expression-pedal use, it should give you a good place to start. The most important thing is to always be creative, have fun, and find your own voice. An expression pedal can help you do all three.