Whether you’re shopping for a new amp or trying to coax different tones from one you’ve got, this comprehensive look at power tubes and their sonic traits is essential reading.
Photo by Andy Ellis.
Look at the back of any all-tube amp, and you’ll see warmly glowing glass bottles in a variety of shapes and sizes. Power tubes (aka output tubes) are typically the biggest ones of the bunch, and they provide the last stage of amplification for the guitar signal before it’s delivered to the speakers. The “power tube” name is a bit deceptive, however, because these big bottles don’t just power your speakers—they actually play a significant role in shaping your amp’s sound and responsiveness.
Regardless of its manufacturer, each power-tube type—EL34, EL84, 6L6, 6V6, 5881, etc.—has a basic sonic personality. Getting to know those tonal characteristics can be a huge help, whether you’re trying to track down a new amp with specific sonic traits, or just wondering whether you can change the sound and feel of an amp you own by using different power tubes (see the Swapper’s Delight sidebar).
To represent the signature sounds of the most popular tubes, I’ve relied on classic rock examples from the 1950s, ’60s, and ’70s. I don’t mean to suggest that tube amps are only good for playing classic rock. But during that era, there was a greater separation between American and British sounds. Also, players used few, if any, effects in those days, so you can often hear the sound of a guitar plugged directly into an amp, providing clear examples of the core sounds associated with each tube type.
Be sure to check out the power-tube comparison video we also created so you can hear the differences between each tube type.
Warning:
All tube amplifiers contain lethal voltages. The most dangerous voltages are stored in electrolytic capacitors, even after the amp has been unplugged from the wall. Before you touch anything inside the amp chassis, it’s imperative that these capacitors are discharged. If you are unsure of this procedure, consult your local amp tech.
Figure 1. This diagram of a 6L6GC illustrates the main parts found in the power tubes we’re discussing.
Tech Talk: Anatomy of a Power Tube
A power tube is essentially a control valve used to regulate the flow of electrons. (This is why guitarists across the Atlantic refer to our little glass friends as “valves” rather than “tubes.”) The electrons flow from a part of the tube called the cathode to the tube’s plate, as shown in Figure 1. While all power tubes have a cathode and a plate, much of each model’s sonic character is due to its specific components and construction.The power tubes we’re discussing here fall into three categories: tetrode, pentode, and beam power. Tetrode tubes have four electrodes—the aforementioned cathode and plate, as well as a control grid and screen grid. When you turn on your tube amp, the tube filament at the center of the bottle receives a voltage (usually 6.3V) that heats the cathode to free up electrons in preparation for current flow. The plate and screen are given large positive DC voltages to attract the electrons from the cathode to the plate. When your amp is in standby mode, the plate and screen voltages are removed to keep the electrons from flowing, while keeping the cathode warm for instant current flow at any moment.
The control grid is given a negative DC voltage that restricts the flow of electrons from the cathode to the screen and plate. When the control-grid voltage is made more negative, electron flow from cathode to plate is reduced. When the control grid is made less negative, electron flow increases.When electrons from the cathode hit the plate, other electrons from the plate may become dislodged and flow to the screen grid, a phenomenon called secondary emission that reduces the efficiency of the tube
Pentode and beam power tubes add an additional electrode between the screen grid and plate to reduce the occurrence of secondary emissions. Pentodes add a grid called the suppressor grid, while beam power tubes usually add a beam-confining electrode instead.
Photo by Tom Moberly.
6L6GC
- NOS electrical specs (GE essential characteristics)
- Classification by construction: “beam power amplifier”
- Filament volts: 6.3 V
- Filament current: 0.9 A
- Max plate volts and watts: 500 V, 30 W
- Max screen volts and watts: 450 V, 5 W
The 6L6 was introduced in the 1930s and made in the United States. Early on it was primarily used in radio sets, with a metal envelope to prevent breakage. Revisions to the original 6L6, such as glass envelopes and increased power handling, yielded new designations such as 6L6G, 6L6GA, 6L6GB, and finally the 6L6GC (introduced in the late 1950s). Because of its superior power handling and efficiency over the earlier 6L6 versions, modern tube manufacturers only make the 6L6GC. As a result, most guitarists and some manufacturers simply refer to the 6L6GC as “6L6.” If you plan on buying a new-old-stock (NOS) 6L6GC, be careful not to order the original, metal-tube 6L6—which will likely sound bad and won’t be able to take the heat from your guitar amp.
1960s Fender Blackface Twin Reverb. Photo courtesy of Tim Mullally and Dave's Guitar Shop.
The 6L6GC is commonly associated with classic American rock ’n’ roll and the sound of vintage Fender amps. It was Fender’s tube of choice in the ’60s for such higher-powered amps as the Bassman, Showman, and Twin Reverb. For a great demo of the 6L6GC sound from back in the day, check out Dick Dale and the Del-Tones’ 1963 performance of “Miserlou.” (See the “YouTube It” sidebar for links.) The lows come through fat, punchy, and strong. Mids are tight, articulate, and warm, accented by top-end chime. The 6L6GC does not break up easily—and when it does, the overdrive sound is thick and tight.
The KT66 and 5881 are common substitutes for the 6L6GC. Developed in the late 1930s as Great Britain’s rival to the American 6L6, the KT66 was used in many Marshall amps from the early to mid 1960s. Most believe that Eric Clapton recorded “Hideaway” with John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers in 1966 using a Marshall JTM45 with KT66s. Clapton found his sound during this era using a Les Paul’s bridge pickup, maxing-out the volume on the guitar and the volume and bass on the amp for a uniquely fat overdrive sound with much bite and sustain. Try a KT66 in place of the 6L6GC for a slightly cleaner sound.
The 6L6GC is commonly associated with classic American rock ’n’ roll and the sound of vintage Fender amps. It was Fender’s tube of choice in the ’60s for such higher-powered amps as the Bassman, Showman, and Twin Reverb. Photo courtesy of Tim Mullally of Dave's Guitar Shop.
The 5881 predates the 6L6GC. It was introduced in the early 1950s as a smaller, more rugged version of the 6L6G for military use. The 5881 was used in Fender’s famous tweed Bassman, whose circuit was copied for the earliest Marshall amps. (These are probably the tubes Buddy Holly had in his Bassman.) Try the 5881 in place of a 6L6GC to reduce low-end frequency response and get easier breakup into overdrive.
An ammeter
Swapper’s Delight
Swapping out power tubes is much trickier than with preamp tubes. Preamp tubes like the famous 12AX7 are cathode biased, which allows the tubes to automatically adjust themselves if one tube runs a little “hotter” (with more plate current) or “cooler” (less plate current) than another. (If you’re in for some preamp-tube-swapping fun, download our comprehensive PDF comparing tonal characteristics of 23 different 12AX7s on the market today.) If your amp also has cathode-biased power tubes, you can simply plug in a new tube of the same type (or a direct substitute) without needing a bias adjustment—just like with a new preamp tube.Before we talk more about ways you can swap your amp’s power tubes with a different type, let’s discuss biasing in a little more detail. Most higher-powered amps (20 watts or more) have a fixed bias, because it’s more efficient and gives the amp more power output. The drawback with fixed bias is that the tubes cannot automatically adjust themselves. They require a bias adjustment if they run a little hotter or cooler than the optimal setting. Many compare biasing an amp to tuning up a car, because the term refers to the tubes’ “idle” setting, and optimal settings vary from tube to tube. Some amps feature self-adjusting bias. Others have a fixed setting you can adjust via an internal bias pot. Others are simply fixed—i.e., not adjustable.
With a fixed-bias amp, it’s a good idea to check the bias whenever you change power tubes. Even tubes of the same type can run a little hotter (i.e., with more plate current) or cooler (with less plate current) in the same amp—even if they’re the same brand. Many people prefer to use electrically matched power tubes and adjust the bias each time they change them, seeking an ideal bias point for sound quality and tube longevity.
All right, now let’s get back to the idea of swapping tube types. With the exception of the EL84 and its nine-pin miniature base, all of the power tubes mentioned in this article have eight-pin octal bases and can fit into the same tube sockets. However, just because they seem interchangeable doesn’t mean you can randomly plug different power tube types into an amp not designed for them! Doing so risks damaging the circuit.
Yellow Jackets YJS converter.
For example, let’s say you have an amp designed to use four 6L6GC power tubes, and you want to hear what it sounds like with four KT77s. Four 6L6GCs draw about 3.6 amperes (or amps, denoted by the mathematical symbol A) of current from the power transformer’s 6.3 volt (V) filament winding (0.9 A x 4 = 3.6 A), while four KT77s draw about 5.6 A (1.4 A x 4 = 5.6 A). If your amplifier’s power transformer isn’t capable of handling the extra 2 A of filament current, you’re guaranteed to blow it. And replacing a power transformer can cost several hundred bucks once you factor in parts and labor.
So what can you do to tweak your power-tube tone if you’re not a tech? Get a bias meter and learn how to bias. Bias meters allow you to plug an ammeter (current meter) into the tube socket for an easy access measurement of the idle plate current. If you’re happy with the sound of your power tubes, measure their idle plate current and use that as a reference for biasing future power tubes of the same type or their direct substitutes. When biasing a new set of tubes, it’s always safer to start with the coldest bias-pot setting and slowly make it hotter while watching the current measurement increase on your bias meter. Don’t make the bias too hot, or your tubes’ plates will start glowing red and tube life will be cut short. Also, be sure you only play at a low volume with the bias meter in place so you don’t damage the meter. When in doubt, take it to a tech.
Beyond optimizing your amp’s biasing, you can also experiment with new sounds even with the existing tube types. Some manufacturers’ offer matched power-tubes sets (of two or four) that come with measurements based on how much plate current they draw at the same bias point. Hotter tubes will have a higher plate-current number, and the cooler tubes will have a lower plate-current number. And you can actually hear a significant difference in tone when a power tube is running hotter or cooler: When biased for the same amount of idle plate current, the hot tube will get louder, with less distortion, and the cooler tube will break up easier, allowing for more power-tube distortion. You should also try different brands of power tubes, because there are tonal differences.
One way to swap power-tube types without having to involve a tech is to try a converter like those from Yellow Jackets or VHT. (Full disclosure: My employer, AmplifiedParts.com, owns the Yellow Jackets line.) If your amp comes with one of the common octal power-tube types (6L6, EL34, 6V6, 6550, 7027, or 7591), these converters allow you to plug cathode-biased EL84s in their place without bias adjustment. This allows you to get more power-tube distortion at lower overall acoustic volumes, as well as give your amp some of that famous British EL84 flavor.
Finally, if you want to switch it up completely and try out a different power-tube type that is not considered a direct substitute for your amp’s original power tubes, contact the amp manufacturer or a technician first. It may be possible, but an expert needs to ascertain this based on the tube types and specific amplifier circuit in question.
Photo by Tom Moberly.
6V6GT
- NOS electrical specs (GE essential characteristics)
- Classification by construction: “beam power amplifier”
- Filament volts: 6.3 V
- Filament current: 0.45 A
- Max plate volts and watts: 350 V, 14 W
- Max screen volts and watts: 315 V, 2.2 W
1950s Fender Tweed Champ. Photo courtesy of Tim Mullally and Dave's Guitar Shop.
Like a small cousin of the 6L6, the 6V6 started out as a metal tube in the 1930s. Developments in the 1940s culminated in the glass 6V6GT we know today. Because the original metal 6V6 is no longer made, most guitarists simply refer to the 6V6GT as “6V6.” The 6V6GT is commonly associated with Fender student-model amps of the ’50s and ’60s, like the Princeton and Champ. Eric Clapton recorded “Layla” with Derek and the Dominos using a Champ.
1960s Fender Blackface Princeton—the 6V6GT has a more straightforward tone than the 6L6GC, with reduced low-end and a little less treble chime. Photo courtesy of Tim Mullally and Dave's Guitar Shop.
The 6V6GT has a more straightforward tone than the 6L6GC, with reduced low-end and a little less treble chime. It breaks up into overdrive more easily, and it can be useful for getting classic American tone with power tube distortion at relatively low levels.
Photo by Tom Moberly.
EL34
- NOS electrical specs (Philips Data Handbook)
- Classification by construction: “A.F. output pentode”)
- Filament volts: 6.3 V
- Filament current: 1.5 A
- Max plate volts and watts: 800 V, 25 W
- Max screen volts and watts: 500 V, 8 W
First introduced in the early 1950s in the Netherlands, the EL34 is commonly associated with the British sound of high-gain Marshall amps. In 1966 Marshall switched from the KT66 to the EL34 as their power tube of choice. In September of that year, Jimi Hendrix arrived in England to form the Jimi Hendrix Experience and, taking his cue from Pete Townshend of the Who, began cranking Marshall amps. The EL34’s low-end frequency response is leaner and possibly meaner than that of the 6L6GC. With tight mids and crisp highs, the EL34 is more easily overdriven than the 6L6GC, providing softer crunch distortion.
A 1959 Super Lead Plexi Serial #12237—with tight mids and crisp highs, the EL34 is more easily overdriven than the 6L6GC, providing softer crunch distortion. Photo courtesy of Marshall Amplification.
The 6CA7 and KT77 are common substitutes for the EL34. The 6CA7 is the American designation for EL34, and some 6CA7 versions use beam power construction instead of a true pentode. Try a 6CA7 in place of an EL34 for more pronounced low-end frequency response with a little more headroom.
The tonal differences between the KT77 and EL34 aren’t dramatic, but there is a significant structural difference: the KT77 doesn’t have an internal connection at pin one like the EL34 and 6CA7 do. This can make it easier to install KT77s in certain American amps designed for the 6L6GC, yielding a more British sound. Amp manufacturers would often use lug 1 of the tube socket for other circuit connections incompatible with an EL34. Could this be why the MOV (Marconi-Osram Valve Co.) datasheet designates the KT77 as having an “international octal” base? If not, at least it helps us remember that there is a difference between the pinouts of the EL34 and KT77.
Photo by Tom Moberly.
EL84
- NOS electrical specs (Philips Data Handbook)
- Classification by construction: “A.F. Output Pentode”
- Filament volts: 6.3 V
- Filament current: 0.76 A
- Max plate volts and watts: 300 V, 12 W
- Max screen volts and watts: 300 V, 2 W
Another early 1950s creation from the Netherlands, the EL84 was probably designed for affordability, and it helped make hi-fi stereo systems more accessible to the masses. The EL84 is commonly associated with the British sound of Vox amps. Its almost beam-like focus is bright and clear, with lots of top-end sparkle transitioning easily into tight overdrive distortion. The Beatles cut a deal with Vox in 1962, forever identifying the AC30 and its four EL84 power tubes with the early British Invasion sound.
A 1960s gray panel Vox AC30 Top Boost—the EL84 is commonly associated with the British sound of Vox amps. Its almost beam-like focus is bright and clear, with lots of top-end sparkle transitioning easily into tight overdrive distortion. Photo courtesy of Tim Mullally and Dave's Guitar Shop.
The American designation for the EL84 is 6BQ5. Some 6BQ5 versions use a beam power construction instead of a true pentode one. There is no significant tonal difference between the 6BQ5 and the EL84. Many brands are labeled with both American and European designations (i.e., 6BQ5/EL84).
Photo by Tom Moberly.
6550
- NOS electrical specs (RCA Receiving Tube Manual)
- Classification by construction: “beam power tube”
- Filament volts: 6.3 V
- Filament current: 1.6 A
- Max plate volts and watts: 600 V, 35 W
- Max screen volts and watts: 400 V, 6 W
Introduced in the mid 1950s and made in the United States, the 6550 met the demand in hi-fi audio for greater power and less distortion. Ampeg used six 6550s in their SVT (“Super Vacuum Tube”) amp in the early 1970s, creating an extremely clean, round, and warm sound that would become a classic for bass players.
The 6550 is not commonly used in guitar amps, but in the 1970s the US distributor for Marshall sold many JMP guitar amps with 6550s instead of EL34s. (Supposedly, many EL34s were faulty by the time they arrived in the US, and the distributor concluded that the rugged 6550 had a better chance of surviving the duration of the warranty.)
Ampeg used six 6550s in their SVT amp in the early 1970s, creating an extremely clean, round, and warm sound that would become a classic for bass players. Photo courtesy of Chicago Music Exchange.
The KT88 is a common substitute for the 6550. There’s not a dramatic difference in tone between the two types. Used with guitar, the two tube types sound tight, bright, and powerful, with a slight overdrive crunch and relatively little compression compared to other tubes. They could be useful for maintaining clean sounds at high volume, or keeping the emphasis on preamp distortion instead of power-amp distortion.
Tubes and Valves: Today and Tomorrow
These days manufacturers from all parts of the world design amps around both traditionally British “valves” and American “tubes,” recreating classic tones while meeting the demands of newer musical styles. Why are so many guitarists still crazy about tube amps? I think their ongoing popularity is largely due to a raw beauty and warmth of tone that’s hard to describe—but it feels so good!YouTube It
This 1963 clip of Dick Dale and the Del-Tones demonstrates the loud, articulate sound of the 6L6GC power tubes used in the era’s large Fender amps.
It’s widely assumed that Eric Clapton’s iconic performance of “Hideaway” with John Mayall’s Bluesbreakers was played through a Marshall JTM with KT66 power tubes.
Buddy Holly’s Fender Bassman probably had 5881 tubes, as heard in this 1957 performance of “Peggy Sue” on Arthur Murray’s Dance Party.
Eric Clapton recorded “Layla” with Derek & the Dominoes using a 6V6GT-equipped Fender Champ.
While Jimi Hendrix often used Fender amps in the studio, his live sound blasted from Marshall amps likely powered by EL34 power tubes.
Check out the Beatles’ EL84-equipped Vox amps at this live Manchester, England, performance from 1963.
Steely Dan’s Walter Becker delivers a classic 6550-powered SVT sound on this 1973 Midnight Special performance of “Reelin’ in the Years.”
Jeff "Skunk" Baxter expands his acclaimed first-ever solo album, Speed of Heat, with a brand new Storytellers Edition, featuring brand-new commentary tracks.
For over five decades, audiences worldwide have marveled at Baxter’s inimitable and instantly recognizable guitar playing and generational songcraft. His output spans classic records as a founding member of Steely Dan and member of the Doobie Brothers in addition to hundreds of recordings with the likes of Donna Summer, Cher, Joni Mitchell, Rod Stewart, Dolly Parton, and many more. During 2022, he initially unveiled Speed of Heat, showcasing yet another side of his creative identity and introducing himself as a solo artist.
On the Storytellers Edition, his fascinating commentary pulls the curtain back on both the process and the message of the music. This version traces the journey to Speed of Heat and its core inspirations as shared directly by Baxter in the form of detailed anecdotes, candid stories, and insightful commentary on every track.
The 12-song album, co-produced by Baxter and CJ Vanston, is a riveting and rewarding musical experience that features a host of brilliantly crafted originals co-written by the guitarist and Vanston, as well as inspired versions of some of the great classics. Along the way, Baxter is joined by guest vocalists and songwriters Michael McDonald, Clint Black, Jonny Lang and Rick Livingstone. Baxter notably handled lead vocals on his rendition of Steely Dan’s “My Old School.” Other standouts include "Bad Move" co-written by Baxter, Clint Black, and CJ Vanston, and “My Place In The Sun”, sung by Michael McDonald and co-authored by McDonald, Baxter and Vanston.
As one of the most recorded guitarists of his generation, Baxter’s creative and versatile playing has been heard on some of the most iconic songs in music history, including “9 to 5” by Dolly Parton and “Hot Stuff” by Donna Summer.
The stunningly diverse collection of material on Speed of Heat presents a 360-degree view of the uniquely gifted musician.
STREAM / SHARE / PURCHASE HERE.
Beauty and sweet sonority elevate a simple-to-use, streamlined acoustic and vocal amplifier.
An EQ curve that trades accuracy for warmth. Easy-to-learn, simple-to-use controls. It’s pretty!
Still exhibits some classic acoustic-amplification problems, like brash, unforgiving midrange if you’re not careful.
$1,199
Taylor Circa 74
taylorguitars.com
Save for a few notable (usually expensive) exceptions, acoustic amplifiers are rarely beautiful in a way that matches the intrinsic loveliness of an acoustic flattop. I’ve certainly seen companies try—usually by using brown-colored vinyl to convey … earthiness? Don’t get me wrong, a lot of these amps sound great and even look okay. But the bar for aesthetics, in my admittedly snotty opinion, remains rather low. So, my hat’s off to Taylor for clearing that bar so decisively and with such style. The Circa 74 is, indeed, a pretty piece of work that’s forgiving to work with, ease to use, streamlined, and sharp.
Boxing Beyond Utility
Any discussion of trees or wood with Bob Taylor is a gas, and highly instructive. He loves the stuff and has dabbled before in amplifier designs that made wood an integral feature, rather than just trim. But the Circa 74 is more than just an aesthetic exercise. Because the Taylor gang started to think in a relatively unorthodox way about acoustic sound amplification—eschewing the notion that flat frequency response is the only path to attractive acoustic tone.
I completely get this. I kind of hate flat-response speakers. I hate nice monitors. We used to have a joke at a studio I frequented about a pair of monitors that often made us feel angry and agitated. Except that they really did. Flat sound can be flat-out exhausting and lame. What brings me happiness is listening to Lee “Scratch” Perry—loud—on a lazy Sunday on my secondhand ’70s Klipsch speakers. One kind of listening is like staring at a sun-dappled summer garden gone to riot with flowers. The other sometimes feels like a stale cheese sandwich delivered by robot.
The idea that live acoustic music—and all its best, earthy nuances—can be successfully communicated via a system that imparts its own color is naturally at odds with acoustic culture’s ethos of organic-ness, authenticity, and directness. But where does purity end and begin in an amplified acoustic signal? An undersaddle pickup isn’t made of wood. A PA with flat-response speakers didn’t grow in a forest. So why not build an amp with color—the kind of color that makes listening to music a pleasure and not a chore?
To some extent, that question became the design brief that drove the evolution of the Circa 74. Not coincidentally, the Circa 74 feels as effortless to use as a familiar old hi-fi. It has none of the little buttons for phase correction that make me anxious every time I see one. There’s two channels: one with an XLR/1/4" combo input, which serves as the vocal channel if you are a singer; another with a 1/4" input for your instrument. Each channel consists of just five controls—level, bass, middle, and treble EQ, and a reverb. An 11th chickenhead knob just beneath the jewel lamp governs the master output. That’s it, if you don’t include the Bluetooth pairing button and 1/8" jacks for auxiliary sound sources and headphones. Power, by the way, is rated at 150 watts. That pours forth through a 10" speaker.Pretty in Practice
I don’t want to get carried away with the experiential and aesthetic aspects of the Circa 74. It’s an amplifier with a job to do, after all. But I had fun setting it up—finding a visually harmonious place among a few old black-panel Fender amps and tweed cabinets, where it looked very much at home, and in many respects equally timeless.
Plugging in a vocal mic and getting a balance with my guitar happened in what felt like 60 seconds. Better still, the sound that came from the Circa 74, including an exceedingly croaky, flu-addled human voice, sounded natural and un-abrasive. The Circa 74 isn’t beyond needing an assist. Getting the most accurate picture of a J-45 with a dual-source pickup meant using both the treble and midrange in the lower third of their range. Anything brighter sounded brash. A darker, all-mahogany 00, however, preferred a scooped EQ profile with the treble well into the middle of its range. You still have to do the work of overcoming classic amplification problems like extra-present high mids and boxiness. But the fixes come fast, easily, and intuitively. The sound may not suggest listening to an audiophile copy of Abbey Road, as some discussions of the amp would lead you to expect. But there is a cohesiveness, particularly in the low midrange, that does give it the feel of something mixed, even produced, but still quite organic.
The Verdict
Taylor got one thing right: The aesthetic appeal of the Circa 74 has a way of compelling you to play and sing. Well, actually, they got a bunch of things right. The EQ is responsive and makes it easy to achieve a warm representation of your acoustic, no matter what its tone signature. It’s also genuinely attractive. It’s not perfectly accurate. Instead, it’s rich in low-mid resonance and responsive to treble-frequency tweaks—lending a glow not a million miles away from a soothing home stereo. I think that approach to acoustic amplification is as valid as the quest for transparency. I’m excited to see how that thinking evolves, and how Taylor responds to their discoveries.
The evolution of Electro-Harmonix’s very first effect yields a powerful boost and equalization machine at a rock-bottom price.
A handy and versatile preamp/booster that goes well beyond the average basic booster’s range. Powerful EQ section.
Can sound a little harsh at more extreme EQ ranges.
$129
Electro-Harmonix LPB-3
ehx.com
Descended from the first Electro-Harmonix pedal ever released, the LPB-1 Linear Power Booster, the new LPB-3 has come a long way from the simple, one-knob unit in a folded-metal enclosure that plugged straight into your amplifier. Now living in Electro-Harmonix’s compact Nano chassis, the LPB-3 Linear Power Booster and EQ boasts six control knobs, two switches, and more gain than ever before.
If 3 Were 6
With six times the controls found on the 1 and 2 versions (if you discount the original’s on/off slider switch,) the LPB-3’s control complement offers pre-gain, boost, mid freq, bass, treble, and mid knobs, with a center detent on the latter three so you can find the midpoint easily. A mini-toggle labeled “max” selects between 20 dB and 33 dB of maximum gain, and another labeled “Q” flips the resonance of the mid EQ between high and low. Obviously, this represents a significant expansion of the LPB’s capabilities.
More than just a booster with a passive tone, the LPB-3 boasts a genuine active EQ stage plus parametric midrange section, comprising the two knobs with shaded legends, mid freq and mid level. The gain stages have also been reimagined to include a pre-gain stage before the EQ, which enables up to 20 dB of input gain. The boost stage that follows the EQ is essentially a level control with gain to allow for up to 33 dB of gain through the LPB-3 when the “max” mini toggle is set to 33dB
A slider switch accessible inside the pedal selects between buffered or true bypass for the hard-latch footswitch. An AC adapter is included, which supplies 200mA of DC at 9.6 volts to the center-negative power input, and EHX specifies that nothing supplying less than 120mA or more than 12 volts should be used. There’s no space for an internal battery.
Power-Boosted
The LPB-3 reveals boatloads of range that betters many linear boosts on the market. There’s lots of tone-shaping power here. Uncolored boost is available when you want it, and the preamp gain knob colors and fattens your signal as you crank it up—even before you tap into the massive flexibility in the EQ stage.
“The preamp gain knob colors and fattens your signal as you crank it up—even before you tap into the massive flexibility in the EQ stage.”
I found the two mid controls work best when used judiciously, and my guitars and amps preferred subtle changes pretty close to the midpoint on each. However, there are still tremendous variations in your mid boost (or scoop, for that matter) within just 15 or 20 percent range in either direction from the center detent. Pushing the boost and pre-gain too far, particularly with the 33 dB setting engaged, can lead to some harsh sounds, but they are easy to avoid and might even be desirable for some users that like to work at more creative extremes.
The Verdict
The new LPB-3 has much, much more range than its predecessors, providing flexible preamp, boost, and overdrive sounds that can be reshaped in significant ways via the powerful EQ. It gives precise tone-tuning flexibility to sticklers that like to match a guitar and amp to a song in a very precise way, but also opens up more radical paths for experimentalists. That it does all this at a $129 price is beyond reasonable.
Electro-Harmonix Lpb-3 Linear Power Booster & Eq Effect Pedal Silver And Blue
Intermediate
Intermediate
• Learn classic turnarounds.
• Add depth and interest to common progressions.
• Stretch out harmonically with hip substitutions.
Get back to center in musical and ear-catching ways.
A turnaround chord progression has one mission: It allows the music to continue seamlessly back to the beginning of the form while reinforcing the key center in a musically interesting way. Consider the last four measures of a 12-bar blues in F, where the bare-bones harmony would be C7-Bb7-F7-F7 (one chord per measure). With no turn around in the last two measures, you would go back to the top of the form, landing on another F7. That’s a lot of F7, both at the end of the form, and then again in the first four bars of the blues. Without a turnaround, you run the risk of obscuring the form of the song. It would be like writing a novel without using paragraphs or punctuation.
The most common turnaround is the I-VI-ii-V chord progression, which can be applied to the end of the blues and is frequently used when playing jazz standards. Our first four turnarounds are based on this chord progression. Furthermore, by using substitutions and chord quality changes, you get more mileage out of the I-VI-ii-V without changing the basic functionality of the turnaround itself. The second group of four turnarounds features unique progressions that have been borrowed from songs or were created from a theoretical idea.
In each example, I added extensions and alterations to each chord and stayed away from the pure R-3-5-7 voicings. This will give each chord sequence more color and interesting voice leading. Each turnaround has a companion solo line that reflects the sound of the changes. Shell voicings (root, 3rd, 7th) are played underneath so that the line carries the sound of the written chord changes, making it easier to hear the sound of the extensions and alterations. All examples are in the key of C. Let’s hit it.
The first turnaround is the tried and true I-VI-ii-V progression, played as Cmaj7-A7-Dm7-G7. Ex. 1 begins with C6/9, to A7(#5), to Dm9, to G7(#5), and resolves to Cmaj7(#11). By using these extensions and alterations, I get a smoother, mostly chromatic melodic line at the top of the chord progression.
Ex. 2 shows one possible line that you can create. As for scale choices, I used C major pentatonic over C6/9, A whole tone for A7(#5), D Dorian for Dm9, G whole tone for G7(#5), and C Lydian for Cmaj7(#11) to get a more modern sound.
The next turnaround is the iii-VI-ii-V progression, played as Em7-A7-Dm7-G7 where the Em7 is substituted for Cmaj7. The more elaborate version in Ex. 3 shows Em9 to A7(#9)/C#, to Dm6/9, to G9/B, resolving to Cmaj7(add6). A common way to substitute chords is to use the diatonic chord that is a 3rd above the written chord. So, to sub out the I chord (Cmaj7) you would use the iii chord (Em7). By spelling Cmaj7 = C-E-G-B and Em7 = E-G-B-D, you can see that these two chords have three notes in common, and will sound similar over the fundamental bass note, C. The dominant 7ths are in first inversion, but serve the same function while having a more interesting bass line.
The line in Ex. 4 uses E Dorian over Em9, A half-whole diminished over A7(#9)/C#, D Dorian over Dm6/9, G Mixolydian over G9/B, and C major pentatonic over Cmaj7(add6). The chord qualities we deal with most are major 7, dominant 7, and minor 7. A quality change is just that… changing the quality of the written chord to another one. You could take a major 7 and change it to a dominant 7, or even a minor 7. Hence the III-VI-II-V turnaround, where the III and the VI have both been changed to a dominant 7, and the basic changes would be E7-A7-D7-G7.
See Ex. 5, where E7(b9) moves to A7(#11), to D7(#9) to G7(#5) to Cmaj9. My scale choices for the line in Ex. 6 are E half-whole diminished over E7(#9), A Lydian Dominant for A7(#11), D half-whole diminished for D7(#9), G whole tone for G7(#5), and C Ionian for Cmaj9.
Ex. 7 is last example in the I-VI-ii-V category. Here, the VI and V are replaced with their tritone substitutes. Specifically, A7 is replaced with Eb7, and G7 is replaced with Db7, and the basic progression becomes Cmaj7-Eb7-Dm7-Db7. Instead of altering the tritone subs, I used a suspended 4th sound that helped to achieve a diatonic, step-wise melody in the top voice of the chord progression.
The usual scales can be found an Ex. 8, where are use a C major pentatonic over C6/9, Eb Mixolydian over Eb7sus4, D Dorian over Dm11, Db Mixolydian over Db7sus4, and once again, C Lydian over Cmaj7(#11). You might notice that the shapes created by the two Mixolydian modes look eerily similar to minor pentatonic shapes. That is by design, since a Bb minor pentatonic contains the notes of an Eb7sus4 chord. Similarly, you would use an Ab minor pentatonic for Db7sus4.
The next four turnarounds are not based on the I-VI-ii-V chord progression, but have been adapted from other songs or theoretical ideas. Ex. 9 is called the “Backdoor” turnaround, and uses a iv-bVII-I chord progression, played as Fm7-Bb7-Cmaj7. In order to keep the two-bar phrase intact, a full measure of C precedes the actual turnaround. I was able to compose a descending whole-step melodic line in the top voice by using Cmaj13 and Cadd9/E in the first bar, Fm6 and Ab/Bb in the second bar, and then resolving to G/C. The slash chords have a more open sound, and are being used as substitutes for the original changes. They have the same function, and they share notes with their full 7th chord counterparts.
Creating the line in Ex. 10 is no more complicated than the other examples since the function of the chords determines which mode or scale to use. The first measure employs the C Ionian mode over the two Cmaj chord sounds. F Dorian is used over Fm6 in bar two. Since Ab/Bb is a substitute for Bb7, I used Bb Mixolydian. In the last measure, C Ionian is used over the top of G/C.
The progression in Ex. 11 is the called the “Lady Bird” turnaround because it is lifted verbatim from the Tadd Dameron song of the same name. It is a I-bIII-bVI-bII chord progression usually played as Cmaj7-Eb7-Abmaj7-Db7. Depending on the recording or the book that you check out, there are slight variations in the last chord but Db7 seems to be the most used. Dressing up this progression, I started with a different G/C voicing, to Eb9(#11), to Eb/Ab (subbing for Abmaj7), to Db9(#11), resolving to C(add#11). In this example, the slash chords are functioning as major seventh chords.
As a result, my scale choices for the line in Ex. 12 are C Ionian over G/C, Eb Lydian Dominant over Eb9(#11), Ab Ionian over Eb/Ab, Db Lydian Dominant over Db9(#11), and C Lydian over C(add#11).
The progression in Ex. 13 is called an “equal interval” turnaround, where the interval between the chords is the same in each measure. Here, the interval is a descending major 3rd that creates a I-bVI-IV-bII sequence, played as Cmaj7-Abmaj7-Fmaj7-Dbmaj7, and will resolve a half-step down to Cmaj7 at the top of the form. Since the interval structure and chord type is the same in both measures, it’s easy to plane sets of voicings up or down the neck. I chose to plane up the neck by using G/C to Abmaj13, then C/F to Dbmaj13, resolving on Cmaj7/E.
The line in Ex. 14 was composed by using the notes of the triad for the slash chord and the Lydian mode for the maj13 chords. For G/C, the notes of the G triad (G-B-D) were used to get an angular line that moves to Ab Lydian over Abmaj13. In the next measure, C/F is represented by the notes of the C triad (C-E-G) along with the root note, F. Db Lydian was used over Dbmaj13, finally resolving to C Ionian over Cmaj7/E. Since this chord progression is not considered “functional” and all the chord sounds are essentially the same, you could use Lydian over each chord as a way to tie the sound of the line together. So, use C Lydian, Ab Lydian, F Lydian, Db Lydian, resolving back to C Lydian.
The last example is the “Radiohead” turnaround since it is based off the chord progression from their song “Creep.” This would be a I-III-IV-iv progression, and played Cmaj7-E7-Fmaj7-Fm7. Dressing this one up, I use a couple of voicings that had an hourglass shape, where close intervals were in the middle of the stack.
In Ex. 15 C6/9 moves to E7(#5), then to Fmaj13, to Fm6 and resolving to G/C. Another potential name for the Fmaj13 would be Fmaj7(add6) since the note D is within the first octave. This chord would function the same way, regardless of which name you used.
Soloing over this progression in Ex. 16, I used the C major pentatonic over C6/9, E whole tone over E7(#5), F Lydian over Fmaj13, and F Dorian over Fm6. Again, for G/C, the notes of the G triad were used with the note E, the 3rd of a Cmaj7 chord.
The main thing to remember about the I-VI-ii-V turnaround is that it is very adaptable. If you learn how to use extensions and alterations, chord substitutions, and quality changes, you can create some fairly unique chord progressions. It may seem like there are many different turnarounds, but they’re really just an adaptation of the basic I-VI-ii-V progression.
Regarding other types of turnarounds, see if you can steal a short chord progression from a pop tune and make it work. Or, experiment with other types of intervals that would move the chord changes further apart, or even closer together. Could you create a turnaround that uses all minor seventh chords? There are plenty of crazy ideas out there to work with, and if it sounds good to you, use it!